CatalaLang/catala
1
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/CatalaLang/catala.git synced 2024-09-20 00:41:05 +03:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Changed position formatting

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Denis Merigoux 2023-04-17 18:07:22 +02:00
parent fcb5561b24
commit 75c2a24b98
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: EE99DCFA365C3EE3
120 changed files with 306 additions and 306 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en
View File

@ -33,14 +33,14 @@ Message: expected either 'condition', or 'content' followed by the expected vari
Autosuggestion: did you mean "content", or maybe "condition"?
Error token:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.20-25:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.21-11.26:
└──┐
11 │ context my_gaming scope GamingAuthorized
│ ‾‾‾‾‾
Last good token:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.10-19:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.11-11.20:
└──┐
11 │ context my_gaming scope GamingAuthorized
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -77,14 +77,14 @@ Message: expected either 'condition', or 'content' followed by the expected vari
Autosuggestion: did you mean "content", or maybe "condition"?
Error token:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.20-25:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.21-11.26:
└──┐
11 │ context my_gaming scope GamingAuthorized
│ ‾‾‾‾‾
Last good token:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.10-19:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.11-11.20:
└──┐
11 │ context my_gaming scope GamingAuthorized
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -121,14 +121,14 @@ Message: expected either 'condition', or 'content' followed by the expected vari
Autosuggestion: did you mean "content", or maybe "condition"?
Error token:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.20-25:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.21-11.26:
└──┐
11 │ context my_gaming scope GamingAuthorized
│ ‾‾‾‾‾
Last good token:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.10-19:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.11-11.20:
└──┐
11 │ context my_gaming scope GamingAuthorized
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -167,14 +167,14 @@ Message: expected either 'condition', or 'content' followed by the expected vari
Autosuggestion: did you mean "content", or maybe "condition"?
Error token:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.20-25:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.21-11.26:
└──┐
11 │ context my_gaming scope GamingAuthorized
│ ‾‾‾‾‾
Last good token:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.10-19:
┌─⯈ examples/NSW_community_gaming/tests/test_nsw_social_housie.catala_en:11.11-11.20:
└──┐
11 │ context my_gaming scope GamingAuthorized
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

30
tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en
View File

@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ scope Money:
$ catala Interpret -s Dec
[WARNING] In scope "Int", the variable "i" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:7.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:7.11-7.12:
└─┐
7 │ context i content decimal
│ ‾
@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Dec
└─ with integers
[WARNING] In scope "Dec", the variable "i" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:17.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:17.11-17.12:
└──┐
17 │ context i content decimal
│ ‾
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Dec
└─ with decimals
[WARNING] In scope "Money", the variable "i" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:27.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:27.11-27.12:
└──┐
27 │ context i content decimal
│ ‾
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Dec
[ERROR] division by zero at runtime
The division operator:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:20.22-29:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:20.23-20.30:
└──┐
20 │ definition i equals 1. / 0.
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ The division operator:
└─ with decimals
The null denominator:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:20.27-29:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:20.28-20.30:
└──┐
20 │ definition i equals 1. / 0.
│ ‾‾
@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ The null denominator:
$ catala Interpret -s Int
[WARNING] In scope "Int", the variable "i" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:7.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:7.11-7.12:
└─┐
7 │ context i content decimal
│ ‾
@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Int
└─ with integers
[WARNING] In scope "Dec", the variable "i" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:17.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:17.11-17.12:
└──┐
17 │ context i content decimal
│ ‾
@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Int
└─ with decimals
[WARNING] In scope "Money", the variable "i" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:27.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:27.11-27.12:
└──┐
27 │ context i content decimal
│ ‾
@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Int
[ERROR] division by zero at runtime
The division operator:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:10.22-27:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:10.23-10.28:
└──┐
10 │ definition i equals 1 / 0
│ ‾‾‾‾‾
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ The division operator:
└─ with integers
The null denominator:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:10.26-27:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:10.27-10.28:
└──┐
10 │ definition i equals 1 / 0
│ ‾
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ The null denominator:
$ catala Interpret -s Money
[WARNING] In scope "Int", the variable "i" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:7.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:7.11-7.12:
└─┐
7 │ context i content decimal
│ ‾
@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Money
└─ with integers
[WARNING] In scope "Dec", the variable "i" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:17.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:17.11-17.12:
└──┐
17 │ context i content decimal
│ ‾
@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Money
└─ with decimals
[WARNING] In scope "Money", the variable "i" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:27.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:27.11-27.12:
└──┐
27 │ context i content decimal
│ ‾
@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Money
[ERROR] division by zero at runtime
The division operator:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:30.22-34:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:30.23-30.35:
└──┐
30 │ definition i equals $10.0 / $0.0
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ The division operator:
└─ with money
The null denominator:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:30.30-34:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/division_by_zero.catala_en:30.31-30.35:
└──┐
30 │ definition i equals $10.0 / $0.0
│ ‾‾‾‾

4
tests/test_arithmetic/bad/logical_prio.catala_en
View File

@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ scope S1:
$ catala typecheck -s S1
[ERROR] Please add parentheses to explicit which of these operators should be applied first
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/logical_prio.catala_en:6.27-30:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/logical_prio.catala_en:6.28-6.31:
└─┐
6 │ definition o equals true and (false and true and true) or false
│ ‾‾‾
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/logical_prio.catala_en:6.57-59:
┌─⯈ tests/test_arithmetic/bad/logical_prio.catala_en:6.58-6.60:
└─┐
6 │ definition o equals true and (false and true and true) or false
│ ‾‾

6
tests/test_array/bad/fold_error.catala_en
View File

@ -15,21 +15,21 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] I don't know how to apply operator >= on types integer and
money
┌─⯈ tests/test_array/bad/fold_error.catala_en:10.49-51:
┌─⯈ tests/test_array/bad/fold_error.catala_en:10.50-10.52:
└──┐
10 │ definition list_high_count equals number of (m >= $7) for m among list
│ ‾‾
└─ Article
Type integer coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_array/bad/fold_error.catala_en:5.34-41:
┌─⯈ tests/test_array/bad/fold_error.catala_en:5.35-5.42:
└─┐
5 │ context list content collection integer
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
└─ Article
Type money coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_array/bad/fold_error.catala_en:10.52-54:
┌─⯈ tests/test_array/bad/fold_error.catala_en:10.53-10.55:
└──┐
10 │ definition list_high_count equals number of (m >= $7) for m among list
│ ‾‾

