no issue
- Updated Test & linting packages
- Updated use of hasOwnProperty
- Using Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty instead (ref. eslint.org/docs/rules/no-prototype-builtins)
- Removed already defined built-in global variable Intl
- Applied `--fix` with lint command on `core/test` folder
- The rules were broken because some of them were made stricter for `eslint: recommended` ruleset (ref. https://eslint.org/docs/user-guide/migrating-to-6.0.0#eslint-recommended-changes)
- Removed redundant global variable declarations to pass linting
closes#10518
- we had a very generic logic to remove "unwanted" null values
- copied from v0.1
- originally added in 7d4107fec4
- this logic transformed: settings = [{key: 'key', value: null}] to [{key: 'key'}], which is wrong
- i've removed this generic logic completely, because i don't know which purpose it serves
- if there a specific case where we want to remove null values, we should either use the JSON schema or use a specific serializer for the target resource
- added tests to proof that settings API behaves as it should
- one test failed because we removed the isNull logic -> if you send published_at = null on a published post
- the model layer has a piece of logic to force a date if you set published_at to null if the status is published
- protected
no issue
- was unable to revert 9dd7aff9c6, because it contains members changes
- functional calls did not work correctly, because the content and admin ctrl differentiation happend in the web layer
- `isContentAPI` returned true for `api.v2.settings.edit(data, {context: {internal:true{})`
- content & admin API are using different controllers
- we can just tell which ctrl is content API and which is not
- the direction fits for the content & admin API split
no issue
- throwing an object from a catch handler is not a good idea
- unexpected and broke functional call to API (always returned a 500, because API returned {err: err, method: ...}
refs #9865
- Changed id passed for api_key to an object to be able to differenciate between admin and content api requests
- Added integration id to frame context
- Small refactoring of frame context initialization
* Added clause in validation for include to not error
refs #10337
Here we forgo erroring when an invalid property for include is sent, and
instead remove the invalid properties.
* Fixed authors test
* Fixed validators tests
refs #10286
- v2 no longer exposes x_by fields (published_by, updated_by, created_by)
- we will add a brand new concept called activity stream/actions soon
Closes#10041
1. Why is this change neccesary?
String.prototype.length returns the number of code units in the string (number
of characters) while Buffer.byteLength returns the actual byte length of a
string.
2. How does it address the issue?
Places that use String.prototype.length to calculate Content-Length
were switched to Buffer.byteLength instead.
refs #9866
- Switched update checker to api v2
- Updated and cleaned up the corresponding test suite
- Updated the frame pipeline to respect context passed in with Frame instance
- Exposed 'active' verison from api index module
no-issue
There are a few libraries, including node core that when given an array
for a query parameter will encode it as repeated query params. e.g.
```
{someParam: ['a', 'b']}
// becomes
'?someParam=a&someParam=b'
```
This adds a check for the value to stop us 500ing on repeated keys and
to add easier interop with http clients
* Added API Key auth middleware to v2 content API
refs #9865
- add `auth.authenticate.authenticateContentApiKey` middleware
- accepts `?key=` query param, sets `req.api_key` if it's a known Content API key
- add `requiresAuthorizedUserOrApiKey` authorization middleware
- passes if either `req.user` or `req.api_key` exists
- update `authenticatePublic` middleware stack for v2 content routes
* Fixed functional content api tests
no-issue
This fixes the functional content api tests so they use the content api
auth.
* Fixed context check and removed skip
* Updated cors middleware for content api
* Removed client_id from frame.context
no-issue
The v2 api doesn't have a notion of clients as we do not use oauth for it
* Fixed tests for posts input serializer
refs #9866
- Added logic ensuring page filter is always set to false in posts endpoint for Content API
- Added functional tests to pages and posts
- Added absolute_url logic in pages controller
- Added slugs controller to v2 API
- Added slugs tests to v2 API
- Updated generic validation error message in shared validator to return validation error with sub-message
refs #9866
- there was a missing step in the shared validator
- we have to differentiate between data validation for browse/read and data validation for add/edit
- furthermore, the data validation for add/edit was missing and was not copied over from v0.1 (check structure of incoming body)
- adds the ability to require properties from req.body.docName[0]
* Added api_key_id to frame.context
refs #9865
This is to allow controllers to check permissions using api_key_id data.
* Removed client and client_id from frame.context
refs #9865
This is unused as we only support oauth on v0.1 API.
refs #9326, refs #9866
**ATTENTION: This is the first iteration. Bugs are expected.**
Main Goals:
- add support for multiple API versions.
- do not touch v0.1 implementation
- do not break v0.1
## Problems with the existing v0.1 implementation
1. It tried to be generic and helpful, but it was a mixture of generic and explicit logic living in basically two files: utils.js and index.js.
2. Supporting multiple api versions means, you want to have as less as possible code per API version. With v0.1 it is impossible to reduce the API controller implementation.
----
This commit adds three things:
1. The tiny framework with well-defined API stages.
2. An example implementation of serving static pages via /pages for the content v2 API.
3. Unit tests to prove that the API framework works in general.
## API Stages
- validation
- input serialization
- permissions
- query
- output serialization
Each request should go through these stages. It is possible to disable stages, but it's not recommended.
The code for each stage will either live in a shared folder or in the API version itself. It depends how API specific the validation or serialization is. Depends on the use case.
We should add a specific API validator or serializer if the use case is API format specific.
We should put everything else to shared.
The goal is to add as much as possible into the shared API layer to reduce the logic per API version.
---
Serializers and validators can be added:
- for each request
- for specific controllers
- for specific actions
---
There is room for improvements/extensions:
1. Remove http header configuration from the API controller, because the API controller should not know about http - decouple.
2. Put permissions helpers into shared. I've just extracted and capsulated the permissions helpers into a single file for now. It had no priority. The focus was on the framework itself.
etc.
---
You can find more information about it in the API README.md (api/README.md)
- e.g. find more information about the structure
- e.g. example controllers
The docs are not perfect. We will improve the docs in the next two weeks.
---
Upcoming tasks:
- prepare test env to test multiple API versions
- copy over the controllers from v0.1 to v2
- adapt the v2 express app to use the v2 controllers
