Ghost/core/server/services/permissions/providers.js
Katharina Irrgang c6a95c6478
Sorted out the mixed usages of include and withRelated (#9425)
no issue

- this commit cleans up the usages of `include` and `withRelated`.

### API layer (`include`)
- as request parameter e.g. `?include=roles,tags`
- as theme API parameter e.g. `{{get .... include="author"}}`
- as internal API access e.g. `api.posts.browse({include: 'author,tags'})`
- the `include` notation is more readable than `withRelated`
- and it allows us to use a different easier format (comma separated list)
- the API utility transforms these more readable properties into model style (or into Ghost style)

### Model access (`withRelated`)
- e.g. `models.Post.findPage({withRelated: ['tags']})`
- driven by bookshelf

---

Commits explained.

* Reorder the usage of `convertOptions`

- 1. validation
- 2. options convertion
- 3. permissions
- the reason is simple, the permission layer access the model layer
  - we have to prepare the options before talking to the model layer
- added `convertOptions` where it was missed (not required, but for consistency reasons)

* Use `withRelated` when accessing the model layer and use `include` when accessing the API layer

* Change `convertOptions` API utiliy

- API Usage
  - ghost.api(..., {include: 'tags,authors'})
  - `include` should only be used when calling the API (either via request or via manual usage)
  - `include` is only for readability and easier format
- Ghost (Model Layer Usage)
  - models.Post.findOne(..., {withRelated: ['tags', 'authors']})
  - should only use `withRelated`
  - model layer cannot read 'tags,authors`
  - model layer has no idea what `include` means, speaks a different language
  - `withRelated` is bookshelf
  - internal usage

* include-count plugin: use `withRelated` instead of `include`

- imagine you outsource this plugin to git and publish it to npm
- `include` is an unknown option in bookshelf

* Updated `permittedOptions` in base model

- `include` is no longer a known option

* Remove all occurances of `include` in the model layer

* Extend `filterOptions` base function

- this function should be called as first action
- we clone the unfiltered options
- check if you are using `include` (this is a protection which could help us in the beginning)
- check for permitted and (later on default `withRelated`) options
- the usage is coming in next commit

* Ensure we call `filterOptions` as first action

- use `ghostBookshelf.Model.filterOptions` as first action
- consistent naming pattern for incoming options: `unfilteredOptions`
- re-added allowed options for `toJSON`
- one unsolved architecture problem:
  - if you override a function e.g. `edit`
  - then you should call `filterOptions` as first action
  - the base implementation of e.g. `edit` will call it again
  - future improvement

* Removed `findOne` from Invite model

- no longer needed, the base implementation is the same
2018-02-15 10:53:53 +01:00

58 lines
2.1 KiB
JavaScript

var _ = require('lodash'),
Promise = require('bluebird'),
models = require('../../models'),
common = require('../../lib/common');
module.exports = {
user: function (id) {
return models.User.findOne({id: id, status: 'all'}, {withRelated: ['permissions', 'roles', 'roles.permissions']})
.then(function (foundUser) {
// CASE: {context: {user: id}} where the id is not in our database
if (!foundUser) {
return Promise.reject(new common.errors.NotFoundError({
message: common.i18n.t('errors.models.user.userNotFound')
}));
}
var seenPerms = {},
rolePerms = _.map(foundUser.related('roles').models, function (role) {
return role.related('permissions').models;
}),
allPerms = [],
user = foundUser.toJSON();
rolePerms.push(foundUser.related('permissions').models);
_.each(rolePerms, function (rolePermGroup) {
_.each(rolePermGroup, function (perm) {
var key = perm.get('action_type') + '-' + perm.get('object_type') + '-' + perm.get('object_id');
// Only add perms once
if (seenPerms[key]) {
return;
}
allPerms.push(perm);
seenPerms[key] = true;
});
});
// @TODO fix this!
// Permissions is an array of models
// Roles is a JSON array
return {permissions: allPerms, roles: user.roles};
});
},
app: function (appName) {
return models.App.findOne({name: appName}, {withRelated: ['permissions']})
.then(function (foundApp) {
if (!foundApp) {
return [];
}
return {permissions: foundApp.related('permissions').models};
});
}
};