6
tests/test_bool/bad/bad_assert.catala_en
View File

@ -17,21 +17,21 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Foo
--> bool
Error coming from typechecking the following expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_bool/bad/bad_assert.catala_en:9.12-13:
┌─⯈ tests/test_bool/bad/bad_assert.catala_en:9.13-9.14:
└─┐
9 │ assertion x
│ ‾
└─ Test
Type integer coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_bool/bad/bad_assert.catala_en:5.21-28:
┌─⯈ tests/test_bool/bad/bad_assert.catala_en:5.22-5.29:
└─┐
5 │ internal x content integer
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
└─ Test
Type bool coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_bool/bad/bad_assert.catala_en:9.12-13:
┌─⯈ tests/test_bool/bad/bad_assert.catala_en:9.13-9.14:
└─┐
9 │ assertion x
│ ‾

6
tests/test_bool/bad/test_xor_with_int.catala_en
View File

@ -15,21 +15,21 @@ $ catala Typecheck
--> bool
Error coming from typechecking the following expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_bool/bad/test_xor_with_int.catala_en:8.29-31:
┌─⯈ tests/test_bool/bad/test_xor_with_int.catala_en:8.30-8.32:
└─┐
8 │ definition test_var equals 10 xor 20
│ ‾‾
└─ 'xor' should be a boolean operator
Type integer coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_bool/bad/test_xor_with_int.catala_en:8.29-31:
┌─⯈ tests/test_bool/bad/test_xor_with_int.catala_en:8.30-8.32:
└─┐
8 │ definition test_var equals 10 xor 20
│ ‾‾
└─ 'xor' should be a boolean operator
Type bool coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_bool/bad/test_xor_with_int.catala_en:8.32-35:
┌─⯈ tests/test_bool/bad/test_xor_with_int.catala_en:8.33-8.36:
└─┐
8 │ definition test_var equals 10 xor 20
│ ‾‾‾

2
tests/test_date/bad/rounding_option.catala_en
View File

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ catala: internal error, uncaught exception:
[WARNING] In scope "Test", the variable "ambiguous" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/rounding_option.catala_en:5.10-19:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/rounding_option.catala_en:5.11-5.20:
└─┐
5 │ context ambiguous content boolean
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

2
tests/test_date/bad/rounding_option.catala_fr
View File

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ catala: internal error, uncaught exception:
[WARNING] In scope "Test", the variable "ambiguité" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/rounding_option.catala_fr:5.11-20:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/rounding_option.catala_fr:5.12-5.21:
└─┐
5 │ contexte ambiguité contenu booléen
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

4
tests/test_date/bad/rounding_option_conflict.catala_en
View File

@ -27,13 +27,13 @@ scope Test:
$ catala Interpret -s Test
[ERROR] You cannot set multiple date rounding modes
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/rounding_option_conflict.catala_en:10.13-23:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/rounding_option_conflict.catala_en:10.14-10.24:
└──┐
10 │ date round decreasing
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/rounding_option_conflict.catala_en:12.13-23:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/rounding_option_conflict.catala_en:12.14-12.24:
└──┐
12 │ date round increasing
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

48
tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en
View File

@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ scope Ge:
$ catala Interpret -s Ge
[WARNING] In scope "Lt", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:7.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:7.11-7.12:
└─┐
7 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Ge
└─ `<` operator
[WARNING] In scope "Le", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:17.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:17.11-17.12:
└──┐
17 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Ge
└─ `<=` operator
[WARNING] In scope "Gt", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:27.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:27.11-27.12:
└──┐
27 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Ge
└─ `<=` operator
[WARNING] In scope "Ge", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:37.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:37.11-37.12:
└──┐
37 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -76,14 +76,14 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Ge
└─ `>=` operator
[ERROR] Cannot compare together durations that cannot be converted to a precise number of days
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:40.22-29:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:40.23-40.30:
└──┐
40 │ definition d equals 1 month >= 2 day
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
└┬ `UncomparableDurations` exception management
└─ `>=` operator
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:40.33-38:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:40.34-40.39:
└──┐
40 │ definition d equals 1 month >= 2 day
│ ‾‾‾‾‾
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Ge
$ catala Interpret -s Gt
[WARNING] In scope "Lt", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:7.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:7.11-7.12:
└─┐
7 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Gt
└─ `<` operator
[WARNING] In scope "Le", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:17.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:17.11-17.12:
└──┐
17 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Gt
└─ `<=` operator
[WARNING] In scope "Gt", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:27.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:27.11-27.12:
└──┐
27 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Gt
└─ `<=` operator
[WARNING] In scope "Ge", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:37.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:37.11-37.12:
└──┐
37 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -128,14 +128,14 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Gt
└─ `>=` operator
[ERROR] Cannot compare together durations that cannot be converted to a precise number of days
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:30.22-29:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:30.23-30.30:
└──┐
30 │ definition d equals 1 month > 2 day
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
└┬ `UncomparableDurations` exception management
└─ `<=` operator
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:30.32-37:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:30.33-30.38:
└──┐
30 │ definition d equals 1 month > 2 day
│ ‾‾‾‾‾
@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Gt
$ catala Interpret -s Le
[WARNING] In scope "Lt", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:7.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:7.11-7.12:
└─┐
7 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Le
└─ `<` operator
[WARNING] In scope "Le", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:17.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:17.11-17.12:
└──┐
17 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Le
└─ `<=` operator
[WARNING] In scope "Gt", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:27.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:27.11-27.12:
└──┐
27 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Le
└─ `<=` operator
[WARNING] In scope "Ge", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:37.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:37.11-37.12:
└──┐
37 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -180,14 +180,14 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Le
└─ `>=` operator
[ERROR] Cannot compare together durations that cannot be converted to a precise number of days
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:20.22-29:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:20.23-20.30:
└──┐
20 │ definition d equals 1 month <= 2 day
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
└┬ `UncomparableDurations` exception management
└─ `<=` operator
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:20.33-38:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:20.34-20.39:
└──┐
20 │ definition d equals 1 month <= 2 day
│ ‾‾‾‾‾
@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Le
$ catala Interpret -s Lt
[WARNING] In scope "Lt", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:7.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:7.11-7.12:
└─┐
7 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Lt
└─ `<` operator
[WARNING] In scope "Le", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:17.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:17.11-17.12:
└──┐
17 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Lt
└─ `<=` operator
[WARNING] In scope "Gt", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:27.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:27.11-27.12:
└──┐
27 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Lt
└─ `<=` operator
[WARNING] In scope "Ge", the variable "d" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:37.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:37.11-37.12:
└──┐
37 │ context d content boolean
│ ‾
@ -232,14 +232,14 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Lt
└─ `>=` operator
[ERROR] Cannot compare together durations that cannot be converted to a precise number of days
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:10.22-29:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:10.23-10.30:
└──┐
10 │ definition d equals 1 month < 2 day
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
└┬ `UncomparableDurations` exception management
└─ `<` operator
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:10.32-37:
┌─⯈ tests/test_date/bad/uncomparable_duration.catala_en:10.33-10.38:
└──┐
10 │ definition d equals 1 month < 2 day
│ ‾‾‾‾‾

