daml/release/RELEASE.md

533 lines
24 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2019-04-04 12:55:22 +03:00
# Making a Release
Please read this document carefully.
At a high level, a release goes through the following steps. All releases must
use the same version number for stable releases; there is more leeway for
snapshots and RCs.
1. A "daml repo" release, orchestrated from this repository.
2. A "canton repo" release, where the code in the release commit must have a
dependency on the artifacts produced by step 1.
3. An "assembly repo" release, which combines the daml and canton release
artifacts and creates the GitHub Release on the daml repo.
4. A "daml-finance repo" release. This is independant of the other steps on a
technical level.
5. A "docs repo" release to publish documentation on
[docs.daml.com](https://docs.daml.com).
6. Manual tests and approval of the final release artifacts.
Note that these are the technical steps to create the release artifacts. The
release process as a whole is quite a bit larger and involves synchronization
between various teams about exactly what we want to include in a release, when
we want to release it, communication to various stakeholders, etc. For details
on the broader process, see the [release planning] document.
For the more detailed technical steps, we need to distinguish between three
cases:
a. A new minor release.
b. A patch release on an existing minor version.
c. The weekly snapshot.
The way in which we get to the final artifact differs based on the three cases
above, but the manual testing steps are always the same. As such, they have
their own section at the end of this document.
## Minor Release
For a minor release, we will usually set a target date and a target scope. When
we get "close enough" to the target scope or date, we create the release
branches for the future release, branching off from `main`. There is no hard rule about
when this step happens, and there may be a few days between repos.
In the [daml] repo, the release branch for minor version `A.B` must be named
`release/A.B.x`, e.g. `release/2.7.x`. In the [canton] repo, the release
branch is named `release-line-A.B`, e.g. `release-line-2.7`. In both repos, we
have special "branch protection rules" set up in GitHub for branches with those
names.
> Note: This also means you should not create branches with those (or similar)
> names if they are not meant to be release branches.
When the release branches contain all the required changes and there are no
blockers left, we create a release candidate (RC). This step can be repeated
multiple times: if issues are found with the current RC, we'll add patches to
the release branches, and create a new RC.
> Note: In most cases work should not be done on a release branch directly.
> Changes should go into the `main` branch first, and then be backported to the
> release branch.
After some time and testing (see the [release planning] document for details),
the RC is accepted and we create a new release from the same code base.
RC version strings in the [daml] repo are indistinguishable from snapshot
names. In the [canton] repo, snapshots are usually names by their date of
production (e.g. `20230401`) whereas RCs contain an explicit `rc` market (e.g.
`2.6.0-rc2`). This can create some confusion, but is hard to change at this
time.
> **When you create the release branch in the [daml] repo, make a PR to `main`
> bumping [`NIGHTLY_PREFIX`] accordingly.**
The steps to create a release are:
1. In the [daml] repo, edit the [`LATEST`] file. The format of that file is a
commit sha of the code you want to release (at this point typically the tip
of the release branch), the version number you want to attribute to the
build, and the words `SPLIT_RELEASE` (for historical reason dating to
pre-2.0 days). For a release candidate, one can generate a snapshot version
string using the `release.sh` script. For example, to create a PR for a
2.0.0 release candidate:
introduce new release process (#4513) Context ======= After multiple discussions about our current release schedule and process, we've come to the conclusion that we need to be able to make a distinction between technical snapshots and marketing releases. In other words, we need to be able to create a bundle for early adopters to test without making it an officially-supported version, and without necessarily implying everyone should go through the trouble of upgrading. The underlying goal is to have less frequent but more stable "official" releases. This PR is a proposal for a new release process designed under the following constraints: - Reuse as much as possible of the existing infrastructure, to minimize effort but also chances of disruptions. - Have the ability to create "snapshot"/"nightly"/... releases that are not meant for general public consumption, but can still be used by savvy users without jumping through too many extra hoops (ideally just swapping in a slightly-weirder version string). - Have the ability to promote an existing snapshot release to "official" release status, with as few changes as possible in-between, so we can be confident that the official release is what we tested as a prerelease. - Have as much of the release pipeline shared between the two types of releases, to avoid discovering non-transient problems while trying to promote a snapshot to an official release. - Triggerring a release should still be done through a PR, so we can keep the same approval process for SOC2 auditability. The gist of this proposal is to replace the current `VERSION` file with a `LATEST` file, which would have the following format: ``` ef5d32b7438e481de0235c5538aedab419682388 0.13.53-alpha.20200214.3025.ef5d32b7 ``` This file would be maintained with a script to reduce manual labor in producing the version string. Other than that, the process will be largely the same, with releases triggered by changes to this `LATEST` and the release notes files. Version numbers =============== Because one of the goals is to reduce the velocity of our published version numbers, we need a different version scheme for our snapshot releases. Fortunately, most version schemes have some support for that; unfortunately, the SDK