daml/compiler/damlc/daml-prim-src/GHC/Classes.daml
Moritz Kiefer edff8a416d
Move files in daml-foundations/daml-ghc to compiler/damlc (#2037)
* Move files in daml-foundations/daml-ghc to compiler/damlc

There is also a bit of refactoring going on to actually split things
apart into sensible targets. What is still missing is a cleanup of the
module hierarchy and a cleanup of the test targets but I’ll leave
those for separate PRs.

As a nice bonus, this also reduces dependencies between targets so it
will speed up compiles.

* Update .hie-bios
2019-07-08 17:55:51 +02:00

355 lines
13 KiB
Haskell

-- Copyright (c) 2019 Digital Asset (Switzerland) GmbH and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
-- SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
-- Copied from https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/23f6f31dd66d7c370cb8beec3f1d96a0cb577393/libraries/ghc-prim/GHC/Classes.hs
-- All DA specific modifications are marked with [DA]
{-# LANGUAGE DamlSyntax #-} -- [DA]
-- [DA] {-# LANGUAGE CPP #-}
{-# LANGUAGE Trustworthy #-}
{-# LANGUAGE NoImplicitPrelude, MagicHash, StandaloneDeriving, BangPatterns,
KindSignatures, DataKinds, ConstraintKinds,
MultiParamTypeClasses, FunctionalDependencies #-}
{-# LANGUAGE AllowAmbiguousTypes #-}
-- ip :: IP x a => a is strictly speaking ambiguous, but IP is magic
{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableSuperClasses #-}
-- Because of the type-variable superclasses for tuples
{-# OPTIONS_GHC -Wno-unused-imports #-}
-- -Wno-unused-imports needed for the GHC.Tuple import below. Sigh.
{-# OPTIONS_GHC -Wno-unused-top-binds #-}
-- -Wno-unused-top-binds is there (I hope) to stop Haddock complaining
-- about the constraint tuples being defined but not used
{-# OPTIONS_HADDOCK hide #-}
daml 1.2
-- | HIDE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
-- Module : GHC.Classes
-- Copyright : (c) The University of Glasgow, 1992-2002
-- License : see libraries/base/LICENSE
--
-- Maintainer : cvs-ghc@haskell.org
-- Stability : internal
-- Portability : non-portable (GHC extensions)
--
-- Basic classes.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
module GHC.Classes(
-- * Implicit paramaters
IP(..),
-- * Equality and ordering
Eq(..),
Ord(..),
-- * Functions over Bool
(&&), (||), not,
) where
import GHC.Base
import GHC.Prim
import GHC.Tuple
import GHC.CString (unpackCString#)
import GHC.Types
import DA.Types
infix 4 ==, /=, <, <=, >=, >
infixr 3 &&
infixr 2 ||
default () -- Double isn't available yet
-- | The syntax `?x :: a` is desugared into `IP "x" a`
-- IP is declared very early, so that libraries can take
-- advantage of the implicit-call-stack feature
class IP (x : Symbol) a | x -> a where
ip : a
{- $matching_overloaded_methods_in_rules
Matching on class methods (e.g. `(==)`) in rewrite rules tends to be a bit
fragile. For instance, consider this motivating example from the `bytestring`
library,
> break :: (Word8 -> Bool) -> ByteString -> (ByteString, ByteString)
> breakByte :: Word8 -> ByteString -> (ByteString, ByteString)
> {-# RULES "break -> breakByte" forall a. break (== x) = breakByte x #-}
Here we have two functions, with `breakByte` providing an optimized
implementation of `break` where the predicate is merely testing for equality
with a known `Word8`. As written, however, this rule will be quite fragile as
the `(==)` class operation rule may rewrite the predicate before our `break`
rule has a chance to fire.
For this reason, most of the primitive types in `base` have 'Eq' and 'Ord'
instances defined in terms of helper functions with inlinings delayed to phase
1. For instance, `Word8`\'s `Eq` instance looks like,
> instance Eq Word8 where
> (==) = eqWord8
> (/=) = neWord8
>
> eqWord8, neWord8 :: Word8 -> Word8 -> Bool
> eqWord8 (W8# x) (W8# y) = ...
> neWord8 (W8# x) (W8# y) = ...
> {-# INLINE [1] eqWord8 #-}
> {-# INLINE [1] neWord8 #-}
This allows us to save our `break` rule above by rewriting it to instead match
against `eqWord8`,
> {-# RULES "break -> breakByte" forall a. break (`eqWord8` x) = breakByte x #-}
