sapling/tests/test-ssh.t

598 lines
18 KiB
Perl
Raw Normal View History

2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
This test tries to exercise the ssh functionality with a dummy script
$ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
> [format]
> usegeneraldelta=yes
> EOF
creating 'remote' repo
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
$ hg init remote
$ cd remote
$ echo this > foo
$ echo this > fooO
$ hg ci -A -m "init" foo fooO
insert a closed branch (issue4428)
$ hg up null
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg branch closed
marked working directory as branch closed
(branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
$ hg ci -mc0
$ hg ci --close-branch -mc1
$ hg up -q default
configure for serving
$ cat <<EOF > .hg/hgrc
> [server]
> uncompressed = True
>
> [hooks]
> changegroup = sh -c "printenv.py changegroup-in-remote 0 ../dummylog"
> EOF
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
$ cd ..
repo not found error
$ hg clone -e "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" ssh://user@dummy/nonexistent local
remote: abort: repository nonexistent not found!
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
abort: no suitable response from remote hg!
[255]
non-existent absolute path
$ hg clone -e "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" ssh://user@dummy/`pwd`/nonexistent local
remote: abort: repository $TESTTMP/nonexistent not found!
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
abort: no suitable response from remote hg!
[255]
clone remote via stream
$ hg clone -e "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" --stream ssh://user@dummy/remote local-stream
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
streaming all changes
changelog: disable delta chains This patch disables delta chains on changelogs. After this patch, new entries on changelogs - including existing changelogs - will be stored as the fulltext of that data (likely compressed). No delta computation will be performed. An overview of delta chains and data justifying this change follows. Revlogs try to store entries as a delta against a previous entry (either a parent revision in the case of generaldelta or the previous physical revision when not using generaldelta). Most of the time this is the correct thing to do: it frequently results in less CPU usage and smaller storage. Delta chains are most effective when the base revision being deltad against is similar to the current data. This tends to occur naturally for manifests and file data, since only small parts of each tend to change with each revision. Changelogs, however, are a different story. Changelog entries represent changesets/commits. And unless commits in a repository are homogonous (same author, changing same files, similar commit messages, etc), a delta from one entry to the next tends to be relatively large compared to the size of the entry. This means that delta chains tend to be short. How short? Here is the full vs delta revision breakdown on some real world repos: Repo % Full % Delta Max Length hg 45.8 54.2 6 mozilla-central 42.4 57.6 8 mozilla-unified 42.5 57.5 17 pypy 46.1 53.9 6 python-zstandard 46.1 53.9 3 (I threw in python-zstandard as an example of a repo that is homogonous. It contains a small Python project with changes all from the same author.) Contrast this with the manifest revlog for these repos, where 99+% of revisions are deltas and delta chains run into the thousands. So delta chains aren't as useful on changelogs. But even a short delta chain may provide benefits. Let's measure that. Delta chains may require less CPU to read revisions if the CPU time spent reading smaller deltas is less than the CPU time used to decompress larger individual entries. We can measure this via `hg perfrevlog -c -d 1` to iterate a revlog to resolve each revision's fulltext. Here are the results of that command on a repo using delta chains in its changelog and on a repo without delta chains: hg (forward) ! wall 0.407008 comb 0.410000 user 0.410000 sys 0.000000 (best of 25) ! wall 0.390061 comb 0.390000 user 0.390000 sys 0.000000 (best of 26) hg (reverse) ! wall 0.515221 comb 0.520000 user 0.520000 sys 0.000000 (best of 19) ! wall 0.400018 comb 0.400000 user 0.390000 sys 0.010000 (best of 25) mozilla-central (forward) ! wall 4.508296 comb 4.490000 user 4.490000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) ! wall 4.370222 comb 4.370000 user 4.350000 sys 0.020000 (best of 3) mozilla-central (reverse) ! wall 5.758995 comb 5.760000 user 5.720000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) ! wall 4.346503 comb 4.340000 user 4.320000 sys 0.020000 (best of 3) mozilla-unified (forward) ! wall 4.957088 comb 4.950000 user 4.940000 sys 0.010000 (best of 3) ! wall 4.660528 comb 4.650000 user 4.630000 sys 0.020000 (best of 3) mozilla-unified (reverse) ! wall 6.119827 comb 6.110000 user 6.090000 sys 0.020000 (best of 3) ! wall 4.675136 comb 4.670000 