* set doobie version to 0.9.2 and rerun maven pin
* port extractor and some of JSON API
* repin maven
* use doobie's own builder compatibility where required
* use probably bad derivations to supply Blockers where transactEC was required
- The point of using Blocker instead of ExecutionContext seems to be to
especially emphasize to API users that it isn't appropriate to use an
ExecutionContext with ordinary behavior. That is what we have done, which
should probably change, but just compiling for now.
* fix fragment inspection test for internal restructuring
- This test depends on implementation details of Doobie, so naturally it must be
altered when that runs. Fortunately, it's been made easier by the changes
in this upgrade.
* allow 256 blockers for navigator transaction blocker, like the global EC
* allow as many blockers as the pool size for trigger service
- The transactor shouldn't share ExecutionContext for transactions with the
caller, so we set up a new one based on configured pool size.
* no changelog
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* add silent_annotations option to da scala bazel functions
* use silent_annotations for several scala targets
* use silencer_plugin instead when the lib isn't used
* use silent_annotations for several more scala targets
* use silencer_lib for strange indirect requirement for running tests
* no changelog
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* silent_annotations support for scaladoc
* ledger-api-client: `maxInboundMessageSize` -> `maxInboundMetadataSize`.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
- [Scala Bindings] Rename a field in the ``LedgerClientConfiguration``
to ``maxInboundMetadataSize``, to match the builder Netty channel
builder. It was incorrectly named ``maxInboundMessageSize``, which is
a different channel property that configures the maximum message size,
not the header size.
CHANGELOG_END
* ledger-api-client: Introduce a `maxInboundMessageSize` config property.
We use this a lot; easier if it's in the configuration.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
- [Scala Bindings] Replace the
``LedgerClientConfiguration.maxInboundMessageSize`` property with a
new one that represents the maximum size of the response body.
CHANGELOG_END
fixes#2506
Judging from the issue this was originally introduced to workaround a
bug. I couldn’t actually track down what that bug was but at this
point they are identical so no point keeping this around.
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* add -Ywarn-unused to all scalac options
* remove some unused arguments
* remove some unused definitions
* remove some unused variable names
* suppress some unused variable names
* changeExtension doesn't use baseName
* no changelog
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* work around no plugins in scenario interpreter perf tests
* remove many more unused things
* remove more unused things, restore some used things
* remove more unused things, restore a couple signature mistakes
* missed import
* unused argument
* remove more unused loggingContexts
* some unused code in triggers
* some unused code in sandbox and kvutils
* some unused code in repl-service and daml-script
* some unused code in bindings-rxjava tests
* some unused code in triggers runner
* more comments on silent usages
- suggested by @cocreature; thanks
* fix missing reference in TestCommands
* more unused in triggers
* more unused in sandbox
* more unused in daml-script
* more unused in ledger-client tests
* more unused in triggers
* more unused in kvutils
* more unused in daml-script
* more unused in sandbox
* remove unused in ledger-api-test-tool
* suppress final special case for codegen unused warnings
.../com/daml/sample/mymain/ContractIdNT.scala:24: warning: parameter value ev 0 in method ContractIdNT Value is never used
implicit def `ContractIdNT Value`[a_a1dk](implicit `ev 0`: ` lfdomainapi`.Value[a_a1dk]): ` lfdomainapi`.Value[_root_.com.daml.sample.MyMain.ContractIdNT[a_a1dk]] = {
^
.../com/daml/sample/mymain/ContractIdNT.scala:41: warning: parameter value eva_a1dk in method ContractIdNT LfEncodable is never used
implicit def `ContractIdNT LfEncodable`[a_a1dk](implicit eva_a1dk: ` lfdomainapi`.encoding.LfEncodable[a_a1dk]): ` lfdomainapi`.encoding.LfEncodable[_root_.com.daml.sample.MyMain.ContractIdNT[a_a1dk]] = {
^
* one more unused in daml-script
* special scaladoc rules may need silencer, too
* unused in compatibility/sandbox-migration
* more commas, a different way to `find`
- suggested by @remyhaemmerle-da; thanks
* add -Xlint:doc-detached
- reverts 1feae964e3 from #6798
* attach several scaladocs where they'll actually be included
* no changelog
* attach several more scaladocs where they'll actually be included
* no changelog
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* set many extra scalac -Xlint options for all Scala projects
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* move NoCopy to its own file
package.scala:18: warning: it is not recommended to define classes/objects inside of package objects.
