mirror of
https://github.com/ProvableHQ/leo.git
synced 2024-12-26 19:51:52 +03:00
964883a535
Make the change to the .txt file.
1036 lines
36 KiB
Plaintext
1036 lines
36 KiB
Plaintext
; Copyright (C) 2019-2021 Aleo Systems Inc.
|
|
; This file is part of the Leo library.
|
|
|
|
; The Leo library is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
; it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
; the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
|
|
; (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
; The Leo library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
; but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
; GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
; You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
; along with the Leo library. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
|
|
|
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
|
|
|
|
; Introduction
|
|
; ------------
|
|
|
|
; This file contains an ABNF (Augmented Backus-Naur Form) grammar of Leo.
|
|
; Background on ABNF is provided later in this file.
|
|
|
|
; This grammar provides an official definition of the syntax of Leo
|
|
; that is both human-readable and machine-readable.
|
|
; It will be part of an upcoming Leo language reference.
|
|
; It may also be used to generate parser tests at some point.
|
|
|
|
; We are also using this grammar
|
|
; as part of a mathematical formalization of the Leo language,
|
|
; which we are developing in the ACL2 theorem prover
|
|
; and which we plan to publish at some point.
|
|
; In particular, we have used a formally verified parser of ABNF grammars
|
|
; (at https://github.com/acl2/acl2/tree/master/books/kestrel/abnf;
|
|
; also see the paper at https://www.kestrel.edu/people/coglio/vstte18.pdf)
|
|
; to parse this grammar into a formal representation of the Leo concrete syntax
|
|
; and to validate that the grammar satisfies certain consistency properties.
|
|
|
|
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
|
|
|
|
; Background on ABNF
|
|
; ------------------
|
|
|
|
; ABNF is an Internet standard:
|
|
; see RFC 5234 at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234
|
|
; and RFC 7405 at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7405.
|
|
; It is used to specify the syntax of JSON, HTTP, and other standards.
|
|
|
|
; ABNF adds conveniences and makes slight modifications
|
|
; to Backus-Naur Form (BNF),
|
|
; without going beyond context-free grammars.
|
|
|
|
; Instead of BNF's angle-bracket notation for nonterminals,
|
|
; ABNF uses case-insensitive names consisting of letters, digits, and dashes,
|
|
; e.g. HTTP-message and IPv6address.
|
|
; ABNF includes an angle-bracket notation for prose descriptions,
|
|
; e.g. <host, see [RFC3986], Section 3.2.2>,
|
|
; usable as last resort in the definiens of a nonterminal.
|
|
|
|
; While BNF allows arbitrary terminals,
|
|
; ABNF uses only natural numbers as terminals,
|
|
; and denotes them via:
|
|
; (i) binary, decimal, or hexadecimal sequences,
|
|
; e.g. %b1.11.1010, %d1.3.10, and %x.1.3.A
|
|
; all denote the sequence of terminals '1 3 10';
|
|
; (ii) binary, decimal, or hexadecimal ranges,
|
|
; e.g. %x30-39 denotes any singleton sequence of terminals
|
|
; 'n' with 48 <= n <= 57 (an ASCII digit);
|
|
; (iii) case-sensitive ASCII strings,
|
|
; e.g. %s"Ab" denotes the sequence of terminals '65 98';
|
|
; and (iv) case-insensitive ASCII strings,
|
|
; e.g. %i"ab", or just "ab", denotes
|
|
; any sequence of terminals among
|
|
; '65 66',
|
|
; '65 98',
|
|
; '97 66', and
|
|
; '97 98'.
|
|
; ABNF terminals in suitable sets represent ASCII or Unicode characters.
|
|
|
|
; ABNF allows repetition prefixes n*m,
|
|
; where n and m are natural numbers in decimal notation;
|
|
; if absent,
|
|
; n defaults to 0, and
|
|
; m defaults to infinity.
|
|
; For example,
|
|
; 1*4HEXDIG denotes one to four HEXDIGs,
|
|
; *3DIGIT denotes up to three DIGITs, and
|
|
; 1*OCTET denotes one or more OCTETs.
|
|
; A single n prefix
|
|
; abbreviates n*n,
|
|
; e.g. 3DIGIT denotes three DIGITs.
|
|
|
|
; Instead of BNF's |, ABNF uses / to separate alternatives.
|
|
; Repetition prefixes have precedence over juxtapositions,
|
|
; which have precedence over /.
|
|
; Round brackets group things and override the aforementioned precedence rules,
|
|
; e.g. *(WSP / CRLF WSP) denotes sequences of terminals
|
|
; obtained by repeating, zero or more times,
|
|
; either (i) a WSP or (ii) a CRLF followed by a WSP.
|
|
; Square brackets also group things but make them optional,
|
|
; e.g. [":" port] is equivalent to 0*1(":" port).
|
|
|
|
; Instead of BNF's ::=, ABNF uses = to define nonterminals,
|
|
; and =/ to incrementally add alternatives
|
|
; to previously defined nonterminals.
|
|
; For example, the rule BIT = "0" / "1"
|
|
; is equivalent to BIT = "0" followed by BIT =/ "1".