user 4.670000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) pypy (forward) ! wall 1.231122 comb 1.240000 user 1.230000 sys 0.010000 (best of 8) ! wall 1.164896 comb 1.160000 user 1.160000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) pypy (reverse) ! wall 1.467049 comb 1.460000 user 1.460000 sys 0.000000 (best of 7) ! wall 1.160200 comb 1.170000 user 1.160000 sys 0.010000 (best of 9) The data clearly shows that it takes less wall and CPU time to resolve revisions when there are no delta chains in the changelogs, regardless of the direction of traversal. Furthermore, not using a delta chain means that fulltext resolution in reverse is as fast as iterating forward. So not using delta chains on the changelog is a clear CPU win for reading operations. An example of a user-visible operation showing this speed-up is revset evaluation. Here are results for `hg perfrevset 'author(gps) or author(mpm)'`: hg ! wall 1.655506 comb 1.660000 user 1.650000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! wall 1.612723 comb 1.610000 user 1.600000 sys 0.010000 (best of 7) mozilla-central ! wall 17.629826 comb 17.640000 user 17.600000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) ! wall 17.311033 comb 17.300000 user 17.260000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) What about 00changelog.i size? Repo Delta Chains No Delta Chains hg 7,033,250 6,976,771 mozilla-central 82,978,748 81,574,623 mozilla-unified 88,112,349 86,702,162 pypy 20,740,699 20,659,741 The data shows that removing delta chains from the changelog makes the changelog smaller. Delta chains are also used during changegroup generation. This operation essentially converts a series of revisions to one large delta chain. And changegroup generation is smart: if the delta in the revlog matches what the changegroup is emitting, it will reuse the delta instead of recalculating it. We can measure the impact removing changelog delta chains has on changegroup generation via `hg perfchangegroupchangelog`: hg ! wall 1.589245 comb 1.590000 user 1.590000 sys 0.000000 (best of 7) ! wall 1.788060 comb 1.790000 user 1.790000 sys 0.000000 (best of 6) mozilla-central ! wall 17.382585 comb 17.380000 user 17.340000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) ! wall 20.161357 comb 20.160000 user 20.120000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) mozilla-unified ! wall 18.722839 comb 18.720000 user 18.680000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) ! wall 21.168075 comb 21.170000 user 21.130000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) pypy ! wall 4.828317 comb 4.830000 user 4.820000 sys 0.010000 (best of 3) ! wall 5.415455 comb 5.420000 user 5.410000 sys 0.010000 (best of 3) The data shows eliminating delta chains makes the changelog part of changegroup generation slower. This is expected since we now have to compute deltas for revisions where we could recycle the delta before. It is worth putting this regression into context of overall changegroup times. Here is the rough total CPU time spent in changegroup generation for various repos while using delta chains on the changelog: Repo CPU Time (s) CPU Time w/ compression hg 4.50 7.05 mozilla-central 111.1 222.0 pypy 28.68 75.5 Before compression, removing delta chains from the changegroup adds ~4.4% overhead to hg changegroup generation, 1.3% to mozilla-central, and 2.0% to pypy. When you factor in zlib compression, these percentages are roughly divided by 2. While the increased CPU usage for changegroup generation is unfortunate, I think it is acceptable because the percentage is small, server operators (those likely impacted most by this) have other mechanisms to mitigate CPU consumption (namely reducing zlib compression level and pre-generated clone bundles), and because there is room to optimize this in the future. For example, we could use the nullid as the base revision, effectively encoding the full revision for each entry in the changegroup. When doing this, `hg perfchangegroupchangelog` nearly halves: mozilla-unified ! wall 21.168075 comb 21.170000 user 21.130000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) ! wall 11.196461 comb 11.200000 user 11.190000 sys 0.010000 (best of 3) This looks very promising as a future optimization opportunity. It's worth that the changes in test-acl.t to the changegroup part size. This is because revision 6 in the changegroup had a delta chain of length 2 before and after this patch the base revision is nullrev. When the base revision is nullrev, cg2packer.deltaparent() hardcodes the *previous* revision from the changegroup as the delta parent. This caused the delta in the changegroup to switch base revisions, the delta to change, and the size to change accordingly. While the size increased in this case, I think sizes will remain the same on average, as the delta base for changelog revisions doesn't matter too much (as this patch shows). So, I don't consider this a regression.
