refs #9192, refs #9178
After trying to progress with current implementation, it became clear that the route service can't control the boot sequence, because then we end up with circular dependencies between the route service and the channel service.
The route service now exposes:
- a siteRouter
- a way for apps to register routes.
- ParentRouter base class for other modules to use
- the registry
...
- moved the default route setup back to site/routes.js 🙈
- moved the parent channel router back to the channel service (this makes way more sense imo)
- this structure prevents circular dependencies
- split the registry out into it's own thing
- fixed-up various bits of tests and comments
- DEBUG will print a list of routes 🎉
refs #9192, #5091
- changed channels to use our new base class
- keep the flexible structure, so that channels can be reloaded
- I had to move the router into the route service otherwise we get circular dependencies
- Don't _really_ want to keep it like this - need a way to define base classes as shared
refs #9192
- Moving towards a centralised concept of routing / routes
- The base router now wraps express router, and offers us the features we need
- Site Router is the parent router, it gets initialised with all of our default routing
- App Router is a sub router for apps - apps register their routes/routers onto it.
- TODO: refactor channels subrouter to work this same way
- MAYBE: move the app router to the apps service
refs #9192, refs #5091, refs #9178
- moved channels from controllers to a service
- split out the parent router from the remaining individual router logic
- moved the tests to match
refs #5091, #9192, #9178
- Get the RSS module into a much better shape
- Controller -> /controllers/rss
- Remainder -> /services/rss
- Moved tests to match & updated requires
refs #9192
- Instead of `setupRoutes` function in apps that gets passed a router, there is now a registerRouter function as part of the proxy
- Moved towards a route service, which will know about all routes
- Using classes to abstract away shared behaviour
Notes:
- changing the app proxy didn't result in a test failure!
- structure of route service is totally new and may change a lot yet
refs #9178
* Add eslint deps, remove old lint deps
* Add eslint config, remove old lint configs
* Config for server and tests are different
* Tweaked rules to suit us
* Fix linting in codebase - lots of indent changes.
* Fix a real broken test
refs #9178
* Moved app handling code into services/apps
- Apps is a service, that allows for the App lifecycle
- /server/apps = contains internal apps
- /server/services/apps = contains code for managing/handling app life cycle, providing the proxy, etc
* Split apps service tests into separate files
* Moved internal app tests into test folders
- Problem: Not all the tests in apps were unit tests, yet they were treated like they were in Gruntfile.js
- Unit tests now live in /test/unit/apps
- Route tests now live in /test/functional/routes/apps
- Gruntfile.js has been updated to match
* Switch api.read usage for settingsCache
* Add tests to cover the basic App lifecycle
* Simplify some of the init logic
refs #9178
- Introduce the /services/ folder
- Move xmlrpc there
- Move slack there
- In slack: remove a usage of the settings API that should use settingsCache
- In slack: Simplify the tests
- Various tiny changes to move towards code consistency
