@stefanobaghino-da is taking care of 1.6.0-snapshot.20200915.5208.0.09014dc6 (#7410), so they get pushed back to the end of the line.
Please do not merge this before #7410.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
Co-authored-by: Azure Pipelines DAML Build <support@digitalasset.com>
Please indulge my OCD.
And apologies to whoever was counting on these for their steganographed
[Whitespace] program.
[Whitespace]: https://esolangs.org/wiki/Whitespace
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
We reach the timeout on pretty much every release lately and we need to
retry to entire release process two or three times to get through. This
is us giving up on Maven, not Maven itself crashing, so I4d like to try
giving it more time.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
@cocreature is taking care of 1.5.0-snapshot.20200908.5166.0.1623baec (#7348), so they get pushed back to the end of the line.
Please do not merge this before #7348.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
Co-authored-by: Azure Pipelines DAML Build <support@digitalasset.com>
NPM doesn’t actually need this (at least it didn’t for me locally and
hopefully CI agrees) to pick up changes and it emits a very
scary-looking warning if you do pass it.
changelog_begin
changelog_end
@rohanjr is taking care of 1.5.0-snapshot.20200901.5116.0.4460cb5e (#7296), so they get pushed back to the end of the line.
Please do not merge this before #7296.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
Co-authored-by: Azure Pipelines DAML Build <support@digitalasset.com>
@leo-da is taking care of 1.5.0-snapshot.20200825.5071.0.d33e130f (#7233), so they get pushed back to the end of the line.
Please do not merge this before #7233.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
Co-authored-by: Azure Pipelines DAML Build <support@digitalasset.com>
@garyverhaegen-da is taking care of 1.5.0-snapshot.20200818.5027.0.1b33d374 (#7173), so they get pushed back to the end of the line.
Please do not merge this before #7173.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
Co-authored-by: Azure Pipelines DAML Build <support@digitalasset.com>
This PR attempts to add some automation around assigning release
management. The PR adds a file `release/rotation`; each week, the
updated CI cron job will:
- Open a PR for the new release [as current].
- Assign the first user in the file to that PR.
- Add the Standard-Change label to the PR.
- Start the build for that PR [as current].
- Open a new PR that rotates the `release/rotate` file, i.e. pushes back
the first line to the end of the file.
This PR also adds mentions of the "release handler" (the first line of
`release/rotation`) to the various messages we send to Slack along the
release process.
The initial state of the `release/rotation` file has been created by
listing all the volunteers (Language team, Application Runtime team, as
well as @SamirTalwar-DA and @stefanobaghino-da) and piping the file
through `shuf`. (Then I put myself at the top so I can hopefully iron
out the issues with the first attempt.)
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* Factor out tar/gzip reproducibility flags
* use mktgz in package-app
* Bazel managed tar/gzip
* Remove quiet = True
As stated in the comment this is no longer required with Bazel >= 3.0.
* Build package-app as a sh_binary
This way Bazel will manage the runtime dependencies tar, gzip, mktgz,
and patchelf.
package-app.sh changes directory so it needs to make sure that all paths
are absolute and that the runfiles tree/manifest location is forwarded
to programs called by package-app.sh.
* Avoid file path too long errors
* Fix readlink -f on MacOS
* Document abspath
changelog_begin
changelog_end
Co-authored-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann@tweag.io>
* Moving `Statements.discard` from //ledger-server/http-json into //libs-scala/scala-utils
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Add new module to the published artifacts
* `com.daml.scalautil` instead of `com.daml.scala.util`
@S11001001: That's because if this is in classpath and you import com.daml._,
you have a different scala in scope than the one you expect.
* Extend `daml new` to accept template as an option
The two positional arguments keep confusing users so this PR changes
things to allow the template to be passed via `--template`. Using a
positional argument still works so this is not breaking.
I’ve updated all docs to use the less confusing syntax.
changelog_begin
- [DAML Assistant] You can now use ``daml new project-name
--template=template-name`` instead of ``daml new project-name
template-name``. The old CLI syntax continues to be supported.
changelog_end
* Update docs/source/getting-started/index.rst
Co-authored-by: Martin Huschenbett <martin.huschenbett@posteo.me>
Co-authored-by: Martin Huschenbett <martin.huschenbett@posteo.me>
* Move public code into daml-integration-api
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
[DAML Integration Kit]: Removed sandbox specific code from the API intended to be used by ledger integrations. Use the maven coordinates ``com.daml:participant-integration-api:VERSION`` instead of ``com.daml:ledger-api-server`` or ``com.daml:sandbox``.
