Elm-Ui-Widgets

Usefull Widgets written for Elm-ui.

Examples of all widgets can be found here. For styling, I used my own Orasund/elm-ui-framework.

Why create such a package?

el After looking at the current packages that implement various reusable views (and components) I noticed two things:

• There are (nearly) no widgets for Elm-Ui, and that's a problem because while going from Element to Html is easy, the opposite is not always possible (as a lot of styling in Elm-Ui would not be adapted to the Html element.)
• There is collection of widgets, all in one place. A lot of components get reimplemented over and over again. It's hard to keep track of what package is currently the best.

This package tries to solve both of these problems.

Here are some alternative packages for creating UIs:

• Using Elm-Ui
  • lucamug/style-framework - Full customization requires the cloning of the package.
  • jxxcarlson/elm-widget - Uses a Builder pattern. Has some redefined customizations.
  • QiTASC/hatchinq - Similar Arroach, stillin experimental phase
• Using Elm/Html
  • nathanjohnson320/elm-ui-components - Sticks with the elm/html way of styling.
  • NoRedInk/noredink-ui - Similar Approach but no customization options.
  • peterszerzo/elm-natural-ui - Uses custom Attributes with some customization.
• Ui Frameworks
  • aforemny/material-components-web-elm - Wrapper of Material design using custom elements.
  • afidegnum/elm-tailwind - Wrapper of Tailwind by including the tailwind stylesheet.
  • surprisetalk/elm-bulma - Wrapper for Bulma by including the bulma stylesheet.
  • rundis/elm-bootstrap - Wrapper for Bootstrap by including the bootstrap stylesheet.

Goal

The long time goal is to have a universal tool for creating UI-frameworks natively in Elm, in particular a native Material Design implementation. It should allow easy customizability and also extendability of existing widgets.

Example: Button

A good example, how I image the package to work is the button:

button: ButtonStyle msg
    ->
        { text : String
        , icon : Element Never
        , onPress : Maybe msg
        }
    -> Element msg

In comparison to Elm-Ui's button, we see two new things:

• List (Attribute msg) has changed into

  type alias ButtonStyle msg =
      { container : List (Attribute msg)
      , labelRow : List (Attribute msg)
      , ifDisabled : List (Attribute msg)
      , ifActive : List (Attribute msg)
      }
  

• We can display an icon, besides the text. Just like the Material Design specification describes it. Actually there is also a type for the button:

  type alias Button msg =
      { text : String
      , icon : Element Never
      , onPress : Maybe msg
      }
  

There are also a few different implementations of the button, like the Icon without text:

iconButton :
    ButtonStyle msg
    ->
        { text : String --for screen readers
        , icon : Element Never
        , onPress : Maybe msg
        }
    -> Element msg

or a Button with no icon

textButton :
    ButtonStyle msg
    ->
        { textButton
            | text : String
            , onPress : Maybe msg
        }
    -> Element msg

Concept

Here are the reasons why I implemented it that way:

• The core of Elm-Ui-Widgets are independend widgets (no components), that can be used without knowing anything else about the package.
• Each widget comes with a Widget Type and a Style Type. The Widget Type is an abstract representation of the widget and the Style Type has all styling attributes.
• Style Types should be definable without knowing implementation details
• Widget Types can be use for a Master View Type (Elm-Ui-Widgets might provide some master view types, for example for elm-Markup support)
• Widget Types can be used as building Blocks for more complicated Widgets (Button -> Select Buttons -> Menu -> Layout)

Where will it go from here

I really would like to write a native material-design implementation in Elm. But after doing this package as a first step, (Which I already wrote while having the material.io docs as reference) I am not quite sure how I can avoid a lot of boilerplating. It seems like a Master View Type would be the solution, but I'm not quite sure how I can ensure the customizability when my entire page can be described as a single type. (I don't want to know how many parameters such a type would need).