6
tests/test_default/bad/conflict.catala_en
View File

@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/conflict.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/conflict.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
@ -21,14 +21,14 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] There is a conflict between multiple valid consequences for assigning the same variable.
This consequence has a valid justification:
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/conflict.catala_en:8.55-56:
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/conflict.catala_en:8.56-8.57:
└─┐
8 │ definition x under condition true consequence equals 1
│ ‾
└─ Article
This consequence has a valid justification:
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/conflict.catala_en:9.55-56:
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/conflict.catala_en:9.56-9.57:
└─┐
9 │ definition x under condition true consequence equals 0
│ ‾

6
tests/test_default/bad/empty.catala_en
View File

@ -13,21 +13,21 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/empty.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/empty.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
└─ Article
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/empty.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/empty.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Article
[ERROR] This variable evaluated to an empty term (no rule that defined it applied in this situation)
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/empty.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/empty.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_default/bad/empty_with_rules.catala_en
View File

@ -16,14 +16,14 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/empty_with_rules.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/empty_with_rules.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
└─ Article
[ERROR] This variable evaluated to an empty term (no rule that defined it applied in this situation)
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/empty_with_rules.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_default/bad/empty_with_rules.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context x content integer
│ ‾

2
tests/test_enum/bad/ambiguous_cases.catala_en
View File

@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] This constructor name is ambiguous, it can belong to E or F. Desambiguate it by prefixing it with the enum name.
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/ambiguous_cases.catala_en:14.22-27:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/ambiguous_cases.catala_en:14.23-14.28:
└──┐
14 │ definition e equals Case1
│ ‾‾‾‾‾

2
tests/test_enum/bad/ambiguous_wildcard.catala_en
View File

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] Couldn't infer the enumeration name from lonely wildcard (wildcard cannot be used as single match case)
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/ambiguous_wildcard.catala_en:15.4-20:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/ambiguous_wildcard.catala_en:15.5-15.21:
└──┐
15 │ -- anything : 31
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

4
tests/test_enum/bad/duplicate_case.catala_en
View File

@ -22,13 +22,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] The constructor Case3 has been matched twice:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/duplicate_case.catala_en:18.15-19:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/duplicate_case.catala_en:18.16-18.20:
└──┐
18 │ -- Case3 : true
│ ‾‾‾‾
└─ Article
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/duplicate_case.catala_en:17.15-20:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/duplicate_case.catala_en:17.16-17.21:
└──┐
17 │ -- Case3 : false
│ ‾‾‾‾‾

2
tests/test_enum/bad/empty.catala_en
View File

@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ declaration scope Bar:
$ catala Typecheck
[ERROR] The enum Foo does not have any cases; give it some for Catala to be able to accept it.
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/empty.catala_en:4.24-27:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/empty.catala_en:4.25-4.28:
└─┐
4 │ declaration enumeration Foo:
│ ‾‾‾

6
tests/test_enum/bad/missing_case.catala_en
View File

@ -20,21 +20,21 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "out" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/missing_case.catala_en:11.10-13:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/missing_case.catala_en:11.11-11.14:
└──┐
11 │ context out content boolean
│ ‾‾‾
└─ Article
[WARNING] The constructor "Case3" of enumeration "E" is never used; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/missing_case.catala_en:7.5-10:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/missing_case.catala_en:7.6-7.11:
└─┐
7 │ -- Case3
│ ‾‾‾‾‾
└─ Article
[ERROR] The constructor Case3 of enum E is missing from this pattern matching
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/missing_case.catala_en:14.24-16.21:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/missing_case.catala_en:14.25-16.22:
└──┐
14 │ definition out equals match e with pattern
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

8
tests/test_enum/bad/not_ending_wildcard.catala_en
View File

@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s First_case
[ERROR] Wildcard must be the last match case
Not ending wildcard:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/not_ending_wildcard.catala_en:19.4-20:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/not_ending_wildcard.catala_en:19.5-19.21:
└──┐
19 │ -- anything : 31
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Not ending wildcard:
└─ Wildcard can't be the first case
Next reachable case:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/not_ending_wildcard.catala_en:20.4-17:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/not_ending_wildcard.catala_en:20.5-20.18:
└──┐
20 │ -- Case2 : 42
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s Middle_case
[ERROR] Wildcard must be the last match case
Not ending wildcard:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/not_ending_wildcard.catala_en:19.4-20:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/not_ending_wildcard.catala_en:19.5-19.21:
└──┐
19 │ -- anything : 31
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ Not ending wildcard:
└─ Wildcard can't be the first case
Next reachable case:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/not_ending_wildcard.catala_en:20.4-17:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/not_ending_wildcard.catala_en:20.5-20.18:
└──┐
20 │ -- Case2 : 42
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

6
tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_2.catala_en
View File

@ -35,21 +35,21 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
--> F
Error coming from typechecking the following expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_2.catala_en:28.22-23:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_2.catala_en:28.23-28.24:
└──┐
28 │ definition y equals x with pattern Case3
│ ‾
└─ Article
Type E coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_2.catala_en:17.20-21:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_2.catala_en:17.21-17.22:
└──┐
17 │ context x content E
│ ‾
└─ Article
Type F coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_2.catala_en:28.22-42:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_2.catala_en:28.23-28.43:
└──┐
28 │ definition y equals x with pattern Case3
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

6
tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_3.catala_en
View File

@ -25,21 +25,21 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
--> F
Error coming from typechecking the following expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_3.catala_en:18.20-21:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_3.catala_en:18.21-18.22:
└──┐
18 │ definition y equals x with pattern Case3
│ ‾
└─ Article
Type E coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_3.catala_en:13.18-19:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_3.catala_en:13.19-13.20:
└──┐
13 │ context x content E
│ ‾
└─ Article
Type F coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_3.catala_en:18.20-40:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_3.catala_en:18.21-18.41:
└──┐
18 │ definition y equals x with pattern Case3
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

