facebook/sapling
1
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/facebook/sapling.git synced 2024-10-07 07:17:55 +03:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
62064c1381
sapling/tests/test-show-stack.t

221 lines
4.3 KiB
Perl
Raw Normal View History

show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
$ cat >> $HGRCPATH << EOF
> [extensions]
> show =
> EOF
$ hg init repo0
$ cd repo0
Empty repo / no checkout results in error
$ hg show stack
abort: stack view only available when there is a working directory
[255]
Stack displays single draft changeset as root revision
$ echo 0 > foo
$ hg -q commit -A -m 'commit 0'
$ hg show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
@ 9f17 commit 0
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
Stack displays multiple draft changesets
$ echo 1 > foo
$ hg commit -m 'commit 1'
$ echo 2 > foo
$ hg commit -m 'commit 2'
$ echo 3 > foo
$ hg commit -m 'commit 3'
$ echo 4 > foo
$ hg commit -m 'commit 4'
$ hg show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
@ 2737 commit 4
o d1a6 commit 3
o 128c commit 2
o 181c commit 1
o 9f17 commit 0
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
Public parent of draft base is displayed, separated from stack
$ hg phase --public -r 0
$ hg show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
@ 2737 commit 4
o d1a6 commit 3
o 128c commit 2
o 181c commit 1
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
/ (stack base)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o 9f17 commit 0
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
$ hg phase --public -r 1
$ hg show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
@ 2737 commit 4
o d1a6 commit 3
o 128c commit 2
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
/ (stack base)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o 181c commit 1
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
Draft descendants are shown
$ hg -q up 2
$ hg show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o 2737 commit 4
o d1a6 commit 3
@ 128c commit 2
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
/ (stack base)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o 181c commit 1
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
$ hg -q up 3
$ hg show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o 2737 commit 4
@ d1a6 commit 3
o 128c commit 2
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
/ (stack base)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o 181c commit 1
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
working dir on public changeset should display special message
$ hg -q up 1
$ hg show stack
show: tweak warning message '.' is "working directory parent" not "working directory."
2017-07-04 07:10:48 +03:00
(empty stack; working directory parent is a published changeset)
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
Branch point in descendants displayed at top of graph
$ hg -q up 3
$ echo b > foo
$ hg commit -m 'commit 5 (new dag branch)'
created new head
$ hg -q up 2
$ hg show stack
\ / (multiple children)
|
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o d1a6 commit 3
@ 128c commit 2
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
/ (stack base)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o 181c commit 1
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
$ cd ..
Base is stopped at merges
$ hg init merge-base
$ cd merge-base
$ echo 0 > foo
$ hg -q commit -A -m initial
$ echo h1 > foo
$ hg commit -m 'head 1'
$ hg -q up 0
$ echo h2 > foo
$ hg -q commit -m 'head 2'
$ hg phase --public -r 0:tip
$ hg -q up 1
$ hg merge -t :local 2
0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg commit -m 'merge heads'
TODO doesn't yet handle case where wdir is a draft merge
$ hg show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
@ 8ee9 merge heads
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
/ (stack base)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o 5947 head 1
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
$ echo d1 > foo
$ hg commit -m 'draft 1'
$ echo d2 > foo
$ hg commit -m 'draft 2'
$ hg show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
@ 430d draft 2
o 787b draft 1
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
/ (stack base)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o 8ee9 merge heads
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
$ cd ..
Now move on to stacks when there are more commits after the base branchpoint
$ hg init public-rebase
$ cd public-rebase
$ echo 0 > foo
$ hg -q commit -A -m 'base'
$ hg phase --public -r .
$ echo d1 > foo
$ hg commit -m 'draft 1'
$ echo d2 > foo
$ hg commit -m 'draft 2'
$ hg -q up 0
$ echo 1 > foo
$ hg commit -m 'new 1'
created new head
$ echo 2 > foo
$ hg commit -m 'new 2'
$ hg -q up 2
Newer draft heads don't impact output
$ hg show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
@ eaff draft 2
o 2b21 draft 1
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
/ (stack base)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o b66b base
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
Newer public heads are rendered
$ hg phase --public -r '::tip'
$ hg show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o baa4 new 2
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
/ (2 commits ahead)
:
: (stack head)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
: @ eaff draft 2
: o 2b21 draft 1
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
:/ (stack base)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o b66b base
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
If rebase is available, we show a hint how to rebase to that head
$ hg --config extensions.rebase= show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o baa4 new 2
/ (2 commits ahead; hg rebase --source 2b21 --dest baa4)
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
:
: (stack head)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
: @ eaff draft 2
: o 2b21 draft 1
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
:/ (stack base)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o b66b base
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
Similar tests but for multiple heads
$ hg -q up 0
$ echo h2 > foo
$ hg -q commit -m 'new head 2'
$ hg phase --public -r .
