When a new node is created with the <kbd>TAB</kbd> key or by clicking the `(+)` on-screen button while multiple nodes are selected, place the new node below all the selected nodes. (Previously, the new node was placed below the node that was selected earliest.)
Additionally, when placing a new node below an existing non-error node with a visualization enabled, place the new node below the visualization. (Previously, the new node was placed to the left of the visualization.)
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/180887079
#### Visuals
The following screencast demonstrates the feature on various arrangements of selected nodes, with visualization enabled and disabled.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/273837/159971452-148aa4d7-c0f3-4b48-871a-a2783989f403.mov
The following screencast demonstrates that new nodes created by double-clicking an output port of a node with visualization enabled are now placed below the visualization:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/273837/160107733-e3f7d0f9-0161-49d1-8cbd-06e18c843a20.mov
# Important Notes
- Some refactorings that were needed for this PR were ported from the #3301 PR:
- the code responsible for calculating the positions of new nodes was moved to a separate module (`new_node_position`);
- the `free_place_finder` module was made a submodule of the `new_node_position` module, due to the latter being its only user.
Use a new algorithm for placement of new nodes in cases when:
- a) there is no selected node, and the `TAB` key is pressed while the mouse pointer is near an existing node (especially in an area below an existing node);
- b) a connection is dragged out from an existing node and dropped near the node (especially in an area below the node).
In both cases mentioned above, the new node will now be placed in a location suggested by an internal algorithm, aligned to existing nodes. Specifically, the placement algorithm used is similar to when pressing `TAB` with a node selected.
For more details, see: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/181076066
# Important Notes
- Visible visualizations enabled with the "eye icon" button are treated as part of a node. (In case of nodes with errors, visualizations are not visible, and are not treated as part of a node.)
[ci no changelog needed]
This PR adds a few simple unit tests for GraphEditor, that can be used as an example of native Unit Tests.
Covered:
1. Creating nodes
- By internal API
- By using a TAB shortcut
- By using (+) button
- By dropping edge
2. Connecting two nodes with an edge
Some APIs were extended to allow their testing.
Usage of `glyph::System` in `text/component/area` was disabled by conditional compilation, as this code can't be used in native code due to JS dependencies.
Implements infrastructure for new aggregations in the Database. It comes with only some basic aggregations and limited error-handling. More aggregations and problem handling will be added in subsequent PRs.
# Important Notes
This introduces basic aggregations using our existing codegen and sets-up our testing infrastructure to be able to use the same aggregate tests as in-memory backend for the database backends.
Many aggregations are not yet implemented - they will be added in subsequent tasks.
There are some TODOs left - they will be addressed in the next tasks.
- Make it easier to understand the computations.
- Fix issue with First.
- Improve quote handling in Concatenate
- Added validation and warnings to input
* Profiling application details
Add enough profiling to account for every missed frame during startup.
See https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/181499507
* Build ActiveInterval hierarchy in profiler_data
* update doctests / await_!
* docs/formatting/naming
* more graph modes
* increase WASM size
Due to new render-profile-flamegraph scene. We should remove these from the main release WASM blob one way or another.
* lint
* fix a test
* Organization (feedback)
* Add @wdanilo to Cargo.lock CODEOWNERS
As discussed after my previous PR got stuck waiting for Cargo.lock review.
* fix doctests
* Update docs. Removed a limitation.
Double-clicking a node's output port or clicking the port with a right mouse button (RMB) creates a new node aligned to the clicked node.
#### Visuals
The screencast below demonstrates the following features:
- double-clicking the left mouse button on a node's output port;
- clicking the right mouse button on a node's output port;
- alignment of the nodes created as a result of the actions described above;
- corner case: double-clicking (and RMB-clicking) on output ports of a "collapsed" ("enterable") node;
- double-clicking on a "collapsed" ("enterable") node still allows entering the node when done over an area of the node that is not the node's output port;
- basic support for nodes with multiple output ports (shown on the `interface` demo scene).
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/273837/158991856-e0faa5f0-9d2f-44bd-bddd-ba314977db6e.mov
The supplementary screencast below demonstrates that double-clicking or RMB-clicking a node's output port cancels the action of dragging a new connection from a node.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/273837/158998097-100aed42-37ff-4467-939f-2b755ef0d3dc.movhttps://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/181076145
# Important Notes
- The "double-clicking a node" shortcut was previously used to allow entering a "collapsed" node (for example, a node created by pressing the `cmd+g` keyboard shortcut after selecting a group of nodes). This PR keeps that functionality when the user double-clicks on a node, as long as the mouse is not positioned over the node's output ports.
- The support for nodes with multiple output ports is currently very basic. The information about a port (`Crumb`) is passed into the `create_node` function, but it is not passed further to `NodeSource`. The Node Searcher currently does not support passing port information through `NodeSource`.