If possible, define trait NoCopy in package data instead.
trait NoCopy {
^
* move more traits, classes, and objects to proper packages
- note that `package` is itself a scoping construct, so if your reason
is the apparent aesthetic of placing a bunch of things in one `package
object`, that is easily remedied by deleting the `object` keyword
* fix some type-parameter-shadow warnings
- I'm generally in favor of sensible name-shadowing, following the
"deliberately hide variables that should not be accessed here" school
of thought. But I think type name shadowing isn't quite as valuable
and more likely to confuse than general variable shadowing, so have
experimentally linted it out.
Example warning:
EventsTableFlatEventsRangeQueries.scala:11: warning: type parameter
Offset defined in trait EventsTableFlatEventsRangeQueries shadows class
Offset defined in package v1. You may want to rename your type
parameter, or possibly remove it.
private[events] sealed trait EventsTableFlatEventsRangeQueries[Offset] {
^
* fix more package-object-classes warnings
* fix an inaccessible warning
ContractsService.scala:197: warning: method searchDb in class ContractsService references private class ContractsFetch.
Classes which cannot access ContractsFetch may be unable to override searchDb.
def searchDb(dao: dbbackend.ContractDao, fetch: ContractsFetch)(
^
* enable -Xlint:infer-any
- continuing the saga of #6116, #6132
* enable -explaintypes for more detailed type errors
* missed header for NoCopy; probably should have left it in the package file
* misspelling in comment
* revert -Xlint:doc-detached
- there are a lot of these fixes, and they are noisy, so shifting to a
separate PR
- thanks to @leo-da for pointing out
* Move public code into daml-integration-api
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
[DAML Integration Kit]: Removed sandbox specific code from the API intended to be used by ledger integrations. Use the maven coordinates ``com.daml:participant-integration-api:VERSION`` instead of ``com.daml:ledger-api-server`` or ``com.daml:sandbox``.
CHANGELOG_END
* replace traverseU and sequenceU with traverse and sequence
- with -Ypartial-unification on, the extra Unapply typeclass lookup is
unnecessary
* no changelog
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* limit imports; we only need *> and void
Hopefully doesn’t need too much explanation. It works on
sandbox-classic, weirdly it seems to fail on sadbonx-next. Still
investigating but I don’t think this should block this.
I’ve changed createManyCounters to produce a single transaction since
that is significantly faster since you don’t have the Ledger-API roundtirp.
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* add -Xsource:2.13, -Ypartial-unification to common_scalacopts
* add now-referenced scalaz-core where needed
* work around bad type signatures in scalatest Aggregating, Containing
* unused Any suppression
* work around bad partial-unification wrought by type alias
* remove unused Conversions import
- not required in 4f68cfc480 either, so unsure how it's survived this long
* work around Future.traverse; remove unused show import
* no changelog
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* remove unused bounds
* remove -Ypartial-unification and -Xsource:2.13 where they were explicitly passed
* longer comment on what the options do
- suggested by @stefanobaghino-da; thanks
* forget Future.traverse, just use scalaz, it knows how to do this
* Add option based constructor for LedgerIdRequirement
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Make option based consructor the default, deprecate old constructor
* Update with review comments
* disable Any wart
* first pass removal of Any suppressions for false positives
* second pass removal of Any suppressions for false positives
* no changelog
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* third pass removal of Any suppressions for false positives
* fourth pass removal of Any suppressions for false positives
* reformat newly single-suppressions into single lines
- suggested by @SamirTalwar-DA; thanks
Specifically, the option to adjust the gRPC maximum inbound message size.
changelog_begin
[Navigator] The CLI help message now shows how to adjust the gRPC
maximum inbound message size.
changelog_end
* factor TlsConfiguration parser from extractor
* move TlsConfigurationParser to new library
* link extractor to ledger-service/cli-opts properly
* use TlsConfigurationCli in http-json, pass SslContext to ledger-client
* test TLS options as used in http-json
- the TLS config code is shared with extractor, where it is more fully
tested; we just do a sanity check here
* doc TLS options for http-json
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
- [JSON API] New ``--pem``, ``--crt``, ``--cacrt``, and ``--tls`` options
for securing the connection between JSON API server and ledger.
See `issue #2540 <https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/issues/2540>`__.
CHANGELOG_END
* TLS off in daml-script JSON API test
Packages com.digitalasset.daml and com.daml have been unified under com.daml
Ledger API and DAML-LF DEV protos have also been moved from `com/digitalasset`
to `com/daml` on the file system.