6
tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_4.catala_en
View File

@ -24,21 +24,21 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
--> F
Error coming from typechecking the following expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_4.catala_en:17.20-21:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_4.catala_en:17.21-17.22:
└──┐
17 │ definition y equals x with pattern Case3
│ ‾
└─ Test
Type E coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_4.catala_en:12.18-19:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_4.catala_en:12.19-12.20:
└──┐
12 │ context x content E
│ ‾
└─ Test
Type F coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_4.catala_en:17.20-40:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_4.catala_en:17.21-17.41:
└──┐
17 │ definition y equals x with pattern Case3
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

2
tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_fail.catala_en
View File

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] The name of this constructor has not been defined before, maybe it is a typo?
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_fail.catala_en:15.37-42:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/quick_pattern_fail.catala_en:15.38-15.43:
└──┐
15 │ definition y equals x with pattern Case3
│ ‾‾‾‾‾

2
tests/test_enum/bad/too_many_cases.catala_en
View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] This case matches a constructor of enumeration E but previous case were matching constructors of enumeration F
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/too_many_cases.catala_en:21.7-12:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/too_many_cases.catala_en:21.8-21.13:
└──┐
21 │ -- Case4 : true
│ ‾‾‾‾‾

2
tests/test_enum/bad/useless_wildcard.catala_en
View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[WARNING] Unreachable match case, all constructors of the enumeration E are already specified
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/useless_wildcard.catala_en:17.4-20:
┌─⯈ tests/test_enum/bad/useless_wildcard.catala_en:17.5-17.21:
└──┐
17 │ -- anything : 31
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

6
tests/test_exception/bad/ambiguous_unlabeled_exception.catala_en
View File

@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] This exception can refer to several definitions. Try using labels to disambiguate
Ambiguous exception
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/ambiguous_unlabeled_exception.catala_en:12.2-13.14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/ambiguous_unlabeled_exception.catala_en:12.3-13.15:
└──┐
12 │ exception
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -27,14 +27,14 @@ Ambiguous exception
└─ Test
Candidate definition
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/ambiguous_unlabeled_exception.catala_en:10.13-14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/ambiguous_unlabeled_exception.catala_en:10.14-10.15:
└──┐
10 │ definition x equals 1
│ ‾
└─ Test
Candidate definition
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/ambiguous_unlabeled_exception.catala_en:8.13-14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/ambiguous_unlabeled_exception.catala_en:8.14-8.15:
└─┐
8 │ definition x equals 0
│ ‾

2
tests/test_exception/bad/dangling_exception.catala_en
View File

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] Unknown label for the scope variable x: "base_y"
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/dangling_exception.catala_en:12.12-18:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/dangling_exception.catala_en:12.13-12.19:
└──┐
12 │ exception base_y
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾

8
tests/test_exception/bad/exceptions_cycle.catala_en
View File

@ -22,14 +22,14 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/exceptions_cycle.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/exceptions_cycle.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] Exception cycle detected when defining x: each of these 3 exceptions applies over the previous one, and the first applies over the last
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/exceptions_cycle.catala_en:8.2-10.14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/exceptions_cycle.catala_en:8.3-10.15:
└──┐
8 │ label base_x
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/exceptions_cycle.catala_en:12.2-14.14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/exceptions_cycle.catala_en:12.3-14.15:
└──┐
12 │ label exception_x
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/exceptions_cycle.catala_en:16.2-18.14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/exceptions_cycle.catala_en:16.3-18.15:
└──┐
16 │ label exception_exception_x
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

2
tests/test_exception/bad/missing_unlabeled_definition.catala_en
View File

@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] This exception does not have a corresponding definition
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/missing_unlabeled_definition.catala_en:8.2-9.14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/missing_unlabeled_definition.catala_en:8.3-9.15:
└─┐
8 │ exception
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

6
tests/test_exception/bad/one_ambiguous_exception.catala_en
View File

@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] This exception can refer to several definitions. Try using labels to disambiguate
Ambiguous exception
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/one_ambiguous_exception.catala_en:18.2-19.14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/one_ambiguous_exception.catala_en:18.3-19.15:
└──┐
18 │ exception
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -33,14 +33,14 @@ Ambiguous exception
└─ Test
Candidate definition
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/one_ambiguous_exception.catala_en:16.13-14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/one_ambiguous_exception.catala_en:16.14-16.15:
└──┐
16 │ definition y equals 4
│ ‾
└─ Test
Candidate definition
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/one_ambiguous_exception.catala_en:14.13-14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/one_ambiguous_exception.catala_en:14.14-14.15:
└──┐
14 │ definition y equals 2
│ ‾

4
tests/test_exception/bad/self_exception.catala_en
View File

@ -14,14 +14,14 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/self_exception.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/self_exception.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context y content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] Cannot define rule as an exception to itself
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/self_exception.catala_en:9.12-18:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/self_exception.catala_en:9.13-9.19:
└─┐
9 │ exception base_y
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾

6
tests/test_exception/bad/two_exceptions.catala_en
View File

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/two_exceptions.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/two_exceptions.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
@ -27,14 +27,14 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] There is a conflict between multiple valid consequences for assigning the same variable.
This consequence has a valid justification:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/two_exceptions.catala_en:12.22-23:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/two_exceptions.catala_en:12.23-12.24:
└──┐
12 │ definition x equals 1
│ ‾
└─ Test
This consequence has a valid justification:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/two_exceptions.catala_en:15.22-23:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/bad/two_exceptions.catala_en:15.23-15.24:
└──┐
15 │ definition x equals 2
│ ‾

8
tests/test_exception/good/double_definition.catala_en
View File

@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ scope Foo:
$ catala Scopelang -s Foo
[WARNING] These definitions have identical justifications and consequences; is it a mistake?
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/good/double_definition.catala_en:9.2-14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/good/double_definition.catala_en:9.3-9.15:
└─┐
9 │ definition x equals 1
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
└─ Foo
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/good/double_definition.catala_en:8.2-14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/good/double_definition.catala_en:8.3-8.15:
└─┐
8 │ definition x equals 1
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -40,13 +40,13 @@ Dcalc translation below.
$ catala Dcalc -s Foo
[WARNING] These definitions have identical justifications and consequences; is it a mistake?
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/good/double_definition.catala_en:9.2-14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/good/double_definition.catala_en:9.3-9.15:
└─┐
9 │ definition x equals 1
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
└─ Foo
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/good/double_definition.catala_en:8.2-14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_exception/good/double_definition.catala_en:8.3-8.15:
└─┐
8 │ definition x equals 1
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

