ladybird/AK/DistinctNumeric.h
Lenny Maiorani f5ced347e6 AK: Prefer using instead of typedef
Problem:
- `typedef` is a keyword which comes from C and carries with it old
  syntax that is hard to read.
- Creating type aliases with the `using` keyword allows for easier
  future maintenance because it supports template syntax.
- There is inconsistent use of `typedef` vs `using`.

Solution:
- Use `clang-tidy`'s checker called `modernize-use-using` to update
  the syntax to use the newer syntax.
- Remove unused functions to make `clang-tidy` happy.
- This results in consistency within the codebase.
2020-11-12 10:19:04 +01:00

309 lines
12 KiB
C++

/*
* Copyright (c) 2020, Ben Wiederhake <BenWiederhake.GitHub@gmx.de>
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
*
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this
* list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
*
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
* this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
* and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
* AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
* DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
* FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
* DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
* SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER
* CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY,
* OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
* OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
#pragma once
#include <AK/Types.h>
namespace AK {
/**
* This implements a "distinct" numeric type that is intentionally incompatible
* to other incantations. The intention is that each "distinct" type that you
* want simply gets different values for `fn_length` and `line`. The macros
* `TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_NUMERIC_*()` at the bottom of `DistinctNumeric.h`.
*
* `Incr`, `Cmp`, `Bool`, `Flags`, `Shift`, and `Arith` simply split up the
* space of operators into 6 simple categories:
* - No matter the values of these, `DistinctNumeric` always implements `==` and `!=`.
* - If `Incr` is true, then `++a`, `a++`, `--a`, and `a--` are implemented.
* - If `Cmp` is true, then `a>b`, `a<b`, `a>=b`, and `a<=b` are implemented.
* - If `Bool` is true, then `!a`, `a&&b`, and `a||b` are implemented (but not `operator bool()`, because of overzealous integer promotion rules).
* - If `Flags` is true, then `~a`, `a&b`, `a|b`, `a^b`, `a&=b`, `a|=b`, and `a^=b` are implemented.
* - If `Shift` is true, then `a<<b`, `a>>b`, `a<<=b`, `a>>=b` are implemented.
* - If `Arith` is true, then `a+b`, `a-b`, `+a`, `-a`, `a*b`, `a/b`, `a%b`, and the respective `a_=b` versions are implemented.
* The semantics are always those of the underlying basic type `T`.
*
* These can be combined arbitrarily. Want a numeric type that supports `++a`
* and `a >> b` but not `a > b`? Sure thing, just set
* `Incr=true, Cmp=false, Shift=true` and you're done!
* Furthermore, some of these overloads make more sense with specific types, like `a&&b` which should be able to operate
*
* I intentionally decided against overloading `&a` because these shall remain
* numeric types.
*
* The C++20 `operator<=>` would require, among other things `std::weak_equality`.
* Since we do not have that, it cannot be implemented.
*
* The are many operators that do not work on `int`, so I left them out:
* `a[b]`, `*a`, `a->b`, `a.b`, `a->*b`, `a.*b`.
*
* There are many more operators that do not make sense for numerical types,
* or cannot be overloaded in the first place. Naturally, they are not implemented.
*/
template<typename T, bool Incr, bool Cmp, bool Bool, bool Flags, bool Shift, bool Arith, typename X>
class DistinctNumeric {
using Self = DistinctNumeric<T, Incr, Cmp, Bool, Flags, Shift, Arith, X>;
public:
DistinctNumeric(T value)
: m_value { value }
{
}
const T& value() const { return m_value; }
// Always implemented: identity.
bool operator==(const Self& other) const
{
return this->m_value == other.m_value;
}
bool operator!=(const Self& other) const
{
return this->m_value != other.m_value;
}
// Only implemented when `Incr` is true:
Self& operator++()
{
static_assert(Incr, "'++a' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Incr'.");
this->m_value += 1;
return *this;
}
Self operator++(int)
{
static_assert(Incr, "'a++' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Incr'.");
Self ret = this->m_value;
this->m_value += 1;
return ret;
}
Self& operator--()
{
static_assert(Incr, "'--a' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Incr'.");
this->m_value -= 1;
return *this;
}
Self operator--(int)
{
static_assert(Incr, "'a--' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Incr'.");
Self ret = this->m_value;
this->m_value -= 1;
return ret;
}
// Only implemented when `Cmp` is true:
bool operator>(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Cmp, "'a>b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Cmp'.");
return this->m_value > other.m_value;
}
bool operator<(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Cmp, "'a<b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Cmp'.");
return this->m_value < other.m_value;
}
bool operator>=(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Cmp, "'a>=b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Cmp'.");
return this->m_value >= other.m_value;
}
bool operator<=(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Cmp, "'a<=b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Cmp'.");
return this->m_value <= other.m_value;
}
// 'operator<=>' cannot be implemented. See class comment.