Protos for already released DAML LF versions (1.6, 1.7, 1.8) stay in the
package `com.digitalasset`.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
[SDK] All Java and Scala packages starting with
``com.digitalasset.daml`` and ``com.digitalasset`` are now consolidated
under ``com.daml``. Simply changing imports should be enough to
migrate your code.
CHANGELOG_END
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
- Move daml2ts, bindings-ts and JSON API out of experimental section in docs
- Rename Experimental to Early Access in docs and assistant
- Reorganise the docs a little bit to de-emphasise the Ledger API
CHANGELOG_END
* bazel_tools: Set `unused_dependency_checker_mode` in one place.
* bazel_tools: Set the default max heap size for Scala processes to 2GB.
And the default initial max heap size to 512MB.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* bazel_tools: Set the `scalac` heap size to 2GB and stack size to 2MB.
* bazel_tools: Delete `da_scala_macro_library`, as it's unused.
* bazel_tools: Revert the description of `da_scala_library_suite`.
Misread it.
* Use com.daml as groupId for all artifacts
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
[SDK] Changed the groupId for Maven artifacts to ``com.daml``.
CHANGELOG_END
* Add 2 additional maven related checks to the release binary
1. Check that all maven upload artifacts use com.daml as the groupId
2. Check that all maven upload artifacts have a unique artifactId
* Address @cocreature's comments in https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/pull/5272#pullrequestreview-385026181
Contributes to #4194.
Closes#4231.
Closes#5022.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
- [Ledger API] The protobuf fields ledger_effective_time and maximum_record_time have been removed from
command submission. These fields were previously deprecated following the introduction
of a new ledger time model. See issue `#4194 <https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/issues/4194>`__.
[Java Bindings] removed the usage of ledgerEffectiveTime and
maximumRecordTime, and instead added minLedgerTimeAbsolute and
minLedgerTimeRelative in CommandSubmissionClient and CommandClient
CHANGELOG_END
* Tighten result type
Command execution can't result in a sequencer error
* New helper method for extracting used contracts
* New error clause
* Add a DAO query for the maximum time of contracts
* Implement algorithm for finding ledger time
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* fixup ledgerTimeHelper
* Use new ledger time algorithm
* Mark LET/MRT as deprecated
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
- [Ledger API] DAML ledgers have switched to a new ledger time model.
The ledger_effective_time and maximum_record_time fields of command submission are deprecated,
the ledger time of transactions is instead set automatically by the ledger API server.
Ledger time is no longer strictly monotonically increasing, but only follows causal monotonicity:
ledger time of transactions is greater than or equal to the ledger time of any used contract.
See `#4345 <https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/issues/4345>`__.
CHANGELOG_END
* Add ledger time skew check
* Remove command updater
LET/MRT are now deprecated, this class is now useless
* Remove old time model validator
* Switch to new time model check: kvutils
* Switch to new time model check: in-memory ledger
* Switch to new time model check: SqlLedger
* Use initial ledger config
* Ignore user provided LET
* Use TimeProvider in submission services
* Use deduplication_time in daml-script runner
- Also remove unnecessary command completion output of CommandTracker.
- Remove usage of maximum record time in CommandTracker.
* Use arbitrary default value for deduplication time
* Use built-in Instant ordering
* Remove obsolete test
* Remove obsolete test: CommandStaticTimeIT
* Refactor test: TransactionMRTCompliance
* Disable test: CommandTrackerFlow timeout
* thread maxDeduplicationTime through to CommandTracker
* Improve test
* Refactor command client configuration
* Deduplication time should always use UTC
* Add missing method in TimedIndexService after rebase
* Put more details into the deduplication error response.
* Use system time for command dedup submittedAt.
* Use explicit UTC time source in command validator
* Revert CommandTracker[Flow] to previous completion-recovering-behavior
* Adapt scala client command config to new config params
Co-authored-by: Gerolf Seitz <gerolf.seitz@digitalasset.com>
Some Option2Iterable ignore annotations are not needed, others were needed for unused methods.
In a few occasions we were ignoring the warning for the very purpose for which is was there,
i.e. avoiding an implicit conversion. I'm all for not verifying this rule if we agree we
don't need it.
