enso/app/gui/enso-profiler-enso-data/Cargo.toml

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

15 lines
462 B
TOML
Raw Normal View History

Multi-process profiles. (#3395) See: [#181837344](https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/181837344). I've separated this PR from some deeper changes I'm making to the profile format, because the changeset was getting too complex. The new APIs and tools in this PR are fully-implemented, except the profile format is too simplistic--it doesn't currently support headers that are needed to determine the relative timings of events from different processes. - Adds basic support for profile files containing data collected by multiple processes. - Implements `api_events_to_profile`, a tool for converting backend message logs (#3392) to the `profiler` format so they can be merged with frontend profiles (currently they can be merged with `cat`, but the next PR will introduce a merge tool). - Introduces `message_beanpoles`, a simple tool that diagrams timing relationships between frontend and backend messages. ### Important Notes - All TODOs introduced here will be addressed in the next PR that defines the new format. - Introduced a new crate, `enso_profiler_enso_data`, to be used by profile consumers that need to refer to Enso application datatypes to interpret metadata. - Introduced a `ProfileBuilder` abstraction for writing the JSON profile format; partially decouples the runtime event log structures from the format definition. - Introducing the conversion performed for `ProfilerBuilder` uncovered that the `.._with_same_start!` low-level `profiler` APIs don't currently work; they return `Started<_>` profilers, but that is inconsistent with the stricter data model that I introduced when I implemented `profiler_data`; they need to return profilers in a created, unstarted state. Low-level async profilers have not been a priority, but once #3382 merges we'll have a way to render their data, which will be really useful because async profilers capture *why* we're doing things. I'll bring up scheduling this in the next performance meeting.
2022-04-21 17:44:03 +03:00
[package]
name = "enso-profiler-enso-data"
version = "0.1.0"
edition = "2021"
authors = ["Enso Team <contact@enso.org>"]
[dependencies]
chrono = { version = "0.4.19", features = ["serde"] }
csv = "1.1"
serde = { workspace = true }
2022-05-23 05:16:04 +03:00
enso-profiler = { path = "../../../lib/rust/profiler" }
enso-profiler-data = { path = "../../../lib/rust/profiler/data" }
ensogl-core = { path = "../../../lib/rust/ensogl/core" }
json-rpc = { path = "../../../lib/rust/json-rpc" }