sits at the intersection of three different version schemes that have made incompatible choices. Without going into too much detail: - Semantic versioning (which we chose as the version format for the SDK version number) allows for "prerelease" version numbers as well as "metadata"; an example of a complete version string would be `1.2.3-nightly.201+server12.43`. The "main" part of the version string always has to have 3 numbers separated by dots; the "prerelease" (after the `-` but before the `+`) and the "metadata" (after the `+`) parts are optional and, if present, must consist of one or more segments separated by dots, where a segment can be either a number or an alphanumeric string. In terms of ordering, metadata is irrelevant and any version with a prerelease string is before the corresponding "main" version string alone. Amongst prereleases, segments are compared in order with purely numeric ones compared as numbers and mixed ones compared lexicographically. So 1.2.3 is more recent than 1.2.3-1, which is itself less recent than 1.2.3-2. - Maven version strings are any number of segments separated by a `.`, a `-`, or a transition between a number and a letter. Version strings are compared element-wise, with numeric segments being compared as numbers. Alphabetic segments are treated specially if they happen to be one of a handful of magic words (such as "alpha", "beta" or "snapshot" for example) which count as "qualifiers"; a version string with a qualifier is "before" its prefix (`1.2.3` is before `1.2.3-alpha.3`, which is the same as `1.2.3-alpha3` or `1.2.3-alpha-3`), and there is a special ordering amongst qualifiers. Other alphabetic segments are compared alphabetically and count as being "after" their prefix (`1.2.3-really-final-this-time` counts as being released after `1.2.3`). - GHC package numbers are comprised of any number of numeric segments separated by `.`, plus an optional (though deprecated) alphanumeric "version tag" separated by a `-`. I could not find any official documentation on ordering for the version tag; numeric segments are compared as numbers. - npm uses semantic versioning so that is covered already. After much more investigation than I'd care to admit, I have come up with the following compromise as the least-bad solution. First, obviously, the version string for stable/marketing versions is going to be "standard" semver, i.e. major.minor.patch, all numbers, which works, and sorts as expected, for all three schemes. For snapshot releases, we shall use the following (semver) format: ``` 0.13.53-alpha.20200214.3025.ef5d32b7 ``` where the components are, respectively: - `0.13.53`: the expected version string of the next "stable" release. - `alpha`: a marker that hopefully scares people enough. - `20200214`: the date of the release commit, which _MUST_ be on master. - `3025`: the number of commits in master up to the release commit (included). Because we have a linear, append-only master branch, this uniquely identifies the commit. - `ef5d32b7ù : the first 8 characters of the release commit sha. This is not strictly speaking necessary, but makes it a lot more convenient to identify the commit. The main downsides of this format are: 1. It is not a valid format for GHC packages. We do not publish GHC packages from the SDK (so far we have instead opted to release our Haskell code as separate packages entirely), so this should not be an issue. However, our SDK version currently leaks to `ghc-pkg` as the version string for the stdlib (and prim) packages. This PR addresses that by tweaking the compiler to remove the offending bits, so `ghc-pkg` would see the above version number as `0.13.53.20200214.3025`, which should be enough to uniquely identify it. Note that, as far as I could find out, this number would never be exposed to users. 2. It is rather long, which I think is good from a human perspective as it makes it more scary. However, I have been told that this may be long enough to cause issues on Windows by pushing us past the max path size limitation of that "OS". I suggest we try it and see what happens. The upsides are: - It clearly indicates it is an unstable release (`alpha`). - It clearly indicates how old it is, by including the date. - To humans, it is immediately obvious which version is "later" even if they have the same date, allowing us to release same-day patches if needed. (Note: that is, commits that were made on the same day; the release date itself is irrelevant here.) - It contains the git sha so the commit built for that release is immediately obvious. - It sorts correctly under all schemes (modulo the modification for GHC). Alternatives I considered: - Pander to GHC: 0.13.53-alpha-20200214-3025-ef5d32b7. This format would be accepted by all schemes, but will not sort as expected under semantic versioning (though Maven will be fine). I have no idea how it will sort under GHC. - Not having any non-numeric component, e.g. `0.13.53.20200214.3025`. This is not valid semantic versioning and is therefore rejected by npm. - Not having detailed info: just go with `0.13.53-snapshot`. This is what is generally done in the Java world, but we then lose track of what version is actually in use and I'm concerned about bug reports. This would also not let us publish to the main Maven repo (at least not more than once), as artifacts there are supposed to be immutable. - No having a qualifier: `0.13.53-3025` would be acceptable to all three version formats. However, it would not clearly indicate to humans that it is not meant as a stable version, and would sort differently under semantic versioning (which counts it as a prerelease, i.e. before `0.13.53`) than under maven (which counts it as a patch, so after `0.13.53`). - Just counting releases: `0.13.53-alpha.1`, where we just count the number of prereleases in-between `0.13.52` and the next. This is currently the fallback plan if Windows path length causes issues. It would be less convenient to map releases to commits, but it could still be done via querying the history of the `LATEST` file. Release notes ============= > Note: We have decided not to have release notes for snapshot releases. Release notes are a bit tricky. Because