2016-10-13 13:50:27 +03:00
4 files to transfer, 602 bytes of data
transferred 602 bytes in * seconds (*) (glob)
searching for changes
no changes found
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
updating to branch default
2010-09-26 22:44:49 +04:00
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
$ cd local-stream
$ hg verify
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
2 files, 3 changesets, 2 total revisions
$ hg branches
default 0:1160648e36ce
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
$ cd ..
clone bookmarks via stream
$ hg -R local-stream book mybook
$ hg clone -e "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" --stream ssh://user@dummy/local-stream stream2
streaming all changes
changelog: disable delta chains This patch disables delta chains on changelogs. After this patch, new entries on changelogs - including existing changelogs - will be stored as the fulltext of that data (likely compressed). No delta computation will be performed. An overview of delta chains and data justifying this change follows. Revlogs try to store entries as a delta against a previous entry (either a parent revision in the case of generaldelta or the previous physical revision when not using generaldelta). Most of the time this is the correct thing to do: it frequently results in less CPU usage and smaller storage. Delta chains are most effective when the base revision being deltad against is similar to the current data. This tends to occur naturally for manifests and file data, since only small parts of each tend to change with each revision. Changelogs, however, are a different story. Changelog entries represent changesets/commits. And unless commits in a repository are homogonous (same author, changing same files, similar commit messages, etc), a delta from one entry to the next tends to be relatively large compared to the size of the entry. This means that delta chains tend to be short. How short? Here is the full vs delta revision breakdown on some real world repos: Repo % Full % Delta Max Length hg 45.8 54.2 6 mozilla-central 42.4 57.6 8 mozilla-unified 42.5 57.5 17 pypy 46.1 53.9 6 python-zstandard 46.1 53.9 3 (I threw in python-zstandard as an example of a repo that is homogonous. It contains a small Python project with changes all from the same author.) Contrast this with the manifest revlog for these repos, where 99+% of revisions are deltas and delta chains run into the thousands. So delta chains aren't as useful on changelogs. But even a short delta chain may provide benefits. Let's measure that. Delta chains may require less CPU to read revisions if the CPU time spent reading smaller deltas is less than the CPU time used to decompress larger individual entries. We can measure this via `hg perfrevlog -c -d 1` to iterate a revlog to resolve each revision's fulltext. Here are the results of that command on a repo using delta chains in its changelog and on a repo without delta chains: hg (forward) ! wall 0.407008 comb 0.410000 user 0.410000 sys 0.000000 (best of 25) ! wall 0.390061 comb 0.390000 user 0.390000 sys 0.000000 (best of 26) hg (reverse) ! wall 0.515221 comb 0.520000 user 0.520000 sys 0.000000 (best of 19) ! wall 0.400018 comb 0.400000 user 0.390000 sys 0.010000 (best of 25) mozilla-central (forward) ! wall 4.508296 comb 4.490000 user 4.490000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) ! wall 4.370222 comb 4.370000 user 4.350000 sys 0.020000 (best of 3) mozilla-central (reverse) ! wall 5.758995 comb 5.760000 user 5.720000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) ! wall 4.346503 comb 4.340000 user 4.320000 sys 0.020000 (best of 3) mozilla-unified (forward) ! wall 4.957088 comb 4.950000 user 4.940000 sys 0.010000 (best of 3) ! wall 4.660528 comb 4.650000 user 4.630000 sys 0.020000 (best of 3) mozilla-unified (reverse) ! wall 6.119827 comb 6.110000 user 6.090000 sys 0.020000 (best of 3) ! wall 4.675136 comb 4.670000 user 4.670000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) pypy (forward) ! wall 1.231122 comb 1.240000 user 1.230000 sys 0.010000 (best of 8) ! wall 1.164896 comb 1.160000 user 1.160000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) pypy (reverse) ! wall 1.467049 comb 1.460000 user 1.460000 sys 0.000000 (best of 7) ! wall 1.160200 comb 1.170000 user 1.160000 sys 0.010000 (best of 9) The data clearly shows that it takes less wall and CPU time to resolve revisions when there are