refs #9742
- rebase against master updated some docs links again
- go over code base again and double check that all docs links are correct
- 2.0 will become the latest version on our readme pages
refs #9742
- Ghost 2.0 is coming
- all doc links in 1.0 must use concrete links e.g. docs.ghost.org/v1 or themes.ghost.org/v1.23.0/
- if we release Ghost 2.0, docs.ghost.org will show 2.0 docs
no issue
- this commit cleans up the usages of `include` and `withRelated`.
### API layer (`include`)
- as request parameter e.g. `?include=roles,tags`
- as theme API parameter e.g. `{{get .... include="author"}}`
- as internal API access e.g. `api.posts.browse({include: 'author,tags'})`
- the `include` notation is more readable than `withRelated`
- and it allows us to use a different easier format (comma separated list)
- the API utility transforms these more readable properties into model style (or into Ghost style)
### Model access (`withRelated`)
- e.g. `models.Post.findPage({withRelated: ['tags']})`
- driven by bookshelf
---
Commits explained.
* Reorder the usage of `convertOptions`
- 1. validation
- 2. options convertion
- 3. permissions
- the reason is simple, the permission layer access the model layer
- we have to prepare the options before talking to the model layer
- added `convertOptions` where it was missed (not required, but for consistency reasons)
* Use `withRelated` when accessing the model layer and use `include` when accessing the API layer
* Change `convertOptions` API utiliy
- API Usage
- ghost.api(..., {include: 'tags,authors'})
- `include` should only be used when calling the API (either via request or via manual usage)
- `include` is only for readability and easier format
- Ghost (Model Layer Usage)
- models.Post.findOne(..., {withRelated: ['tags', 'authors']})
- should only use `withRelated`
- model layer cannot read 'tags,authors`
- model layer has no idea what `include` means, speaks a different language
- `withRelated` is bookshelf
- internal usage
* include-count plugin: use `withRelated` instead of `include`
- imagine you outsource this plugin to git and publish it to npm
- `include` is an unknown option in bookshelf
* Updated `permittedOptions` in base model
- `include` is no longer a known option
* Remove all occurances of `include` in the model layer
* Extend `filterOptions` base function
- this function should be called as first action
- we clone the unfiltered options
- check if you are using `include` (this is a protection which could help us in the beginning)
- check for permitted and (later on default `withRelated`) options
- the usage is coming in next commit
* Ensure we call `filterOptions` as first action
- use `ghostBookshelf.Model.filterOptions` as first action
- consistent naming pattern for incoming options: `unfilteredOptions`
- re-added allowed options for `toJSON`
- one unsolved architecture problem:
- if you override a function e.g. `edit`
- then you should call `filterOptions` as first action
- the base implementation of e.g. `edit` will call it again
- future improvement
* Removed `findOne` from Invite model
- no longer needed, the base implementation is the same
