closes#10060
- Implemented scheduling for posts and pages
- Added cache invalidation when scheduling
- Refactored admin token eneration function to accept existing key as parameter in tests
- Added Ghost Scheduler Integration fixture
- Added fixture for permissions for post publish action
- Migrated getScheduled method to v2
- Did not add support for 'from' and 'to' parameters as they were not used by DefaultScheduler
- This method needs rethinking in a long run as it's an ugly hack and should rather become proper endpoint that returns JSON data instead of models
- Removed unused auth middleware from v2 routes
- Added internal scheduler role
- Implemetnted transactions in v2 frame
- This takes into account scenario mentioned in c93f03b87e
- Specifically:
>if two queries happening in a transaction we have to signalise
knex/mysql that we select for an update
otherwise the following case happens:
you fetch posts for an update
a user requests comes in and updates the post (e.g. sets title to "X")
you update the fetched posts, title would get overriden to the old one
* Simplified db controller permissions options
The existing objects were confusing because they did the same thing as
setting permissions to true, but gave the impressions that something
special was happening/required.
* Added DB Backup Integration Role
This will allow us to assign certain api_keys this role, in order to
automate db backups
* Allowed admin api_keys to have configurable roles
This will allow keys for the admin api to do customised things such as db export
* Added ghost-backup integration to fixtures
* Added migrations for DB Backup Integration and role
no issue
- Forced a filter on read and browse requests to the integrations endpoint to limit fetches to only "custom" and "builtin" integration types
- Expanded test coverage for "internal" integrations
no issue
- Initial commit that broke the build: 20cce5da37
- There is no enforced ordering for integrations and because of combined differences how MySQL/SQLite orders by default in combination with how created_at/updated_at dates are generated for fixtures in tests and for migrations there is no reliable way to check order
no issue
- The basic test coverate for 'browse' endpoint for integrations was missing.
- It case is needed to be able to expand it in https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/pull/10501
refs #10921
- New SEO related fields will now be available as a part of Admin API /settings endpoint
- The ordering of fields is taken from post's schema
- Extended settings test suite with new SEO fields
- Adjusted settings model unit test
no issue
- Updated Test & linting packages
- Updated use of hasOwnProperty
- Using Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty instead (ref. eslint.org/docs/rules/no-prototype-builtins)
- Removed already defined built-in global variable Intl
- Applied `--fix` with lint command on `core/test` folder
- The rules were broken because some of them were made stricter for `eslint: recommended` ruleset (ref. https://eslint.org/docs/user-guide/migrating-to-6.0.0#eslint-recommended-changes)
- Removed redundant global variable declarations to pass linting
refs #10656
- To make sure more users see important updates or announcements
notification dismissal now works per user instead of globally
- Expanded acceptance test for notification deletion
- Expanded regression test covering multiuser dismissal of notification
- Added clarifying comment about destroyAll method use in API
no-issue
This is so that someone with empty defaults for installed_apps and
active_apps, or someone without the defaults at all, will not see the
warning message when importing.
no issue
- the `{active,installed}_apps` settings related to a very old, minimally implemented, unreleased, and problematic approach to custom apps
- this is the first step towards full removal of the old "apps" concept
Credits: Kacper Szurek
no issue
- Admin API v2 returned /404/, see comment in code base:
/**
* CASE: admin api should serve preview urls
*
* @NOTE
* The url service has no clue of the draft/scheduled concept. It only generates urls for published resources.
* Adding a hardcoded fallback into the url service feels wrong IMO.
*
* Imagine the site won't be part of core and core does not serve urls anymore.
* Core needs to offer a preview API, which returns draft posts.
* That means the url is no longer /p/:uuid, it's e.g. GET /api/v2/content/preview/:uuid/.
* /p/ is a concept of the site, not of core.
*
* The site is not aware of existing drafts. It won't be able to get the uuid.
*
* Needs further discussion.
*/
no issue
- Reported here: https://forum.ghost.org/t/in-version-2-16-3-found-bug/6065/3
---
Admin Client sends false or true booleans for `is_private` key.
The settings table has two columns "key" and "value". And "value" is always type TEXT.
If you pass value=false, the db will transform this value into "0".
`settingsCache.get('is_private')` is then always true, even though the value is meant to be false.
We should add a migration in v3 and normalize all setting values to ensure consistent database values. Furthermore, we should improve the handling around settings values in general.
For now, we protect parsing values from DB, which we anyway need to transform the values into the correct data type, because we always save strings. This will protect values being stored as "false" or "1" or whatever.
closes#10518
- we had a very generic logic to remove "unwanted" null values
- copied from v0.1
- originally added in 7d4107fec4
- this logic transformed: settings = [{key: 'key', value: null}] to [{key: 'key'}], which is wrong
- i've removed this generic logic completely, because i don't know which purpose it serves
- if there a specific case where we want to remove null values, we should either use the JSON schema or use a specific serializer for the target resource
- added tests to proof that settings API behaves as it should
- one test failed because we removed the isNull logic -> if you send published_at = null on a published post
- the model layer has a piece of logic to force a date if you set published_at to null if the status is published
- protected
* Required kid be a header claim as according to spec
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7515#section-4.1.4 (JWT is an extension of JWS)
* Updated error message for missing kid
* Fixed admin-api key unit tests
* Fixed regression and acceptance tests
refs #10438
- "null" means the resource does not exist (it was sett to "null"), which is not true
- we won't serve primary_tag and primary_author by default
- TODO: add the same change to the Content API v2 (raise issue)
refs #10438
- To make response structure future proof and conform to the rest of API responses /images* now returns an object with url property instead of plain url string
refs #10438, refs #10106
* Renamed existing pages ctrl
* Splitted posts & pages for Admin API v2
* Added pages JSON input schema for Admin API v2
* Removed single author for Content & Admin API v2
- single author is not documented
- single author usage is deprecated in v0.1
- single author usage is removed in API v2
* Splitted posts & postsPublic controller for v2
* Removed requirement to send `status=all` from Admin API v2
* Removed `status` option from pages Content API v2
* Removed `status` options from Users Admin API v2
refs #10438
- the `updated_at` functions as version control value
- it is required for collision detection
- we might redesign this feature at some point
refs #10438
- these fields are not used
- no need to expose them in v2
- we will either remove them in the next major or use them for new features (will see)
no issue
- the model & api layer suffered from missing fields when creating resources
- usually there is only a handful of fields which are required to insert a resource
- the other fields are nullable and/or get defaults assigned
- the API only returned the configured default fields and the fields you have sent to the API
- this resulted in a response with missing fields
- if you have listend on "created" event, the same happend
- you received a model with missing fields
- we now set the undefined fields to null on purpose to ensure a full model for both cases
@NOTE:
There is no endpoint to serve webhooks (not for v0.1, not for v2).
Exposing the secret is required if an integration fetches it's api keys and it's webhooks.
The secret is currently un-used and not implemented.
refs #10438
- integrations != users
- Ghost's assumption is: if you create a post, the primary author becomes the logged in user
- we have to require authors for integrations
- short fix and needs some more thoughts later