Currently this is only done for '(==)', '(/=)', '(<)', '(<=)', '(>)', and '(>=)'
for the types in "GHC.Word" and "GHC.Int".
-}
-- | The `Eq` class defines equality (`==`) and inequality (`/=`).
-- All the basic datatypes exported by the "Prelude" are instances of `Eq`,
-- and `Eq` may be derived for any datatype whose constituents are also
-- instances of `Eq`.
--
-- Usually, `==` is expected to implement an equivalence relationship where two
-- values comparing equal are indistinguishable by "public" functions, with
-- a "public" function being one not allowing to see implementation details. For
-- example, for a type representing non-normalised natural numbers modulo 100,
-- a "public" function doesn't make the difference between 1 and 201. It is
-- expected to have the following properties:
--
-- **Reflexivity**: `x == x` = `True`
--
-- **Symmetry**: `x == y` = `y == x`
--
-- **Transitivity**: if `x == y && y == z` = `True`, then `x == z` = `True`
--
-- **Substitutivity**: if `x == y` = `True` and `f` is a "public" function
-- whose return type is an instance of `Eq`, then `f x == f y` = `True`
--
-- **Negation**: `x /= y` = `not (x == y)`
--
-- Minimal complete definition: either `==` or `/=`.
--
class Eq a where
(==), (/=) : a -> a -> Bool
x /= y = not (x == y)
x == y = not (x /= y)
{-# MINIMAL (==) | (/=) #-}
deriving instance Eq ()
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b) => Eq (a, b)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c) => Eq (a, b, c)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d) => Eq (a, b, c, d)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e) => Eq (a, b, c, d, e)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f)
=> Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g)
=> Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g,
Eq h)
=> Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g,
Eq h, Eq i)
=> Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g,
Eq h, Eq i, Eq j)
=> Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g,
Eq h, Eq i, Eq j, Eq k)
=> Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g,
Eq h, Eq i, Eq j, Eq k, Eq l)
=> Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g,
Eq h, Eq i, Eq j, Eq k, Eq l, Eq m)
=> Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g,
Eq h, Eq i, Eq j, Eq k, Eq l, Eq m, Eq n)
=> Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g,
Eq h, Eq i, Eq j, Eq k, Eq l, Eq m, Eq n, Eq o)
=> Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o)
deriving instance (Eq a, Eq b) => Eq (Either a b)
-- slightly strange encoding to avoid value level recursion
-- and to optimise so we avoid going through the dictionary lots of times
eqList : (a -> a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a] -> Bool
eqList = primitive @"BEEqualList"
instance (Eq a) => Eq [a] where
(==) = eqList (==)
deriving instance Eq Ordering
instance Eq Bool where
(==) = primitive @"BEEqual"
instance Eq Int where
(==) = primitive @"BEEqual"
instance Eq Decimal where
(==) = primitive @"BEEqual"
instance Eq Text where
(==) = primitive @"BEEqual"
-- | The `Ord` class is used for totally ordered datatypes.
--
-- Instances of `Ord` can be derived for any user-defined datatype whose
-- constituent types are in `Ord`. The declared order of the constructors in
-- the data declaration determines the ordering in derived `Ord` instances. The
-- `Ordering` datatype allows a single comparison to determine the precise
-- ordering of two objects.
--
-- The Haskell Report defines no laws for `Ord`. However, `<=` is customarily
-- expected to implement a non-strict partial order and have the following
-- properties:
--
-- **Transitivity**: if `x <= y && y <= z` = `True`, then `x <= z` = `True`
--
-- **Reflexivity**: `x <= x` = `True`
--
-- **Antisymmetry**: if `x <= y && y <= x` = `True`, then `x == y` = `True`
--
-- Note that the following operator interactions are expected to hold:
--
-- 1. `x >= y` = `y <= x`
-- 2. `x < y` = `x <= y && x /= y`
-- 3. `x > y` = `y < x`
-- 4. `x < y` = `compare x y == LT`
-- 5. `x > y` = `compare x y == GT`