no delta chains in the changelogs, regardless of the direction of traversal. Furthermore, not using a delta chain means that fulltext resolution in reverse is as fast as iterating forward. So not using delta chains on the changelog is a clear CPU win for reading operations. An example of a user-visible operation showing this speed-up is revset evaluation. Here are results for `hg perfrevset 'author(gps) or author(mpm)'`: hg ! wall 1.655506 comb 1.660000 user 1.650000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6) ! wall 1.612723 comb 1.610000 user 1.600000 sys 0.010000 (best of 7) mozilla-central ! wall 17.629826 comb 17.640000 user 17.600000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) ! wall 17.311033 comb 17.300000 user 17.260000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) What about 00changelog.i size? Repo Delta Chains No Delta Chains hg 7,033,250 6,976,771 mozilla-central 82,978,748 81,574,623 mozilla-unified 88,112,349 86,702,162 pypy 20,740,699 20,659,741 The data shows that removing delta chains from the changelog makes the changelog smaller. Delta chains are also used during changegroup generation. This operation essentially converts a series of revisions to one large delta chain. And changegroup generation is smart: if the delta in the revlog matches what the changegroup is emitting, it will reuse the delta instead of recalculating it. We can measure the impact removing changelog delta chains has on changegroup generation via `hg perfchangegroupchangelog`: hg ! wall 1.589245 comb 1.590000 user 1.590000 sys 0.000000 (best of 7) ! wall 1.788060 comb 1.790000 user 1.790000 sys 0.000000 (best of 6) mozilla-central ! wall 17.382585 comb 17.380000 user 17.340000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) ! wall 20.161357 comb 20.160000 user 20.120000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) mozilla-unified ! wall 18.722839 comb 18.720000 user 18.680000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) ! wall 21.168075 comb 21.170000 user 21.130000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) pypy ! wall 4.828317 comb 4.830000 user 4.820000 sys 0.010000 (best of 3) ! wall 5.415455 comb 5.420000 user 5.410000 sys 0.010000 (best of 3) The data shows eliminating delta chains makes the changelog part of changegroup generation slower. This is expected since we now have to compute deltas for revisions where we could recycle the delta before. It is worth putting this regression into context of overall changegroup times. Here is the rough total CPU time spent in changegroup generation for various repos while using delta chains on the changelog: Repo CPU Time (s) CPU Time w/ compression hg 4.50 7.05 mozilla-central 111.1 222.0 pypy 28.68 75.5 Before compression, removing delta chains from the changegroup adds ~4.4% overhead to hg changegroup generation, 1.3% to mozilla-central, and 2.0% to pypy. When you factor in zlib compression, these percentages are roughly divided by 2. While the increased CPU usage for changegroup generation is unfortunate, I think it is acceptable because the percentage is small, server operators (those likely impacted most by this) have other mechanisms to mitigate CPU consumption (namely reducing zlib compression level and pre-generated clone bundles), and because there is room to optimize this in the future. For example, we could use the nullid as the base revision, effectively encoding the full revision for each entry in the changegroup. When doing this, `hg perfchangegroupchangelog` nearly halves: mozilla-unified ! wall 21.168075 comb 21.170000 user 21.130000 sys 0.040000 (best of 3) ! wall 11.196461 comb 11.200000 user 11.190000 sys 0.010000 (best of 3) This looks very promising as a future optimization opportunity. It's worth that the changes in test-acl.t to the changegroup part size. This is because revision 6 in the changegroup had a delta chain of length 2 before and after this patch the base revision is nullrev. When the base revision is nullrev, cg2packer.deltaparent() hardcodes the *previous* revision from the changegroup as the delta parent. This caused the delta in the changegroup to switch base revisions, the delta to change, and the size to change accordingly. While the size increased in this case, I think sizes will remain the same on average, as the delta base for changelog revisions doesn't matter too much (as this patch shows). So, I don't consider this a regression.