|
|
|
|
; The syntax of ABNF itself is formally specified in ABNF
|
|
; (in Section 4 of the aforementioned RFC 5234,
|
|
; after the syntax and semantics of ABNF
|
|
; are informally specified in natural language
|
|
; (in Sections 1, 2, and 3 of the aforementioned RFC 5234).
|
|
; The syntax rules of ABNF prescribe the ASCII codes allowed for
|
|
; white space (spaces and horizontal tabs),
|
|
; line endings (carriage returns followed by line feeds),
|
|
; and comments (semicolons to line endings).
|
|
|
|
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
|
|
|
|
; Structure
|
|
; ---------
|
|
|
|
; This ABNF grammar consists of two (sub-)grammars:
|
|
; (i) a lexical grammar that describes how
|
|
; sequence of characters are parsed into tokens, and
|
|
; (ii) a syntactic grammar that described how
|
|
; tokens are parsed into expressions, statements, etc.
|
|
; The adjectives 'lexical' and 'syntactic' are
|
|
; the same ones used in the Java language reference,
|
|
; for instance;
|
|
; alternative terms may be used in other languages,
|
|
; but the separation into these two components is quite common
|
|
; (the situation is sometimes a bit more complex, with multiple passes,
|
|
; e.g. Unicode escape processing in Java).
|
|
|
|
; This separation enables
|
|
; concerns of white space, line endings, etc.
|
|
; to be handled by the lexical grammar,
|
|
; with the syntactic grammar focused on the more important structure.
|
|
; Handling both aspects in a single grammar may be unwieldy,
|
|
; so having two grammars provides more clarity and readability.
|
|
|
|
; ABNF is a context-free grammar notation, with no procedural interpretation.
|
|
; The two grammars conceptually define two subsequent processing phases,
|
|
; as detailed below.
|
|
; However, a parser implementation does not need to perform
|
|
; two strictly separate phases (in fact, it typically does not),
|
|
; so long as it produces the same final result.
|
|
|
|
; The grammar is accompanied by some extra-grammatical requirements,
|
|
; which are not conveniently expressible in a context-free grammar like ABNF.
|
|
; These requirements are needed to make the grammar unambiguous,
|
|
; i.e. to ensure that, for each sequence of terminals,
|
|
; there is exactly one parse tree for that sequence terminals
|
|
; that satisfies not only the grammar rules
|
|
; but also the extra-grammatical requirements.
|
|
; These requirements are expressed as comments in this file.
|
|
|
|
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
|
|
|
|
; Operator Precedence
|
|
; -------------------
|
|
|
|
; We formulate the grammar rules for expressions
|
|
; in a way that describes the relative precedence of operators,
|
|
; as often done in language syntax specifications.
|
|
|
|
; For instance, consider the rules
|
|
;
|
|
; multiplicative-expression =
|
|
; exponential-expression
|
|
; / multiplicative-expression "*" exponential-expression
|
|
; / multiplicative-expression "/" exponential-expression
|
|
;
|
|
; additive-expression =
|
|
; multiplicative-expression
|
|
; / additive-expression "+" multiplicative-expression
|
|
; / additive-expression "-" multiplicative-expression
|
|
;
|
|
; These rules tell us
|
|
; that the additive operators '+' and '-' have lower precedence
|
|
; than the multiplicative operators '*' and '/',
|
|
; and that both the additive and multiplicative operators associate to the left.
|
|
; This may be best understood via the examples given below.
|
|
|
|
; According to the rules, the expression
|
|
;
|
|
; x + y * z
|
|
;
|
|
; can only be parsed as
|
|
;
|
|
; +
|
|
; / \
|
|
; x *
|
|
; / \
|
|
; y z
|
|
;
|
|
; and not as
|
|
;
|
|
; *
|
|
; / \
|
|
; + z
|
|
; / \
|
|
; x y
|
|
;
|
|
; because a multiplicative expression cannot have an additive expression
|
|
; as first sub-expression, as it would in the second tree above.
|
|
|
|
; Also according to the rules, the expression
|
|
;
|
|
; x + y + z
|
|
;
|
|
; can only be parsed as
|
|
;
|
|
; +
|
|
; / \
|
|
; + z
|
|
; / \
|
|
; x y
|
|
;
|
|
; and not as
|
|
;
|
|
; +
|
|
; / \
|
|
; x +
|
|
; / \
|
|
; y z
|
|
;
|
|
; because an additive expression cannot have an additive expression
|
|
; as second sub-expression, as it would in the second tree above.
|
|
|
|
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
|
|
|
|
; Naming Convention
|
|
; -----------------
|
|
|
|
; This ABNF grammar uses nonterminal names
|
|
; that consist of complete English words, separated by dashes,
|
|
; and that describe the construct the way it is in English.
|
|
; For instance, we use the name 'conditional-statement'
|
|
; to describe conditional statements.
|
|
|
|
; At the same time, this grammar establishes
|
|
; a precise and official nomenclature for the Leo constructs,
|
|
; by way of the nonterminal names that define their syntax.
|
|
; For instance, the rule
|
|
;
|
|
; group-literal = product-group-literal
|
|
; / affine-group-literal
|
|
;
|
|
; tells us that there are two kinds of group literals,
|
|
; namely product group literals and affine group literals.
