refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/694
- Additional try/catch block needed in async/await implementation increased method complexity and broke the complexity linting rule. This is a dirty way to fix the warning. Ideally the implementation should stay with async/await syntax and instead move the custom error handling logic into some different layer. For example we could introduce a separate "stage" in the API framework's "pipeline" where we'd catch and handle in a generic way all of the "unique" types of errors. It would make sense to have a generic handler because this same code happens in labels, member and few more places.
refs baccbb4942
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/694
- The change is here to remove yet another ESLint method complexity error
- The custom error handling complexity was introduced here in a referenced commit without an obvious reason. The specifics of how the "sendTestEmail" method handles errors should not leak out from the method, if there are errors in the response they should be handled internally and the method would uniformly reject with a single error.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/694
- The code complexity in the email preview's read controller method was breaking the complexity rule in ESLint. To reduce the complexity extracted common parts into mega service
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/694
- async/await has been a standard way to handle async code throughout the codebase. Refactoring it before moving code makes it way easier to reason about similarities between multiple controllers
no issue
- Logic with slightly more complex structure belongs to the service. Extracting it there also show's how little of an API the oembed service should actually expose
- Unquestionably, at some point we need to rework the API code so that we have less stuff everywhere
- However, the max-lines index.js rule exists as a proxy to find index.js files which are not exposing Public API, but rather contain logic
- These 6 cases are all valid index.js files as the expose the Public API of the module
- Therefore, I've added an override and an override notice explaining.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/949
- Initializing PostsService with almost identical parameters is burdensome, having a single factory method in create instances is far more maintainable
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/949
- The post model handling related to newsletter sending and email recipient filter logic were duplicating across v3/v4(canary) APIs and it made sense to extract it into a posts service.
- This will allow for a central place to handle about to land logic for email_only newsletter handling.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/949
- The code is exactly the same in six (!) places. It's beyond unmaintainable to add another line to any of these place, which will be needed for `email_only` handling.
- The newly created posts service is a temporary, slightly better solution that complies with codebase's best practice of extracting new services using class with DI pattern
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/949
refs e64274bb45
- This refactor is needed to bring the code in line with the rest of pages API controllers
- Next step will extract shared code patterns into a separate module
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/912
- Exposing a single method out of the service makes the API surface smaller - more readable.
- Additionlally having a wrapping method in service will be helpful for other triggers that are going to be executed in later iterations
no issue
- i18n is deprecated in favour of `tpl`
- normalized method syntax so `add` matches the rest of the controller's methods (fixed a complexity warning but was not the primary intention)
- This is a precursor to trying to split apart into:
- model events + webhooks system which makes sense
- frontend events which should be independent or removed
- maybe some concept of a settings manager that we can use in various places to bind logic 🤔
- other usages of events that should be refactored to not use events
refs: https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/831
- This ultimately fixes the index.js file
- It also makes it super clear what methods in the themeService are used by the API, and which are part of the service loading logic
- It also moves the activate and init function into a single file in a way that highlights they are very similar
- They are also very similar to what happens in storage.setFromZip but that code is mixed up with storage code at the moment
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/849
As part of work for segmented post access with multiple products, the custom filter for post access is stored in `visibility` field on posts but passed with `visibility_filter` property on API. This change -
- updates input serializer of posts to transform `visibility` and `visibility_filter` properties correctly
- updates output serializer for canary to transform and send `visibility_filter` attribute with filter value
- updates output serializer for v3 to ignore any custom filter on visibility and return `paid` instead as v3 didn't have a concept of custom filter
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/849
Custom post visibility (behind alpha flag) is added to the API using new `visibility_filter` attribute that stores the custom filter. This change -
- updates validator for visibility to check new `visibility_filter` property
- cleans usage of i18n in favor of tpl
- This is part of the quest to separate the frontend and server & get rid of all the places where there are cross-requires
- At the moment the settings cache is one big shared cache used by the frontend and server liberally
- This change doesn't really solve the fundamental problems, as we still depend on events, and requires from inside frontend
- However it allows us to control the misuse slightly better by getting rid of restricted requires and turning on that eslint ruleset
- The main goal here is getting this settings related code out of the routing service as it really doesn't belong there
- This settings file is used purely by the API to get and set files - its not really anything to do with actual routing
- This file calls out to the bridge to do a reload, which helps decouple slightly
- More refactoring is needed to get rid of the urlService dependency
- Note this file is really similar to the redirects one, it would be good to merge them
- At the moment the bootstrap.start method asks the settings service for its settings
- This couples the routing and settings services together - when maybe we want to use a different method to generate settings
- By passing the settings to the routing service at the right time, we open up possibilities for refactoring
refs d9ddc2db6a
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/754
- The tests were written with falsy assumptions and validation added in refed commit have uncovered it!