we want the ability to make snapshot releases, then later on promote them to stable releases, it follows that we want to build commits from the past. However, if we decide post-hoc that a commit is actually a good candidate for a release, there is no way that commit can have the appropriate release notes: it cannot know what version number it's getting, and, moreover, we now track changes in commit messages. And I do not think anyone wants to go back to the release notes file being a merge bottleneck. But release notes need to be published to the releases blog upon releasing a stable version, and the docs website needs to be updated and include them. The only sensible solution here is to pick up the release notes as of the commit that triggers the release. As the docs cron runs asynchronously, this means walking down the git history to find the relevant commit. > Note: We could probably do away with the asynchronicity at this point. > It was originally included to cover for the possibility of a release > failing. If we are releasing commits from the past after they have been > tested, this should not be an issue anymore. If the docs generation were > part of the synchronous release step, it would have direct access to the > correct release notes without having to walk down the git history. > > However, I think it is more prudent to keep this change as a future step, > after we're confident the new release scheme does indeed produce much more > reliable "stable" releases. New release process =================== Just like releases are currently controlled mostly by detecting changes to the `VERSION` file, the new process will be controlled by detecting changes to the `LATEST` file. The format of that file will include both the version string and the corresponding SHA. Upon detecting a change to the `LATEST` file, CI will run the entire release process, just like it does now with the VERSION file. The main differences are: 1. Before running the release step, CI will checkout the commit specified in the LATEST file. This requires separating the release step from the build step, which in my opinion is cleaner anyway. 2. The `//:VERSION` Bazel target is replaced by a repository rule that gets the version to build from an environment variable, with a default of `0.0.0` to remain consistent with the current `daml-head` behaviour. Some of the manual steps will need to be skipped for a snapshot release. See amended `release/RELEASE.md` in this commit for details. The main caveat of this approach is that the official release will be a different binary from the corresponding snapshot. It will have been built from the same source, but with a different version string. This is somewhat mitigated by Bazel caching, meaning any build step that does not depend on the version string should use the cache and produce identical results. I do not think this can be avoided when our artifact includes its own version number. I must note, though, that while going through the changes required after removing the `VERSION` file, I have been quite surprised at the sheer number of things that actually depend on the SDK version number. I believe we should look into reducing that over time. CHANGELOG_BEGIN CHANGELOG_END
2020-02-25 19:01:23 +03:00
```
$ git fetch
$ ./release.sh snapshot origin/release/2.0.x 2.0.0
```
You should put that line in the file in order to preserve semver ordering,
and overwrite any existing snapshot with the same prefix.
Stable releases should use the same code as the last RC, so instead of
adding a new line you should simply remove the `-snapshot.*` part of the
version string on the appropriate line of the [`LATEST`] file.
2. Make a PR **targeting the `main` branch** with just that one line added,
touching no other file. Add the `Standard-Change` label to that PR.
4. When the PR is merged, the build of the corresponding commit on `main` will
create a "split release" bundle and push it to Artifactory. It should notify
on `#ci-failures-daml` on Slack.
5. The next step is to request a build from the [Canton] team (on
`#team-canton`) that relies on the RC snapshot. Once you have a [canton]
release, you can proceed.
6. Go to the [assembly] repo, and follow the instructions there to make a release
using the [Canton] version that was just created. The `LATEST` file on the
[assembly] repo only contains one version; it is safe to overwrite it, and to
"go backwards" if needed.
7. Once the `main` build of the [assembly] repo has finished, you should
proceed with testing. You should open up this document _in the branch of
the release you're making_, as testing instructions change over time.
(Though rarely these days.)
## Patch Release
On the technical side, a patch release is very similar to a minor release,
except that:
1. The non-technical steps of the broader process are much simpler. See the
[release planning] document for details.
2. Depending on the nature of the patch, we sometimes skip the RC process and
go straight for a stable version number. This is a judgement call based on
the specifics of the changes.
Patch releases are done from the corresponding release branch.
## Weekly Snapshot
> Note: You should not have to make any change to this repo.
The weekly snapshot relies on daily builds from both the [canton] and [daml]
repos, so there is no need to create those manually.
1. On Tuesday, you should see a reminder on Slack (`#team-daml`) with the name
of the release tester for the week.
1. On Wednesday morning, a cron should create a release PR on the [assembly]
repo, mentioning you. Please reach out to `@gary` on Slack if that's
missing.
2. Follow the instructions in the PR description. Merge the PR and wait for the
corresponding `main` build to finish.
2. Once the [assembly] build is finished, it should post a message to Slack
with instructions on how to get the release artifacts.
3. Go to the [Testing](#testing) section of this file.
> Note: Documentation for weekly snapshots should be published automatically by
> the [docs] repo cron. This is an hourly cron, however, and it can only run
> after the release artifacts have been created and pushed to GitHub releases
> on the [daml] repo, so it may take some time to appear.