4
tests/test_func/bad/bad_func.catala_en
View File

@ -32,14 +32,14 @@ $ catala Interpret -s S
[ERROR] There is a conflict between multiple valid consequences for assigning the same variable.
This consequence has a valid justification:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/bad_func.catala_en:14.64-69:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/bad_func.catala_en:14.65-14.70:
└──┐
14 │ definition f of x under condition (x >= x) consequence equals x + x
│ ‾‾‾‾‾
└─ Article
This consequence has a valid justification:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/bad_func.catala_en:15.61-66:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/bad_func.catala_en:15.62-15.67:
└──┐
15 │ definition f of x under condition not b consequence equals x * x
│ ‾‾‾‾‾

4
tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency.catala_en
View File

@ -17,14 +17,14 @@ $ catala typecheck
[ERROR] Function argument name mismatch between declaration ('x') and definition ('y')
Argument declared here:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency.catala_en:4.41-42:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency.catala_en:4.42-4.43:
└─┐
4 │ internal f1 content decimal depends on x content integer
│ ‾
Defined here:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency.catala_en:10.19-20:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency.catala_en:10.20-10.21:
└──┐
10 │ definition f1 of y under condition not cond
│ ‾

4
tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency2.catala_en
View File

@ -16,14 +16,14 @@ $ catala typecheck
[ERROR] Function argument name mismatch between declaration ('x') and definition ('y')
Argument declared here:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency2.catala_en:4.41-42:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency2.catala_en:4.42-4.43:
└─┐
4 │ internal f1 content decimal depends on x content integer
│ ‾
Defined here:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency2.catala_en:9.29-30:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency2.catala_en:9.30-9.31:
└─┐
9 │ exception definition f1 of y under condition not cond
│ ‾

4
tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency3.catala_en
View File

@ -16,14 +16,14 @@ $ catala typecheck
[ERROR] Function argument name mismatch between declaration ('x') and definition ('y')
Argument declared here:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency3.catala_en:4.41-42:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency3.catala_en:4.42-4.43:
└─┐
4 │ internal f1 content decimal depends on x content integer
│ ‾
Defined here:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency3.catala_en:9.29-30:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/param_inconsistency3.catala_en:9.30-9.31:
└─┐
9 │ exception definition f1 of y under condition not cond
│ ‾

2
tests/test_func/bad/recursive.catala_en
View File

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ scope RecursiveFunc:
$ catala Interpret -s RecursiveFunc
[ERROR] The variable f is used in one of its definitions, but recursion is forbidden in Catala
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/recursive.catala_en:8.27-28:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/bad/recursive.catala_en:8.28-8.29:
└─┐
8 │ definition f of x equals f of x + 1
│ ‾

6
tests/test_func/good/context_func.catala_en
View File

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ scope B:
$ catala Scopelang -s B
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "f" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/good/context_func.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/good/context_func.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context f content integer depends on x content integer
│ ‾
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ let scope B (b: bool|input) =
$ catala Dcalc -s A
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "f" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/good/context_func.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/good/context_func.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context f content integer depends on x content integer
│ ‾
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ let scope A (A_in: A_in): A =
$ catala Dcalc -s B
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "f" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/good/context_func.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_func/good/context_func.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context f content integer depends on x content integer
│ ‾

4
tests/test_io/bad/forgot_input.catala_en
View File

@ -19,14 +19,14 @@ $ catala Typecheck
[ERROR] This subscope variable is a mandatory input but no definition was provided.
Incriminated subscope:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/forgot_input.catala_en:9.2-3:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/forgot_input.catala_en:9.3-9.4:
└─┐
9 │ a scope A
│ ‾
└─ Test
Incriminated variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/forgot_input.catala_en:6.8-9:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/forgot_input.catala_en:6.9-6.10:
└─┐
6 │ input x content integer
│ ‾

6
tests/test_io/bad/inputing_to_not_input.catala_en
View File

@ -19,21 +19,21 @@ $ catala Typecheck
[ERROR] It is impossible to give a definition to a subscope variable not tagged as input or context.
Incriminated subscope:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/inputing_to_not_input.catala_en:8.2-3:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/inputing_to_not_input.catala_en:8.3-8.4:
└─┐
8 │ a scope A
│ ‾
└─ Test
Incriminated variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/inputing_to_not_input.catala_en:5.9-10:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/inputing_to_not_input.catala_en:5.10-5.11:
└─┐
5 │ output a content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
Incriminated subscope variable definition:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/inputing_to_not_input.catala_en:14.2-16:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/inputing_to_not_input.catala_en:14.3-14.17:
└──┐
14 │ definition a.a equals 0
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

6
tests/test_io/bad/redefining_input.catala_en
View File

@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Typecheck
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "a" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/redefining_input.catala_en:5.8-9:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/redefining_input.catala_en:5.9-5.10:
└─┐
5 │ input a content integer
│ ‾
@ -19,14 +19,14 @@ $ catala Typecheck
[ERROR] It is impossible to give a definition to a scope variable tagged as input.
Incriminated variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/redefining_input.catala_en:5.8-9:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/redefining_input.catala_en:5.9-5.10:
└─┐
5 │ input a content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
Incriminated variable definition:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/redefining_input.catala_en:8.2-14:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/redefining_input.catala_en:8.3-8.15:
└─┐
8 │ definition a equals 0
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

8
tests/test_io/bad/using_non_output.catala_en
View File

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ scope B:
$ catala Typecheck
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "a" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/using_non_output.catala_en:5.11-12:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/using_non_output.catala_en:5.12-5.13:
└─┐
5 │ internal a content integer
│ ‾
@ -25,21 +25,21 @@ $ catala Typecheck
[ERROR] The variable a.a cannot be used here, as it is not part of subscope a's results. Maybe you forgot to qualify it as an output?
Incriminated variable usage:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/using_non_output.catala_en:14.12-15:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/using_non_output.catala_en:14.13-14.16:
└──┐
14 │ assertion a.a = 0
│ ‾‾‾
└─ Test
Incriminated subscope variable declaration:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/using_non_output.catala_en:5.11-12:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/using_non_output.catala_en:5.12-5.13:
└─┐
5 │ internal a content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
Incriminated subscope declaration:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/using_non_output.catala_en:8.2-3:
┌─⯈ tests/test_io/bad/using_non_output.catala_en:8.3-8.4:
└─┐
8 │ a scope A
│ ‾