|
|
; This is more precise than describing them as
|
|
; integers (which are not really group elements per se),
|
|
; or points (they are all points, just differently specified),
|
|
; or being singletons vs. pairs (which is a bit generic).
|
|
|
|
; The only exception to the nomenclature-establishing role of the grammar
|
|
; is the fact that, as discussed above,
|
|
; we write the grammar rules in a way that determines
|
|
; the relative precedence and the associativity of expression operators,
|
|
; and therefore we have rules like
|
|
;
|
|
; unary-expression = primary-expression
|
|
; / "!" unary-expression
|
|
; / "-" unary-expression
|
|
;
|
|
; In order to allow the recursion of the rule to stop,
|
|
; we need to regard, in the grammar, a primary expression as a unary expression
|
|
; (i.e. a primary expression is also a unary expression in the grammar;
|
|
; but note that the opposite is not true).
|
|
; However, this is just a grammatical artifact:
|
|
; ontologically, a primary expression is not really a unary expression,
|
|
; because a unary expression is one that consists of
|
|
; a unary operator and an operand sub-expression.
|
|
; These terminological exceptions should be easy to identify in the rules.
|
|
|
|
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
|
|
|
|
; Lexical Grammar
|
|
; ---------------
|
|
|
|
; A Leo file is a finite sequence of Unicode characters,
|
|
; represented as Unicode code points,
|
|
; which are numbers in the range form 0 to 10FFFFh.
|
|
; These are captured by the ABNF rule 'character' below.
|
|
|
|
; The lexical grammar defines how, at least conceptually,
|
|
; the sequence of characters is turned into
|
|
; a sequence of tokens, comments, and whitespaces:
|
|
; these entities are all defined by the grammar rules below.
|
|
|
|
; As stated, the lexical grammar alone is ambiguous.
|
|
; For example, the sequence of characters '**' (i.e. two stars)
|
|
; could be equally parsed as two '*' symbol tokens or one '**' symbol token
|
|
; (see rule for 'symbol' below).
|
|
; As another example, the sequence or characters '<CR><LF>'
|
|
; (i.e. carriage return followed by line feed)
|
|
; could be equally parsed as two line terminators or one
|
|
; (see rule for 'newline').
|
|
|
|
; Thus, as often done in language syntax definitions,
|
|
; the lexical grammar is disambiguated by
|
|
; the extra-grammatical requirement that
|
|
; the longest possible sequence of characters is always parsed.
|
|
; This way, '**' must be parsed as one '**' symbol token,
|
|
; and '<CR><LF>' must be parsed as one line terminator.
|
|
|
|
; As mentioned above, a character is any Unicode code point.
|
|
; This grammar does not say how those are encoded in files (e.g. UTF-8):
|
|
; it starts with a decoded sequence of Unicode code points.
|
|
; Note that we allow any value,
|
|
; even though some values may not be used according to the Unicode standard.
|
|
|
|
character = %x0-10FFFF ; any Unicode code point
|
|
|
|
; We give names to certain ASCII characters.
|
|
|
|
horizontal-tab = %x9
|
|
|
|
line-feed = %xA
|
|
|
|
carriage-return = %xD
|
|
|
|
space = %x20
|
|
|
|
double-quote = %x22
|
|
|
|
; We give names to complements of certain ASCII characters.
|
|
; These consist of all the Unicode characters except for one or two.
|
|
|
|
not-double-quote = %x0-22 / %x24-10FFFF ; anything but "
|
|
|
|
not-star = %x0-29 / %x2B-10FFFF ; anything but *
|
|
|
|
not-line-feed-or-carriage-return = %x0-9 / %xB-C / %xE-10FFFF
|
|
; anything but LF or CR
|
|
|
|
not-star-or-slash = %x0-29 / %x2B-2E / %x30-10FFFF ; anything but * or /
|
|
|
|
; Lines in Leo may be terminated via
|
|
; a single carriage return,
|
|
; a line feed,
|
|
; or a carriage return immediately followed by a line feed.
|
|
; Note that the latter combination constitutes a single line terminator,
|
|
; according to the extra-grammatical requirement of the longest sequence,
|
|
; described above.
|
|
|
|
newline = line-feed / carriage-return / carriage-return line-feed
|
|
|
|
; Line terminators form whitespace, along with spaces and horizontal tabs.
|
|
|
|
whitespace = space / horizontal-tab / newline
|
|
|
|
; There are two kinds of comments in Leo, as in other languages.
|
|
; One is block comments of the form '/* ... */',
|
|
; and the other is end-of-line comments of the form '// ...'.
|
|
; The first kind start at '/*' and end at the first '*/',
|
|
; possibly spanning multiple (partial) lines;
|
|
; these do no nest.
|
|
; The second kind start at '//' and extend till the end of the line.
|
|
; The rules about comments given below are similar to
|
|
; the ones used in the Java language reference.
|
|
|
|
comment = block-comment / end-of-line-comment
|
|
|
|
block-comment = "/*" rest-of-block-comment
|
|
|
|
rest-of-block-comment = "*" rest-of-block-comment-after-star
|
|
/ not-star rest-of-block-comment
|
|
|
|
rest-of-block-comment-after-star = "/"
|
|
/ "*" rest-of-block-comment-after-star
|
|
/ not-star-or-slash rest-of-block-comment
|
|
|
|
end-of-line-comment = "//" *not-line-feed-or-carriage-return newline
|
|
|
|
; Below are the keywords in the Leo language.