CHANGELOG_END
This was never intentional, nobody even knew that this was possible
and we have an alternative, documented way of getting this via github
releases.
To avoid introducing this issue again, I’ve removed non-jar artifact
types from the Maven upload script.
fixes#448
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Add `platform-version` field to `daml.yaml`
This PR adds the `platform-version` field to `daml.yaml`. Based on the
approach agreed upon in #6558, the logic for this all sits in
`daml-helper` and there are no changes to the assistant.
The details of how the logic work are in a comment so I’m not going to
repeat them here but the commands that are affected are:
- `daml sandbox`
- `daml sandbox-classic`
- `daml json-api`
- `daml start` (but only for sandbox and the JSON API, not for
Navigator or anything else)
For tests, I’ve added a test to the compat workspace that installs two
SDKs simultaneously and tries out various combinations and verifies
that we get the correct version. Open to other ideas for testing this
but that seemed like the most sensible option that actually tests what
we run.
changelog_begin
- [DAML Assistant] You can now specify the version of Sandbox and the
JSON API independently of your SDK version by setting
``platform-version`` in your ``daml.yaml``. This is useful if you
are deploying to a ledger that is running components from a
different SDK version. See
https://docs.daml.com/tools/assistant.html#project-config-file-daml-yaml
for details.
changelog_end
* Run platform-version tests
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Fix tag globbing
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* fmt
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* .
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Try to fix env vars
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Remove hardcoded references to 1.2.0
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Rephrase doc comment
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* get things to compile
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* maybe fix things for realz
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Remove debugging output
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Get angry at windows
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* why is windows
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* .
changelog_begin
changelog_end
Buildifier now comes with a handy attachment to catch single `\`
characters inside strings and replace them with `\\` if the escape
sequence is invalid. Skylark/Python will do this at runtime anyway; this
just makes it clearer what the actual behavior is.
I needed to change `\` characters at the end of lines to `\\` manually
in order to stop Buildifier from simply concatenating the lines
together. Everything else was automatic.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* Address https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/pull/6507#discussion_r446113575
* drop blindinginfo.proto
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* drop BlindingCoder
* Remove blindinginfo Protobuf definition JAR
changelog_begin
[DAML-LF] The blindinginfo Protobuf definition JAR, which was previously unused, has been pulled from the artifacts released on Maven
changelog_end
Co-authored-by: Remy Haemmerle <Remy.Haemmerle@daml.com>
* LF: rename library transaction-scalacheck to transaction-test-lib
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* move files in com/daml
* missing change in release/artifacts.yaml
* remove 'com/dam' from the path
* Add release checklist to release instructions
This includes a couple of checks that internal projects have been
tested on the release candidate.
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Update release/RELEASE.md
Co-authored-by: Samir Talwar <samir.talwar@digitalasset.com>
Co-authored-by: Samir Talwar <samir.talwar@digitalasset.com>
* release: Compute missing deps by using one Bazel query, not many.
* release: Publish all JARs to the local Maven repository at once.
This is way, way faster than running `mvn install:install-file` in a
loop.
It works by creating a POM that instructs the `install:install-file`
plugin command to install the JARs in roughly the same way as before,
and then running `mvn initialize` once.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* release: Make the `Maven` file easier to read with less nesting.
And also more nesting.
* release: Always validate the Maven artifacts, as before.
* release: Explain `maybeMissingDeps` a little better.
* release: Delete the comment on excluding scenario and script services.
* release: Use `withCreateProcess` when calling `mvn initialize`.
* release: Build the TypeScript packages in one `bazel` call.
* release: Remove an unncessary `liftIO`.
This small PR makes a few QoL improvements to the release.sh script:
1. The snapshot command will now work for any commit. Previously, it
would refuse to print the snapshot suffix for commits that were not
ancestors of the `master` branch. The new version will print a
warning if the commit does not seem to be part of a release branch,
but will still print the result.
2. On checking the LATEST file, the script will now print a slightly
more useful error message if the file format is not valid.