6
tests/test_money/bad/no_mingle.catala_en
View File

@ -17,21 +17,21 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] I don't know how to apply operator * on types money and
money
┌─⯈ tests/test_money/bad/no_mingle.catala_en:12.25-26:
┌─⯈ tests/test_money/bad/no_mingle.catala_en:12.26-12.27:
└──┐
12 │ definition z equals (x * y)
│ ‾
└─ Article
Type money coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_money/bad/no_mingle.catala_en:5.20-25:
┌─⯈ tests/test_money/bad/no_mingle.catala_en:5.21-5.26:
└─┐
5 │ context x content money
│ ‾‾‾‾‾
└─ Article
Type money coming from expression:
┌─⯈ tests/test_money/bad/no_mingle.catala_en:6.20-25:
┌─⯈ tests/test_money/bad/no_mingle.catala_en:6.21-6.26:
└─┐
6 │ context y content money
│ ‾‾‾‾‾

2
tests/test_name_resolution/bad/toplevel_defs.catala_en
View File

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ declaration glob5 content decimal
$ catala typecheck
[ERROR] Scope calls are not allowed outside of a scope
┌─⯈ tests/test_name_resolution/bad/toplevel_defs.catala_en:11.10-22:
┌─⯈ tests/test_name_resolution/bad/toplevel_defs.catala_en:11.11-11.23:
└──┐
11 │ equals (output of S1).a
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/array_length-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/array_length-empty.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/array_length-empty.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/array_length-empty.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/array_length-empty.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/array_length-overlap.catala_en
View File