|
|
; They cannot be used as identifiers.
|
|
|
|
keyword = %s"address"
|
|
/ %s"as"
|
|
/ %s"bool"
|
|
/ %s"circuit"
|
|
/ %s"console"
|
|
/ %s"const"
|
|
/ %s"else"
|
|
/ %s"false"
|
|
/ %s"field"
|
|
/ %s"for"
|
|
/ %s"function"
|
|
/ %s"group"
|
|
/ %s"i8"
|
|
/ %s"i16"
|
|
/ %s"i32"
|
|
/ %s"i64"
|
|
/ %s"i128"
|
|
/ %s"if"
|
|
/ %s"import"
|
|
/ %s"in"
|
|
/ %s"input"
|
|
/ %s"let"
|
|
/ %s"mut"
|
|
/ %s"return"
|
|
/ %s"Self"
|
|
/ %s"self"
|
|
/ %s"static"
|
|
/ %s"string"
|
|
/ %s"true"
|
|
/ %s"u8"
|
|
/ %s"u16"
|
|
/ %s"u32"
|
|
/ %s"u64"
|
|
/ %s"u128"
|
|
|
|
; The following rules define (ASCII) digits
|
|
; and (uppercase and lowercase) letters.
|
|
|
|
digit = %x30-39 ; 0-9
|
|
|
|
uppercase-letter = %x41-5A ; A-Z
|
|
|
|
lowercase-letter = %x61-7A ; a-z
|
|
|
|
letter = uppercase-letter / lowercase-letter
|
|
|
|
; An identifier is a non-empty sequence of letters, digits, and underscores,
|
|
; starting with a letter.
|
|
; It must not be a keyword: this is an extra-grammatical constraint.
|
|
|
|
identifier = letter *( letter / digit / "_" ) ; but not a keyword
|
|
|
|
; A package name consists of one or more segments separated by single dashes,
|
|
; where each segment is a non-empty sequence of lowercase letters and digits.
|
|
|
|
package-name = 1*( lowercase-letter / digit )
|
|
*( "-" 1*( lowercase-letter / digit ) )
|
|
|
|
; A format string is a sequence of characters, other than double quote,
|
|
; surrounded by double quotes.
|
|
; Within a format string, sub-strings '{}' are distinguished as containers
|
|
; (these are the ones that may be matched with values
|
|
; whose textual representation replaces the containers
|
|
; in the printed string).
|
|
; There is an implicit extra-grammatical requirements that
|
|
; the explicit 'format-string-container' instances include
|
|
; all the occurrences of '{}' in the parsed character sequence:
|
|
; that is, there may not be two contiguous 'not-double-quote' instances
|
|
; that are '{' and '}'.
|
|
|
|
format-string-container = "{}"
|
|
|
|
not-double-quote-or-open-brace = %x0-22 / %x24-7A / %x7C-10FFFF
|
|
|
|
not-double-quote-or-close-brace = %x0-22 / %x24-7C / %x7E-10FFFF
|
|
|
|
format-string-element = not-double-quote-or-open-brace
|
|
/ "{" not-double-quote-or-close-brace
|
|
/ format-string-container
|
|
|
|
format-string = double-quote *format-string-element double-quote
|
|
|
|
; Here is (part of this ABNF comment),
|
|
; an alternative way to specify format strings,
|
|
; which captures the extra-grammatical requirement above in the grammar,
|
|
; but is more complicated:
|
|
;
|
|
; not-double-quote-or-open-brace = %x0-22 / %x24-7A / %x7C-10FFFF
|
|
;
|
|
; not-double-quote-or-close-brace = %x0-22 / %x24-7C / %x7E-10FFFF
|
|
;
|
|
; format-string-element = not-double-quote-or-open-brace
|
|
; / "{" not-double-quote-or-close-brace
|
|
; / format-string-container
|
|
;
|
|
; format-string = double-quote *format-string-element double-quote
|
|
;
|
|
; It is not immediately clear which approach is better; there are tradeoffs.
|
|
; We may choose to adopt this one in future revisions of the grammar.
|
|
|
|
; Annotations have names, which are identifiers immediately preceded by '@'.
|
|
|
|
annotation-name = "@" identifier
|
|
|
|
; A natural (number) is a sequence of one or more digits.
|
|
; We allow leading zeros, e.g. '007'.
|
|
|
|
natural = 1*digit
|
|
|
|
; An integer (number) is either a natural or its negation.
|
|
; We allow leading zeros also in negative numbers, e.g. '-007'.
|
|
|
|
integer = [ "-" ] natural
|
|
|
|
; An untyped literal is just an integer.
|
|
|
|
untyped-literal = integer
|
|
|
|
; Unsigned literals are naturals followed by unsigned types.
|
|
|
|
unsigned-literal = natural ( %s"u8" / %s"u16" / %s"u32" / %s"u64" / %s"u128" )
|
|
|
|
; Signed literals are integers followed by signed types.
|
|
|
|
signed-literal = integer ( %s"i8" / %s"i16" / %s"i32" / %s"i64" / %s"i128" )
|
|
|
|
; Field literals are integers followed by the type of field elements.