- A secondary issue touched here is additional JSON object serialization that is used in the "input serializer" -d9ddc2db6a/core/server/api/v2/utils/serializers/input/settings.js (L107-L110)
- The additional stringification should not be there at all. It covers for a mistaken internal use of Settings API where raw objects are passed around instead of serialized JSON Objects (see commets left with this changeset for details)
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/754
refs a7dec233ba
- Additional validation protects from problems like the ones in refed commit from even getting through to the database.
- At the moment only used notificatons and couple more settings to ensure they are arrays when passed into the API. This is to avoid making big change in settings straight away - this is a problematic area which needs cautious approach.
- Ideally in the future the list of settings to check the "array" type (and other types) should be automatically generated based on the default-settings.json (or whatever way we define settings in the db a that moment)
- There's an ugly code-tripplication going on in this change. This is a separate topic that will be addressed once we work on API cleanup.
fixes https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/809
- Bookshelf won't throw a `NotFoundError` unless `require=true` in the
options
- this is present in most other API endpoints, so it's just simply
missing from the snippet one
- without this, Ghost will crash with a 500 saying `Cannot read property
'destroy' of null`
- this commit adds `require=true` to the destroy options for both the canary +
v3 endpoints
issue https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/750
- Only accessible by admins
- Resets all staff users' passwords and prevents them to log-in
- Sends them a reset email password to give them back access to their account
- Closes all existing staff user sessions
- Part of the effort to split Ghost down into smaller, decoupled pieces
- Moved out our internal validator tooling to a separate library
- Replaced all usage of our own tooling and validatorjs directly with @tryghost/validator
- Removed the validatorjs dependency and removed the renovate pin
- This gives us a consistant, smaller, clearer public API for validations
- It will eventually be used on Ghost Admin too
- This way we can start getting up to date with validator whilst not increasing build size
no issue
The only pieces of Ghost-Ignition used in Ghost were debug and
logging. Both of these modules have been superceded by the Framework
monorepo, and all usages of Ignition have now been removed, replaced
with @tryghost/debug and @tryghost/logging.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/770
We want post feature image functionality to better match what's available inside the editor, to do that we'll need somewhere to store alt and caption meta data. `posts_meta` chosen because even though we want to make this generic for other tables in the future those tables also have a `feature_image` (or closely related) field.
- updated schema with new columns
- added migration to create columns
- cleaned new columns from API output
- not output on v2/v3
- conditionally output on v4/canary output based on labs flag
- bumped `@tryghost/admin-api-schema` to allow new columns through in canary API requests
- silently clean properties from input when labs flag is disabled
- updated acceptance tests so they fail if `admin-api-schema` is not letting the new fields through
no issue
`post.clean()` implementation was expecting a flat structure representing final API output but was being called before the flatten operation for `posts_meta` meaning the structure looked like `attrs.posts_meta.property` instead
- adjusted order in output serializers to call `clean()` after flattening the `posts_meta` object
- in `v2` output serializer, moved removal of properties from the serializer into `clean()` for consistency
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/757
- There is no usecase for editing "labs" settings outside of canary/v4 API versions. Removing support for older versions makes the supported API surface smaller (easy maintenance).