2016-10-13 13:50:27 +03:00
4 files to transfer, 602 bytes of data
transferred 602 bytes in * seconds (*) (glob)
searching for changes
no changes found
updating to branch default
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd stream2
$ hg book
mybook 0:1160648e36ce
$ cd ..
$ rm -rf local-stream stream2
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
clone remote via pull
$ hg clone -e "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" ssh://user@dummy/remote local
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 3 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files
new changesets 1160648e36ce:ad076bfb429d
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
updating to branch default
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
verify
$ cd local
$ hg verify
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
2 files, 3 changesets, 2 total revisions
$ cat >> .hg/hgrc <<EOF
> [hooks]
> changegroup = sh -c "printenv.py changegroup-in-local 0 ../dummylog"
> EOF
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
empty default pull
$ hg paths
default = ssh://user@dummy/remote
$ hg pull -e "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\""
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
pulling from ssh://user@dummy/remote
searching for changes
no changes found
pull from wrong ssh URL
$ hg pull -e "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" ssh://user@dummy/doesnotexist
pulling from ssh://user@dummy/doesnotexist
remote: abort: repository doesnotexist not found!
abort: no suitable response from remote hg!
[255]
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
local change
$ echo bleah > foo
$ hg ci -m "add"
updating rc
$ echo "default-push = ssh://user@dummy/remote" >> .hg/hgrc
$ echo "[ui]" >> .hg/hgrc
$ echo "ssh = \"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" >> .hg/hgrc
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
find outgoing
$ hg out ssh://user@dummy/remote
comparing with ssh://user@dummy/remote
searching for changes
changeset: 3:a28a9d1a809c
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
tag: tip
parent: 0:1160648e36ce
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: add
find incoming on the remote side
$ hg incoming -R ../remote -e "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" ssh://user@dummy/local
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
comparing with ssh://user@dummy/local
searching for changes
changeset: 3:a28a9d1a809c
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
tag: tip
parent: 0:1160648e36ce
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: add
find incoming on the remote side (using absolute path)
$ hg incoming -R ../remote -e "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" "ssh://user@dummy/`pwd`"
comparing with ssh://user@dummy/$TESTTMP/local
searching for changes
changeset: 3:a28a9d1a809c
tag: tip
parent: 0:1160648e36ce
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: add
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
push
$ hg push
pushing to ssh://user@dummy/remote
searching for changes
remote: adding changesets
remote: adding manifests
remote: adding file changes
remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
$ cd ../remote
check remote tip
$ hg tip
changeset: 3:a28a9d1a809c
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
tag: tip
parent: 0:1160648e36ce
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: add
$ hg verify
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
2 files, 4 changesets, 3 total revisions
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
$ hg cat -r tip foo
bleah
$ echo z > z
$ hg ci -A -m z z
created new head
test pushkeys and bookmarks
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
$ cd ../local
$ hg debugpushkey --config ui.ssh="\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" ssh://user@dummy/remote namespaces
bookmarks
namespaces
2012-12-16 23:50:57 +04:00
phases
$ hg book foo -r 0
$ hg out -B
comparing with ssh://user@dummy/remote
searching for changed bookmarks
foo 1160648e36ce
$ hg push -B foo
pushing to ssh://user@dummy/remote
searching for changes
no changes found
exporting bookmark foo
[1]
$ hg debugpushkey --config ui.ssh="\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" ssh://user@dummy/remote bookmarks