// Only implemented when `bool` is true:
bool operator!() const
{
static_assert(Bool, "'!a' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Bool'.");
return !this->m_value;
}
bool operator&&(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Bool, "'a&&b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Bool'.");
return this->m_value && other.m_value;
}
bool operator||(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Bool, "'a||b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Bool'.");
return this->m_value || other.m_value;
}
// Intentionally don't define `operator bool() const` here. C++ is a bit
// overzealos, and whenever there would be a type error, C++ instead tries
// to convert to a common int-ish type first. `bool` is int-ish, so
// `operator bool() const` would defy the entire point of this class.
// Only implemented when `Flags` is true:
Self operator~() const
{
static_assert(Flags, "'~a' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Flags'.");
return ~this->m_value;
}
Self operator&(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Flags, "'a&b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Flags'.");
return this->m_value & other.m_value;
}
Self operator|(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Flags, "'a|b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Flags'.");
return this->m_value | other.m_value;
}
Self operator^(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Flags, "'a^b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Flags'.");
return this->m_value ^ other.m_value;
}
Self& operator&=(const Self& other)
{
static_assert(Flags, "'a&=b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Flags'.");
this->m_value &= other.m_value;
return *this;
}
Self& operator|=(const Self& other)
{
static_assert(Flags, "'a|=b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Flags'.");
this->m_value |= other.m_value;
return *this;
}
Self& operator^=(const Self& other)
{
static_assert(Flags, "'a^=b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Flags'.");
this->m_value ^= other.m_value;
return *this;
}
// Only implemented when `Shift` is true:
// TODO: Should this take `int` instead?
Self operator<<(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Shift, "'a<<b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Shift'.");
return this->m_value << other.m_value;
}
Self operator>>(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Shift, "'a>>b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Shift'.");
return this->m_value >> other.m_value;
}
Self& operator<<=(const Self& other)
{
static_assert(Shift, "'a<<=b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Shift'.");
this->m_value <<= other.m_value;
return *this;
}
Self& operator>>=(const Self& other)
{
static_assert(Shift, "'a>>=b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Shift'.");
this->m_value >>= other.m_value;
return *this;
}
// Only implemented when `Arith` is true:
Self operator+(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Arith, "'a+b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.");
return this->m_value + other.m_value;
}
Self operator-(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Arith, "'a-b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.");
return this->m_value - other.m_value;
}
Self operator+() const
{
static_assert(Arith, "'+a' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.");
return +this->m_value;
}
Self operator-() const
{
static_assert(Arith, "'-a' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.");
return -this->m_value;
}
Self operator*(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Arith, "'a*b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.");
return this->m_value * other.m_value;
}
Self operator/(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Arith, "'a/b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.");
return this->m_value / other.m_value;
}
Self operator%(const Self& other) const
{
static_assert(Arith, "'a%b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.");
return this->m_value % other.m_value;
}
Self& operator+=(const Self& other)
{
static_assert(Arith, "'a+=b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.");
this->m_value += other.m_value;
return *this;
}
Self& operator-=(const Self& other)
{
static_assert(Arith, "'a+=b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.");
this->m_value += other.m_value;
return *this;
}
Self& operator*=(const Self& other)
{
static_assert(Arith, "'a*=b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.");
this->m_value *= other.m_value;
return *this;
}
Self& operator/=(const Self& other)
{
static_assert(Arith, "'a/=b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.");
this->m_value /= other.m_value;
return *this;
}
Self& operator%=(const Self& other)
{
static_assert(Arith, "'a%=b' is only available for DistinctNumeric types with 'Arith'.");
this->m_value %= other.m_value;
return *this;
}
private:
T m_value;
};
// TODO: When 'consteval' sufficiently-well supported by host compilers, try to
// provide a more usable interface like this one:
// https://gist.github.com/alimpfard/a3b750e8c3a2f44fb3a2d32038968ddf
}
#define TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_NUMERIC_GENERAL(T, Incr, Cmp, Bool, Flags, Shift, Arith, NAME) \
using NAME = DistinctNumeric<T, Incr, Cmp, Bool, Flags, Shift, Arith, struct __##NAME##_tag>;
#define TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_ORDERED_ID(T, NAME) TYPEDEF_DISTINCT_NUMERIC_GENERAL(T, false, true, true, false, false, false, NAME)
// TODO: Further type aliases?
using AK::DistinctNumeric;