3This is an implementation of Cloud Haskell, as described in
4/Towards Haskell in the Cloud/ by Jeff Epstein, Andrew Black, and Simon
5Peyton Jones (<http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/parallel/>),
6although some of the details are different. The precise message passing
7semantics are based on /A unified semantics for future Erlang/ by Hans
8Svensson, Lars-Åke Fredlund and Clara Benac Earle.
10For a detailed description of the package and other reference materials,
11please see the distributed-process wiki page on github:
12<https://github.com/haskell-distributed/distributed-process/wiki>.
15module Control.Distributed.Process
23 , liftIO -- Reexported for convenience
38 -- * Advanced messaging
58 -- * Process management
67 , ProcessTerminationException(..)
68 , ProcessRegistrationException(..)
74 -- * Monitoring and linking
86 , MonitorRef -- opaque
87 , ProcessLinkException(..)
88 , NodeLinkException(..)
89 , PortLinkException(..)
90 , ProcessMonitorNotification(..)
91 , NodeMonitorNotification(..)
92 , PortMonitorNotification(..)
109 , registerRemoteAsync
110 , reregisterRemoteAsync
111 , unregisterRemoteAsync
116 -- * Exception handling
133 -- * Local versions of 'spawn'
141#if ! MIN_VERSION_base(4,6,0)
142import Prelude hiding (catch)
145import Control.Monad.IO.Class (liftIO)
146import Control.Applicative ((<$>))
147import Control.Monad.Reader (ask)
148import Control.Concurrent.MVar (newEmptyMVar, takeMVar, putMVar)
149import Control.Distributed.Static
155import Control.Distributed.Process.Internal.Types
160 , ProcessMonitorNotification(..)
161 , NodeMonitorNotification(..)
162 , PortMonitorNotification(..)
163 , ProcessLinkException(..)
164 , NodeLinkException(..)
165 , PortLinkException(..)
166 , ProcessRegistrationException(..)
175 , LocalProcess(processNode)
178import Control.Distributed.Process.Serializable (Serializable)
179import Control.Distributed.Process.Internal.Primitives
189 -- Advanced messaging
208 -- Process management
210 , ProcessTerminationException(..)
220 -- Monitoring and linking
240 , registerRemoteAsync
241 , reregisterRemoteAsync
242 , unregisterRemoteAsync
248 -- Exception handling
266import Control.Distributed.Process.Node (forkProcess)
267import Control.Distributed.Process.Internal.Spawn
268 ( -- Spawning Processes/Channels
279-- 1. 'send' never fails. If you want to know that the remote process received
280-- your message, you will need to send an explicit acknowledgement. If you
281-- want to know when the remote process failed, you will need to monitor
282-- that remote process.
284-- 2. 'send' may block (when the system TCP buffers are full, while we are
285-- trying to establish a connection to the remote endpoint, etc.) but its
286-- return does not imply that the remote process received the message (much
287-- less processed it). When 'send' targets a local process, it is dispatched
288-- via the node controller however, in which cases it will /not/ block. This
289-- isn't part of the semantics, so it should be ok. The ordering is maintained
290-- because the ctrlChannel still has FIFO semantics with regards interactions
291-- between two disparate forkIO threads.
293-- 3. Message delivery is reliable and ordered. That means that if process A
294-- sends messages m1, m2, m3 to process B, B will either arrive all three
295-- messages in order (m1, m2, m3) or a prefix thereof; messages will not be
296-- 'missing' (m1, m3) or reordered (m1, m3, m2)
298-- In order to guarantee (3), we stipulate that
300-- 3a. We do not garbage collect connections because Network.Transport provides
301-- ordering guarantees only *per connection*.
303-- 3b. Once a connection breaks, we have no way of knowing which messages
304-- arrived and which did not; hence, once a connection fails, we assume the
305-- remote process to be forever unreachable. Otherwise we might sent m1 and
306-- m2, get notified of the broken connection, reconnect, send m3, but only
309-- 3c. As a consequence of (3b) we should not reuse PIDs. If a process dies,
310-- we consider it forever unreachable. Hence, new processes should get new
311-- IDs or they too would be considered unreachable.
313-- Main reference for Cloud Haskell is
315-- [1] "Towards Haskell in the Cloud", Jeff Epstein, Andrew Black and Simon
317-- http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/parallel/remote.pdf
319-- The precise semantics for message passing is based on
321-- [2] "A Unified Semantics for Future Erlang", Hans Svensson, Lars-Ake Fredlund
322-- and Clara Benac Earle (not freely available online, unfortunately)
324-- Some pointers to related documentation about Erlang, for comparison and
327-- [3] "Programming Distributed Erlang Applications: Pitfalls and Recipes",
328-- Hans Svensson and Lars-Ake Fredlund
329-- http://man.lupaworld.com/content/develop/p37-svensson.pdf
330-- [4] The Erlang manual, sections "Message Sending" and "Send"
331-- http://www.erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/processes.html#id82409
332-- http://www.erlang.org/doc/reference_manual/expressions.html#send
333-- [5] Questions "Is the order of message reception guaranteed?" and
334-- "If I send a message, is it guaranteed to reach the receiver?" of
336-- http://www.erlang.org/faq/academic.html
337-- [6] "Delivery of Messages", post on erlang-questions
338-- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2012-February/064767.html
340--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
341-- Local versions of spawn --
342--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
344-- | Spawn a process on the local node
345spawnLocal :: Process () -> Process ProcessId
347 node <- processNode <$> ask
348 liftIO $ forkProcess node proc
350-- | Create a new typed channel, spawn a process on the local node, passing it
351-- the receive port, and return the send port
352spawnChannelLocal :: Serializable a
353 => (ReceivePort a -> Process ())
354 -> Process (SendPort a)
355spawnChannelLocal proc = do
356 node <- processNode <$> ask
359 _ <- forkProcess node $ do
360 -- It is important that we allocate the new channel in the new process,
361 -- because otherwise it will be associated with the wrong process ID
362 (sport, rport) <- newChan
363 liftIO $ putMVar mvar sport
keysesc to close
- j k
- move down, up
- enter
- open
- esc
- back, or up a level
- 1 2 3 4
- readme, files, commits, refs
- /
- filter
- y
- copy the clone command
- c
- compare the chosen commit with another (or shift-click both)
- ?
- show or hide this list