foo 1160648e36cec0054048a7edc4110c6f84fde594
$ hg book -f foo
2010-11-29 03:21:47 +03:00
$ hg push --traceback
pushing to ssh://user@dummy/remote
searching for changes
no changes found
updating bookmark foo
[1]
$ hg book -d foo
$ hg in -B
comparing with ssh://user@dummy/remote
searching for changed bookmarks
foo a28a9d1a809c
$ hg book -f -r 0 foo
$ hg pull -B foo
pulling from ssh://user@dummy/remote
no changes found
updating bookmark foo
$ hg book -d foo
$ hg push -B foo
pushing to ssh://user@dummy/remote
searching for changes
no changes found
deleting remote bookmark foo
[1]
a bad, evil hook that prints to stdout
2011-05-05 03:47:46 +04:00
$ cat <<EOF > $TESTTMP/badhook
> import sys
> sys.stdout.write("KABOOM\n")
> EOF
$ cat <<EOF > $TESTTMP/badpyhook.py
> import sys
> def hook(ui, repo, hooktype, **kwargs):
> sys.stdout.write("KABOOM IN PROCESS\n")
> EOF
$ cat <<EOF >> ../remote/.hg/hgrc
> [hooks]
> changegroup.stdout = $PYTHON $TESTTMP/badhook
> changegroup.pystdout = python:$TESTTMP/badpyhook.py:hook
> EOF
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
$ echo r > r
$ hg ci -A -m z r
push should succeed even though it has an unexpected response
$ hg push
pushing to ssh://user@dummy/remote
searching for changes
remote has heads on branch 'default' that are not known locally: 6c0482d977a3
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
remote: adding changesets
remote: adding manifests
remote: adding file changes
remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
remote: KABOOM
remote: KABOOM IN PROCESS
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
$ hg -R ../remote heads
changeset: 5:1383141674ec
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
tag: tip
parent: 3:a28a9d1a809c
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: z
changeset: 4:6c0482d977a3
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
parent: 0:1160648e36ce
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: z
2011-03-13 14:24:17 +03:00
clone bookmarks
$ hg -R ../remote bookmark test
$ hg -R ../remote bookmarks
* test 4:6c0482d977a3
$ hg clone -e "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" ssh://user@dummy/remote local-bookmarks
2011-03-13 14:24:17 +03:00
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 6 changesets with 5 changes to 4 files (+1 heads)
new changesets 1160648e36ce:1383141674ec
2011-03-13 14:24:17 +03:00
updating to branch default
3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg -R local-bookmarks bookmarks
test 4:6c0482d977a3
2011-03-13 14:24:17 +03:00
passwords in ssh urls are not supported
(we use a glob here because different Python versions give different
results here)
$ hg push ssh://user:erroneouspwd@dummy/remote
pushing to ssh://user:*@dummy/remote (glob)
abort: password in URL not supported!
[255]
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
$ cd ..
2011-11-26 03:10:31 +04:00
hide outer repo
$ hg init
2011-11-26 03:10:31 +04:00
Test remote paths with spaces (issue2983):
$ hg init --ssh "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" "ssh://user@dummy/a repo"
$ touch "$TESTTMP/a repo/test"
$ hg -R 'a repo' commit -A -m "test"
adding test
2011-11-26 03:10:31 +04:00
$ hg -R 'a repo' tag tag
$ hg id --ssh "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" "ssh://user@dummy/a repo"
73649e48688a
2011-11-26 03:10:31 +04:00
$ hg id --ssh "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" "ssh://user@dummy/a repo#noNoNO"
abort: unknown revision 'noNoNO'!
[255]
Test (non-)escaping of remote paths with spaces when cloning (issue3145):
$ hg clone --ssh "\"$PYTHON\" \"$TESTDIR/dummyssh\"" "ssh://user@dummy/a repo"
destination directory: a repo
abort: destination 'a repo' is not empty
[255]
Make sure hg is really paranoid in serve --stdio mode. It used to be
possible to get a debugger REPL by specifying a repo named --debugger.
$ hg -R --debugger serve --stdio
abort: potentially unsafe serve --stdio invocation: ['-R', '--debugger', 'serve', '--stdio']
[255]
$ hg -R --config=ui.debugger=yes serve --stdio
abort: potentially unsafe serve --stdio invocation: ['-R', '--config=ui.debugger=yes', 'serve', '--stdio']
[255]
Abbreviations of 'serve' also don't work, to avoid shenanigans.