|
|
|
|
field-literal = integer %s"field"
|
|
|
|
; There are two kinds of group literals.
|
|
; One is a single integer followed by the type of group elements,
|
|
; which denotes the scalar product of the generator point by the integer.
|
|
; The other kind is not a token because it allows some whitespace inside;
|
|
; therefore, it is defined in the syntactic grammar.
|
|
|
|
product-group-literal = integer %s"group"
|
|
|
|
; Boolean literals are the usual two.
|
|
|
|
boolean-literal = %s"true" / %s"false"
|
|
|
|
; An address literal starts with 'aleo1'
|
|
; and continues with exactly 58 lowercase letters and digits.
|
|
; Thus an address always consists of 63 characters.
|
|
|
|
address-literal = %s"aleo1" 58( lowercase-letter / digit )
|
|
|
|
; The ones above are all the atomic literals
|
|
; (in the sense that they are tokens, without whitespace allowed in them),
|
|
; as defined by the following rule.
|
|
|
|
atomic-literal = untyped-literal
|
|
/ unsigned-literal
|
|
/ signed-literal
|
|
/ field-literal
|
|
/ product-group-literal
|
|
/ boolean-literal
|
|
/ address-literal
|
|
|
|
; After defining the (mostly) alphanumeric tokens above,
|
|
; it remains to define tokens for non-alphanumeric symbols such as "+" and "(".
|
|
; Different programming languages used different terminologies for these,
|
|
; e.g. operators, separators, punctuators, etc.
|
|
; Here we use 'symbol', for all of them.
|
|
; We also include a token consisting of
|
|
; a closing parenthesis immediately followed by 'group':
|
|
; as defined in the syntactic grammar,
|
|
; this is the final part of an affine group literal;
|
|
; even though it includes letters,
|
|
; it seems appropriate to still consider it a symbol,
|
|
; particularly since it starts with a proper symbol.
|
|
|
|
; We could give names to all of these symbols,
|
|
; via rules such as
|
|
;
|
|
; equality-operator = "=="
|
|
;
|
|
; and defining 'symbol' in terms of those
|
|
;
|
|
; symbol = ... / equality-operator / ...
|
|
;
|
|
; This may or may not make the grammar more readable,
|
|
; but it would help establish a terminology in the grammar,
|
|
; namely the exact names of some of these token.
|
|
; On the other hand, at least some of them are perhaps simple enough
|
|
; that they could be just described in terms of their symbols,
|
|
; e.g. 'double dot', 'question mark', etc.
|
|
|
|
symbol = "!" / "&&" / "||"
|
|
/ "==" / "!="
|
|
/ "<" / "<=" / ">" / ">="
|
|
/ "+" / "-" / "*" / "/" / "**"
|
|
/ "=" / "+=" / "-=" / "*=" / "/=" / "**="
|
|
/ "(" / ")"
|
|
/ "[" / "]"
|
|
/ "{" / "}"
|
|
/ "," / "." / ".." / "..." / ";" / ":" / "::" / "?"
|
|
/ "->" / "_"
|
|
/ %s")group"
|
|
|
|
; Everything defined above, other than comments and whitespace,
|
|
; is a token, as defined by the following rule.
|
|
|
|
token = keyword
|
|
/ identifier
|
|
/ atomic-literal
|
|
/ package-name
|
|
/ format-string
|
|
/ annotation-name
|
|
/ symbol
|
|
|
|
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
|
|
|
|
; Syntactic Grammar
|
|
; -----------------
|
|
|
|
; The processing defined by the lexical grammar above
|
|
; turns the initial sequence of characters
|
|
; into a sequence of tokens, comments, and whitespaces.
|
|
; The purpose of comments and whitespaces, from a syntactic point of view,
|
|
; is just to separate tokens:
|
|
; they are discarded, leaving a sequence of tokens.
|
|
; The syntactic grammar describes how to turn
|
|
; a sequence of tokens into concrete syntax trees.
|
|
|
|
; There are unsigned and signed integer types, for five sizes.
|
|
|
|
unsigned-type = %s"u8" / %s"u16" / %s"u32" / %s"u64" / %s"u128"
|
|
|
|
signed-type = %s"i8" / %s"i16" / %s"i32" / %s"i64" / %s"i128"
|
|
|
|
integer-type = unsigned-type / signed-type
|
|
|
|
; The integer types, along with the field and group types,
|
|
; for the arithmetic types, i.e. the ones that support arithmetic operations.
|
|
|
|
field-type = %s"field"
|
|
|
|
group-type = %s"group"
|
|
|
|
arithmetic-type = integer-type / field-type / group-type
|
|
|
|
; The arithmetic types, along with the boolean and address types,
|
|
; form the scalar types, i.e. the ones whose values do not contain (sub-)values.
|
|
|
|
boolean-type = %s"bool"
|
|
|
|
address-type = %s"address"
|
|
|
|
scalar-type = boolean-type / arithmetic-type / address-type
|
|
|
|
; Circuit types are denoted by identifiers and the keyword 'Self'.
|
|
; The latter is only allowed inside a circuit definition,
|
|
; to denote the circuit being defined.
