1
1
mirror of https://github.com/NixOS/mobile-nixos.git synced 2024-11-28 12:56:54 +03:00
mobile-nixos/modules/system-types.nix
2018-06-23 17:11:07 -04:00

59 lines
1.8 KiB
Nix

{ config, lib, pkgs, ... }:
with lib;
let
system_type = config.mobile.system.type;
device_config = config.mobile.device;
hardware_config = config.mobile.hardware;
stage-1 = config.mobile.boot.stage-1;
build_types = {
android-bootimg = pkgs.callPackage ../systems/bootimg.nix {
inherit device_config;
# XXX : this feels like a hack
initrd = pkgs.callPackage ../systems/initrd.nix { inherit device_config stage-1; };
};
kernel-initrd = pkgs.linkFarm "${device_config.name}-build" [
{
name = "kernel-initrd";
path = pkgs.callPackage ../systems/kernel-initrd.nix {
# FIXME this all feels a bit not enough generic.
inherit device_config hardware_config;
initrd = pkgs.callPackage ../systems/initrd.nix { inherit device_config stage-1; };
};
}
{
name = "system";
# Equivalent to:
# → nix-build nixos -I nixos-config=system-image.nix -A config.system.build.sdImage
path = ((import (pkgs.path + "/nixos")) { configuration = ../system-image.nix; }).config.system.build.sdImage;
}
];
};
in
{
options.mobile = {
system.type = mkOption {
type = types.enum (lib.attrNames build_types);
description = ''
Defines the kind of system the device is.
The different kind of system types will define the outputs
produced for the system.
'';
};
};
config = {
assertions = [
# While the enum type is enough to implement value safety, this will help
# when implementing new platforms and not implementing them in build_types.
{ assertion = build_types ? system_type; message = "cannot build unexpected system type: ${system_type}.";}
];
system = {
build = build_types."${system_type}";
};
};
}