closes#10773
- The refactoring is a substitute for `urlService.utils` used previously throughout the codebase and now extracted into the separate module in Ghost-SDK
- Added url-utils stubbing utility for test suites
- Some tests had to be refactored to avoid double mocks (when url's are being reset inside of rested 'describe' groups)
closes#10709
- Only transform a canonical URL that is identical with the Blog URL to a relative URL when the protocol matches as well
- Leave the canonical URL absolute for all other cases
- Use case for this is e. g. when users want to port over their Facebook comments/shares/likes after a move from `http` to `https`
closes#10518
- we had a very generic logic to remove "unwanted" null values
- copied from v0.1
- originally added in 7d4107fec4
- this logic transformed: settings = [{key: 'key', value: null}] to [{key: 'key'}], which is wrong
- i've removed this generic logic completely, because i don't know which purpose it serves
- if there a specific case where we want to remove null values, we should either use the JSON schema or use a specific serializer for the target resource
- added tests to proof that settings API behaves as it should
- one test failed because we removed the isNull logic -> if you send published_at = null on a published post
- the model layer has a piece of logic to force a date if you set published_at to null if the status is published
- protected
refs #9389
- https://github.com/sinonjs/sinon/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
Breaking changes for Ghost:
- no need to create a sandbox anymore, each file get's it's own sandbox
- just require sinon and use this sandbox
- you can still create separate sandboxes with .createSandbox
- reset single stubs: use .resetHistory instead of .reset
This is a global replace for any sandbox creation.
---
From https://sinonjs.org/releases/v7.2.3/sandbox/
> Default sandbox
> Since sinon@5.0.0, the sinon object is a default sandbox. Unless you have a very advanced setup or need a special configuration, you probably want to just use that one.
refs #9326, refs #9866
**ATTENTION: This is the first iteration. Bugs are expected.**
Main Goals:
- add support for multiple API versions.
- do not touch v0.1 implementation
- do not break v0.1
## Problems with the existing v0.1 implementation
1. It tried to be generic and helpful, but it was a mixture of generic and explicit logic living in basically two files: utils.js and index.js.
2. Supporting multiple api versions means, you want to have as less as possible code per API version. With v0.1 it is impossible to reduce the API controller implementation.
----
This commit adds three things:
1. The tiny framework with well-defined API stages.
2. An example implementation of serving static pages via /pages for the content v2 API.
3. Unit tests to prove that the API framework works in general.
## API Stages
- validation
- input serialization
- permissions
- query
- output serialization
Each request should go through these stages. It is possible to disable stages, but it's not recommended.
The code for each stage will either live in a shared folder or in the API version itself. It depends how API specific the validation or serialization is. Depends on the use case.
We should add a specific API validator or serializer if the use case is API format specific.
We should put everything else to shared.
The goal is to add as much as possible into the shared API layer to reduce the logic per API version.
---
Serializers and validators can be added:
- for each request
- for specific controllers
- for specific actions
---
There is room for improvements/extensions:
1. Remove http header configuration from the API controller, because the API controller should not know about http - decouple.
2. Put permissions helpers into shared. I've just extracted and capsulated the permissions helpers into a single file for now. It had no priority. The focus was on the framework itself.
etc.
---
You can find more information about it in the API README.md (api/README.md)
- e.g. find more information about the structure
- e.g. example controllers
The docs are not perfect. We will improve the docs in the next two weeks.
---
Upcoming tasks:
- prepare test env to test multiple API versions
- copy over the controllers from v0.1 to v2
- adapt the v2 express app to use the v2 controllers