$ hg -R narf serv --stdio
abort: potentially unsafe serve --stdio invocation: ['-R', 'narf', 'serv', '--stdio']
[255]
Test hg-ssh using a helper script that will restore PYTHONPATH (which might
have been cleared by a hg.exe wrapper) and invoke hg-ssh with the right
parameters:
$ cat > ssh.sh << EOF
> userhost="\$1"
> SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND="\$2"
> export SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND
> PYTHONPATH="$PYTHONPATH"
> export PYTHONPATH
> "$PYTHON" "$TESTDIR/../contrib/hg-ssh" "$TESTTMP/a repo"
> EOF
$ hg id --ssh "sh ssh.sh" "ssh://user@dummy/a repo"
73649e48688a
$ hg id --ssh "sh ssh.sh" "ssh://user@dummy/a'repo"
remote: Illegal repository "$TESTTMP/a'repo" (glob)
abort: no suitable response from remote hg!
[255]
$ hg id --ssh "sh ssh.sh" --remotecmd hacking "ssh://user@dummy/a'repo"
remote: Illegal command "hacking -R 'a'\''repo' serve --stdio"
abort: no suitable response from remote hg!
[255]
$ SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND="'hg' -R 'a'repo' serve --stdio" $PYTHON "$TESTDIR/../contrib/hg-ssh"
Illegal command "'hg' -R 'a'repo' serve --stdio": No closing quotation
[255]
Test hg-ssh in read-only mode:
$ cat > ssh.sh << EOF
> userhost="\$1"
> SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND="\$2"
> export SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND
> PYTHONPATH="$PYTHONPATH"
> export PYTHONPATH
> "$PYTHON" "$TESTDIR/../contrib/hg-ssh" --read-only "$TESTTMP/remote"
> EOF
$ hg clone --ssh "sh ssh.sh" "ssh://user@dummy/$TESTTMP/remote" read-only-local
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 6 changesets with 5 changes to 4 files (+1 heads)
new changesets 1160648e36ce:1383141674ec
updating to branch default
3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd read-only-local
$ echo "baz" > bar
$ hg ci -A -m "unpushable commit" bar
$ hg push --ssh "sh ../ssh.sh"
pushing to ssh://user@dummy/*/remote (glob)
searching for changes
remote: Permission denied
remote: pretxnopen.hg-ssh hook failed
abort: push failed on remote
[255]
$ cd ..
stderr from remote commands should be printed before stdout from local code (issue4336)
$ hg clone remote stderr-ordering
updating to branch default
3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ cd stderr-ordering
$ cat >> localwrite.py << EOF
> from mercurial import exchange, extensions
>
> def wrappedpush(orig, repo, *args, **kwargs):
> res = orig(repo, *args, **kwargs)
> repo.ui.write('local stdout\n')
> return res
>
> def extsetup(ui):
> extensions.wrapfunction(exchange, 'push', wrappedpush)
> EOF
$ cat >> .hg/hgrc << EOF
> [paths]
> default-push = ssh://user@dummy/remote
> [ui]
> ssh = "$PYTHON" "$TESTDIR/dummyssh"
> [extensions]
> localwrite = localwrite.py
> EOF
$ echo localwrite > foo
$ hg commit -m 'testing localwrite'
$ hg push
pushing to ssh://user@dummy/remote
searching for changes
remote: adding changesets
remote: adding manifests
remote: adding file changes
remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
remote: KABOOM
remote: KABOOM IN PROCESS
local stdout
debug output
$ hg pull --debug ssh://user@dummy/remote
pulling from ssh://user@dummy/remote
running .* ".*/dummyssh" ['"]user@dummy['"] ('|")hg -R remote serve --stdio('|") (re)
sending hello command
sending between command
remote: 372
remote: capabilities: lookup changegroupsubset branchmap pushkey known getbundle unbundlehash batch streamreqs=generaldelta,revlogv1 $USUAL_BUNDLE2_CAPS$ unbundle=HG10GZ,HG10BZ,HG10UN
remote: 1
query 1; heads
sending batch command
searching for changes
all remote heads known locally
no changes found
sending getbundle command
bundle2-input-bundle: with-transaction
bundle2-input-part: "listkeys" (params: 1 mandatory) supported
bundle2-input-part: total payload size 45
bundle2-input-part: "phase-heads" supported
bundle2-input-part: total payload size 72
bundle2-input-bundle: 1 parts total
checking for updated bookmarks
$ cd ..
