fixes https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/481
This change fixes an issue when multiple images with the same name are
uploaded in parallel. The current system does not guarantee that the
original filename is stored under NAME+`_o`, because the upload for the
original file and the resized file are happening in parallel.
Solution:
- Wait for the storage of the resized image (= the image without the _o
suffix) before storing the original file.
- When that is stored, use the generated file name of the stored image
to generate the filename with the _o suffix. This way, it will always
match and we don't risk both files to have a different number suffix.
We'll also set the `targetDir` argument when saving the file, to avoid
storing the original file in a different directory (when uploading a
file around midnight both files could be stored in 2023/01 and 2023/02).
Some extra optimisations needed with this fix:
- Previously when uploading image.jpg, while it already exists, it would
store two filenames on e.g., `image-3.jpg` and `image_o-3.jpg`. Note the
weird positioning of `_o`. This probably caused bugs when uploading
files named `image-3.jpg`, which would store the original in
`image-3_o.jpg`, but this original would never be used by the
handle-image-sizes middleware (it would look for `image_o-3.jpg`). This
fix would solve this weird naming issue, and make it more consistent.
But we need to make sure our middlewares (including handle-image-sizes)
will be able to handle both file locations to remain compatible with the
old format. This isn't additional work, because it would fix the old bug
too.
- Prevent uploading files that end with `_o`, e.g. by automatically
stripping that suffix from uploaded files. To prevent collisions.
Advantage(s):
- We keep the original file name, which is better for SEO.
- No changes required to the storage adapters.
Downside(s):
- The storage of both files will nog happen parallel any longer. But I
expect the performance implications to be minimal.
- Changes to the routing: normalize middleware is removed
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/503
- The Dynamic URL service no longer generates "url.added" event when only a partial resource update happened - only non-url forming properties were modified. The sitemaps service still needs to know when to update the lastmod ("Last Modified") field associated with specific URL.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/501
- this reverts commit 48dda23554
- also includes a resolution for `@elastic/elasticsearch` so we don't
run a version that is potentially problematic - see referenced issue
for context
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/2416
This extends the mock API to use a more formal pattern of moving our
entity code into a separate package, and use the service/repository
patterns we've been work toward.
The repository is currently in memory, this allows us to start using
the API without having to make commitments to the database structure.
We've also injected a single fake webmention for testing. I'd expect
the Mention object to change a lot from this initial definition as we
gain more information about the type of data we expect to see.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/499
refs 6bcc47a0ad
- Using module directly caused issues with snapshots manager instance initialization (mocha hooks did not apply to a correct instance)
- See refed commit for more
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/499
- Outgoing emails have been a weak point of Ghost's stability recently. The concept of "emailMockReceiver" similarly to "webhookMockReceiver", allows to test side-effects like outgoing emails.
- This is a first iteration which should lay groundwork for testing all outgoing emails in the future
- The change adds a new concept of "email mock receiver" which is very similar to how the "webhook mock receiver" works. The email mock receiver exposes two methods to record and verify snapshots:
- matchHTMLSnapshot - records and verifies only the HTML content of the outgoint email
- matchMetadataSnapshot - records and verifies all the non-HTML properties sent along an email content, e.g.: to address, plaintext, subject, etc.
- What's missing is matching content based on dynamic content like dates, links with JWT tokens, etc.
