diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 97cf6fe..fcdff6f 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -15,12 +15,21 @@ These include:
 * Validated Input
 * Scrolling Nav
 
-Check out the [examples](https://orasund.github.io/elm-ui-widgets/)
+Examples of all widgets can be found [here](https://orasund.github.io/elm-ui-widgets/). For styling, I used my own [Orasund/elm-ui-framework](https://package.elm-lang.org/packages/Orasund/elm-ui-framework/latest/).
 
-## Why was this package created
+## Why create such a package?
 
-There are two reasons I created this package.
+After looking at the current packages that implement various reusable views (and components) I noticed two things:
 
-1. There are no reusable views written from Elm-Ui
-2. There are a lot of reusable views out there, all trying to reinvent the wheel,
-    and all do it differently. This packages tries to keep the complexity at a minimum and all the widgets consistent with eachother.
\ No newline at end of file
+* There are (nearly) no widgets for Elm-Ui, and that's a problem because while going from `Element` to `Html` is easy, the opposite is not always possible (as a lot of styling in Elm-Ui would not be adapted to the `Html` element.)
+* There is collection of widgets, all in one place. A lot of components get reimplemented over and over again. It's hard to keep track of what package is currently the best.
+
+This package tries to solve both of these problems.
+
+## Why does this package also include components?
+
+I wrote a component whenever the boilerplate of a similar reusable view is less than just include the wiring in the package.
+
+## Where will it go from here
+
+I really would like to write a native material-design implementation in Elm. But after doing this package as a first step, (Which I already wrote while having the material.io docs as reference) I am not quite sure how I can avoid a lot of boilerplating. It seems like a [Master View Type](https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/scaling-elm-views-with-master-view-types/) would be the solution, but I'm not quite sure how I can ensure the customizability when my entire page can be described as a single type. (I don't want to know how many parameters such a type would need).
\ No newline at end of file