closes#10060
- Implemented scheduling for posts and pages
- Added cache invalidation when scheduling
- Refactored admin token eneration function to accept existing key as parameter in tests
- Added Ghost Scheduler Integration fixture
- Added fixture for permissions for post publish action
- Migrated getScheduled method to v2
- Did not add support for 'from' and 'to' parameters as they were not used by DefaultScheduler
- This method needs rethinking in a long run as it's an ugly hack and should rather become proper endpoint that returns JSON data instead of models
- Removed unused auth middleware from v2 routes
- Added internal scheduler role
- Implemetnted transactions in v2 frame
- This takes into account scenario mentioned in c93f03b87e
- Specifically:
>if two queries happening in a transaction we have to signalise
knex/mysql that we select for an update
otherwise the following case happens:
you fetch posts for an update
a user requests comes in and updates the post (e.g. sets title to "X")
you update the fetched posts, title would get overriden to the old one
closes#10927
- Previous fix 2823c0b342
- It didn't work because the validation layer in "frame" doesn't take into account the value under `required` property of the controller, so to prevent validation on the field whole `required` key/value have to be removed
- Removed unused variables
- Extended regression suite to prevent similar problems in the future
* Swapped v1 with v4 UUID as requestId when logging
no issue
v1 UUID are based on current time and the hardware MAC address of the
machine where they are being generated. As such they have much more
complex semantics than v4 UUIDs which are simply randomly generated.
Unless there's a specific requirement for the special semantics of v1
UUIDs it is simpler and less error prone to simply go for v4 UUIDs
whenever just a unique identifier is needed.
* Swapped v1 with v4 UUID when creating a temporary contentFolder
no issue
v1 UUID are based on current time and the hardware MAC address of the
machine where they are being generated. As such they have much more
complex semantics than v4 UUIDs which are simply randomly generated.
Unless there's a specific requirement for the special semantics of v1
UUIDs it is simpler and less error prone to simply go for v4 UUIDs
whenever just a unique identifier is needed.
* Swapped v1 with v4 UUID when creating a temporary exportFolder
no issue
v1 UUID are based on current time and the hardware MAC address of the
machine where they are being generated. As such they have much more
complex semantics than v4 UUIDs which are simply randomly generated.
Unless there's a specific requirement for the special semantics of v1
UUIDs it is simpler and less error prone to simply go for v4 UUIDs
whenever just a unique identifier is needed.
no issue
- Updated Test & linting packages
- Updated use of hasOwnProperty
- Using Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty instead (ref. eslint.org/docs/rules/no-prototype-builtins)
- Removed already defined built-in global variable Intl
- Applied `--fix` with lint command on `core/test` folder
- The rules were broken because some of them were made stricter for `eslint: recommended` ruleset (ref. https://eslint.org/docs/user-guide/migrating-to-6.0.0#eslint-recommended-changes)
- Removed redundant global variable declarations to pass linting
closes#10773
- The refactoring is a substitute for `urlService.utils` used previously throughout the codebase and now extracted into the separate module in Ghost-SDK
- Added url-utils stubbing utility for test suites
- Some tests had to be refactored to avoid double mocks (when url's are being reset inside of rested 'describe' groups)
refs #10656
- To make sure more users see important updates or announcements
notification dismissal now works per user instead of globally
- Expanded acceptance test for notification deletion
- Expanded regression test covering multiuser dismissal of notification
- Added clarifying comment about destroyAll method use in API
refs #9178
- Migrated settings model regression to unit tests
- Removed redundant/unuseful post tests
- Extracted post model regression tests to API tests
- Renamed test suites for consistency
refs #10593
- Added `canonical_url` field to post&pages resources in Admin & Content APIs
- Support for canonical URL on metadata layer (used in {{ghost_head}} helper)
- Made sure the new field is not accessible from API v0.1
- Added handling same domain relative and absolute URLs
no issue
- Reported here: https://forum.ghost.org/t/in-version-2-16-3-found-bug/6065/3
---
Admin Client sends false or true booleans for `is_private` key.
The settings table has two columns "key" and "value". And "value" is always type TEXT.
If you pass value=false, the db will transform this value into "0".
`settingsCache.get('is_private')` is then always true, even though the value is meant to be false.
We should add a migration in v3 and normalize all setting values to ensure consistent database values. Furthermore, we should improve the handling around settings values in general.
For now, we protect parsing values from DB, which we anyway need to transform the values into the correct data type, because we always save strings. This will protect values being stored as "false" or "1" or whatever.
closes#10512
- Removed field filtering in blog owner fetching because it didn't work before (fields weren't reduced) and now broke generated sql queries (ambiguous id field)
refs #10512
- Fixed ability to fetch specific fields when fetching tag resource by id
- Also only returning `url` field when specified in `fields` parameter
closes#10518
- we had a very generic logic to remove "unwanted" null values
- copied from v0.1
- originally added in 7d4107fec4
- this logic transformed: settings = [{key: 'key', value: null}] to [{key: 'key'}], which is wrong
- i've removed this generic logic completely, because i don't know which purpose it serves
- if there a specific case where we want to remove null values, we should either use the JSON schema or use a specific serializer for the target resource
- added tests to proof that settings API behaves as it should
- one test failed because we removed the isNull logic -> if you send published_at = null on a published post
- the model layer has a piece of logic to force a date if you set published_at to null if the status is published
- protected
* Required kid be a header claim as according to spec
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7515#section-4.1.4 (JWT is an extension of JWS)
* Updated error message for missing kid
* Fixed admin-api key unit tests
* Fixed regression and acceptance tests
refs #10438
- "null" means the resource does not exist (it was sett to "null"), which is not true
- we won't serve primary_tag and primary_author by default
- TODO: add the same change to the Content API v2 (raise issue)
no issue
- make use of filter instead of status=all or data.page
- nql was designed to filter data on database layer
- do not break v0.1
- we just got rid of the "status" query param, you should use the filter instead
- get rid of the ugly condition to remove page field if "fields" param was used
- allow filtering on model layer for "findOne"
- do not allow filtering for "findOne" on API layer for now
- the API controller defines what is allowed
- the model layer can allow more by default
- we can re-use the powerful filter logic without adding hacks
refs #10438, refs #10106
* Renamed existing pages ctrl
* Splitted posts & pages for Admin API v2
* Added pages JSON input schema for Admin API v2
* Removed single author for Content & Admin API v2
- single author is not documented
- single author usage is deprecated in v0.1
- single author usage is removed in API v2
* Splitted posts & postsPublic controller for v2
* Removed requirement to send `status=all` from Admin API v2
* Removed `status` option from pages Content API v2
* Removed `status` options from Users Admin API v2
refs #10438
- the `updated_at` functions as version control value
- it is required for collision detection
- we might redesign this feature at some point
refs #10438
- these fields are not used
- no need to expose them in v2
- we will either remove them in the next major or use them for new features (will see)
no issue
- the model & api layer suffered from missing fields when creating resources
- usually there is only a handful of fields which are required to insert a resource
- the other fields are nullable and/or get defaults assigned
- the API only returned the configured default fields and the fields you have sent to the API
- this resulted in a response with missing fields
- if you have listend on "created" event, the same happend
- you received a model with missing fields
- we now set the undefined fields to null on purpose to ensure a full model for both cases
@NOTE:
There is no endpoint to serve webhooks (not for v0.1, not for v2).
Exposing the secret is required if an integration fetches it's api keys and it's webhooks.
The secret is currently un-used and not implemented.
