no issue
- This new format allows to return additional metadata with failed import records. The data for invalid records is returned in following format:
```
{
count: {count_of_invalid_records},
errors: [{
message: "Members not imported. Members with duplicate Stripe customer ids are not allowed." // message field of the error
context: "Attempting to import members with duplicate Stripe customer ids." // context field of the error
help: "Remove duplicate Stripe customer ids from the import file, and re-run the import." // help field of the error
count: 2 // count of this specific error
}]
};
- Errors are grouped by their context fields because message fields sometimes can contain unique information like Stripe customer id, which would produce too many errors in case of bigger datasets.
no issue
- When imported member contains stripe_customer_id data but there is no Stripe configured on the Ghost instance such import should faiil. The logic is consistent with one where import fails after not being able to find customer in linked Stripe account
- Fixed import stats to show import failures instead of "duplicate" when the validation error is of "Stripe" origin
no issue
- There is a need to be able to label certain import group of members
with custom labels. This will allow to distinguish/filter these newly
imported members.
- Allowed `POST /members/csv/` endpoint to accept `labels`
field parameter which assigns labels to every member from imported csv.
no issue
- Similarly to other additive api methods (e.g. members.add) returned more specific ValidationError with contex filled in with the reason why adding did not succed.
- This change is needed for more graceful label handling when adding new members through import
no issue
- adds `search` bookshelf plugin that calls out to an optional `searchQuery()` method on individual models to apply model-specific SQL conditions to queries
- updated the base model's `findPage()` method to use the search plugin within `findPage` calls
- added a `searchQuery` method to the `member` model that performs a basic `LIKE %query%` for both `name` and `email` columns
- allowed the `?search=` parameter to pass through in the `options` object for member browse requests
* moved `server/config` to `shared/config`
* updated config import paths in server to use shared
* updated config import paths in frontend to use shared
* updated config import paths in test to use shared
* updated config import paths in root to use shared
* trigger regression tests
* of course the rebase broke tests
no issue
- moves members stats generation for the admin graph from the client to the server
- outputs a basic totals count across a requested date range of 30, 90, 365 days, or all time. See below for the response shape
- leaves heavy lifting of the counts to the SQL engines - tested on a dataset of 100k members and query performance is <100ms
```
GET /ghost/api/canary/members/stats/?days=30
{
total: 100000,
total_in_range: 20000,
total_on_date: {
'2020-04-25': 19000,
'2020-04-26': 19500,
// continues until today's date
},
new_today: 200
}
```
refs #10898
- Execute string replacement on external paths
- Take non-top-level base URLs into consideration (to avoid #10776 dups)
- Added tests for all of the above cases
- All var declarations are now const or let as per ES6
- All comma-separated lists / chained declarations are now one declaration per line
- This is for clarity/readability but also made running the var-to-const/let switch smoother
- ESLint rules updated to match
How this was done:
- npm install -g jscodeshift
- git clone https://github.com/cpojer/js-codemod.git
- git clone git@github.com:TryGhost/Ghost.git shallow-ghost
- cd shallow-ghost
- jscodeshift -t ../js-codemod/transforms/unchain-variables.js . -v=2
- jscodeshift -t ../js-codemod/transforms/no-vars.js . -v=2
- yarn
- yarn test
- yarn lint / fix various lint errors (almost all indent) by opening files and saving in vscode
- grunt test-regression
- sorted!
- move all test files from core/test to test/
- updated all imports and other references
- all code inside of core/ is then application code
- tests are correctly at the root level
- consistent with other repos/projects
Co-authored-by: Kevin Ansfield <kevin@lookingsideways.co.uk>