-- 6. `x == y` = `compare x y == EQ`
-- 7. `min x y == if x <= y then x else y` = 'True'
-- 8. `max x y == if x >= y then x else y` = 'True'
--
-- Minimal complete definition: either `compare` or `<=`.
-- Using `compare` can be more efficient for complex types.
--
class (Eq a) => Ord a where
compare : a -> a -> Ordering
(<), (<=), (>), (>=) : a -> a -> Bool
max, min : a -> a -> a
compare x y = if x == y then EQ
-- NB: must be '<=' not '<' to validate the
-- above claim about the minimal things that
-- can be defined for an instance of Ord:
else if x <= y then LT
else GT
x < y = case compare x y of { LT -> True; _ -> False }
x <= y = case compare x y of { GT -> False; _ -> True }
x > y = case compare x y of { GT -> True; _ -> False }
x >= y = case compare x y of { LT -> False; _ -> True }
-- These two default methods use '<=' rather than 'compare'
-- because the latter is often more expensive
max x y = if x <= y then y else x
min x y = if x <= y then x else y
{-# MINIMAL compare | (<=) #-}
deriving instance Ord ()
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b) => Ord (a, b)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c) => Ord (a, b, c)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d) => Ord (a, b, c, d)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d, Ord e) => Ord (a, b, c, d, e)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d, Ord e, Ord f)
=> Ord (a, b, c, d, e, f)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d, Ord e, Ord f, Ord g)
=> Ord (a, b, c, d, e, f, g)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d, Ord e, Ord f, Ord g,
Ord h)
=> Ord (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d, Ord e, Ord f, Ord g,
Ord h, Ord i)
=> Ord (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d, Ord e, Ord f, Ord g,
Ord h, Ord i, Ord j)
=> Ord (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d, Ord e, Ord f, Ord g,
Ord h, Ord i, Ord j, Ord k)
=> Ord (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d, Ord e, Ord f, Ord g,
Ord h, Ord i, Ord j, Ord k, Ord l)
=> Ord (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d, Ord e, Ord f, Ord g,
Ord h, Ord i, Ord j, Ord k, Ord l, Ord m)
=> Ord (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d, Ord e, Ord f, Ord g,
Ord h, Ord i, Ord j, Ord k, Ord l, Ord m, Ord n)
=> Ord (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b, Ord c, Ord d, Ord e, Ord f, Ord g,
Ord h, Ord i, Ord j, Ord k, Ord l, Ord m, Ord n, Ord o)
=> Ord (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o)
deriving instance (Ord a, Ord b) => Ord (Either a b)
instance (Ord a) => Ord [a] where
compare [] [] = EQ
compare [] (_ :: _) = LT
compare (_ :: _) [] = GT
compare (x :: xs) (y :: ys) = case compare x y of
EQ -> compare xs ys
other -> other
deriving instance Ord Ordering
instance Ord Bool where
b1 `compare` b2 = case (b1, b2) of
(False, False) -> EQ
(False, True ) -> LT
(True , False) -> GT
(True , True ) -> EQ
instance Ord Int where
(<) = primitive @"BELess"
(<=) = primitive @"BELessEq"
(>=) = primitive @"BEGreaterEq"
(>) = primitive @"BEGreater"
instance Ord Decimal where
(<) = primitive @"BELess"
(<=) = primitive @"BELessEq"
(>=) = primitive @"BEGreaterEq"
(>) = primitive @"BEGreater"
instance Ord Text where
(<) = primitive @"BELess"
(<=) = primitive @"BELessEq"
(>=) = primitive @"BEGreaterEq"
(>) = primitive @"BEGreater"
-- TODO(MH): Move this to GHC.Base and force inlining.
-- OK, so they're technically not part of a class...:
-- Boolean functions
-- | Boolean \"and\".
-- This function has short-circuiting semantics, i.e., when both arguments are
-- present and the first arguments evaluates to 'False', the second argument
-- is not evaluated at all.
(&&) : Bool -> Bool -> Bool
True && x = x
False && _ = False
-- | Boolean \"or\".
-- This function has short-circuiting semantics, i.e., when both arguments are
-- present and the first arguments evaluates to 'True', the second argument
-- is not evaluated at all.
(||) : Bool -> Bool -> Bool
True || _ = True
False || x = x
-- | Boolean \"not\"
not : Bool -> Bool
not True = False
not False = True