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/757
- To safeguard from mise of a very permissing "object" value of the "labs" setting this change introduces an "allowlist" approach to filtering unrecognized labs flags
- Should allow maintainers to have a clear view of which labs flags are currently in use and manage them accordingly
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/754
- This is fixing the root cause of an error being saved in `settings` table under `notifications` key. There needs to be a follow up to this fixing any possible instances that might have been affected byt the bug
no issue
- moved `config` and `site` API output generation to a `public-config` service allowing all API versions to use `publicConfig.config` or `publicConfig.site` in their query methods
- updated `config` and `site` API output serializers to use an allow-list that limits the data returned for each API version
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/693
Since we no longer have the concept the "comped" we update the v3 API to
always have a `comped` flag of `false` - maintaining backwards
compatibility.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/581
closes https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/582
Emails can now be sent to members with specific associated labels or products by specifying an NQL string. We want to bring the same members segment feature to content by allowing `visibility` to be an NQL filter string on top of the `public/members/paid` special-case strings.
As an example it's possible to set `posts.visibility` to `label:vip` to make a post available only to those members with the `vip` label.
- removed enum validations for `visibility` so it now accepts any string or `null`
- bumped `@tryghost/admin-api-schema` for API-level validation changes
- added nql validation to API input validators by running the visibility query against the members model
- added transform of NQL to special-case visibility values when saving post model
- ensures there's a single way of representing "members" and "paid" where NQL gives multiple ways of representing the same segment
- useful for keeping theme-level checks such as `{{#has visibility="paid"}}` working as expected
- updated content-gating to parse nql from post's visibility and use it to query the currently logged in member to see if there's a match
- bumped @tryghost/members-api to include label and product data when loading member
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/581
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/582
When publishing a post via the API it was possible to send it using `?email_recipient_filter=all/free/paid` which allowed you to send to members only based on their payment status which is quite limiting for some sites.
This PR updates the `?email_recipient_filter` query param to support Ghost's `?filter` param syntax which enables more specific recipient lists, eg:
`?email_recipient_filter=status:free` = free members only
`?email_recipient_filter=status:paid` = paid members only
`?email_recipient_filter=label:vip` = members that have the `vip` label attached
`?email_recipient_filter=status:paid,label:vip` = paid members and members that have the `vip` label attached
The older `free/paid` values are still supported by the API for backwards compatibility.
- updates `Post` and `Email` models to transform legacy `free` and `paid` values to their NQL equivalents on read/write
- lets us not worry about supporting legacy values elsewhere in the code
- cleanup migration to transform all rows slated for 5.0
- removes schema and API `isIn` validations for recipient filters so allow free-form filters
- updates posts API input serializers to transform `free` and `paid` values in the `?email_recipient_filter` param to their NQL equivalents for backwards compatibility
- updates Post API controllers `edit` methods to run a query using the supplied filter to verify that it's valid
- updates `mega` service to use the filter directly when selecting recipients
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/496
We want to give more control over the default selection of email recipients when publishing a post, to do that we need somewhere to store those settings. These settings are site-wide and intended for use by admins to control the default editor behaviour for all staff users. They _do not_ control API behaviour, if you want to send email when publishing via the API it's still necessary to explicitly opt in to that using the `?email_recipients_filter=` query param.
- new `editor` settings group to indicate that these settings only affect the UI rather than the API
- `editor_default_email_recipients` controls overall behaviour, string/enum with these allowed values:
- `'disabled'`: no option to send email is shown in the editor's publishing dropdown
- `'visibility'`: (default) selected member segment is dynamic and matches the post visibility filter
- `'filter'`: specific member filter defined in `editor_default_email_recipients_filter` setting
- `editor_default_email_recipients_filter` is an NQL string for selecting members, used when `editor_default_email_recipients` is set to `'filter'`
- default value is `'all'`
- the segment string can be any valid NQL filter with the additional special-case values of `'all'` and `'none'`
refs 829e8ed010
- i18n is used everywhere but only requires shared or external packages, therefore it's a good candidate for living in shared
- this reduces invalid requires across frontend and server, and lets us use it everywhere until we come up with a better option
- Having these as destructured from the same package is hindering refactoring now
- Events should really only ever be used server-side
- i18n should be a shared module for now so it can be used everywhere until we figure out something better
- Having them seperate also allows us to lint them properly
refs: bf0823c9a2
refs: ae86254972
- continuing the work of splitting up the theme service into logical components
Themes Service
- The serverside theme service now serves just the API and boot
- It loads the theme and passes it to the theme-engine via the bridge
This achieves the bare minimum goal of removing all the cross requires between server and frontend around themes
There is still a lot more to do to achieve an ideal architecture here as laid out in ae86254972
