no issue
- this commit cleans up the usages of `include` and `withRelated`.
### API layer (`include`)
- as request parameter e.g. `?include=roles,tags`
- as theme API parameter e.g. `{{get .... include="author"}}`
- as internal API access e.g. `api.posts.browse({include: 'author,tags'})`
- the `include` notation is more readable than `withRelated`
- and it allows us to use a different easier format (comma separated list)
- the API utility transforms these more readable properties into model style (or into Ghost style)
### Model access (`withRelated`)
- e.g. `models.Post.findPage({withRelated: ['tags']})`
- driven by bookshelf
---
Commits explained.
* Reorder the usage of `convertOptions`
- 1. validation
- 2. options convertion
- 3. permissions
- the reason is simple, the permission layer access the model layer
- we have to prepare the options before talking to the model layer
- added `convertOptions` where it was missed (not required, but for consistency reasons)
* Use `withRelated` when accessing the model layer and use `include` when accessing the API layer
* Change `convertOptions` API utiliy
- API Usage
- ghost.api(..., {include: 'tags,authors'})
- `include` should only be used when calling the API (either via request or via manual usage)
- `include` is only for readability and easier format
- Ghost (Model Layer Usage)
- models.Post.findOne(..., {withRelated: ['tags', 'authors']})
- should only use `withRelated`
- model layer cannot read 'tags,authors`
- model layer has no idea what `include` means, speaks a different language
- `withRelated` is bookshelf
- internal usage
* include-count plugin: use `withRelated` instead of `include`
- imagine you outsource this plugin to git and publish it to npm
- `include` is an unknown option in bookshelf
* Updated `permittedOptions` in base model
- `include` is no longer a known option
* Remove all occurances of `include` in the model layer
* Extend `filterOptions` base function
- this function should be called as first action
- we clone the unfiltered options
- check if you are using `include` (this is a protection which could help us in the beginning)
- check for permitted and (later on default `withRelated`) options
- the usage is coming in next commit
* Ensure we call `filterOptions` as first action
- use `ghostBookshelf.Model.filterOptions` as first action
- consistent naming pattern for incoming options: `unfilteredOptions`
- re-added allowed options for `toJSON`
- one unsolved architecture problem:
- if you override a function e.g. `edit`
- then you should call `filterOptions` as first action
- the base implementation of e.g. `edit` will call it again
- future improvement
* Removed `findOne` from Invite model
- no longer needed, the base implementation is the same
refs #6103
- simplify `toJSON`
- `baseKey` was not used - have not find a single use case
- all the functionality of our `toJSON` is offered in bookshelf
- `omitPivot` does remove pivot elements from the JSON obj (bookshelf feature)
- `shallow` allows you to not return relations
- make use of `serialize`, see http://bookshelfjs.org/docs/src_base_model.js.html#line260
- fetching nested relations e.g. `users.roles` still works (unrelated to this refactoring)
> pick('shallow', 'baseKey', 'include', 'context')
We will re-add options validation in https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/pull/9427, but then with the official way: use `filterOptions`.
---
We return all fetched relations (pre-defined with `withRelated`) by default.
You can disable it with `shallow:true`.
* 🎨 schema change
- simply role_id attribute
* 🎨 update invite model
- remove all methods we don't need
- ensure we remove the relation from the model
- ensure we do not allow to call withRelated
* 🎨 adapt api changes
* 🎨 adapt auth module
* 🎨 adapt tests
* 🎨 better error handling
* schema update
