mirror of
https://github.com/AleoHQ/leo.git
synced 2024-11-13 08:47:17 +03:00
[RFC] Move text on multiple entry points to subsection.
Also improve that text.
This commit is contained in:
parent
184243b471
commit
f525d34922
@ -134,14 +134,12 @@ this is, roughly speaking, the assertion proved in zero-knowledge.
|
||||
|
||||
## Design
|
||||
|
||||
### Proposed Leo Program Execution Model
|
||||
### Multiple Entry Points
|
||||
|
||||
The current model described above seems adequate overall, but we need to:
|
||||
1. Clarify how Leo code reads old records and writes new records.
|
||||
2. Generalize from one entry point (i.e. the `main` function) to multiple entry points, in line with the smart contract paradigm.
|
||||
We propose to generalize from one entry point (i.e. the `main` function) to multiple entry points,
|
||||
in line with the smart contract paradigm.
|
||||
|
||||
Generalizing from one `main` entry point to multiple ones is conceptually easy.
|
||||
It means that, instead of implicitly designating `main` as the only entry point,
|
||||
Instead of implicitly designating `main` as the only entry point,
|
||||
we need a mechanism to explicitly designate one or more Leo functions as entry points.
|
||||
|
||||
A simple approach could be to use an annotation like `@entrypoint` to designate _entry point functions_:
|
||||
@ -170,7 +168,10 @@ entrypoint {
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Now let us turn to the issue of clarifying how the Leo code reads old records and writes new records.
|
||||
In the rest of this design section we assume the annotation approach (i.e. `@entrypoint`) for concreteness,
|
||||
but that can be replaced as soon as we converge on a choice.
|
||||
|
||||
### Proposed Leo Program Execution Model
|
||||
|
||||
Given that records have a fixed structure with typed slots,
|
||||
their format could be described by a Leo circuit type,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user