For ProcessFailedException it was a bit gratuitous, I changed the way in which the exception
message is built.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* Share test certificates
This is primarily an attempt at making sure my contribution stats
remain negative but I think it’s a nice cleanup. The only difference
in the certs used by daml-helper which are now used everywhere is that
they use a different CN for the CA and the server. This is required to
make openssl happy (which is used by the daml-helper).
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Fix script and trigger tests
This PR fixes the tls configuration to work if client auth is not
enabled and adds a `--tls` flag to extractor and navigator which
allows you to enable tls without overriding any certificates.
There is a test for extractor but none for navigator since there are
no tls tests at all afaict atm. I did however test it manually.
changelog_begin
- [Navigator] Navigator can now run a TLS enabled ledger without
client authentication. You can enable TLS without any special
certificates by passing ``--tls``.
- [Extractor] Extractor can now run a TLS enabled ledger without
client authentication. You can enable TLS without any special
certificates by passing ``--tls``.
changelog_end
Context
=======
After multiple discussions about our current release schedule and
process, we've come to the conclusion that we need to be able to make a
distinction between technical snapshots and marketing releases. In other
words, we need to be able to create a bundle for early adopters to test
without making it an officially-supported version, and without
necessarily implying everyone should go through the trouble of
upgrading. The underlying goal is to have less frequent but more stable
"official" releases.
This PR is a proposal for a new release process designed under the
following constraints:
- Reuse as much as possible of the existing infrastructure, to minimize
effort but also chances of disruptions.
- Have the ability to create "snapshot"/"nightly"/... releases that are
not meant for general public consumption, but can still be used by savvy
users without jumping through too many extra hoops (ideally just
swapping in a slightly-weirder version string).
- Have the ability to promote an existing snapshot release to "official"
release status, with as few changes as possible in-between, so we can be
confident that the official release is what we tested as a prerelease.
- Have as much of the release pipeline shared between the two types of
releases, to avoid discovering non-transient problems while trying to
promote a snapshot to an official release.
- Triggerring a release should still be done through a PR, so we can
keep the same approval process for SOC2 auditability.
The gist of this proposal is to replace the current `VERSION` file with
a `LATEST` file, which would have the following format:
```
ef5d32b7438e481de0235c5538aedab419682388 0.13.53-alpha.20200214.3025.ef5d32b7
```
This file would be maintained with a script to reduce manual labor in
producing the version string. Other than that, the process will be
largely the same, with releases triggered by changes to this `LATEST`
and the release notes files.
Version numbers
===============
Because one of the goals is to reduce the velocity of our published
version numbers, we need a different version scheme for our snapshot
releases. Fortunately, most version schemes have some support for that;
unfortunately, the SDK sits at the intersection of three different
version schemes that have made incompatible choices. Without going into
too much detail:
- Semantic versioning (which we chose as the version format for the SDK
version number) allows for "prerelease" version numbers as well as
"metadata"; an example of a complete version string would be
`1.2.3-nightly.201+server12.43`. The "main" part of the version string
always has to have 3 numbers separated by dots; the "prerelease"
(after the `-` but before the `+`) and the "metadata" (after the `+`)
parts are optional and, if present, must consist of one or more segments
separated by dots, where a segment can be either a number or an
alphanumeric string. In terms of ordering, metadata is irrelevant and
any version with a prerelease string is before the corresponding "main"
version string alone. Amongst prereleases, segments are compared in
order with purely numeric ones compared as numbers and mixed ones
compared lexicographically. So 1.2.3 is more recent than 1.2.3-1,
which is itself less recent than 1.2.3-2.
- Maven version strings are any number of segments separated by a `.`, a
`-`, or a transition between a number and a letter. Version strings
are compared element-wise, with numeric segments being compared as
numbers. Alphabetic segments are treated specially if they happen to be
one of a handful of magic words (such as "alpha", "beta" or "snapshot"
for example) which count as "qualifiers"; a version string with a
qualifier is "before" its prefix (`1.2.3` is before `1.2.3-alpha.3`,
which is the same as `1.2.3-alpha3` or `1.2.3-alpha-3`), and there is a
special ordering amongst qualifiers. Other alphabetic segments are
compared alphabetically and count as being "after" their prefix
(`1.2.3-really-final-this-time` counts as being released after `1.2.3`).
- GHC package numbers are comprised of any number of numeric segments
separated by `.`, plus an optional (though deprecated) alphanumeric
"version tag" separated by a `-`. I could not find any official
documentation on ordering for the version tag; numeric segments are
compared as numbers.
