3This is an implementation of Cloud Haskell, as described in
4/Towards Haskell in the Cloud/ by Jeff Epstein, Andrew Black, and Simon
6<http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/parallel/>),
7although some of the details are different. The precise message passing
8semantics are based on /A unified semantics for future Erlang/ by Hans
9Svensson, Lars-Åke Fredlund and Clara Benac Earle.
11For a detailed description of the package and other reference materials,
12please see the distributed-process wiki page on github:
13<https://github.com/haskell-distributed/distributed-process/wiki>.
16module Control.Distributed.Process
24 , liftIO -- Reexported for convenience
39 -- * Advanced messaging
59 -- * Process management
68 , ProcessTerminationException(..)
69 , ProcessRegistrationException(..)
75 -- * Monitoring and linking
87 , MonitorRef -- opaque
88 , ProcessLinkException(..)
89 , NodeLinkException(..)
90 , PortLinkException(..)
91 , ProcessMonitorNotification(..)
92 , NodeMonitorNotification(..)
93 , PortMonitorNotification(..)
110 , registerRemoteAsync
111 , reregisterRemoteAsync
112 , unregisterRemoteAsync
117 -- * Exception handling
134 -- * Local versions of 'spawn'
142#if ! MIN_VERSION_base(4,6,0)
143import Prelude hiding (catch)
146import Control.Monad.IO.Class (liftIO)
147import Control.Applicative ((<$>))
148import Control.Monad.Reader (ask)
149import Control.Concurrent.MVar (newEmptyMVar, takeMVar, putMVar)
150import Control.Distributed.Static
156import Control.Distributed.Process.Internal.Types
161 , ProcessMonitorNotification(..)
162 , NodeMonitorNotification(..)
163 , PortMonitorNotification(..)
164 , ProcessLinkException(..)
165 , NodeLinkException(..)
166 , PortLinkException(..)
167 , ProcessRegistrationException(..)
176 , LocalProcess(processNode)
179import Control.Distributed.Process.Serializable (Serializable)
180import Control.Distributed.Process.Internal.Primitives
190 -- Advanced messaging
209 -- Process management
211 , ProcessTerminationException(..)
221 -- Monitoring and linking
241 , registerRemoteAsync
242 , reregisterRemoteAsync
243 , unregisterRemoteAsync
249 -- Exception handling
267import Control.Distributed.Process.Node (forkProcess)
268import Control.Distributed.Process.Internal.Spawn
269 ( -- Spawning Processes/Channels
280-- 1. 'send' never fails. If you want to know that the remote process received
281-- your message, you will need to send an explicit acknowledgement. If you
282-- want to know when the remote process failed, you will need to monitor
283-- that remote process.
285-- 2. 'send' may block (when the system TCP buffers are full, while we are
286-- trying to establish a connection to the remote endpoint, etc.) but its
287-- return does not imply that the remote process received the message (much
288-- less processed it). When 'send' targets a local process, it is dispatched
289-- via the node controller however, in which cases it will /not/ block. This
290-- isn't part of the semantics, so it should be ok. The ordering is maintained
291-- because the ctrlChannel still has FIFO semantics with regards interactions
292-- between two disparate forkIO threads.
294-- 3. Message delivery is reliable and ordered. That means that if process A
295-- sends messages m1, m2, m3 to process B, B will either arrive all three
296-- messages in order (m1, m2, m3) or a prefix thereof; messages will not be
297-- 'missing' (m1, m3) or reordered (m1, m3, m2)
299-- In order to guarantee (3), we stipulate that
301-- 3a. We do not garbage collect connections because Network.Transport provides
302-- ordering guarantees only *per connection*.
304-- 3b. Once a connection breaks, we have no way of knowing which messages
305-- arrived and which did not; hence, once a connection fails, we assume the
306-- remote process to be forever unreachable. Otherwise we might sent m1 and
307-- m2, get notified of the broken connection, reconnect, send m3, but only
310-- 3c. As a consequence of (3b) we should not reuse PIDs. If a process dies,
311-- we consider it forever unreachable. Hence, new processes should get new
312-- IDs or they too would be considered unreachable.
314-- Main reference for Cloud Haskell is
316-- [1] "Towards Haskell in the Cloud", Jeff Epstein, Andrew Black and Simon
318-- http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/parallel/remote.pdf
320-- The precise semantics for message passing is based on
322-- [2] "A Unified Semantics for Future Erlang", Hans Svensson, Lars-Ake Fredlund
323-- and Clara Benac Earle (not freely available online, unfortunately)
325-- Some pointers to related documentation about Erlang, for comparison and
328-- [3] "Programming Distributed Erlang Applications: Pitfalls and Recipes",
329-- Hans Svensson and Lars-Ake Fredlund
330-- http://man.lupaworld.com/content/develop/p37-svensson.pdf
331-- [4] The Erlang manual, sections "Message Sending" and "Send"
332-- http://www.erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/processes.html#id82409
333-- http://www.erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/expressions.html#send
334-- [5] Questions "Is the order of message reception guaranteed?" and
335-- "If I send a message, is it guaranteed to reach the receiver?" of
337-- http://www.erlang.org/faq/academic.html
338-- [6] "Delivery of Messages", post on erlang-questions
339-- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2012-February/064767.html
341--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
342-- Local versions of spawn --
343--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
345-- | Spawn a process on the local node
346spawnLocal :: Process () -> Process ProcessId
348 node <- processNode <$> ask
349 liftIO $ forkProcess node proc
351-- | Create a new typed channel, spawn a process on the local node, passing it
352-- the receive port, and return the send port
353spawnChannelLocal :: Serializable a
354 => (ReceivePort a -> Process ())
355 -> Process (SendPort a)
356spawnChannelLocal proc = do
357 node <- processNode <$> ask
360 _ <- forkProcess node $ do
361 -- It is important that we allocate the new channel in the new process,
362 -- because otherwise it will be associated with the wrong process ID
363 (sport, rport) <- newChan
364 liftIO $ putMVar mvar sport
keysesc to close
- j k
- move down, up
- enter
- open
- esc
- back, or up a level
- 1 2 3 4
- readme, files, commits, refs
- /
- filter
- y
- copy the clone command
- c
- compare the chosen commit with another (or shift-click both)
- ?
- show or hide this list