This slows things down a bit because to find the holes and give them the
right multiplicities, we need to normalise all the arguments which might
have been metavariables. Maybe we should skip this if we're not using
anything linear, for efficiency?
As patterns are handled by deciding which side of the as is considered
'used'. In case blocks, that should be the variable name, but in general
it should be the pattern, so IAs now has a flag to say which one.
Need to record which holes are still to be solved (not counting
elaborations where there are user defined holes) and check at the end
that they are now solved.
There was a check on evaluating lets which was in Blodwen but I hadn't
added to the normaliser yet! Also, normalisation needs to reduce as
patterns for unification, but not when reducing finished LHS and
argument terms. This is a bit of a hack (but then, so is the
implementation of as patterns in general...).
So, when we're checking a nested expression, we have the as pattern as a
let bound variable (so that it has the necessary computational force)
but when we compile we just pass it as an ordinary argument, then it
gets the desired behaviour in case trees.
It's not quite there yet, though, because the treatment of 'as' patterns
isn't quite right and the slightly hacky approach we're taking might not
be the best. Rethinking now...
Changed nested names (and case blocks) to store the resolved name as the
outer name, rather than the unresolved name, otherwise we'll have issues
when loading from TTC
Since the NF might refer to hole names, and those hole names might be
possible to evaluate now, we'll need to recalculate the expected type's
normal form before rerunning the delayed elaborator
Works by running all possible elaborators and checking that exactly one
succeeds. Still to do: pruning the list of elaborators by target type,
dealing with 'UniqueDefault', checking that delaying on failure works as
it should.
When we encounter them, not that they're a binding as normal, but also
record the thing they expand to. Then bind as a PLet, and convert that
to a Let on the RHS so it has computational force. The case tree
compiler knows about as patterns, so they get compiled to use the
appropriate name on the rhs (rather than a let).
