Scenario and TripEndpoint have some methods defined on them that're
specific to sim. Do we rearrange these methods entirely or make some
kind of wrapper types?
crate, in preparation for future focus on travel demand models that
incorporate more per-person info.
Note: I'm also a bit tempted to try to further split sim into a
"high-level" layer that orchestrates spawning and different legs of a
trip, from the "low-level" layer that moves pedestrians and vehicles.
That could _possibly_ pave the way for someday using a different traffic
simulation backend with more realistic movement mechanics.
Step 1: just get the synthpop crate to build
* Also implement ContraflowMovement for pathfinder v2
* Change uses of Turn to Turn | ContraflowTurn
* Reverse contraflowturn geometry when tracing pathstep
* Don't start or end a path in a ContraflowTurn either
to further organize them by purpose, but for the moment, two problems:
1) the city picker UI is getting way too crowded
2) on native, the initial download is up to 145MB
Removing:
- the 3 Aurora maps and Green Lake, added for the ARC workshop, but no
longer the most active of collaborations
- Ballard is now subsumed by central Seattle -- the only advantage would
be keeping its full scenario of walking and transit trips, but the
simulation is horribly gridlocked there anyway
- the Rainier Valley map, originally meant for an SNG traffic light
timing study
- the larger udistrict map
- Procedurally generate houses there, so the automatic travel demand
model doesn't produce totally silly patterns.
- Disable parking
- Allow vehicles to enter the intersection even when it looks like they
might get stuck; this lets the default scenario complete without
gridlock.
- Prebake the scenario, so a researcher can make edits and use all of
the A/B testing data viz.
The home-to-work scenario produces laughably bogus patterns... everyone
working at Bank Sepah.
any trips snap successfully to buildings, so we wind up with 0-trip
people that break some UI logic.
Reimported all actdev scenarios. Hopefully there weren't any cases like
this in the Seattle data, but I'll do a full regeneration later tonight
anyway...
lane that they're stuck behind them. Only record a risk exposure event
the first time, but let passing happen anywhere. #382
Also add scenario name to PrebakeSummary, to disambiguate the Poundbury
results.
lane and both want to park in the same building or parking lot, they're
assigned the same spot. When the second one tries to use it, they pick
another. Now the second will still consider spots that they're directly
next to. #688
