* do not run pr-only tests on main, do not run main-only tests on prs
* split data dep tests into main-only and pr-only
* run non-dev conformance tests on main only
* Retire changelog entries mechanism
It is no longer used these days, so it simply imposes unnecessary
work. If it ever becomes useful again, retrieving the relevant
scripts from history should be relatively easy.
* Remove references to `unreleased.sh`
* Re-add `unreleased.sh` for summarization -- feedback from @mziolekda`
This should hopefully get CI working again.
There are two changes in here:
1. We can no longer change our patched Bazel. I didn’t switch away
from the current patched version for now (we upload it to gcp bucket
so it still works fine even if we cannot build it) but if we upgrade,
we need to go to an unpatched version for now.
2. We need to get `az` from dev-env. I tested the self service compat
job stuff and it works fine with this but there is a chance other
parts don’t.
changelog_begin
changelog_end
Because there's no reason not to. The only obstacle to automating the
normal release process is that we need an explicit manual validation
step for our audit log when creating a release, but split-releases are
created in the Assemblty repo, so we can have the audit log over there.
The diff is going to be very messy because there's a lot of stuff moving
around. The only thing that is not just moving a job to a separate file
is the `ci/daily-snapshot.yml` file, which is 100% new and is meant as
a new Azure Pipelines entrypoint (which I will create after this gets
approved). I have made a reasonable effort to create individual commits
that simplify reviewing, but I expect it's still going to be kind of a
mess. I'm open to opening separate PRs to ~bump my stats~ move one job
at a time if that makes reviewing (and testing) easier.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
New year, new copyright, new expected unknown issues with various files
that won't be covered by the script and/or will be but shouldn't change.
I'll do the details on Jan 1, but would appreciate this being
preapproved so I can actually get it merged by then.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
The "tell slack about failures" step is conditional on the branch name
being main; for whatever reason if we don't supply a branch name Azure
sets it to `main`, regardless of the fact that the commit is not in that
branch at all.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
This is currently failing for the notice file update PR. While we
could try to hack around the git commands to do something sensible, I
don’t really see the point. We really only need this for PRs.
changelog_begin
changelog_end
It should now be possible for anyone to trigger the daily compat build
by adding a `run-full-compat: true` trailer to their commit message.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
run-full-compat: true
* Add the ability to check protobuf compatibility with the branch head alongside the latest release tag.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CI - add check to PR for protobuf breaking changes against the target branch head
CHANGELOG_END
Reminds people adding new users to the rotation that they should also
be added to DACH-NY/daml-language-ad-hoc to have a box in the cloud
for Windows testing.
Adds the possibility of adding comments at the beginning of the rotation file.
changelog_begin
changelog_end
In the automated process, the Azure build is triggered on the branch
directly, which will be named `auto-release-pr-$(date -I)`. But if a
manual change needs to be made, and people subsequently use the `/azp
run` feature of Azure, the build then runs for the PR, which means it
actually runs on the merge commit of the branch and `main`, not on the
branch itself. In that case, the branch that we run the build on is
called `merge` and is thus not starting with `auto-release-pr-`.
This change should get us the notification back on manual PR builds too.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
- Our Linux binaries are now built on Ubuntu 20.04 instead of 16.04. We
do not expect any user-level impact, but please reach out if you
do notice any issue that might be caused by this.
CHANGELOG_END
This is another take on #8276, with the same underlying motivation.
However, this approach is mostly duplication-free, which seems better,
especially given the already-pretty-sorry state of our CI config.
Like #8276, this is done in 2 commits for ease of review. The first
commit is wholly unintresting and just copies `azure-pipelines.yml` to
both `ci/prs.yml` and `ci/build.yml`; the second commit removes from
each part what it shouldn't have. The intention is for `ci/build.yml` to
have all of the common parts.
CHANGELOG_BEGIN
CHANGELOG_END
