Some e2e tests (about leaving nodes) were always failing on my machine because of the race condition in the tests. The issue was caused by edges positions lagging behind for a few frames when switching Enso functions, which caused incorrect handling of clicks in the test code.
Now we wait for edges being initialized *and* node sizes being updated.
Thanks to @farmaazon for helping with debugging.
- Improved performance by batching simulatenous node edits, including metadata updates when dragging many selected nodes together.
- Updated Vue to new version, allowing us to use `defineModel`.
- Fixed#9161
- Unified all handling of auto-blur by making `useAutoBlur` cheap to register - all logic goes through a single window event handler.
- Combined all `ResizeObserver`s into one.
- Fixed the behaviour of repeated toast messages. Now only the latest compilation status is visible at any given time, and the errors disappear once compilation passes.
- Actually fixed broken interaction of node and visualization widths. There no longer is a style feedback loop and the visible node backdrop width no longer jumps or randomly fails to update.
Fixes#9182
Now we are careful when to handle events - before or after updating intersected set.
Added general E2E and detailed unit tests for selecting.
Also discovered, that sometimes the test are running while nodes are not yet in right positions. Added an instruction ensuring the position is right.
Probably fixes the first point in #8942
My guess is that the mockExpressionUpdate may be not set in cases when the test runs before App mounting. To make sure all the setup is done, we wait for `App` widget to being mounted before proceeding.
# Important Notes
This PR also change the way we run test's server. Before it was always a production build, but this makes development iteration long. Now we test production build only on CI or when `PROD=true` env variable is set.
- Closes#8179
# Important Notes
- ⚠️ These tests are currently *not run* on any CI workflow.
- There is some unused code for mocking the PM. This has been intentionally kept, as this may be useful in the future.
Note that this may be useful for testing the dashboard, however the dashboard is currently only tested in cloud mode
- that is, without the backend switcher, and with only the remote backend available. As such, currently it uses HTTP API mocks, and no PM mock.