2010-09-26 22:41:32 +04:00
$ cat dummylog
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R nonexistent serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R $TESTTMP/nonexistent serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R local-stream serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R doesnotexist serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R local serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R $TESTTMP/local serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
changegroup-in-remote hook: HG_BUNDLE2=1 HG_HOOKNAME=changegroup HG_HOOKTYPE=changegroup HG_NODE=a28a9d1a809cab7d4e2fde4bee738a9ede948b60 HG_NODE_LAST=a28a9d1a809cab7d4e2fde4bee738a9ede948b60 HG_SOURCE=serve HG_TXNID=TXN:$ID$ HG_URL=remote:ssh:$LOCALIP
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
changegroup-in-remote hook: HG_BUNDLE2=1 HG_HOOKNAME=changegroup HG_HOOKTYPE=changegroup HG_NODE=1383141674ec756a6056f6a9097618482fe0f4a6 HG_NODE_LAST=1383141674ec756a6056f6a9097618482fe0f4a6 HG_SOURCE=serve HG_TXNID=TXN:$ID$ HG_URL=remote:ssh:$LOCALIP
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg init 'a repo'
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R 'a repo' serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R 'a repo' serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R 'a repo' serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R 'a repo' serve --stdio
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
changegroup-in-remote hook: HG_BUNDLE2=1 HG_HOOKNAME=changegroup HG_HOOKTYPE=changegroup HG_NODE=65c38f4125f9602c8db4af56530cc221d93b8ef8 HG_NODE_LAST=65c38f4125f9602c8db4af56530cc221d93b8ef8 HG_SOURCE=serve HG_TXNID=TXN:$ID$ HG_URL=remote:ssh:$LOCALIP
Got arguments 1:user@dummy 2:hg -R remote serve --stdio
remote hook failure is attributed to remote
$ cat > $TESTTMP/failhook << EOF
> def hook(ui, repo, **kwargs):
> ui.write('hook failure!\n')
> ui.flush()
> return 1
> EOF
$ echo "pretxnchangegroup.fail = python:$TESTTMP/failhook:hook" >> remote/.hg/hgrc
$ hg -q --config ui.ssh="\"$PYTHON\" $TESTDIR/dummyssh" clone ssh://user@dummy/remote hookout
$ cd hookout
$ touch hookfailure
$ hg -q commit -A -m 'remote hook failure'
$ hg --config ui.ssh="\"$PYTHON\" $TESTDIR/dummyssh" push
pushing to ssh://user@dummy/remote
searching for changes
remote: adding changesets
remote: adding manifests
remote: adding file changes
remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
remote: hook failure!
remote: transaction abort!
remote: rollback completed
remote: pretxnchangegroup.fail hook failed
abort: push failed on remote
[255]
abort during pull is properly reported as such
$ echo morefoo >> ../remote/foo
$ hg -R ../remote commit --message "more foo to be pulled"
$ cat >> ../remote/.hg/hgrc << EOF
> [extensions]
> crash = ${TESTDIR}/crashgetbundler.py
> EOF
$ hg --config ui.ssh="\"$PYTHON\" $TESTDIR/dummyssh" pull
pulling from ssh://user@dummy/remote
searching for changes
remote: abort: this is an exercise
abort: pull failed on remote
[255]
abort with no error hint when there is a ssh problem when pulling
$ hg pull ssh://brokenrepository
pulling from ssh://brokenrepository/
remote: ssh: Could not resolve hostname brokenrepository: Name or service not known
abort: no suitable response from remote hg!
[255]
abort with configured error hint when there is a ssh problem when pulling
$ hg pull ssh://brokenrepository --config ui.ssherrorhint="Please see http://company/internalwiki/ssh.html"
pulling from ssh://brokenrepository/
remote: ssh: Could not resolve hostname brokenrepository: Name or service not known
abort: no suitable response from remote hg!
(Please see http://company/internalwiki/ssh.html)
[255]