|
|
|
|
self-type = %s"Self"
|
|
|
|
circuit-type = identifier / self-type
|
|
|
|
; A tuple type consists of zero, two, or more component types.
|
|
|
|
tuple-type = "(" [ type 1*( "," type ) ] ")"
|
|
|
|
; An array type consists of an element type
|
|
; and an indication of dimensions.
|
|
; There is either a single dimension,
|
|
; or a tuple of one or more dimensions.
|
|
|
|
array-type = "[" type ";" array-dimensions "]"
|
|
|
|
array-dimensions = natural
|
|
/ "(" natural *( "," natural ) ")"
|
|
|
|
; Circuit, tuple, and array types form the aggregate types,
|
|
; i.e. types whose values contain (sub-)values
|
|
; (with the corner-case exception of the empty tuple value).
|
|
|
|
aggregate-type = tuple-type / array-type / circuit-type
|
|
|
|
; Scalar and aggregate types form all the types.
|
|
|
|
type = scalar-type / aggregate-type
|
|
|
|
; The lexical grammar given earlier defines product group literals.
|
|
; The other kind of group literal is a pair of integer coordinates,
|
|
; which are reduced modulo the prime to identify a point,
|
|
; which must be on the elliptic curve.
|
|
; It is also allowed to omit one coordinate (not both),
|
|
; with an indication of how to fill in the missing coordinate
|
|
; (i.e. sign high, sign low, or inferred).
|
|
; This is an affine group literal,
|
|
; because it consists of affine point coordinates.
|
|
|
|
group-coordinate = integer / "+" / "-" / "_"
|
|
|
|
affine-group-literal = "(" group-coordinate "," group-coordinate %s")group"
|
|
|
|
; A literal is either an atomic one or an affine group literal.
|
|
|
|
literal = atomic-literal / affine-group-literal
|
|
|
|
; The following rule is not directly referenced in the rules for expressions
|
|
; (which reference 'literal' instead),
|
|
; but it is useful to establish terminology:
|
|
; a group literal is either a product group literal or an affine group literal.
|
|
|
|
group-literal = product-group-literal / affine-group-literal
|
|
|
|
; As often done in grammatical language syntax specifications,
|
|
; we define rules for different kinds of expressions,
|
|
; which also defines the relative precedence
|
|
; of operators and other expression constructs,
|
|
; and the (left or right) associativity of binary operators.
|
|
|
|
; The primary expressions are self-contained in a way,
|
|
; i.e. they have clear deliminations:
|
|
; Some consist of single tokens,
|
|
; while others have explicit endings.
|
|
; Primary expressions also include parenthesized expressions,
|
|
; i.e. any expression may be turned into a primary one
|
|
; by putting parentheses around it.
|
|
|
|
primary-expression = identifier
|
|
/ %s"self"
|
|
/ %s"input"
|
|
/ literal
|
|
/ "(" expression ")"
|
|
/ tuple-expression
|
|
/ array-expression
|
|
/ circuit-expression
|
|
|
|
; Tuple expressions construct tuples.
|
|
; Each consists of zero, two, or more component expressions.
|
|
|
|
tuple-construction = "(" [ expression 1*( "," expression ) ] ")"
|
|
|
|
tuple-expression = tuple-construction
|
|
|
|
; Array expressions construct arrays.
|
|
; There are two kinds:
|
|
; one lists the element expressions (at least one),
|
|
; including spreads (via '...') which are arrays being spliced in;
|
|
; the other repeats (the value of) a single expression
|
|
; across one or more dimensions.
|
|
|
|
array-inline-construction = "["
|
|
array-inline-element
|
|
*( "," array-inline-element )
|
|
"]"
|
|
|
|
array-inline-element = expression / "..." expression
|
|
|
|
array-repeat-construction = "[" expression ";" array-dimensions "]"
|
|
|
|
array-construction = array-inline-construction / array-repeat-construction
|
|
|
|
array-expression = array-construction
|
|
|
|
; Circuit expressions construct circuit values.
|
|
; Each lists values for all the member variables (in any order);
|
|
; there must be at least one member variable.
|
|
; A single identifier abbreviates
|
|
; a pair consisting of the same identifier separated by colon;
|
|
; note that, in the expansion, the left one denotes a member name,
|
|
; while the right one denotes an expression (a variable),
|
|
; so they are syntactically identical but semantically different.
|
|
|
|
circuit-construction = circuit-type "{"
|
|
circuit-inline-element *( "," circuit-inline-element ) [ "," ]
|
|
"}"
|
|
|
|
circuit-inline-element = identifier ":" expression / identifier
|
|
|
|
circuit-expression = circuit-construction
|
|
|
|
; After primary expressions, postfix expressions have highest precedence.
|
|
; They apply to primary expressions, and recursively to postfix expressions.
|
|
|
|
; There are postfix expressions to access parts of aggregate values.
|
|
; A tuple access selects a component by index (zero-based).
|
|
; There are two kinds of array accesses:
|
|
; one selects a single element by index (zero-based);
|
|
; the other selects a range via two indices,
|
|
; the first inclusive and the second exclusive --
|
|
; both are optional,
|
|
; the first defaulting to 0 and the second to the array length.
|
|
; A circuit access selects a member variable by name.
|
|
|
|
; Function calls are also postfix expressions.