3. The snapshot command will now print the entire line to be added into
the LATEST file, rather than just the version suffix.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
The `gawk`-based method currently referenced does not work in a
multi-line `LATEST` world. I don't want to scare people with the command
that would work here.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* equalz Scalatest matcher in new daml-lf/scalatest-tools library
* equalz typing tests
* a 'should' replacing design
* a 'MatcherFactory1' design
- this fails because the TC parameter should be a type member to avoid
scala/bug#5075 but it is not
* MatcherFactory1 with chained Lub+Equal typeclass
- requires partial-unification at point of use, which is not great
* LubEqual's extra tparam is probably unneeded
* better LtEqual
* demonstrate that HK LubEqual's resolve with DMT should + MatcherFactory
* remove unneeded 3rd param from LubEqual, again
* update dependency specs and license headers
* allow use with should, shouldNot in some cases, preserving the shouldx/shouldNotx alternatives
* move Equalz to libs-scala/scalatest-utils
* rename bzl targets and place in com.daml.scalatest package
* add scalatest-utils to release
* move *SpecCheckLaws, Unnatural to scalatest-utils
* missed scalacheck dep in scalatest-utils
* downstreams of *SpecCheckLaws now get them from scalatest-utils
* test equal-types case as well
* update LF documentation
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* whitespace error
trigger all releases from master
The 1.1.0 release went wrong and we had to trash it and release 1.1.1
instead. This is an attempt at identifying and correcting the root
cause behind that incident.
To understand the situation, we need to know how releases worked before
1.0. We had a one-line file called `LATEST` that specifies the git SHA and
version tag for the latest release. A change to that file triggered a
release with the specified release tag, built from the source tree of
the specified commit. The `LATEST` file looked something like:
```
f050da78c9 1.0.0-snapshot.20200411.3905.0.f050da78
```
To mark a release as stable, we would change it to look like this:
```
f050da78c9 1.0.0
```
i.e. simply drop the `-snapshot...` suffix. Even though the commit (and
thus the entire source tree we build from) is the same, we would need to
rebuild almost all of our release artifacts, as they embed the version
tag in various places and ways. That worked well as long as we could
assume we were doing trunk-based development, i.e. all releases would
always come from the same (`master`) branch.
When we released 1.0, and started work on 1.1, we had a few bug reports
for 1.0 that we decided should be resolved in a point release. We
decided that the best way to handle that would be to have a branch
starting on the release commit for 1.0, and then backport patches from
`master` to that branch. We adapted our build process to also watch the
`release/1.0.x` branch and, in particular, trigger a new release build if
the `LATEST` file in that branch changed. That worked well.
The plan going forward was to keep doing regular snapshot releases from
the `master` branch, and create support, point releases ("patch" releases
in semver) from dedicated branches.
On April 30, we made a snapshot release as an RC for 1.1.0, by changing
the `LATEST` file in the `master` branch. That release was built on commit
681c862d. On May 6, we decided to take a new snapshot as the RC for
1.1.0; we changed `LATEST` in `master` to designate 7e448d81 as the new
latest release.
On May 11, we noticed an issue that broke our builds. Without going into
details, an external artifact we depend on had changed in incompatible
ways. After fixing that on `master`, we reasoned that this would also
break the build of the final 1.1.0 release if we just tried to build
7e448d81 again. But as the target release date was May 13, we did not
want to take a new snapshot after that fix, as that would have included
one more week of work in the release, and given us no time to test it.
So we did what we did for the 1.0 branch, as it had worked well: we
created a branch that forked from `master` at commit 7e448d81 and called
it `release/1.1.x`, then cherry-picked the one fix to our build process to
work around the broken download. When the time came to make the final
1.1.0 build on May 13, we naturally picked the `LATEST` file from the
`release/1.1.x` branch and dropped the `-snapshot...` suffix. Importantly,
we did not need to update the target commit to include the "broken
download" fix as, in the meantime, the internet had fixed itself, and we
thus reasoned we should go for the exact code of the RC rather than
include an unnecessary, albeit seemingly harmless, change.
Everything went well with the release process. Tests went well too. Then
we got a report that an application that worked against the latest RC
broke with the final 1.1.0. The issue was that we had built the wrong
commit: by branching off at the point of the _target_ commit for the
latest snapshot, we did not have the change to the `LATEST` file that
designated that commit as the target. So the `LATEST` file in
`release/1.1.x` was still pointing to 681c862d.
I believe the root cause for this issue is the fact that we have
scattered our release process over multiple branches, meaning there is
no linear history of what was released and we are relying on people
being able to mentally manage multiple timelines. Therefore, I propose
to fix our release process so this should not happen again by
linearizing the release process, i.e. getting back to a situation where
all releases are made from a single branch, `master`.
