2017-08-15 23:24:13 +03:00
|
|
|
Getting Started
|
|
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
[Déjà Fu is] A martial art in which the user's limbs move in time
|
|
|
|
as well as space, […] It is best described as "the feeling that
|
|
|
|
you have been kicked in the head this way before"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Déjà Fu is a unit-testing library for concurrent Haskell programs.
|
|
|
|
Tests are deterministic and expressive, making it easy and convenient
|
2018-02-01 16:15:31 +03:00
|
|
|
to test your threaded code. Available on :github:`GitHub <>`,
|
|
|
|
:hackage:`Hackage <dejafu>`, and :stackage:`Stackage <dejafu>`.
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Features:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* An abstraction over the concurrency functionality in ``IO``
|
|
|
|
* Deterministic testing of nondeterministic code
|
|
|
|
* Both complete (slower) and incomplete (faster) modes
|
|
|
|
* A unit-testing-like approach to writing test cases
|
|
|
|
* A property-testing-like approach to comparing stateful operations
|
|
|
|
* Testing of potentially nonterminating programs
|
2018-02-01 16:15:31 +03:00
|
|
|
* Integration with :hackage:`HUnit` and :hackage:`tasty`
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are a few different packages under the Déjà Fu umbrella:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. csv-table::
|
|
|
|
:header: "Package", "Version", "Summary"
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-14 03:01:51 +03:00
|
|
|
":hackage:`concurrency`", "1.11.0.1", "Typeclasses, functions, and data types for concurrency and STM"
|
2021-03-14 03:03:30 +03:00
|
|
|
":hackage:`dejafu`", "2.4.0.2", "Systematic testing for Haskell concurrency"
|
2020-07-01 02:21:38 +03:00
|
|
|
":hackage:`hunit-dejafu`", "2.0.0.4", "Déjà Fu support for the HUnit test framework"
|
2020-12-28 00:42:28 +03:00
|
|
|
":hackage:`tasty-dejafu`", "2.0.0.7", "Déjà Fu support for the tasty test framework"
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-15 23:24:13 +03:00
|
|
|
Installation
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
Install from Hackage globally:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: none
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-07 22:47:18 +03:00
|
|
|
$ cabal install dejafu
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or add it to your cabal file:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: none
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
build-depends: ...
|
|
|
|
, dejafu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or to your package.yaml:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: none
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dependencies:
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
- dejafu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quick start guide
|
|
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Déjà Fu supports unit testing, and comes with a helper function
|
|
|
|
called ``autocheck`` to look for some common issues. Let's see it in
|
|
|
|
action:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: haskell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import Control.Concurrent.Classy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
myFunction :: MonadConc m => m String
|
|
|
|
myFunction = do
|
|
|
|
var <- newEmptyMVar
|
|
|
|
fork (putMVar var "hello")
|
|
|
|
fork (putMVar var "world")
|
|
|
|
readMVar var
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That ``MonadConc`` is a typeclass abstraction over concurrency, but
|
|
|
|
we'll get onto that shortly. First, the result of testing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: none
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> autocheck myFunction
|
2018-06-10 16:50:54 +03:00
|
|
|
[pass] Successful
|
|
|
|
[fail] Deterministic
|
2018-02-04 23:54:15 +03:00
|
|
|
"hello" S0----S1--S0--
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-04 23:54:15 +03:00
|
|
|
"world" S0----S2--S0--
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
False
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-10 16:50:54 +03:00
|
|
|
There are no concurrency errors, which is good; but the program is (as
|
|
|
|
you probably spotted) nondeterministic!
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Along with each result, Déjà Fu gives us a representative execution
|
|
|
|
trace in an abbreviated form. ``Sn`` means that thread ``n`` started
|
|
|
|
executing, and ``Pn`` means that thread ``n`` pre-empted the
|
|
|
|
previously running thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why Déjà Fu?
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing concurrent programs is difficult, because in general they are
|
|
|
|
nondeterministic. This leads to people using work-arounds like
|
|
|
|
running their testsuite many thousands of times; or running their
|
|
|
|
testsuite while putting their machine under heavy load.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These approaches are inadequate for a few reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* **How many runs is enough?** When you are just hopping to spot a bug
|
|
|
|
by coincidence, how do you know to stop?
|
|
|
|
* **How do you know if you've fixed a bug you saw previously?**
|
|
|
|
Because the scheduler is a black box, you don't know if the
|
|
|
|
previously buggy schedule has been re-run.
|
|
|
|
* **You won't actually get that much scheduling variety!** Operating
|
|
|
|
systems and language runtimes like to run threads for long periods
|
|
|
|
of time, which reduces the variety you get (and so drives up the
|
|
|
|
number of runs you need).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Déjà Fu addresses these points by offering *complete* testing. You
|
|
|
|
can run a test case and be guaranteed to find all results with some
|
|
|
|
bounds. These bounds can be configured, or even disabled! The
|
|
|
|
underlying approach used is smarter than merely trying all possible
|
|
|
|
executions, and will in general explore the state-space quickly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If your test case is just too big for complete testing, there is also
|
|
|
|
a random scheduling mode, which is necessarily *incomplete*. However,
|
2018-06-03 15:09:51 +03:00
|
|
|
Déjà Fu will tend to produce much more scheduling variety than just
|
|
|
|
running your test case in ``IO`` a bunch of times, and so bugs will
|
|
|
|
tend to crop up sooner. Furthermore, as you get execution traces out,
|
|
|
|
you can be certain that a bug has been fixed by following the trace by
|
|
|
|
eye.
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-01 16:15:31 +03:00
|
|
|
**If you'd like to get involved with Déjà Fu**, check out :github:`the
|
|
|
|
"good first issue" label on the issue tracker
|
|
|
|
<issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22good+first+issue%22>`.
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Questions, feedback, discussion
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* For general help talk to me in IRC (barrucadu in #haskell) or shoot
|
|
|
|
me an email (mike@barrucadu.co.uk)
|
2018-02-01 16:15:31 +03:00
|
|
|
* For bugs, issues, or requests, please :issue:`file an issue <>`.
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bibliography
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Déjà Fu has been produced as part of my Ph.D work, and wouldn't be
|
|
|
|
possible without prior research. Here are the core papers:
|
2017-08-15 23:24:13 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-08-16 00:41:09 +03:00
|
|
|
* Bounded partial-order reduction, K. Coons, M. Musuvathi,
|
|
|
|
and K. McKinley (2013)
|
|
|
|
* Dynamic Partial Order Reduction for Relaxed Memory
|
|
|
|
Models, N. Zhang, M. Kusano, and C. Wang (2015)
|
|
|
|
* Concurrency Testing Using Schedule Bounding: an Empirical
|
|
|
|
Study, P. Thompson, A. Donaldson, and A. Betts (2014)
|
|
|
|
* On the Verification of Programs on Relaxed Memory
|
|
|
|
Models, A. Linden (2014)
|