- npm uses semantic versioning so that is covered already.
After much more investigation than I'd care to admit, I have come up
with the following compromise as the least-bad solution. First,
obviously, the version string for stable/marketing versions is going to
be "standard" semver, i.e. major.minor.patch, all numbers, which works,
and sorts as expected, for all three schemes. For snapshot releases, we
shall use the following (semver) format:
```
0.13.53-alpha.20200214.3025.ef5d32b7
```
where the components are, respectively:
- `0.13.53`: the expected version string of the next "stable" release.
- `alpha`: a marker that hopefully scares people enough.
- `20200214`: the date of the release commit, which _MUST_ be on
master.
- `3025`: the number of commits in master up to the release commit
(included). Because we have a linear, append-only master branch, this
uniquely identifies the commit.
- `ef5d32b7ù : the first 8 characters of the release commit sha. This is
not strictly speaking necessary, but makes it a lot more convenient to
identify the commit.
The main downsides of this format are:
1. It is not a valid format for GHC packages. We do not publish GHC
packages from the SDK (so far we have instead opted to release our
Haskell code as separate packages entirely), so this should not be an
issue. However, our SDK version currently leaks to `ghc-pkg` as the
version string for the stdlib (and prim) packages. This PR addresses
that by tweaking the compiler to remove the offending bits, so `ghc-pkg`
would see the above version number as `0.13.53.20200214.3025`, which
should be enough to uniquely identify it. Note that, as far as I could
find out, this number would never be exposed to users.
2. It is rather long, which I think is good from a human perspective as
it makes it more scary. However, I have been told that this may be
long enough to cause issues on Windows by pushing us past the max path
size limitation of that "OS". I suggest we try it and see what
happens.
The upsides are:
- It clearly indicates it is an unstable release (`alpha`).
- It clearly indicates how old it is, by including the date.
- To humans, it is immediately obvious which version is "later" even if
they have the same date, allowing us to release same-day patches if
needed. (Note: that is, commits that were made on the same day; the
release date itself is irrelevant here.)
- It contains the git sha so the commit built for that release is
immediately obvious.
- It sorts correctly under all schemes (modulo the modification for
GHC).
Alternatives I considered:
- Pander to GHC: 0.13.53-alpha-20200214-3025-ef5d32b7. This format would
be accepted by all schemes, but will not sort as expected under semantic
versioning (though Maven will be fine). I have no idea how it will sort
under GHC.
- Not having any non-numeric component, e.g. `0.13.53.20200214.3025`.
This is not valid semantic versioning and is therefore rejected by
npm.
- Not having detailed info: just go with `0.13.53-snapshot`. This is
what is generally done in the Java world, but we then lose track of what
version is actually in use and I'm concerned about bug reports. This
would also not let us publish to the main Maven repo (at least not more
than once), as artifacts there are supposed to be immutable.
- No having a qualifier: `0.13.53-3025` would be acceptable to all three
version formats. However, it would not clearly indicate to humans that
it is not meant as a stable version, and would sort differently under
semantic versioning (which counts it as a prerelease, i.e. before
`0.13.53`) than under maven (which counts it as a patch, so after
`0.13.53`).
- Just counting releases: `0.13.53-alpha.1`, where we just count the
number of prereleases in-between `0.13.52` and the next. This is
currently the fallback plan if Windows path length causes issues. It
would be less convenient to map releases to commits, but it could still
be done via querying the history of the `LATEST` file.
Release notes
=============
> Note: We have decided not to have release notes for snapshot releases.
Release notes are a bit tricky. Because we want the ability to make
snapshot releases, then later on promote them to stable releases, it
follows that we want to build commits from the past. However, if we
decide post-hoc that a commit is actually a good candidate for a
release, there is no way that commit can have the appropriate release
notes: it cannot know what version number it's getting, and, moreover,
we now track changes in commit messages. And I do not think anyone wants
to go back to the release notes file being a merge bottleneck.
But release notes need to be published to the releases blog upon
releasing a stable version, and the docs website needs to be updated and
include them.
The only sensible solution here is to pick up the release notes as of
the commit that triggers the release. As the docs cron runs
asynchronously, this means walking down the git history to find the
relevant commit.
> Note: We could probably do away with the asynchronicity at this point.
> It was originally included to cover for the possibility of a release
> failing. If we are releasing commits from the past after they have been
> tested, this should not be an issue anymore. If the docs generation were
> part of the synchronous release step, it would have direct access to the
> correct release notes without having to walk down the git history.