## Testing
This testing procedure starts once the release is listed on the [releases page].
In the following notes, we assume that `$VERSION` contains
the full version tag for the release you are testing - in other words, the full version as recorded on the Slack
`#team-daml` message that is generated when closing the `main` build PR.
For example, for the Slack message:
> team_daml_notifs
>
> Just published `2.4.0-snapshot.20220830.10494.0.4622de48`.
>
> For testing:
>
> - Follow the [instructions](https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/blob/v2.4.0-snapshot.20220830.10494.0.4622de48/release/RELEASE.md).
> - Install on macOS/Linux with `curl -sSL https://get.daml.com/ | sh -s 2.4.0-snapshot.20220830.10494.0.4622de48`.
> - Install on Windows using this [link](https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/releases/download/v2.4.0-snapshot.20220830.10494.0.4622de48/daml-sdk-2.4.0-snapshot.20220830.10494.0.4622de48-windows.exe).
we set `$VERSION` to be `2.4.0-snapshot.20220830.10494.0.4622de48`.
1.
- On Windows, install the new SDK using the installer on the [releases page]. This will typically be the asset
named `daml-sdk-$VERSION-windows.exe` (located on the [DAML releases](https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/releases) page).
Please ensure that `$VERSION` is expanded correctly!.
- On MacOS/Linux (please ensure that `$VERSION` is expanded correctly!):
```
curl -sSL https://get.daml.com/ | sh -s "$VERSION"
```
> ## Tips for Windows testing in an ad-hoc machine
>
> If you are part of the release rotation, you can create Windows VMs
> through the [ad-hoc] project. The created machine is a bit raw, though, so
> here are a few tips to help you along.
>
> First we should clone the git repository https://github.com/DACH-NY/daml-language-ad-hoc and then enter the cloned
> repo.
>
> If this is your first time doing this, edit `tf/main.tf` and add your username to the `members` field of the
> `google_project_iam_binding.machine_managers` resource. Generate and submit a PR with these changes. Once the PR
> has been accepted, you should now have permission to create GCP compute instances.
>
> Assuming `direnv` is installed, entering the `daml-language-ad-hoc` project directory will be sufficient to
> configure and install the extra software (e.g. the GCP SDK) required for your environment. Note that this could
> take a few minutes.
>
> A new GCP windows instance can be created by running `./ad-hoc.sh temp windows` inside the `daml-language-ad-hoc`
> project. This command prints IP address, username and password for the created Windows VM. Save this output.
> You will need this information later when you create an RDP connection.
>
> ‼️ After starting, it's going to take some time for the machine to be configured (see notes below).
>
> Before you may connect to this windows instance, you need to ensure that the VPN is connected. On Mac OSX you can
> do this by selecting the preconfigured _Connect GCP Frankfurt full tunnel_ VPN profile.
>
> If you're on a Mac, you can use Microsoft Remote Desktop to connect. This can be installed via the Mac App Store
> or directly [here](https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=868963).
>
> If you're on Linux, you can use [Remmina].
>
> Remmina notes: when creating an RDP connection, you may want to specify custom
> resolution. The default setting is to `use client resolution`. You may notice a
> failure due to color depth settings. You can adjust those in the settings panel
> right below the resolution settings.
>
> The ad-hoc machines take a bit of time to be available after being reported as
> created, so be patient for a bit if your first connection attempt(s) fail.
>
> Once the Windows machine is up and running, use Firefox (in Windows) to download and install
> `daml-sdk-$VERSION-windows.exe` from https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/releases
> (please ensure `$VERSION` is expanded correctly!.
>
> NOTE 1: **Use Firefox for testing.** Windows machines come with both Internet Explorer and Firefox installed. Do
> not make the mistake of trying to use Internet Explorer.
>
> Ad-hoc machines also come with Node, VSCode and OpenJDK preinstalled, so
> you don't need to worry about those.
>
> NOTE 2: After logging in, **it takes some time for the machine to be configured.** The script that installs Firefox,
> Node, VSCode and OpenJDK runs once the machine is available for login. The software you need should appear within
> about 10 minutes (an easy way to check is to try to open `D:\` , as this volume is created after all the software
> is installed).
>
> All the commands mentioned in this testing section can be run from a simple
> DOS prompt (start menu -> type "cmd" -> click "Command prompt").
>
> At the end of your Windows testing session, please be sure to terminate the GCP instance by running
> `./ad-hoc.sh destroy $ID`. Here `$ID` is the identity for your GCP instance - this is printed when you create your
> Windows instance.
1. Prerequisites for running the tests:
- [Visual Studio Code, Java-SDK](https://docs.daml.com/getting-started/installation.html)
- [Node.js](https://nodejs.org/en/download/)
- Just the bare install; no need to build C dependencies.
If you have `nix` installed, you can use a suitable version of nodejs by
running `nix-shell -p nodejs-18_x` before running the `npm` commands below.
