Łukasz Czajka 2e38aa609f Unify type signature declaration syntax (#3178) ... * Closes #2990 * Allows type signatures for constructors, record fields and axioms to have the same form as in function definitions, e.g., ``` field {A} {{M A}} (arg1 arg2 : A) : List A ``` * For constructors, this introduces an ambiguity between record and GADT syntax with names. For example, ``` ctr { A : Type } ``` can be confused by the parser with initial part of GADT type signature: ``` ctr {A : Type} : A -> C A ``` For now, this is resolved by preferring the record syntax. Hence, it's currently not possible to use type signatures with implicit arguments for constructors. Ultimately, the `@` in record syntax should be made mandatory, which would resolve the ambiguity: ``` ctr@{ A : Type } ``` --------- Co-authored-by: Jan Mas Rovira <janmasrovira@gmail.com>		2024-11-20 15:57:15 +00:00
..
Negative.hs	Fix compiler error on import cycles (#3171)	2024-11-15 09:41:02 +01:00
Positive.hs	Unify type signature declaration syntax (#3178)	2024-11-20 15:57:15 +00:00