$ hg -q up 2
$ hg show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o baa4 new 2
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
/ (2 commits ahead)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
: o 9a84 new head 2
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
:/ (1 commits ahead)
:
: (stack head)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
: @ eaff draft 2
: o 2b21 draft 1
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
:/ (stack base)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o b66b base
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
$ hg --config extensions.rebase= show stack
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o baa4 new 2
/ (2 commits ahead; hg rebase --source 2b21 --dest baa4)
: o 9a84 new head 2
:/ (1 commits ahead; hg rebase --source 2b21 --dest 9a84)
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
:
: (stack head)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
: @ eaff draft 2
: o 2b21 draft 1
show: implement "stack" view People often want to know what they are working on *now*. As part of this, they also commonly want to know how that work is related to other changesets in the repo so they can perform common actions like rebase, histedit, and merge. `hg show work` made headway into this space. However, it is geared towards a complete repo view as opposed to just the current line of work. If you have a lot of in-flight work or the repo has many heads, the output can be overwhelming. The closest thing Mercurial has to "show me the current thing I'm working on" that doesn't require custom revsets is `hg qseries`. And this requires MQ, which completely changes workflows and repository behavior and has horrible performance on large repos. But as sub-optimal as MQ is, it does some things right, such as expose a model of the repo that is easy for people to reason about. This simplicity is why I think a lot of people prefer to use MQ, despite its shortcomings. One common development workflow is to author a series of linear changesets, using bookmarks, branches, anonymous heads, or even topics (3rd party extension). I'll call this a "stack." You periodically rewrite history in place (using `hg histedit`) and reparent the stack against newer changesets (using `hg rebase`). This workflow can be difficult because there is no obvious way to quickly see the current "stack" nor its relation to other changesets. Figuring out arguments to `hg rebase` can be difficult and may require highlighting and pasting multiple changeset nodes to construct a command. The goal of this commit is to make stack based workflows simpler by exposing a view of the current stack and its relationship to other releant changesets, notably the parent of the base changeset in the stack and newer heads that the stack could be rebased or merged into. Introduced is the `hg show stack` view. Essentially, it finds all mutable changesets from the working directory revision in both directions, stopping at a merge or branch point. This limits the revisions to a DAG linear range. The stack is rendered as a concise list of changesets. Alongside the stack is a visualization of the DAG, similar to `hg log -G`. Newer public heads from the branch point of the stack are rendered above the stack. The presence of these heads helps people understand the DAG model and the relationship between the stack and changes made since the branch point of that stack. If the "rebase" command is available, a `hg rebase` command is printed for each head so a user can perform a simple copy and paste to perform a rebase. This view is alpha quality. There are tons of TODOs documented inline. But I think it is good enough for a first iteration.
2017-07-02 08:38:42 +03:00
:/ (stack base)
show: use consistent (and possibly shorter) node lengths `hg show` makes heavy use of shortest() to limit the length of the node hash. For the "stack" and "work" views, you are often looking at multiple lines of similar output for "lines" of work. It is visually appeasing for things to vertically align. A naive use of {shortest(node, N)} could result in variable length nodes and for the first character of the description to vary by a column or two. We implement a function to determine the longest shortest prefix for a set of revisions. The new function is used to determine the printed node length for all `hg show` views. .. feature:: show: use consistent node length in views Our previous shortest node length of 5 was arbitrarily chosen. shortest() already does the work of ensuring that a partial node isn't ambiguous with an integer revision, which is our primary risk of a collision for very short nodes. It should be safe to go with the shortest node possible. Existing code is also optimized to handle nodes as short as 4. So, we decrease the minimum hash length from 5 to 4. We also add a test demonstrating that prefix collisions increase the node length. .. feature:: show: decrease minimum displayed hash length from 5 to 4 Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D558
2017-09-14 07:15:46 +03:00
o b66b base
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink