daml/daml-lf/scenario-interpreter
nickchapman-da 68b323635d
[engine] prefer lastLocation to stackTrace (#15111)
TLDR: Remove broken code which constructs stackTrace().
Happy never to have to read those NOTE(MH) comments in the pushLocation code again!

(1) This code was fundamentally broken for various reasons:
- It doesn't make sense to track location info on the continuation stack. The continuation stack is a record of the evaluation still to come; not a context for the current evaluation.
- Stack traces can't sensibly be provided in a language such as Daml which promises that tail-recursion is evaluated in constant stack-space.
- Attempting to keep location info on the continuation stack does not play well when exceptions are thrown and the stack is unwound.

(2) The stack-trace management code was also very hacky:
- The pushLocation code contained special cases when the continuation stack was headed by a KArg/SToken continuation. This is an internal implementation detail. The KArg doesn't even exist when we stop using the deprecated SEAppGeneral expression constructor.
- The pushLocation code also contained special support for copying stack-traces into SEVal and SDefinition caches, and then later back on to the continuation stack. Yuck!

(3) The stackTrace() code was barely used:
- Some time ago an alternative/simpler location tracking system (lastLocation) was implemented.
- Only ScenarioRunner makes use of the stackTrace()
- Only a single test changes behaviour when we drop use of stackTrace() in favour of getLastLocation
2022-09-28 13:15:08 +01:00
..
src [engine] prefer lastLocation to stackTrace (#15111) 2022-09-28 13:15:08 +01:00
BUILD.bazel LF: Add LoggingContext to Speedy Machine (#12976) 2022-02-21 13:34:46 +01:00