- [Maven](https://maven.apache.org)
1. Run `daml version --assistant=yes` and verify that the new version is
selected as the assistant version and the default version for new projects.
1. Tests for the getting started guide (macOS/Linux **and** Windows). Note: if
using a remote Windows VM and an RDP client that supports copy/paste, you
can run through this on both Windows and your local unix in parallel fairly
easily.
1. For these steps you will need the getting started documentation for the
release that you are about to make. This documentation (for the release that you are testing) is published
at `https://docs.daml.com/$VERSION/getting-started/index.html`. Please ensure that `$VERSION` is expanded
correctly before trying this link!
1. `daml new create-daml-app --template create-daml-app`
1. `cd create-daml-app`
1. `daml start`
1. In a new terminal (with nodejs configured as above), from the `ui` folder:
1. `npm install`
- if this command returns with an exit code of 0, errors may be safely ignored.
1. `npm start`
1. Open two browser windows (you want to see them simultaneously ideally) at `localhost:3000`.
1. Log in as `alice` in the first window, log in as `bob` in the second window.
1. In the first window, where you are logged in as `Alice`, follow
`Bob` by typing their name in the dropdown (note that it will
be `Bob` not `bob`, the former is the global alias, the latter
is the participant-local username). Verify that `Bob` appears
in the list of users `Alice` is following. Verify in the other
browser window that `Alice` shows up in `Bob`s network.
1. In the second window, where you are logged in as `Bob`,
follow `Alice` by selecting it in the dropdown.
Verify that `Alice` appears in
the list of users `Bob` is following. Verify in the other
browser window that `Bob` shows up in `Alice`s network.
1. Open the *"Your first feature"* section of the Getting Started Guide, e.g., from
`https://docs.daml.com/$VERSION/getting-started/first-feature.html`
if you did not build docs locally.
1. In a third terminal window, run `daml studio --replace=always` from the project root
directory. This should open Visual Studio Code. In the editor, open `daml/User.daml`.
1. Copy the `Message` template from the documentation to the end of `User.daml`.
1. Copy the `SendMessage` choice from the documentation to the
`User` template below the `Follow` choice.
1. Save your changes and close VSCode.
1. In the first terminal window (where `daml start` is running), press 'r'
(respectively 'r' + 'Enter' on Windows).
1. In the third terminal window, run `daml studio`.
1. Create `MessageList.tsx`, `MessageEdit.tsx` and modify
`MainView.tsx` as described in the documentation.
1. Verify that you do not see errors in the typescript code in VSCode.
1. Save your changes and close VSCode.
1. As before, open two browser windows at `localhost:3000` and log
in as `alice` and `bob`.
1. Make `Alice` follow `Bob`.
1. From `Bob`, select Alice in the `Select a follower` dropdown,
insert `hi alice` in the message field and click on `Send`.
1. Verify that `Alice` has received the message in the other window.
1. Make `Bob` follow `Alice`.
1. From `Alice`, select Bob in the `Select a follower` dropdown,
insert `hi bob` in the message field and click on `Send`.
1. Verify that `Bob` has received the message in the other window.
1. You can now close both browser windows and both running processes (`daml
start` and `npm start`).
1. Don't forget to run this on the other platform! E.g. if you just ran
through on Linux or macOS, you still need to run on Windows, and vice
versa. For testing on Windows instances, please refer to the _Tips for Windows testing in an ad-hoc machine_
notes above.
1. Run through the following test plan on Windows. This is slightly shortened to
make testing faster and since most issues are not platform specific.
1. Run `daml new myproject` to create a new project and switch to it using
`cd myproject`.
1. Run `daml start`.
1. Open your browser at `http://localhost:7500`, verify that you can log in as
alice and there is one contract, and that the template list contains
`Main:Asset` among other templates.
1. Kill `daml start` with `Ctrl-C`.
1. Run `daml studio --replace=always` and open `daml/Main.daml`. Verify that
the script result appears within 30 seconds.
- you will need to click on the _Script results_ link in the open VS code window in order to verify this
1. Add `+` at the end of line 26 after `(PartyIdHint "Alice")` and verify that
you get an error on line 27.
1. On your PR (the one that triggered the release process: on
[daml] for 1.x releases, and on [assembly] for 2.x
releases), add the comment:
> Manual tests passed on Windows.
1. Tests for `quickstart-java` (Linux/macOS)
While this is no longer the default in the Getting Started Guide, we still test it
since the process covers things not covered by the new Getting Started Guide
(e.g. Navigator, Scripts, Maven artifacts, etc.)
1. Create a new project with `daml new quickstart --template quickstart-java`
and switch to it using `cd quickstart`.
1. Verify the new version is specified in `daml.yaml` as the `sdk-version`.
1. Run `daml start`. Your browser should be opened automatically at
`http://localhost:7500`.
1. Login as `alice` and verify that there is 1 contract.
1. In the templates section, verify that the templates list contains `Iou:Iou`, `Iou:IouTransfer`,
and `IouTrade:IouTrade` among other templates.
