refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/292
- When version missmatch handling is done in Ghost we need to store the 'Accept-Version' header values that have been already processed in the past (to avoid sending notifications about the same mismatch multiple times)
- The `version_notifications` will be storing an array with handled versions like so: `['v3.44', 'v4.23', 'v4.39']`.
- The emailing logic and processing is slightly similar to how "notification" key is handled, that's why I've placed the definition of this new key close by.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/1533
- Needed to create the read newsletter endpoint to make the newsletter resource more consistent with the other resources
- Read is available to admins like other newsletter actions
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/1469
With multiple newsletters, members will now be able to subscribe to one or more newsletters on the site. Previously, the subscription to default newsletter for a member was controlled via a single boolean `subscribed` column on the member table.
This change allows mapping multiple newsletters to a member via new pivot table that stores relation between a member and newsletter.
- adds new `members_newsletters` pivot table
- update tests
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/1463
- Allow admins to perform all newsletter operations
- We can adjust and be more permissive in the future if needed
- Added the tests back as permissions are configured correctly now
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/1433
- The `default` property stores whether a newsletter is set as default by the admin
- The `status` property stores whether a newsletter is archived or not
- The `recipient_filter` property is only storing whether a newsletter is "paid-only" or not for now, although it can be expanded to more specific filters in the future
- The `subscribe_on_signup` property stores whether a new member should be automatically signed up to the newsletter
- The `sort_order` property enables displaying the newsletter list in an order chosen by the admins
- the setup() function returns a function that's expected to be called as a mocha hook
- wrapping this in a function means it doesn't get called properly
- therefore the db setup was never being called for this test
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/1071
We used `posts.visibility` originally to store visibility as `free|paid` with a character limit of 50. This same field was repurposed to store an NQL filter when member tiers is enabled. The NQL filter uses the slug of the tier name, which can easily create a filter longer than 50 characters, adding an unwanted limitation on number of tiers that can be added to post's visibility.
Going forward, we'd like to store the visibility of posts for tiers in a separate pivot table and instead store the value of `visibility` as `tiers` when restricting post access to specific tiers. This change -
- adds a new pivot table fixture for storing relation between posts and tiers
- adds a migration for creating the new table
- updates tests
closes https://github.com/TryGhost/Zapier/issues/56
- fixes tag creation when creating posts with `tags: [{slug: 'new'}]` which should be supported
- assigning tags with only `{slug: 'new'}` was triggering our validation for the required `name` property then bubbling up to the `bookshelf-relations` library resulting in a 500 error
- the fix applied here is to set the `name` field to the same as the `slug` field if a name is not provided
no issue
- Having rewire here doens't do any difference and should not be used if absolutely needed. Usually using rewire gives a code "smell" so there's some sort of coupling that's going on and probably has to be addressed first
https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/130
The transaction no longer commits in the promise chain, which wasn't
valid logic for a transaction, since it is commited automatically when
the promise chain resolves, and rollsback automatically when the
promise chain rejects.
This makes code which fails during the transaction error in the right
place, instead of getting stuck here. (Especially good for writing
tests).
The tests for this code can now live in the integration folder.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/127
- Passing around whole instance of a frontend router was an overkill when there are only 3 static pieces of information that needed to be loaded. Extracting the router out makes the UrlGenerator way more readable, tests slimer, and the memory footpring of the process should be slightly lighter
- The toString overloading didn't make sense at the time of this refactor, maybe if there's a concrete usecase we could resurect it in a form of passing in a router's name or something.
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/127
- This is an effor t to define a precise set of data needed for the UrlGenerator to function, which should help with decoupling it from the frontend routes
- This is almost the last piece to free us up from the massive "router" object that has been passed around
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/127
- This is an effor t to define a precise set of data needed for the UrlGenerator to function, which should help with decoupling it from the frontend routes
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/127
- This is an effor t to define a precise set of data needed for the UrlGenerator to function, which should help with decoupling it from the frontend routes
refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/commit/b93e7d7f7c
Our CI wasn't running integration tests so this slipped through. When
adding a new table we must update the exporter to ensure it's exported,
and that means the tests need to be updated to check for it!
- e2e tests are tests that cover critical functionality by booting ghost
- integration tests are more like unit tests, but need to initialise and use a db
- so settings shouldn't start Ghost, url service is critical and should be in integration, and preview is critical and should be in e2e
- some tests are necessarily driven from the db
- these are like unit tests, except they only make sense if using the db - else you have to stub too much to make them worthwhile
- for these rare but important cases, we have the clear concept of integration tests
