enso/test/Benchmarks
Radosław Waśko 1b8b30a68d
Improve performance of Join_Condition.Between by sorting on one dimension (#8212)
- Closes #5303
- Refactors `JoinStrategy` allowing us to 'stack' join strategies on top of each other (to some extent) - currently a `HashJoin` can be followed by another join strategy (currently `SortJoin`)
- Adds benchmarks for join
- Due to limitations of the sorting approach this will still not be as fast as possible for cases where there is more than 1 `Between` condition in a single query - trying to demonstrate that in benchmarks.
- We can replace sorting by d-dimensional [RangeTrees](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_tree) to get `O((n + m) log^d n + k)` performance (where `n` and `m` are sizes of joined tables, `d` is the amount of `Between` conditions used in the query and `k` is the result set size).
- Follow up ticket for consideration later:
#8216
- Closes #8215
- After all, it turned out that `TreeSet` was problematic (because of not enough flexibility with duplicate key handling), so the simplest solution was to immediately implement this sub-task.
- Closes #8204
- Unrelated, but I ran into this here: adds type checks to other arguments of `set`.
- Before, putting in a Column as `new_name` (i.e. mistakenly messing up the order of arguments), lead to a hard to understand `Method `if_then_else` of type Column could not be found.`, instead now it would file with type error 'expected Text got Column`.
2023-11-08 12:59:55 +00:00
..
polyglot-sources/benchmark-java-helpers/src/main/java/org/enso/benchmark_helpers Compare performance of Panic / Java Exception / Dataflow error (#8130) 2023-10-24 12:03:44 +00:00
src Improve performance of Join_Condition.Between by sorting on one dimension (#8212) 2023-11-08 12:59:55 +00:00
package.yaml Run components through the launcher (#1073) 2020-08-19 13:24:31 +01:00