1. Close the tab and kill `daml start` using `Ctrl-C`.
1. Run `daml build`.
1. In 3 separate terminals (each being in the `quickstart-java` project directory), run:
1. In Terminal 1 run `daml sandbox --port 6865`
1. In Terminal 2, run each of the following:
1. `daml ledger upload-dar --host localhost --port 6865 .daml/dist/quickstart-0.0.1.dar`
1.
```sh
daml script --ledger-host localhost --ledger-port 6865 --dar .daml/dist/quickstart-0.0.1.dar --script-name Main:initialize --output-file output.json
```
1. `cat output.json` and verify that the output looks like this:
```json
["Alice::NAMESPACE", "EUR_Bank::NAMESPACE"]
```
where `NAMESPACE` is some randomly generated series of hex digits.
1. `daml navigator server localhost 6865 --port 7500`
1. In Terminal 3, run:
```sh
daml codegen java && mvn compile exec:java@run-quickstart -Dparty=$(cat output.json | sed 's/\[\"//' | sed 's/".*//')
```
Note that this step scrapes the `Alice::NAMESPACE` party name from the `output.json` produced in the previous steps.
> Note: It takes some time (typically around half-an-hour) for our artifacts
> to be available on Maven Central. If you try running the last command before
> the artifacts are available, you will get a "not found" error. Trying to
> build again _in the next 24 hours_ will result in:
>
> ```
> Failure to find ... was cached in the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update interval of digitalasset-releases has elapsed or updates are forced
> ```
>
> This is Maven telling you it has locally cached that "not found" result
> and will consider it valid for 24h. To bypass that and force Maven to
> try the network call again, add a `-U` option, as in
> `mvn compile exec:java@run-quickstart -U`. Note that this is required to
> bypass your local cache of the failure; it will not be required for a
> user trying to run the quickstart after the artifacts have been
> published.
>
> Another common problem is that artifacts fail to resolve because of custom
> Maven settings. Check your `~/.m2/settings.xml` configuration and try
> disabling them temporarily.
1. Point your browser to `http://localhost:7500`, login as `alice` and verify
that there is 1 contract, 1 owned IOU, and the templates list contains `Iou:Iou`, `Iou:IouTransfer`,
and `IouTrade:IouTrade` among other templates.
1. Check that `curl http://localhost:8080/iou` returns:
```
{"0":{"issuer":"EUR_Bank::NAMESPACE","owner":"Alice::NAMESPACE","currency":"EUR","amount":100.0000000000,"observers":[]}}
```
where NAMESPACE is again the series of hex digits that you saw before.
1. Kill all processes.
1. Run `daml studio --replace=always`. This should open VSCode and trigger
the Daml extension that's bundled with the new SDK version. (The new
VSCode extension will not be in the marketplace at this point.)
1. Open `daml/Main.daml`.
1. Click on `Script results` above `initialize` (in the code) and wait for the script
results to appear.
1. Add `+` at the end of line 14, after `(PartyIdHint "Alice")` and
confirm you get an error in line 15.
1. Add `1` after the `+` and confirm you get a type error in line 14,
which says that `Script Party` does not match `Int`.
1. Delete the `+1` and the `e` in the second `"Alice"` and verify
that the script results are updated to the misspelled name.
1. Right click on `eurBank` in line 28 and verify that "Go to Definition"
takes you to the definition in line 17.
1. Close all files.
> Note: when running `daml studio --replace=always`, you force the
> installation of the VSCode extension bundled with the Daml SDK, and
> _disable the auto-upgrade mechanism in VSCode_. To instruct VSCode to go
> back to the published version of the extension, including auto-upgrades,
> you can run `daml studio --replace=published`.
1. On your PR (the one that triggered the release process: on
[daml] for 1.x releases, and on [assembly] for 2.x
releases), add the comment:
> Manual tests passed on [Linux/macOS].
specifying which platform you tested on.
1. If the release is bad, delete the release from the [releases page]. Mention
why it is bad as a comment on your PR, and **stop the process here**.
Note that **the Standard-Change label must remain on the PR**, even if the
release has failed.
1. Announce the release on `#product-daml` on Slack. For a stable release,
direct people to the release blog post. If there were any errors during testing,
but we decided to keep the release anyway, report those on the PR and include a
link to the PR in the announcement.
For a stable release, you need to additionally:
1. Go to the [releases page] and remove the prerelease marker on
the release. Also change the text to
```See [the release notes blog]() for details.```
adding in the direct link to this version's [release notes]. Documentation
for this release will be added to docs.daml.com on the next hour.
