[ci no changelog needed]
This PR implements a new helper for the future Component Browser - `component_group::multi::Wrapper`. It propagates FRP events from multiple component groups and ensures that only a single component group is focused at all times.
See the updated component group demo scene (console logs shows propagated FRP events from all component groups):
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6566674/172359141-8ea6f1ba-e357-4c1b-852a-adb4d5207e03.mp4
- Fixed a `define_endpoints_2!` macro. FRP endpoints for `focus` events weren't connected properly.
- List View now uses an overlay shape to catch mouse events, it allows much easier implementation of `is_header_selected` in the component group.
Define some workflows for batch-mode profiling.
Implemented:
- collapse nodes
- create node
- enter collapsed node
- new project
- open visualization
They can currently be built and run with a command like:
`./run.sh ide build --profiling-level=debug && dist/ide/linux-unpacked/enso --entry-point profile --workflow create_node --save-profile out.json`
And the data can be displayed with:
`dist/ide/linux-unpacked/enso --entry-point profiling_run_graph --load-profile out.json`
Demo of recording and viewing a profile with a command-line one-liner:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1047859/169954795-2d9520ca-84f9-45d2-b83a-5063ebe6f718.mp4
See: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/182195399.
# Important Notes
- When defining workflows, two helpers are enough to allow us to tell when the action is really done: `Fixture::compile_new_shaders`, and `Fixture::backend_execution`. Often, it is appropriate to await both, but it depends on the task.
- The shader compiler is now driven by a `Controller`; while the `Compiler` is reset if context is lost, the `Controller`'s state survives context loss.
- A new `--load-profile` option supports specifying a profile by path when running `profiling_run_graph`.
- Drop the `with_same_start` profiler interface; we ended up preferring a child profiler convention, and this interface was not implemented compatibly with the stricter data model we've had since the introduction of `profiler::data`.
- Fix the noisy `rustfmt` output.
Implement a command that launches the application, runs a series of steps (a "workflow"), writes a profile to a file, and exits.
See: [#181775808](https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/181775808)
# Important Notes
- The command to capture run and profile is used like: `./run profile --workflow=new_project --save-profile=out.json`. Defining some more workflows (collapse nodes, create node and edit value) comes next; they are implemented with the same infrastructure as the integration-tests.
- The `--save-profile` option can also be used when profiling interactively; when the option is provided, capturing a profile with the hotkey will write a file instead of dumping the data to the devtools console.
- If the IDE panics, the error message is now printed to the console that invoked the process, as well as the devtools console. (If a batch workflow fails, this allows us to see why.)
- New functionality (writing profile files, quitting on command, logging to console) relies on Electron APIs. These APIs are implemented in `index.js`, bridged to the render process in `preload.js`, and wrapped for use in Rust in a `debug_api` crate.