Because we do want to be able to release _for_ multiple release branches
(to provide backports and bugfixes), we still need some way to
accommodate that. Having a single `LATEST` file in the same format as
before would not really work well: keeping track of interleaved release
streams on a single file would not really be easier than keeping track
of multiple branches.
My proposed solution is to instead have a multiline LATEST file, so that
all the release branch "tips" can be observed at the same time, and, as
long as we take care to only advance one release branch at a time, we
can easily keep track of each of them. This is what this PR does.
This required a few changes to our release process. Most notably:
- Obviously, as this is the main point of this PR, the build process has
once again been restricted to only trigger new releases from the
`master` branch.
- As our CI machinery cannot easily be made to produce multiple releases
from a single build, the `check_for_release` step will only recognize
a commit as a release trigger if it changes a single line in the
`LATEST` file. This restriction comes in addition to the existing one
that a release commit is only allowed to change either just the
`LATEST` file or both the `LATEST` and
`docs/source/support/release-notes.rst` files.
- The docs publication process has been changed to update _all_
published versions to display the _latest_ release notes page. This
means that the release notes page will always show you all published
versions, regardless of which version of the documentation you're
looking at. This also means that interleaving release notes correctly on
that page is a manual exercise.
- As per the intention of the new process, the `LATEST` file has been
updated to contained all existing post-1.0 stable releases. It should
also include all existing snapshot releases should we have more than one
at a time (say, should we discover an issue with 1.1.1 that required us
to work on a 1.1.2).
- The `release.sh` script has been dramatically simplified as I felt it
was trying to do too much and porting its existing functionality to a
multi-line `LATEST` file would be too hard.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* Extract caching from participant-state as a library
This will be used to keep a cache of values to cut on LF translation cost when serving transactions.
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Add dependency where missing
Currently, there are quite a few releases that are lacking the
Standard-Change label, even though they did publish artifacts. This
makes our SOC2-compliance tracking a bit harder. For the past two
months, I have manually added the label after-the-fact while preparing
the monthly compliance report, but that doesn't seem like a great
solution.
This PR changes the release process to be more optimistic: assume the
release is going to succeed by putting in the label immediately, and
then (optionally) removing it if the release fails.
Note that the label should only be removed in the rare case where the
release was merged into master but somehow did not produce any artifact.
This can only happen if the Linux build fails quite early, which as far
as I know only happened once over the past two months when we had the
release notes race condition.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* factor TlsConfiguration parser from extractor
* move TlsConfigurationParser to new library
* link extractor to ledger-service/cli-opts properly
* use TlsConfigurationCli in http-json, pass SslContext to ledger-client
* test TLS options as used in http-json
- the TLS config code is shared with extractor, where it is more fully
tested; we just do a sanity check here
* doc TLS options for http-json
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
- [JSON API] New ``--pem``, ``--crt``, ``--cacrt``, and ``--tls`` options
for securing the connection between JSON API server and ledger.
See `issue #2540 <https://github.com/digital-asset/daml/issues/2540>`__.
CHANGELOG_END
* TLS off in daml-script JSON API test
This PR updates two points in the release process:
1. The process for getting release notes for a stable release based on
my experience of doing that for the past 2 releases.
1. It adds testing for the getting started guide. I did not remove the
testing of `quickstart-java`. I do want to test scenarios and
navigator and a bit of VSCode so the only potentially redundant
point there is the `mvn compile` step but that verifies that Maven
artifacts have been published successfully so I think it is still
useful.
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* ledger/metrics: Move metric helpers to their own Bazel package.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
* sandbox: Use ledger/metrics.
* metrics: Rename `Metrics` to `Timed` and drop the `timed` prefix.
Importing methods is harder than importing objects.
* metrics: Publish to Maven Central.
* Used `daml codegen java` instead of calling the codegen from maven
This should hopefully fix the issues with mismatched versions of
slf4j.
changelog_begin
changelog_end
* Move config to daml.yaml
* Remove alternative invocation via maven from docs
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
- Move daml2ts, bindings-ts and JSON API out of experimental section in docs
- Rename Experimental to Early Access in docs and assistant
- Reorganise the docs a little bit to de-emphasise the Ledger API
CHANGELOG_END
This PR removes the code for publishing to Bintray and updates the
documentation to point to github releases or Maven central.
I had to slightly change the docs formatting since trying to use
markup in code blocks results in a horrible layout and I don’t want to
fix that atm.
I’ve removed all artifacts that were only published to Bintray.
changelog_begin
changelog_end