sapling/tests/test-merge-default.t

175 lines
3.9 KiB
Perl
Raw Normal View History

$ . helpers-usechg.sh
2010-09-11 13:44:53 +04:00
$ hg init
$ echo a > a
$ hg commit -A -ma
adding a
$ echo b >> a
$ hg commit -mb
$ echo c >> a
$ hg commit -mc
$ hg up 1
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo d >> a
$ hg commit -md
$ hg up 1
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo e >> a
$ hg commit -me
$ hg up 1
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Should fail because not at a head:
$ hg merge
abort: working directory not at a head revision
(use 'hg update' or merge with an explicit revision)
2010-09-17 02:51:32 +04:00
[255]
2010-09-11 13:44:53 +04:00
$ hg up
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
updated to "f25cbe84d8b3: e"
update: warn about other topological heads on bare update A concern around the user experience of Mercurial is user getting stuck on there own topological branch forever. For example, someone pulling another topological branch, missing that message in pull asking them to merge and getting stuck on there own local branch. The current way to "address" this concern was for bare 'hg update' to target the tipmost (also latest pulled) changesets and complain when the update was not linear. That way, failure to merge newly pulled changesets would result in some kind of failure. Yet the failure was quite obscure, not working in all cases (eg: commit right after pull) and the behavior was very impractical in the common case (eg: issue4673). To be able to change that behavior, we need to provide other ways to alert a user stucks on one of many topological head. We do so with an extra message after bare update: 1 other heads for branch "default" Bookmark get its own special version: 1 other divergent bookmarks for "foobar" There is significant room to improve the message itself, and we should augment it with hint about how to see theses other heads or handle the situation (see in-line comment). But having "a" message is already a significant improvement compared to the existing situation. Once we have it we can iterate on a better version of it. As having such message is an important step toward changing the default destination for update and other nicety, I would like to move forward quickly on getting such message. This was discussed during London - October 2015 Sprint.
2016-02-02 17:49:02 +03:00
2 other heads for branch "default"
2010-09-11 13:44:53 +04:00
Should fail because > 2 heads:
$ HGMERGE=internal:other; export HGMERGE
$ hg merge
abort: branch 'default' has 3 heads - please merge with an explicit rev
(run 'hg heads .' to see heads)
2010-09-17 02:51:32 +04:00
[255]
2010-09-11 13:44:53 +04:00
Should succeed:
$ hg merge 2
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
identify: add template support This is based on a patch proposed last year by Mathias De Maré[1], with a few changes. - Tags and bookmarks are now formatted lists, for more flexible queries. - The templater is populated whether or not [-nibtB] is specified. (Plain output is unchanged.) This seems more consistent with other templated commands. - The 'id' property is a string, instead of a list. - The parents of 'wdir()' have their own list of attributes. I left 'id' as a string because it seems very useful for generating version info. It's also a bit strange because the value and meaning changes depending on whether or not --debug is passed (short vs full hash), whether the revision is a merge or not (one hash or two, separated by a '+'), the working directory or not (node vs p1node), and local or not (remote defaults to tip, and never has '+'). The equivalent string built with {rev} seems much less useful, and I couldn't think of a reasonable name, so I left it out. The discussion seemed to be pointing towards having a list of nodes, with more than one entry for a merge. It seems simpler to give the nodes a name, and use {node} for the actual commit probed, especially now that there is a virtual node for 'wdir()'. Yuya mentioned using fm.nested() in that thread, so I did for the parent nodes. I'm not sure if the plan is to fill in all of the context attributes in these items, or if these nested items should simply be made {p1node} and {p1rev}. I used ':' as the tag separator for consistency with {tags} in the log templater. Likewise, bookmarks are separated by a space for consistency with the corresponding log template. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-August/087039.html
2017-06-25 06:09:21 +03:00
$ hg id -Tjson
[
{
"bookmarks": [],
"branch": "default",
"dirty": "+",
identify: add template support This is based on a patch proposed last year by Mathias De Maré[1], with a few changes. - Tags and bookmarks are now formatted lists, for more flexible queries. - The templater is populated whether or not [-nibtB] is specified. (Plain output is unchanged.) This seems more consistent with other templated commands. - The 'id' property is a string, instead of a list. - The parents of 'wdir()' have their own list of attributes. I left 'id' as a string because it seems very useful for generating version info. It's also a bit strange because the value and meaning changes depending on whether or not --debug is passed (short vs full hash), whether the revision is a merge or not (one hash or two, separated by a '+'), the working directory or not (node vs p1node), and local or not (remote defaults to tip, and never has '+'). The equivalent string built with {rev} seems much less useful, and I couldn't think of a reasonable name, so I left it out. The discussion seemed to be pointing towards having a list of nodes, with more than one entry for a merge. It seems simpler to give the nodes a name, and use {node} for the actual commit probed, especially now that there is a virtual node for 'wdir()'. Yuya mentioned using fm.nested() in that thread, so I did for the parent nodes. I'm not sure if the plan is to fill in all of the context attributes in these items, or if these nested items should simply be made {p1node} and {p1rev}. I used ':' as the tag separator for consistency with {tags} in the log templater. Likewise, bookmarks are separated by a space for consistency with the corresponding log template. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-August/087039.html
