Translate syntax warnings and attach to IR when translating operator applications.
We should ensure that all Trees are checked for warnings and every warning is attached to some IR. That would require a bit of refactoring: In TreeToIr, we could define helpers wrapping every IR constructor and accepting a `Tree` parameter. The `Tree` could be used to populate the `IdentifiedLocation` when constructing the IR type, and then to attach all warnings after constructing the IR object.
# Important Notes
- Update JNI dependency.
- Introduces a `cargo bench` runner for parser.
part of #7954
# Important Notes
The workflow is:
- `$ npm install` -- just in case
- `$ npm --workspace=enso-gui2 run build-ydoc-server-polyglot` -- build the `ydocServer.js` bundle
- `$ sbt ydoc-server/assembly` -- build the ydoc server jar
- `env POLYGLOT_YDOC_SERVER=true npm --workspace=enso-gui2 run dev` -- run the dev server with the polyglot ydoc server. Providing `POLYGLOT_YDOC_SERVER_DEBUG=true` env variable enables the chrome debugger
* Reduce parser dependencies
- `enso-parser-syntax-tree-visitor` is now only used when building tests and debug tools.
- Remove `enso-logging` crate and its macros.
- The main bin for `enso-parser` has been moved to a `check_syntax` tool in `enso-parser-debug`.
This PR updates the Rust toolchain to recent nightly.
Most of the changes are related to fixing newly added warnings and adjusting the feature flags. Also the formatter changed its behavior slightly, causing some whitespace changes.
Other points:
* Changed debug level of the `buildscript` profile to `lint-tables-only` — this should improve the build times and space usage somewhat.
* Moved lint configuration to the worksppace `Cargo.toml` definition. Adjusted the formatter appropriately.
* Removed auto-generated IntelliJ run configurations, as they are not useful anymore.
* Added a few trivial stdlib nightly functions that were removed to our codebase.
* Bumped many dependencies but still not all:
* `clap` bump encountered https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/issues/5407 — for now the warnings were silenced by the lint config.
* `octocrab` — our forked diverged to far with the original, needs more refactoring.
* `derivative` — is unmaintained and has no updated version, despite introducing warnings in the generated code. There is no direct replacement.
Removed `enso-types` crate which had only one reference in unused part of the code. Removed some unused dependencies from `Cargo.toml` files.
# Important Notes
CI has a similar hiccup as before. Please disregard this for now in the review.
Implements:
- UUIDs: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/182931137
- Comments: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/182981779
- Type annotations and signatures: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/182497454
- Fix getter names (https://github.com/enso-org/enso/pull/3627#discussion_r940887460).
# Important Notes
- I can't fully test UUIDs; I have tested that the data obtained in Rust matches my understanding of how the format is supposed to work. What remains to be tested is that the data in Java matches the way the old parser handles the format. So @JaroslavTulach, let me know if you see any cases where I'm not returning the same values.
- This implementation of type annotations and signatures accepts any expression in type context. It would probably be nice to narrow this down at some point, but for now I have no design info on what specifically should be allowed in type expressions; this implementation should be at least an incremental improvement.
Provide a JNI dynamic-library interface to `enso_parser`.
# Important Notes
- The library can be built with: `cargo build -p enso-parser-jni`.
- A new `org.enso.syntax2.Parser` API is implemented on top of the JNI interface provided by `enso-parser-jni`.
- We are using the `jni` crate, since apparently Java cannot just call C-ABI functions. The crate is not well-maintained. I came across an obviously-unsound `safe` function, and found it was reported over a year ago, with a PR to fix: jni-rs/jni-rs#303. However our needs are simple. We can't trust any safety guarantees they imply, but I think we are unlikely to encounter any logic bugs using the basic bindings.