@ -15,13 +15,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/array_length-overlap.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/array_length-overlap.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/array_length-overlap.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/array_length-overlap.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/bad/assert-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ scope Foo:
```catala-test-inline
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[ERROR] [Foo.x] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/assert-empty.catala_en:4.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/assert-empty.catala_en:4.11-4.12:
└─┐
4 │ output x content integer
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/dates_get_year-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -17,13 +17,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_get_year-empty.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_get_year-empty.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_get_year-empty.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_get_year-empty.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/dates_get_year-overlap.catala_en
View File

@ -17,13 +17,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_get_year-overlap.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_get_year-overlap.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_get_year-overlap.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_get_year-overlap.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/dates_simple-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -16,13 +16,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_simple-empty.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_simple-empty.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_simple-empty.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_simple-empty.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/dates_simple-overlap.catala_en
View File

@ -17,13 +17,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_simple-overlap.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_simple-overlap.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_simple-overlap.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/dates_simple-overlap.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/duration-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/duration-empty.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/duration-empty.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/duration-empty.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/duration-empty.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/duration-overlap.catala_en
View File

@ -15,13 +15,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/duration-overlap.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/duration-overlap.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/duration-overlap.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/duration-overlap.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

6
tests/test_proof/bad/enums-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -25,20 +25,20 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-empty.catala_en:15.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-empty.catala_en:15.11-15.12:
└──┐
15 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[WARNING] The constructor "C" of enumeration "T" is never used; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-empty.catala_en:7.6-7:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-empty.catala_en:7.7-7.8:
└─┐
7 │ -- C content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.x] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-empty.catala_en:15.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-empty.catala_en:15.11-15.12:
└──┐
15 │ context x content integer
│ ‾

6
tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -23,20 +23,20 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-empty.catala_en:13.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-empty.catala_en:13.11-13.12:
└──┐
13 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[WARNING] The constructor "C" of enumeration "T" is never used; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-empty.catala_en:5.6-7:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-empty.catala_en:5.7-5.8:
└─┐
5 │ -- C content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.x] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-empty.catala_en:13.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-empty.catala_en:13.11-13.12:
└──┐
13 │ context x content integer
│ ‾

6
tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-overlap.catala_en
View File

@ -23,20 +23,20 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-overlap.catala_en:13.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-overlap.catala_en:13.11-13.12:
└──┐
13 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[WARNING] The constructor "C" of enumeration "T" is never used; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-overlap.catala_en:5.6-7:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-overlap.catala_en:5.7-5.8:
└─┐
5 │ -- C content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.x] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-overlap.catala_en:13.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-nonbool-overlap.catala_en:13.11-13.12:
└──┐
13 │ context x content integer
│ ‾

6
tests/test_proof/bad/enums-overlap.catala_en
View File

@ -25,20 +25,20 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-overlap.catala_en:15.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-overlap.catala_en:15.11-15.12:
└──┐
15 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[WARNING] The constructor "C" of enumeration "T" is never used; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-overlap.catala_en:7.6-7:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-overlap.catala_en:7.7-7.8:
└─┐
7 │ -- C content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.x] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-overlap.catala_en:15.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums-overlap.catala_en:15.11-15.12:
└──┐
15 │ context x content integer
│ ‾

6
tests/test_proof/bad/enums_inj-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -18,20 +18,20 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_inj-empty.catala_en:10.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_inj-empty.catala_en:10.11-10.12:
└──┐
10 │ context y content integer
│ ‾
└─ Article
[WARNING] The constructor "C2" of enumeration "E" is never used; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_inj-empty.catala_en:6.5-7:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_inj-empty.catala_en:6.6-6.8:
└─┐
6 │ -- C2
│ ‾‾
└─ Article
[ERROR] [A.y] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_inj-empty.catala_en:10.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_inj-empty.catala_en:10.11-10.12:
└──┐
10 │ context y content integer
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/enums_inj-overlap.catala_en
View File

@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_inj-overlap.catala_en:10.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_inj-overlap.catala_en:10.11-10.12:
└──┐
10 │ context y content integer
│ ‾
└─ Article
[ERROR] [A.y] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_inj-overlap.catala_en:10.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_inj-overlap.catala_en:10.11-10.12:
└──┐
10 │ context y content integer
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/enums_unit-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_unit-empty.catala_en:10.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_unit-empty.catala_en:10.11-10.12:
└──┐
10 │ context y content integer
│ ‾
└─ Article
[ERROR] [A.y] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_unit-empty.catala_en:10.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_unit-empty.catala_en:10.11-10.12:
└──┐
10 │ context y content integer
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/enums_unit-overlap.catala_en
View File

@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_unit-overlap.catala_en:10.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_unit-overlap.catala_en:10.11-10.12:
└──┐
10 │ context y content integer
│ ‾
└─ Article
[ERROR] [A.y] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_unit-overlap.catala_en:10.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/enums_unit-overlap.catala_en:10.11-10.12:
└──┐
10 │ context y content integer
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/let_in_condition-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -15,13 +15,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/let_in_condition-empty.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/let_in_condition-empty.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context x content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.x] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/let_in_condition-empty.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/let_in_condition-empty.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context x content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/money-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/money-empty.catala_en:8.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/money-empty.catala_en:8.11-8.12:
└─┐
8 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/money-empty.catala_en:8.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/money-empty.catala_en:8.11-8.12:
└─┐
8 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/money-overlap.catala_en
View File

@ -19,13 +19,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/money-overlap.catala_en:8.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/money-overlap.catala_en:8.11-8.12:
└─┐
8 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/money-overlap.catala_en:8.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/money-overlap.catala_en:8.11-8.12:
└─┐
8 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/no_vars-conflict.catala_en
View File

@ -19,13 +19,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/no_vars-conflict.catala_en:8.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/no_vars-conflict.catala_en:8.11-8.12:
└─┐
8 │ context y content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/no_vars-conflict.catala_en:8.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/no_vars-conflict.catala_en:8.11-8.12:
└─┐
8 │ context y content integer
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/no_vars-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/no_vars-empty.catala_en:7.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/no_vars-empty.catala_en:7.11-7.12:
└─┐
7 │ context y content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/no_vars-empty.catala_en:7.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/no_vars-empty.catala_en:7.11-7.12:
└─┐
7 │ context y content integer
│ ‾

10
tests/test_proof/bad/prolala_motivating_example.catala_en
View File

@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ scope Amount:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "Amount", the variable "amount" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/prolala_motivating_example.catala_en:60.10-16:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/prolala_motivating_example.catala_en:60.11-60.17:
└──┐
60 │ context amount content integer
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -133,14 +133,14 @@ $ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
└─ Amount
[WARNING] In scope "Amount", the variable "correct_amount" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/prolala_motivating_example.catala_en:61.10-24:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/prolala_motivating_example.catala_en:61.11-61.25:
└──┐
61 │ context correct_amount content integer
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
└┬ ProLaLa 2022 Super Cash Bonus
└─ Amount
[ERROR] [Amount.amount] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/prolala_motivating_example.catala_en:60.10-16:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/prolala_motivating_example.catala_en:60.11-60.17:
└──┐
60 │ context amount content integer
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ $ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
└─ Amount
Counterexample generation is disabled so none was generated.
[ERROR] [Eligibility.is_eligible] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/prolala_motivating_example.catala_en:11.9-20:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/prolala_motivating_example.catala_en:11.10-11.21:
└──┐
11 │ output is_eligible content boolean
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ Counterexample generation is disabled so none was generated.
└─ Eligibility
Counterexample generation is disabled so none was generated.
[ERROR] [Eligibility.is_eligible] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/prolala_motivating_example.catala_en:11.9-20:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/prolala_motivating_example.catala_en:11.10-11.21:
└──┐
11 │ output is_eligible content boolean
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/rationals-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/rationals-empty.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/rationals-empty.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/rationals-empty.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/rationals-empty.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/rationals-overlap.catala_en
View File

@ -15,13 +15,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/rationals-overlap.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/rationals-overlap.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.y] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/rationals-overlap.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/rationals-overlap.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/sat_solving.catala_en
View File

@ -42,13 +42,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x10" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/sat_solving.catala_en:15.10-13:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/sat_solving.catala_en:15.11-15.14:
└──┐
15 │ context x10 content boolean
│ ‾‾‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.x10] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/sat_solving.catala_en:15.10-13:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/sat_solving.catala_en:15.11-15.14:
└──┐
15 │ context x10 content boolean
│ ‾‾‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/structs-empty.catala_en
View File

@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/structs-empty.catala_en:13.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/structs-empty.catala_en:13.11-13.12:
└──┐
13 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.x] This variable might return an empty error:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/structs-empty.catala_en:13.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/structs-empty.catala_en:13.11-13.12:
└──┐
13 │ context x content integer
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/bad/structs-overlap.catala_en
View File

@ -23,13 +23,13 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/structs-overlap.catala_en:13.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/structs-overlap.catala_en:13.11-13.12:
└──┐
13 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[ERROR] [A.x] At least two exceptions overlap for this variable:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/structs-overlap.catala_en:13.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/bad/structs-overlap.catala_en:13.11-13.12:
└──┐
13 │ context x content integer
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/array_length.catala_en
View File

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/array_length.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/array_length.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/dates_get_year.catala_en
View File

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/dates_get_year.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/dates_get_year.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/dates_simple.catala_en
View File

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/dates_simple.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/dates_simple.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/duration.catala_en
View File

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/duration.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/duration.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/good/enums-arith.catala_en
View File

@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums-arith.catala_en:13.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums-arith.catala_en:13.11-13.12:
└──┐
13 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[WARNING] The constructor "C" of enumeration "T" is never used; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums-arith.catala_en:5.6-7:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums-arith.catala_en:5.7-5.8:
└─┐
5 │ -- C content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/good/enums-nonbool.catala_en
View File

@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums-nonbool.catala_en:13.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums-nonbool.catala_en:13.11-13.12:
└──┐
13 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[WARNING] The constructor "C" of enumeration "T" is never used; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums-nonbool.catala_en:5.6-7:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums-nonbool.catala_en:5.7-5.8:
└─┐
5 │ -- C content boolean
│ ‾

4
tests/test_proof/good/enums.catala_en
View File

@ -22,14 +22,14 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums.catala_en:13.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums.catala_en:13.11-13.12:
└──┐
13 │ context x content integer
│ ‾
└─ Test
[WARNING] The constructor "C" of enumeration "T" is never used; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums.catala_en:5.6-7:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums.catala_en:5.7-5.8:
└─┐
5 │ -- C content boolean
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/enums_inj.catala_en
View File

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums_inj.catala_en:10.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums_inj.catala_en:10.11-10.12:
└──┐
10 │ context y content integer
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/enums_unit.catala_en
View File

@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums_unit.catala_en:10.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/enums_unit.catala_en:10.11-10.12:
└──┐
10 │ context y content integer
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/functions.catala_en
View File

@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "z" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/functions.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/functions.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context z content integer
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/let_in_condition.catala_en
View File

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/let_in_condition.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/let_in_condition.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context x content boolean
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/money.catala_en
View File

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/money.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/money.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/no_vars.catala_en
View File

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/no_vars.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/no_vars.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context x content integer
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/rationals.catala_en
View File

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "y" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/rationals.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/rationals.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context y content boolean
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/simple_vars.catala_en
View File

@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "z" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/simple_vars.catala_en:7.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/simple_vars.catala_en:7.11-7.12:
└─┐
7 │ context z content integer
│ ‾

2
tests/test_proof/good/structs.catala_en
View File

@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ scope A:
$ catala Proof --disable_counterexamples
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "x" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/structs.catala_en:13.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_proof/good/structs.catala_en:13.11-13.12:
└──┐
13 │ context x content integer
│ ‾

6
tests/test_scope/bad/cycle_in_scope.catala_en
View File

@ -20,21 +20,21 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
z → x → y → z
z is used here in the definition of x:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cycle_in_scope.catala_en:14.22-23:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cycle_in_scope.catala_en:14.23-14.24:
└──┐
14 │ definition x equals z
│ ‾
└─ Article
x is used here in the definition of y:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cycle_in_scope.catala_en:11.31-32:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cycle_in_scope.catala_en:11.32-11.33:
└──┐
11 │ definition y under condition x >= 0 consequence equals x
│ ‾
└─ Article
y is used here in the definition of z:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cycle_in_scope.catala_en:13.31-32:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cycle_in_scope.catala_en:13.32-13.33:
└──┐
13 │ definition z under condition y < 1 consequence equals y
│ ‾

6
tests/test_scope/bad/cyclic_scope_calls.catala_en
View File

@ -32,21 +32,21 @@ $ catala typecheck
S4 → S3 → S2 → S4
S4 is used here in the definition of S3:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cyclic_scope_calls.catala_en:21.23-35:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cyclic_scope_calls.catala_en:21.24-21.36:
└──┐
21 │ definition o equals (output of S4).o
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
S3 is used here in the definition of S2:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cyclic_scope_calls.catala_en:18.42-54:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cyclic_scope_calls.catala_en:18.43-18.55:
└──┐
18 │ definition o equals (output of S1).o + (output of S3).o
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
S2 is used here in the definition of S4:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cyclic_scope_calls.catala_en:24.23-35:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cyclic_scope_calls.catala_en:24.24-24.36:
└──┐
24 │ definition o equals (output of S2).o
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾

4
tests/test_scope/bad/cyclic_scopes.catala_en
View File

@ -21,14 +21,14 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] Cyclic dependency detected between the following scopes: B → A → B
B is used here in the definition of A:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cyclic_scopes.catala_en:5.2-3:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cyclic_scopes.catala_en:5.3-5.4:
└─┐
5 │ b scope B
│ ‾
└─ Article
A is used here in the definition of B:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cyclic_scopes.catala_en:9.2-3:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/cyclic_scopes.catala_en:9.3-9.4:
└─┐
9 │ a scope A
│ ‾

8
tests/test_scope/bad/scope.catala_en
View File

@ -18,14 +18,14 @@ scope A:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "a" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope.catala_en:5.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope.catala_en:5.11-5.12:
└─┐
5 │ context a content integer
│ ‾
└─ Article
[WARNING] In scope "A", the variable "b" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope.catala_en:6.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope.catala_en:6.11-6.12:
└─┐
6 │ context b content integer
│ ‾
@ -33,14 +33,14 @@ $ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] There is a conflict between multiple valid consequences for assigning the same variable.
This consequence has a valid justification:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope.catala_en:13.56-60:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope.catala_en:13.57-13.61:
└──┐
13 │ definition b under condition not c consequence equals 1337
│ ‾‾‾‾
└─ Article
This consequence has a valid justification:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope.catala_en:14.56-57:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope.catala_en:14.57-14.58:
└──┐
14 │ definition b under condition not c consequence equals 0
│ ‾

2
tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_duplicate.catala_en
View File

@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ scope Titi:
$ catala dcalc -s Titi
[ERROR] Duplicate definition of scope input variable 'bar'
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_duplicate.catala_en:14.69-72:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_duplicate.catala_en:14.70-14.73:
└──┐
14 │ definition fizz equals output of Toto with {--bar: 1 --baz: 2.1 -- bar: 3}
│ ‾‾‾

4
tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_extra.catala_en
View File

@ -18,14 +18,14 @@ scope Titi:
$ catala dcalc -s Titi
[ERROR] Scope Toto has no input variable biz
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_extra.catala_en:14.48-51:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_extra.catala_en:14.49-14.52:
└──┐
14 │ definition fizz equals output of Toto with {--biz: 1}
│ ‾‾‾
Scope Toto declared here
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_extra.catala_en:2.18-22:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_extra.catala_en:2.19-2.23:
└─┐
2 │ declaration scope Toto:
│ ‾‾‾‾

6
tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_missing.catala_en
View File

@ -18,21 +18,21 @@ scope Titi:
$ catala dcalc -s Titi
[WARNING] In scope "Toto", the variable "baz" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_missing.catala_en:4.8-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_missing.catala_en:4.9-4.12:
└─┐
4 │ input baz content decimal
│ ‾‾‾
[ERROR] Definition of input variable 'baz' missing in this scope call
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_missing.catala_en:14.25-55:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_missing.catala_en:14.26-14.56:
└──┐
14 │ definition fizz equals output of Toto with {--bar: 1}
│ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
Declaration of the missing input variable
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_missing.catala_en:4.8-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/scope_call_missing.catala_en:4.9-4.12:
└─┐
4 │ input baz content decimal
│ ‾‾‾

2
tests/test_scope/bad/sub_vars_in_sub_var.catala_en
View File

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ scope B:
$ catala Interpret -s A
[ERROR] The subscope a is used when defining one of its inputs, but recursion is forbidden in Catala
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/sub_vars_in_sub_var.catala_en:13.27-30:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/bad/sub_vars_in_sub_var.catala_en:13.28-13.31:
└──┐
13 │ definition a.y equals if a.x then 0 else 1
│ ‾‾‾

2
tests/test_scope/good/191_fix_record_name_confusion.catala_en
View File

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ scope ScopeB:
$ catala OCaml -O
[WARNING] In scope "ScopeB", the variable "a" is never used anywhere; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/good/191_fix_record_name_confusion.catala_en:8.10-11:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/good/191_fix_record_name_confusion.catala_en:8.11-8.12:
└─┐
8 │ context a content boolean
│ ‾

2
tests/test_scope/good/nothing.catala_en
View File

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ declaration scope Foo2:
$ catala Scalc -s Foo2 -O -t
[WARNING] In scope "Foo2", the variable "bar" is declared but never defined; did you forget something?
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/good/nothing.catala_en:5.9-12:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/good/nothing.catala_en:5.10-5.13:
└─┐
5 │ output bar content integer
│ ‾‾‾

2
tests/test_scope/good/scope_call.catala_en
View File

@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ scope Foo:
$ catala interpret -s Foo
[WARNING] The structure "Test" is never used; maybe it's unnecessary?
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/good/scope_call.catala_en:2.22-26:
┌─⯈ tests/test_scope/good/scope_call.catala_en:2.23-2.27:
└─┐
2 │ declaration structure Test:
│ ‾‾‾‾

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More