1. Coordinate with product (& marketing) for the relevant public
announcements (Daml Forum, Twitter, etc.).
introduce new release process (#4513) Context ======= After multiple discussions about our current release schedule and process, we've come to the conclusion that we need to be able to make a distinction between technical snapshots and marketing releases. In other words, we need to be able to create a bundle for early adopters to test without making it an officially-supported version, and without necessarily implying everyone should go through the trouble of upgrading. The underlying goal is to have less frequent but more stable "official" releases. This PR is a proposal for a new release process designed under the following constraints: - Reuse as much as possible of the existing infrastructure, to minimize effort but also chances of disruptions. - Have the ability to create "snapshot"/"nightly"/... releases that are not meant for general public consumption, but can still be used by savvy users without jumping through too many extra hoops (ideally just swapping in a slightly-weirder version string). - Have the ability to promote an existing snapshot release to "official" release status, with as few changes as possible in-between, so we can be confident that the official release is what we tested as a prerelease. - Have as much of the release pipeline shared between the two types of releases, to avoid discovering non-transient problems while trying to promote a snapshot to an official release. - Triggerring a release should still be done through a PR, so we can keep the same approval process for SOC2 auditability. The gist of this proposal is to replace the current `VERSION` file with a `LATEST` file, which would have the following format: ``` ef5d32b7438e481de0235c5538aedab419682388 0.13.53-alpha.20200214.3025.ef5d32b7 ``` This file would be maintained with a script to reduce manual labor in producing the version string. Other than that, the process will be largely the same, with releases triggered by changes to this `LATEST` and the release notes files. Version numbers =============== Because one of the goals is to reduce the velocity of our published version numbers, we need a different version scheme for our snapshot releases. Fortunately, most version schemes have some support for that; unfortunately, the SDK sits at the intersection of three different version schemes that have made incompatible choices. Without going into too much detail: - Semantic versioning (which we chose as the version format for the SDK version number) allows for "prerelease" version numbers as well as "metadata"; an example of a complete version string would be `1.2.3-nightly.201+server12.43`. The "main" part of the version string always has to have 3 numbers separated by dots; the "prerelease" (after the `-` but before the `+`) and the "metadata" (after the `+`) parts are optional and, if present, must consist of one or more segments separated by dots, where a segment can be either a number or an alphanumeric string. In terms of ordering, metadata is irrelevant and any version with a prerelease string is before the corresponding "main" version string alone. Amongst prereleases, segments are compared in order with purely numeric ones compared as numbers and mixed ones compared lexicographically. So 1.2.3 is more recent than 1.2.3-1, which is itself less recent than 1.2.3-2. - Maven version strings are any number of segments separated by a `.`, a `-`, or a transition between a number and a letter. Version strings are compared element-wise, with numeric segments being compared as numbers. Alphabetic segments are treated specially if they happen to be one of a handful of magic words (such as "alpha", "beta" or "snapshot" for example) which count as "qualifiers"; a version string with a qualifier is "before" its prefix (`1.2.3` is before `1.2.3-alpha.3`, which is the same as `1.2.3-alpha3` or `1.2.3-alpha-3`), and there is a special ordering amongst qualifiers. Other alphabetic segments are compared alphabetically and count as being "after" their prefix (`1.2.3-really-final-this-time` counts as being released after `1.2.3`). - GHC package numbers are comprised of any number of numeric segments separated by `.`, plus an optional (though deprecated) alphanumeric "version tag" separated by a `-`. I could not find any official documentation on ordering for the version tag; numeric segments are compared as numbers. - npm uses semantic versioning so that is covered already. After much more investigation than I'd care to admit, I have come up with the following compromise as the least-bad solution. First, obviously, the version string for stable/marketing versions is going to be "standard" semver, i.e. major.minor.patch, all numbers, which works, and sorts as expected, for all three schemes. For snapshot releases, we shall use the following (semver) format: ``` 0.13.53-alpha.20200214.3025.ef5d32b7 ``` where the components are, respectively: - `0.13.53`: the expected version string of the next "stable" release. - `alpha`: a marker that hopefully scares people enough. - `20200214`: the date of the release commit, which _MUST_ be on master. - `3025`: the number of commits in master up to the release commit (included). Because we have a linear, append-only master branch, this uniquely identifies the commit. - `ef5d32b7ù : the first 8 characters of the release commit sha. This is not strictly speaking necessary, but makes it a lot more convenient to identify the commit. The main downsides of this format are: 1. It is not a valid format for GHC packages. We do not publish GHC packages from the SDK (so far we have instead opted to release our Haskell code as separate packages entirely), so this should not be an issue. However, our SDK version currently leaks to `ghc-pkg` as the version string for the stdlib (and prim) packages. This PR addresses that by tweaking the compiler to remove the offending bits, so `ghc-pkg` would see the above version number as `0.13.53.20200214.3025`, which should be enough to uniquely identify it. Note that, as far as I could find out, this number would never be exposed to users. 