The mechanism follows a similar approach to what is being in functions
with default arguments.
Additionally since InstantiateAtomNode wasn't a subtype of EnsoRootNode it
couldn't be used in the application, which was the primary reason for
issue #181449213.
Alternatively InstantiateAtomNode could have been enhanced to extend
EnsoRootNode rather than RootNode to carry scope info but the former
seemed simpler.
See test cases for previously crashing and invalid cases.
@akavel spotted a compilation error, when building test for graph_editor crate. The cause was that:
* prelude without serde still added serde derivatives in im_string_newtype
* and the graph_editor needs serde from prelude anyway (because it wants to have serializable ImStrings).
In this PR two things are implemented:
1. Node Searcher zoom factor (and therefore its size) is fixed no matter how you move the main camera. The node searcher is also positioned directly below currently edited node at all times.
2. Node growth/shrink animation when you start/finish node editing. After animation end the edited node zoom factor is also fixed and matches the zoom factor of the node searcher.
See attached video with different ways of editing/creating nodes:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6566674/157348758-2880aa2b-494d-46e6-8eee-a22be84081ed.mp4
#### Technical details
1. Added several additional scene layers for separate rendering: `node_searcher`, `node_searcher_text`, `edited_node`, `edited_node_text`. Searcher is always rendered by `node_searcher` camera, edited node moves between its usual layers and `edited_node` layer. Because text rendering uses different API, all node components were modified to support change of the layer.
2. Also added `node_searcher` DOM layer, because documentation is implemented as a DOM object.
3. Added two FRP endpoints for `ensogl::Animation`: `on_end` and `set_value`. These endpoints are useful while implementing growth/shrink animation.
4. Added FRP endpoints for the `Camera2d`: `position` and `zoom` outputs. This allows to synchronize cameras easily using FRP networks.
5. Growth/shrink animation implemented in GraphEditor by blending two animations, similar to Node Snapping implementation. However, shrinking animation is a bit tricky to implement correctly, as we must always return node back to the `main` scene layer after editing is done.
* Creating a new node with the (+) button (#3278)
[The Task](https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/180887253)
A new (+) button on the left-bottom corner appeared. It may be clicked to open searcher in the middle of the scene, as an alternative to tab key.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3919101/154514279-7972ed6a-0203-47cb-9a09-82dba948cf2f.mp4
* The window_control_buttons::common was extracted to separate crate `ensogl-component-button` almost without change.
* This includes a severe refactoring of adding nodes in general in the Graph Editor. The whole responsibility of adding new nodes (and starting their editing) was moved to Graph Editor - the Project View only reacts for GE events to show searcher properly.
* The status bar was moved from the bottom-left corner to the middle-top of the scene. It does not collide with (+) button, and plays "notification" role anyway.
* The `interface` debug scene was buggy. The problem was with one expression's span-tree. When I replaced it, the scene works.
* I've removed "new searcher" API, as it is completely outdated.
* I've changed code owners of integration tests to GUI team, as it is the team writing mostly the integration tests (int rust)
* Fix regression #181528359
* Add docs & remove unused function
* Fix & enable native Rust tests
* Fix formatting
Co-authored-by: Adam Obuchowicz <adam.obuchowicz@enso.org>
Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
PR fixes the issue when the user is unable to sign in with Google.
In the end, my assumption about the `User-Agent` header was correct and Google sign-in works with the recent Electron out of the box.
[ci no changelog needed]
This PR reverts commit [0836ce741d](0836ce741d) because of the spotted regression:
To reproduce:
1. Open a default project.
2. Without doing anything else, cmd + click on any node to edit it.
3. Abort editing by pressing escape.
4. Top-most node disappears (it is actually removed from scene)
If you start editing the bottom node - you will also see a visible regression in node searcher's position.
See thread https://discord.com/channels/401396655599124480/950730235719065620/950731247909478410 for details.
- Added Minimum, Maximum, Longest. Shortest, Mode, Percentile
- Added first and last to Map
- Restructured Faker type more inline with FakerJS
- Created 2,500 row data set
- Tests for group_by
- Performance tests for group_by
Fix comments introduced in commit 807506485d so that they're full English sentences (ending in a dot `.`). Also, fix them to avoid redundantly spelling "All" and "always" in the same sentences.
See a thread on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/401396655599124480/407883608204771338/948857557219418162
> Your commit is not following style guide (https://github.com/enso-org/enso/pull/3307). Please revert it and create a PR with comments that are correct English sentences (with dots at the end).
> Also, why some of the comments have ", always." ending and some not? I understand that "Modules should be documented" is applied always as well, isn't it?
# Important Notes
[ci no changelog needed]