|
|
; There are three kinds of function calls:
|
|
; top-level function calls,
|
|
; instance (i.e. non-static) member function calls, and
|
|
; static member function calls.
|
|
; What changes is the start, but they all end in an argument list.
|
|
|
|
function-arguments = "(" [ expression *( "," expression ) ] ")"
|
|
|
|
postfix-expression = primary-expression
|
|
/ postfix-expression "." natural
|
|
/ postfix-expression "." identifier
|
|
/ identifier function-arguments
|
|
/ postfix-expression "." identifier function-arguments
|
|
/ circuit-type "::" identifier function-arguments
|
|
/ postfix-expression "[" expression "]"
|
|
/ postfix-expression "[" [expression] ".." [expression] "]"
|
|
|
|
; Unary operators have the highest operator precedence.
|
|
; They apply to postfix expressions,
|
|
; and recursively to unary expressions.
|
|
|
|
unary-expression = postfix-expression
|
|
/ "!" unary-expression
|
|
/ "-" unary-expression
|
|
|
|
; Next in the operator precedence is exponentiation,
|
|
; following mathematical practice.
|
|
; The current rule below makes exponentiation left-associative,
|
|
; i.e. 'a ** b ** c' must be parsed as '(a ** b) ** c'.
|
|
|
|
exponential-expression = unary-expression
|
|
/ unary-expression "**" exponential-expression
|
|
|
|
; Next in precedence come multiplication and division, both left-associative.
|
|
|
|
multiplicative-expression = exponential-expression
|
|
/ multiplicative-expression "*" exponential-expression
|
|
/ multiplicative-expression "/" exponential-expression
|
|
|
|
; Then there are addition and subtraction, both left-assocative.
|
|
|
|
additive-expression = multiplicative-expression
|
|
/ additive-expression "+" multiplicative-expression
|
|
/ additive-expression "-" multiplicative-expression
|
|
|
|
; Next in the precedence order are ordering relations.
|
|
; These are not associative, because they return boolean values.
|
|
|
|
ordering-expression = additive-expression
|
|
/ additive-expression "<" additive-expression
|
|
/ additive-expression ">" additive-expression
|
|
/ additive-expression "<=" additive-expression
|
|
/ additive-expression ">=" additive-expression
|
|
|
|
; Equalities return booleans but may also operate on booleans;
|
|
; the rule below makes them left-associative.
|
|
|
|
equality-expression = ordering-expression
|
|
/ equality-expression "==" ordering-expression
|
|
/ equality-expression "!=" ordering-expression
|
|
|
|
; Next come conjunctive expressions, left-associative.
|
|
|
|
conjunctive-expression = equality-expression
|
|
/ conjunctive-expression "&&" equality-expression
|
|
|
|
; Next come disjunctive expressions, left-associative.
|
|
|
|
disjunctive-expression = conjunctive-expression
|
|
/ disjunctive-expression "||" conjunctive-expression
|
|
|
|
; Finally we have conditional expressions.
|
|
|
|
conditional-expression = disjunctive-expression
|
|
/ conditional-expression
|
|
"?" expression
|
|
":" conditional-expression
|
|
|
|
; Those above are all the expressions.
|
|
; Recall that conditional expressions
|
|
; may be disjunctive expressions,
|
|
; which may be conjunctive expressions,
|
|
; and so on all the way to primary expressions.
|
|
|
|
expression = conditional-expression
|
|
|
|
; There are various kinds of statements, including blocks.
|
|
; Blocks are possibly empty sequences of statements surrounded by curly braces.
|
|
|
|
statement = expression-statement
|
|
/ return-statement
|
|
/ variable-definition-statement
|
|
/ conditional-statement
|
|
/ loop-statement
|
|
/ assignment-statement
|
|
/ console-statement
|
|
/ block
|
|
|
|
block = "{" *statement "}"
|
|
|
|
; An expression (that must return the empty tuple, as semantically required)
|
|
; can be turned into a statement by appending a semicolon.
|
|
|
|
expression-statement = expression ";"
|
|
|
|
; A return statement always takes an expression,
|
|
; and does not end with a semicolon.
|
|
|
|
return-statement = %s"return" expression ";"
|
|
|
|
; There are two kinds of variable definition statements,
|
|
; which only differ in the starting keyword.
|
|
; The variables are either a single one or a tuple of two or more;
|
|
; in all cases, there is just one optional type
|
|
; and just one initializing expression.
|
|
|
|
variable-definition-statement = ( %s"let" / %s"const" )
|
|
identifier-or-identifiers
|
|
[ ":" type ] "=" expression ";"
|
|
|
|
identifier-or-identifiers = identifier
|
|
/ "(" identifier 1*( "," identifier ) ")"
|
|
|
|
; A conditional statement always starts with a condition and a block
|
|
; (which together form a branch).
|
|
; It may stop there, or it may continue with an alternative block,
|
|
; or possibly with another conditional statement, forming a chain.
|
|
; Note that blocks are required in all branches, not merely statements.
|
|
|
|
branch = %s"if" expression block
|
|
|
|
conditional-statement = branch
|
|
/ branch %s"else" block
|
|
/ branch %s"else" conditional-statement
|
|
|
|
; A loop statement implicitly defines a loop variable
|
|
; that goes from a starting value (inclusive) to an ending value (exclusive).