2. It is rather long, which I think is good from a human perspective as it makes it more scary. However, I have been told that this may be long enough to cause issues on Windows by pushing us past the max path size limitation of that "OS". I suggest we try it and see what happens. The upsides are: - It clearly indicates it is an unstable release (`alpha`). - It clearly indicates how old it is, by including the date. - To humans, it is immediately obvious which version is "later" even if they have the same date, allowing us to release same-day patches if needed. (Note: that is, commits that were made on the same day; the release date itself is irrelevant here.) - It contains the git sha so the commit built for that release is immediately obvious. - It sorts correctly under all schemes (modulo the modification for GHC). Alternatives I considered: - Pander to GHC: 0.13.53-alpha-20200214-3025-ef5d32b7. This format would be accepted by all schemes, but will not sort as expected under semantic versioning (though Maven will be fine). I have no idea how it will sort under GHC. - Not having any non-numeric component, e.g. `0.13.53.20200214.3025`. This is not valid semantic versioning and is therefore rejected by npm. - Not having detailed info: just go with `0.13.53-snapshot`. This is what is generally done in the Java world, but we then lose track of what version is actually in use and I'm concerned about bug reports. This would also not let us publish to the main Maven repo (at least not more than once), as artifacts there are supposed to be immutable. - No having a qualifier: `0.13.53-3025` would be acceptable to all three version formats. However, it would not clearly indicate to humans that it is not meant as a stable version, and would sort differently under semantic versioning (which counts it as a prerelease, i.e. before `0.13.53`) than under maven (which counts it as a patch, so after `0.13.53`). - Just counting releases: `0.13.53-alpha.1`, where we just count the number of prereleases in-between `0.13.52` and the next. This is currently the fallback plan if Windows path length causes issues. It would be less convenient to map releases to commits, but it could still be done via querying the history of the `LATEST` file. Release notes ============= > Note: We have decided not to have release notes for snapshot releases. Release notes are a bit tricky. Because we want the ability to make snapshot releases, then later on promote them to stable releases, it follows that we want to build commits from the past. However, if we decide post-hoc that a commit is actually a good candidate for a release, there is no way that commit can have the appropriate release notes: it cannot know what version number it's getting, and, moreover, we now track changes in commit messages. And I do not think anyone wants to go back to the release notes file being a merge bottleneck. But release notes need to be published to the releases blog upon releasing a stable version, and the docs website needs to be updated and include them. The only sensible solution here is to pick up the release notes as of the commit that triggers the release. As the docs cron runs asynchronously, this means walking down the git history to find the relevant commit. > Note: We could probably do away with the asynchronicity at this point. > It was originally included to cover for the possibility of a release > failing. If we are releasing commits from the past after they have been > tested, this should not be an issue anymore. If the docs generation were > part of the synchronous release step, it would have direct access to the > correct release notes without having to walk down the git history. > > However, I think it is more prudent to keep this change as a future step, > after we're confident the new release scheme does indeed produce much more > reliable "stable" releases. New release process =================== Just like releases are currently controlled mostly by detecting changes to the `VERSION` file, the new process will be controlled by detecting changes to the `LATEST` file. The format of that file will include both the version string and the corresponding SHA. Upon detecting a change to the `LATEST` file, CI will run the entire release process, just like it does now with the VERSION file. The main differences are: 1. Before running the release step, CI will checkout the commit specified in the LATEST file. This requires separating the release step from the build step, which in my opinion is cleaner anyway. 2. The `//:VERSION` Bazel target is replaced by a repository rule that gets the version to build from an environment variable, with a default of `0.0.0` to remain consistent with the current `daml-head` behaviour. Some of the manual steps will need to be skipped for a snapshot release. See amended `release/RELEASE.md` in this commit for details. The main caveat of this approach is that the official release will be a different binary from the corresponding snapshot. It will have been built from the same source, but with a different version string. This is somewhat mitigated by Bazel caching, meaning any build step that does not depend on the version string should use the cache and produce identical results. I do not think this can be avoided when our artifact includes its own version number. I must note, though, that while going through the changes required after removing the `VERSION` file, I have been quite surprised at the sheer number of things that actually depend on the SDK version number. I believe we should look into reducing that over time. CHANGELOG_BEGIN CHANGELOG_END
2020-02-25 19:01:23 +03:00
1. Documentation is published automatically once the release is
public on GitHub, though this runs on an hourly cron.
Thanks for making a release!
[assembly]: https://github.com/DACH-NY/assembly
[canton]: https://github.com/DACH-NY/canton
[docs]: https://github.com/digital-asset/docs.daml.com
[`LATEST`]: https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/blob/main/LATEST
[`LATEST`]: https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/blob/main/NIGHTLY_PREFIX
[`release.sh`]: https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/blob/main/release.sh
[checklist]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RY2Qe9GwAUiiSJmq1lTzy6wu1N2ZSEILQ68M9n8CHgg
[release planning]: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FaBFuYweYt0hx6fVg9rhufCtDNPiATXu5zwN2NWp2s4/edit#
[daml]: https://github.com/digital-asset/daml
[release notes]: https://daml.com/release-notes/
[releases page]: https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/releases
[testing]: #testing
[Remmina]: https://remmina.org