The WebContent process behaves a bit awkwardly on macOS. When we launch
the process, we have to create a QGuiApplication to access system fonts.
But on macOS, doing so creates an entry in the Dock, and also causes the
WebContent to be focused. So if you enter cmd+Q without first focusing
the Ladybird GUI, WebContent is closed, while the Ladybird process keeps
running.
Now that the Core::EventLoop is driven by a QEventLoop in Ladybird,
we don't need to patch LibWeb with Web::Platform plugins.
This patch removes EventLoopPluginQt and TimerQt.
Note that we can't just replace the Web::Platform abstractions with
LibCore stuff immediately, since the Web::Platform APIs use
JS::SafeFunction for callbacks.
This patch adds EventLoopImplementationQt which is a full replacement
for the Core::EventLoopImplementationUnix that uses Qt's event loop
as a backend instead.
This means that Core::Timer, Core::Notifier, and Core::Event delivery
are all driven by Qt primitives in the Ladybird UI and WC processes.
- Add Qt::Core, Qt::Gui, LibGfx, LibIPC, and LibJS to the ladybird
target, remove LibGL, LibSoftGPU, and LibWebSocket
- Add LibJS to the WebContent target, remove LibWebView
- Order them properly :^)
Regressed in https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/pull/15746.
Fixes#108.
Always call platform_init after there's a QApplication, because in the
installed configuration that's how we find the resources.
Try QCoreApplication::applicationDirPath() after looking in ./WebContent
for the WebContent process. In an installed configuration, ladybird and
WebContent will both be in $PREFIX/bin.
Add install rules for WebContent and its linked libraries, for if they
ever differ from ladybird's.
This patch brings over the WebContent process over from SerenityOS
to Ladybird, along with a new WebContentView widget that renders
web content in a separate process.
There's a lot of jank and FIXME material here, notably I had to re-add
manually pumped Core::EventLoop instances on both sides, in order to get
the IPC protocol running. This introduces a lot of latency and we should
work towards replacing those loops with improved abstractions.
The WebContent process is built separately here (not part of Lagom) and
we provide our own main.cpp for it. Like everything, this can be better
architected, it's just a starting point. :^)