2017-06-25 06:09:21 +03:00
"id": "f25cbe84d8b3+2d95304fed5d+",
"node": "ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff",
"parents": [{"node": "f25cbe84d8b320e298e7703f18a25a3959518c23", "rev": 4}, {"node": "2d95304fed5d89bc9d70b2a0d02f0d567469c3ab", "rev": 2}],
identify: add template support This is based on a patch proposed last year by Mathias De Maré[1], with a few changes. - Tags and bookmarks are now formatted lists, for more flexible queries. - The templater is populated whether or not [-nibtB] is specified. (Plain output is unchanged.) This seems more consistent with other templated commands. - The 'id' property is a string, instead of a list. - The parents of 'wdir()' have their own list of attributes. I left 'id' as a string because it seems very useful for generating version info. It's also a bit strange because the value and meaning changes depending on whether or not --debug is passed (short vs full hash), whether the revision is a merge or not (one hash or two, separated by a '+'), the working directory or not (node vs p1node), and local or not (remote defaults to tip, and never has '+'). The equivalent string built with {rev} seems much less useful, and I couldn't think of a reasonable name, so I left it out. The discussion seemed to be pointing towards having a list of nodes, with more than one entry for a merge. It seems simpler to give the nodes a name, and use {node} for the actual commit probed, especially now that there is a virtual node for 'wdir()'. Yuya mentioned using fm.nested() in that thread, so I did for the parent nodes. I'm not sure if the plan is to fill in all of the context attributes in these items, or if these nested items should simply be made {p1node} and {p1rev}. I used ':' as the tag separator for consistency with {tags} in the log templater. Likewise, bookmarks are separated by a space for consistency with the corresponding log template. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-August/087039.html
2017-06-25 06:09:21 +03:00
"tags": ["tip"]
}
]
2010-09-11 13:44:53 +04:00
$ hg commit -mm1
Should succeed - 2 heads:
$ hg merge -P
changeset: 3:ea9ff125ff88
parent: 1:1846eede8b68
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: d
$ hg merge
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg commit -mm2
identify: add template support This is based on a patch proposed last year by Mathias De Maré[1], with a few changes. - Tags and bookmarks are now formatted lists, for more flexible queries. - The templater is populated whether or not [-nibtB] is specified. (Plain output is unchanged.) This seems more consistent with other templated commands. - The 'id' property is a string, instead of a list. - The parents of 'wdir()' have their own list of attributes. I left 'id' as a string because it seems very useful for generating version info. It's also a bit strange because the value and meaning changes depending on whether or not --debug is passed (short vs full hash), whether the revision is a merge or not (one hash or two, separated by a '+'), the working directory or not (node vs p1node), and local or not (remote defaults to tip, and never has '+'). The equivalent string built with {rev} seems much less useful, and I couldn't think of a reasonable name, so I left it out. The discussion seemed to be pointing towards having a list of nodes, with more than one entry for a merge. It seems simpler to give the nodes a name, and use {node} for the actual commit probed, especially now that there is a virtual node for 'wdir()'. Yuya mentioned using fm.nested() in that thread, so I did for the parent nodes. I'm not sure if the plan is to fill in all of the context attributes in these items, or if these nested items should simply be made {p1node} and {p1rev}. I used ':' as the tag separator for consistency with {tags} in the log templater. Likewise, bookmarks are separated by a space for consistency with the corresponding log template. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-August/087039.html
2017-06-25 06:09:21 +03:00
$ hg id -r 1 -Tjson
[
{
"bookmarks": [],
"branch": "default",
"id": "1846eede8b68",
"node": "1846eede8b6886d8cc8a88c96a687b7fe8f3b9d1",
"tags": []
}
]
2010-09-11 13:44:53 +04:00
Should fail because at tip:
$ hg merge
abort: nothing to merge
2010-09-17 02:51:32 +04:00
[255]
2010-09-11 13:44:53 +04:00
$ hg up 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Should fail because there is only one head:
$ hg merge
abort: nothing to merge
(use 'hg update' instead)
2010-09-17 02:51:32 +04:00
[255]
2010-09-11 13:44:53 +04:00
$ hg up 3
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo f >> a
$ hg branch foobranch
marked working directory as branch foobranch
2011-12-09 00:32:44 +04:00
(branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
2010-09-11 13:44:53 +04:00
$ hg commit -mf
Should fail because merge with other branch:
$ hg merge
abort: branch 'foobranch' has one head - please merge with an explicit rev
(run 'hg heads' to see all heads)
2010-09-17 02:51:32 +04:00
[255]
2010-09-11 13:44:53 +04:00
Test for issue2043: ensure that 'merge -P' shows ancestors of 6 that
are not ancestors of 7, regardless of where their common ancestors are.
2010-09-11 13:44:53 +04:00
Merge preview not affected by common ancestor:
$ hg up -q 7
$ hg merge -q -P 6
2:2d95304fed5d
4:f25cbe84d8b3
5:a431fabd6039
6:e88e33f3bf62
Test experimental destination revset
$ hg log -r '_destmerge()'
abort: branch 'foobranch' has one head - please merge with an explicit rev
(run 'hg heads' to see all heads)
[255]
(on a branch with a two heads)
$ hg up 5
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo f >> a
$ hg commit -mf
$ hg log -r '_destmerge()'
changeset: 6:e88e33f3bf62
parent: 5:a431fabd6039
parent: 3:ea9ff125ff88
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: m2
(from the other head)
$ hg log -r '_destmerge(e88e33f3bf62)'
changeset: 8:b613918999e2
tag: tip
parent: 5:a431fabd6039
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: f
(from unrelated branch)
$ hg log -r '_destmerge(foobranch)'
abort: branch 'foobranch' has one head - please merge with an explicit rev
(run 'hg heads' to see all heads)
[255]