>
> However, I think it is more prudent to keep this change as a future step,
> after we're confident the new release scheme does indeed produce much more
> reliable "stable" releases.
New release process
===================
Just like releases are currently controlled mostly by detecting
changes to the `VERSION` file, the new process will be controlled by
detecting changes to the `LATEST` file. The format of that file will
include both the version string and the corresponding SHA.
Upon detecting a change to the `LATEST` file, CI will run the entire
release process, just like it does now with the VERSION file. The main
differences are:
1. Before running the release step, CI will checkout the commit
specified in the LATEST file. This requires separating the release
step from the build step, which in my opinion is cleaner anyway.
2. The `//:VERSION` Bazel target is replaced by a repository rule
that gets the version to build from an environment variable, with a
default of `0.0.0` to remain consistent with the current `daml-head`
behaviour.
Some of the manual steps will need to be skipped for a snapshot release.
See amended `release/RELEASE.md` in this commit for details.
The main caveat of this approach is that the official release will be a
different binary from the corresponding snapshot. It will have been
built from the same source, but with a different version string. This is
somewhat mitigated by Bazel caching, meaning any build step that does
not depend on the version string should use the cache and produce
identical results. I do not think this can be avoided when our artifact
includes its own version number.
I must note, though, that while going through the changes required after
removing the `VERSION` file, I have been quite surprised at the sheer number of
things that actually depend on the SDK version number. I believe we should
look into reducing that over time.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* Navigator: Fixes dependencies
This PR fix the navigator decencies that were remove a bit too eagerly in f33e79c787 (#3938)
* changelog
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* formatting
* formatting
* Upgrade to Akka 2.6.1, akka-http 10.1.11 and Scala 2.12.10
Akka 2.6.1 Upgrade Changes
- Materializer in place of ActorMaterializer
- Source.future instead of Source.fromFuture
- The Scheduler.schedule method has been deprecated in favor of selecting scheduleWithFixedDelay or scheduleAtFixedRate
- onDownstreamFinish(cause: Throwable)
- ActorAttributes.supervisionStrategy(...) in place of ActorMaterializerSettings.withSupervisionStrategy
See https://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/project/migration-guide-2.5.x-2.6.x.html
* Akka 2.6.1 Upgrade Changes
- onDownstreamFinish(cause: Throwable)
See https://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/project/migration-guide-2.5.x-2.6.x.html
* code review: remove unnecessary supervision strategy
* drop Nones from records when JSON-encoding
* elide some needless conversions in ApiCodecCompressed
* record with visible Inj
- seems to be running up against scala/scala#5075
* use new 3rdparty lib reference
* construct record types field-by-field
- works around scala/scala#5075
* switch to record style for records' Inj
- suggested by @leo-da
* include some samples to experiment with record
* record parsing
* RecordVa doesn't benefit from kind-projector
* scalafmt
* make RecordVa details private; only intended API is public
* Arbitrary and Shrink record support
* rename RecordVa#Inj to HRec, to accommodate variants in same cons structure
* use record testing in lf-value-json
* add complex record type
* add complex record value and test it
* more documentation for RecordVa
* Table-ify prior record tests
* start adding variant support
* scalacheck support for variants
* more scalacheck support for variants
* variant examples
* example of using align for records
* test variant roundtrip
* test variant in record
* add sample tests for the JSON format of records and variants
* rename record-specific functions in RecordVa
* rename RecordVa to RecVarSpec
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
- [Sandbox] Restore 0.13.38 logging behaviour.
- [Navigator] Restore 0.13.38 logging behaviour.
- [Extractor] Restore 0.13.38 logging behaviour.
- [Internals] As of 0.13.39, we merged a number of internal JAR files in
the SDK tarball to reduce its size. These jars used to be standalone
JARs you could invoke as e.g. ``java -jar sandbox.jar <args>``. As a
result of merging the jars, they lost their individual ``logback.xml``
configuration file. Although running the jars directly was (and is
still) not supported, note that you can now achieve the same behaviour
with e.g. ``java -Dlogback.configurationFile=sandbox-logback.xml -jar
daml-sdk.jar sandbox <args>``.
CHANGELOG_END
* convert party allocation to the new committer pattern
* scalafmt
* Use map with optional values for kvutils input state
We need to do this to detect when a submission has maliciously
omitted an input key.
