Edwin Brady 04e4ebf80e Better approach to erasure in pattern matching ... It's a big patch, but the summary is that it's okay to use a pattern in an erased position if either: - the pattern can also be solved by unification (this is the same as 'dot patterns' for matching on non-constructor forms) - the argument position is detaggable w.r.t. non-erased arguments, which means we can tell which pattern it is without pattern matching The second case, in particular, means we can still pattern match on proof terms which turn out to be irrelevant, especially Refl. Fixes #178		2020-01-21 18:47:43 +00:00
..
Dots1.idr	More tests from Blodwen	2019-06-27 19:33:02 +01:00
Dots2.idr	More tests from Blodwen	2019-06-27 19:33:02 +01:00
Dots3.idr	More tests from Blodwen	2019-06-27 19:33:02 +01:00
expected	Better approach to erasure in pattern matching	2020-01-21 18:47:43 +00:00
run	More tests from Blodwen	2019-06-27 19:33:02 +01:00