|
|
; The body is a block.
|
|
|
|
loop-statement = %s"for" identifier %s"in" expression ".." expression block
|
|
|
|
; An assignment statement is straightforward.
|
|
; Based on the operator, the assignment may be simple (i.e. '=')
|
|
; or compound (i.e. combining assignment with an arithmetic operation).
|
|
|
|
assignment-operator = "=" / "+=" / "-=" / "*=" / "/=" / "**="
|
|
|
|
assignment-statement = expression assignment-operator expression ";"
|
|
|
|
; Console statements start with the 'console' keyword,
|
|
; followed by a console function call.
|
|
; The call may be an assertion or a print command.
|
|
; The former takes an expression (which must be boolean) as argument.
|
|
; The latter takes either no argument,
|
|
; or a format string followed by expressions,
|
|
; whose number must match the number of containers '{}' in the format string.
|
|
; Note that the console function names are identifiers, not keywords.
|
|
; There are three kinds of print commands.
|
|
|
|
console-statement = %s"console" "." console-call
|
|
|
|
console-call = assert-call
|
|
/ print-call
|
|
|
|
assert-call = %s"assert" "(" expression ")"
|
|
|
|
print-function = %s"debug" / %s"error" / %s"log"
|
|
|
|
print-arguments = "(" [ format-string *( "," expression ) ] ")"
|
|
|
|
print-call = print-function print-arguments
|
|
|
|
; An annotation consists of an annotation name (which starts with '@')
|
|
; with optional annotation arguments, which are identifiers.
|
|
; Note that no parentheses are used if there are no arguments.
|
|
|
|
annotation = annotation-name
|
|
[ "(" identifier *( "," identifier ) ")" ]
|
|
|
|
; A function declaration defines a function.
|
|
; The output type is optional, defaulting to the empty tuple type.
|
|
; In general, a function input consists of an identifier and a type,
|
|
; with an optional 'const' modifier.
|
|
; Additionally, functions inside circuits
|
|
; may start with a 'mut self' or 'const self' or 'self' parameter.
|
|
; Furthermore, any function may end with an 'input' parameter.
|
|
|
|
function-declaration = *annotation %s"function" identifier
|
|
"(" [ function-parameters ] ")" [ "->" type ]
|
|
block
|
|
|
|
function-parameters = self-parameter
|
|
/ self-parameter "," function-inputs
|
|
/ function-inputs
|
|
|
|
self-parameter = [ %s"mut" / %s"const" ] %s"self"
|
|
|
|
function-inputs = function-input *( "," function-input )
|
|
|
|
function-input = [ %s"const" ] identifier ":" type
|
|
|
|
input-parameter = %s"input"
|
|
|
|
; A circuit member variable declaration consists of an identifier and a type.
|
|
; A circuit member function declaration consists of a function declaration.
|
|
|
|
member-declaration = member-variable-declaration
|
|
/ member-function-declaration
|
|
|
|
member-variable-declaration = identifier ":" type
|
|
|
|
member-function-declaration = function-declaration
|
|
|
|
; A circuit declaration defines a circuit type,
|
|
; as consisting of member variables and functions.
|
|
|
|
circuit-declaration = *annotation %s"circuit" identifier
|
|
"{" member-declaration *( "," member-declaration ) "}"
|
|
|
|
; An import declaration consists of the 'import' keyword
|
|
; followed by a package path, which may be one of the following:
|
|
; a single wildcard;
|
|
; an identifier, optionally followed by a local renamer;
|
|
; a package name followed by a path, recursively;
|
|
; or a parenthesized list of package paths,
|
|
; which are "fan out" of the initial path.
|
|
; Note that we allow the last element of the parenthesized list
|
|
; to be followed by a comma, for convenience.
|
|
|
|
import-declaration = %s"import" package-path
|
|
|
|
package-path = "*"
|
|
/ identifier [ %s"as" identifier ]
|
|
/ package-name "." package-path
|
|
/ "(" package-path *( "," package-path ) [","] ")"
|
|
|
|
; Finally, we define a file as a sequence of zero or more declarations.
|
|
|
|
declaration = import-declaration
|
|
/ function-declaration
|
|
/ circuit-declaration
|
|
|
|
file = *declaration
|
|
|
|
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
|
|
|
|
; Format Note
|
|
; -----------
|
|
|
|
; The ABNF standard requires grammars to consist of lines terminated by CR LF
|
|
; (i.e. carriage return followed by line feed, DOS/Windows-style),
|
|
; as explained in the background on ABNF earlier in this file.
|
|
; This file's lines are therefore terminated by CR LF.
|
|
; To avoid losing this requirement across systems,
|
|
; this file is marked as 'text eol=crlf' in .gitattributes:
|
|
; this means that the file is textual, enabling visual diffs,
|
|
; but its lines will always be terminated by CR LF on any system.
|
|
|
|
; Note that this CR LF requirement only applies to the grammar files themselves.
|
|
; It does not apply to the lines of the languages described by the grammar.
|
|
; ABNF grammars may describe any kind of languages,
|
|
; with any kind of line terminators,
|
|
; or even without line terminators at all (e.g. for "binary" languages).
|