mirror of
https://github.com/enso-org/enso.git
synced 2024-11-30 05:35:09 +03:00
1d2371f986
Fixes #7336 in a quick way. Next to the old way of defining groups, the library can just add `GROUP` tag to some entities, and it will be added to the group specified in tag's description. The group name may be qualified (with project name, like `Standard.Base.Input/Output`) or just name - in the latter case, IDE will assume a group defined in the same library as the entity. Also moved some entities from "export" list in package.yaml to GROUP tag to give an example. I didn't move all of those, as I assume the library team will reorganize those groups anyway. ### Important Notes @jdunkerley @radeusgd @GregoryTravis When you will start specifying groups in tags, remember that: * The groups still belongs to a concrete project; if some entity outside a project wants to be added to its group, the "qualified" name should be specified. See `Table.new` example in this PR. * If the group name does not reflect any group in package.yaml **the tag is ignored**. * A single entity may be only in a single group. If it's specified in both package.yaml and in tag, the tag takes precedence. --------- Co-authored-by: Ilya Bogdanov <fumlead@gmail.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| debug | ||
| doc-parser | ||
| generate-java | ||
| jni | ||
| src | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||