Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
kirrg001
865366c7c8 Ensured consistency for event handlers in the model layer
no issue

- the event chain works like this:
  - if a model registers an event, it get's triggered, because it's stronger than the base model
- but you have to call the base model to agree on a contract, because base model implements generic logic in event handlers
- this was inconsistently used
2019-02-07 11:02:35 +01:00
Rishabh Garg
c638863cb9 Updated webhooks schema and add relation (#10018)
* Extended webhooks schema/model and connected with integrations

refs #9942

- Updated webhooks schema with new columns - name, integration_id, secret, last_triggered_at, api_version
- Updated webhooks and integration model to map relationships
- Updated schema hash
- Updated test utils to exclude new webhooks columns for response comparison

* Added migration script for new webhooks columns

refs #9942

- Added migration script in 2.3 to add new columns to webhooks

* Updated schema hash

* Updated maxLength for api_version in schema

* Removed concurrency value from migration script

* Added defaults for webhooks model

* Added status field to webhooks for last trigger status

* Updated schema hash

* Fixed tests with status field

* Removed concurrency value in migration script

* Cleanup

* Updated schema with new fields

 - last_triggered_status, last_triggered_error
2018-10-17 18:17:13 +07:00
kirrg001
5f5f0021db 🔥 Drop Node v4 Support
no issue

- support ends today
- see https://github.com/nodejs/Release
- removed `use strict`
2018-05-01 14:06:18 +02:00
Katharina Irrgang
fb79f24316
Fixed model events and transactions (#9524)
no issue

- if multiple queries run in a transaction, the model events are triggered before the txn finished
- if the txn rolls back, the events are anyway emitted
- the events are triggered too early
- solution:
  - `emitChange` needs to detect that a transaction is happening
  - it listens on a txn event to determine if events should be triggered
2018-04-06 18:19:45 +02:00
Katharina Irrgang
c6a95c6478
Sorted out the mixed usages of include and withRelated (#9425)
no issue

- this commit cleans up the usages of `include` and `withRelated`.

### API layer (`include`)
- as request parameter e.g. `?include=roles,tags`
- as theme API parameter e.g. `{{get .... include="author"}}`
- as internal API access e.g. `api.posts.browse({include: 'author,tags'})`
- the `include` notation is more readable than `withRelated`
- and it allows us to use a different easier format (comma separated list)
- the API utility transforms these more readable properties into model style (or into Ghost style)

### Model access (`withRelated`)
- e.g. `models.Post.findPage({withRelated: ['tags']})`
- driven by bookshelf

---

Commits explained.

* Reorder the usage of `convertOptions`

- 1. validation
- 2. options convertion
- 3. permissions
- the reason is simple, the permission layer access the model layer
  - we have to prepare the options before talking to the model layer
- added `convertOptions` where it was missed (not required, but for consistency reasons)

* Use `withRelated` when accessing the model layer and use `include` when accessing the API layer

* Change `convertOptions` API utiliy

- API Usage
  - ghost.api(..., {include: 'tags,authors'})
  - `include` should only be used when calling the API (either via request or via manual usage)
  - `include` is only for readability and easier format
- Ghost (Model Layer Usage)
  - models.Post.findOne(..., {withRelated: ['tags', 'authors']})
  - should only use `withRelated`
  - model layer cannot read 'tags,authors`
  - model layer has no idea what `include` means, speaks a different language
  - `withRelated` is bookshelf
  - internal usage

* include-count plugin: use `withRelated` instead of `include`

- imagine you outsource this plugin to git and publish it to npm
- `include` is an unknown option in bookshelf

* Updated `permittedOptions` in base model

- `include` is no longer a known option

* Remove all occurances of `include` in the model layer

* Extend `filterOptions` base function

- this function should be called as first action
- we clone the unfiltered options
- check if you are using `include` (this is a protection which could help us in the beginning)
- check for permitted and (later on default `withRelated`) options
- the usage is coming in next commit

* Ensure we call `filterOptions` as first action

- use `ghostBookshelf.Model.filterOptions` as first action
- consistent naming pattern for incoming options: `unfilteredOptions`
- re-added allowed options for `toJSON`
- one unsolved architecture problem:
  - if you override a function e.g. `edit`
  - then you should call `filterOptions` as first action
  - the base implementation of e.g. `edit` will call it again
  - future improvement

* Removed `findOne` from Invite model

- no longer needed, the base implementation is the same
2018-02-15 10:53:53 +01:00
kirrg001
6f6c8f4521 Import lib/common only
refs #9178

- avoid importing 4 modules (logging, errors, events and i18n)
- simply require common in each file
2017-12-12 10:28:13 +01:00
kirrg001
ac2578b419 Moved errors,logging,i18n and events to lib/common
refs #9178
2017-12-12 10:28:13 +01:00
Kevin Ansfield
bffb3dbd90
Webhooks support for subscriber events (#9230)
no issue

Support for http://resthooks.org style webhooks that can be used with Zapier triggers. This can currently be used in two ways:

a) adding a webhook record to the DB manually
b) using the API with password auth and POSTing to /webhooks/ (this is private API so not documented)

⚠️ only _https_ URLs are supported in the webhook `target_url` field 🚨

- add `webhooks` table to store event names and target urls
- add `POST` and `DELETE` endpoints for `/webhooks/`
- configure `subscribers.added` and `subscribers.deleted` events to trigger registered webhooks
2017-11-21 15:43:14 +00:00