2006-05-02 20:44:02 +04:00
|
|
|
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
|
|
|
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
|
|
|
2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
Fix zombie files in merge
# HG changeset patch
# User maf46@burn.cl.cam.ac.uk
# Node ID 57667c9b93a5a743e4629d15a0e6bd76699130c3
# Parent 4309b0a5a6010dd2e5811b77d2bc29a51acf290f
Fix zombie files in merge
Keir Fraser observed the following:
> I made a small test case that illustrates the bug in merging changesets
> with 'hg remove's in them:
>
> 1. Create a repository A containing files foo & bar.
> 2. Create clone called B.
> 3. A removes file bar, and commits this removal.
> 4. B edits file foo, and commits this edit.
>
> Now, if B:
> # hg pull ../A; hg update -m; hg commit
> Then bar remains deleted.
>
> If A:
> # hg pull ../B; hg update -m; hg commit
> Then bar is resurrected!
>
> It looks as though, when you merge across a branch, any deletions in
> your own branch are forgotten.
> ...
> Fixing this is a must, as zombie files are a real pain. :-)
Keir later patched our local copy of hg as shown below, which fixes
the problem. I've also enclosed a test which captures the test Keir
outlined...
Files deleted on a branch should not automatically reappear in a merge
Patch notes:
1. The first chunk does not change behaviour, but cleans up the code
to more closely match check of 'force' in the second chunk. I
think it makes the code clearer.
2. The second chunk fixes two bugs --
i. If we choose to keep a remotely-changed locally-deleted file,
then we need to 'get' that file. If we choose to delete it
then no action need be taken (it is already deleted in the
working manifest). Without this fix, choosing to delete would
get a Python traceback.
ii. The test for whether the file was remotely-created is
insufficient. It is only true if f is not in the common
ancestor. Otherwise the file was deleted locally, and should
remain deleted. (this is the most important fix!)
Index: hg/tests/test-merge6
===================================================================
2005-07-05 00:38:34 +04:00
|
|
|
pulling from ../B1
|
|
|
|
|
searching for changes
|
|
|
|
|
adding changesets
|
|
|
|
|
adding manifests
|
2005-07-27 07:23:59 +04:00
|
|
|
adding file changes
|
2005-08-25 06:19:35 +04:00
|
|
|
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
|
2006-03-29 22:27:16 +04:00
|
|
|
(run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
|
2006-05-02 20:44:02 +04:00
|
|
|
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
|
|
|
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
|
Fix zombie files in merge
# HG changeset patch
# User maf46@burn.cl.cam.ac.uk
# Node ID 57667c9b93a5a743e4629d15a0e6bd76699130c3
# Parent 4309b0a5a6010dd2e5811b77d2bc29a51acf290f
Fix zombie files in merge
Keir Fraser observed the following:
> I made a small test case that illustrates the bug in merging changesets
> with 'hg remove's in them:
>
> 1. Create a repository A containing files foo & bar.
> 2. Create clone called B.
> 3. A removes file bar, and commits this removal.
> 4. B edits file foo, and commits this edit.
>
> Now, if B:
> # hg pull ../A; hg update -m; hg commit
> Then bar remains deleted.
>
> If A:
> # hg pull ../B; hg update -m; hg commit
> Then bar is resurrected!
>
> It looks as though, when you merge across a branch, any deletions in
> your own branch are forgotten.
> ...
> Fixing this is a must, as zombie files are a real pain. :-)
Keir later patched our local copy of hg as shown below, which fixes
the problem. I've also enclosed a test which captures the test Keir
outlined...
Files deleted on a branch should not automatically reappear in a merge
Patch notes:
1. The first chunk does not change behaviour, but cleans up the code
to more closely match check of 'force' in the second chunk. I
think it makes the code clearer.
2. The second chunk fixes two bugs --
i. If we choose to keep a remotely-changed locally-deleted file,
then we need to 'get' that file. If we choose to delete it
then no action need be taken (it is already deleted in the
working manifest). Without this fix, choosing to delete would
get a Python traceback.
ii. The test for whether the file was remotely-created is
insufficient. It is only true if f is not in the common
ancestor. Otherwise the file was deleted locally, and should
remain deleted. (this is the most important fix!)
Index: hg/tests/test-merge6
===================================================================
2005-07-05 00:38:34 +04:00
|
|
|
bar should remain deleted.
|
2005-08-23 13:19:38 +04:00
|
|
|
f9b0e817f6a48de3564c6b2957687c5e7297c5a0 644 foo
|
Fix zombie files in merge
# HG changeset patch
# User maf46@burn.cl.cam.ac.uk
# Node ID 57667c9b93a5a743e4629d15a0e6bd76699130c3
# Parent 4309b0a5a6010dd2e5811b77d2bc29a51acf290f
Fix zombie files in merge
Keir Fraser observed the following:
> I made a small test case that illustrates the bug in merging changesets
> with 'hg remove's in them:
>
> 1. Create a repository A containing files foo & bar.
> 2. Create clone called B.
> 3. A removes file bar, and commits this removal.
> 4. B edits file foo, and commits this edit.
>
> Now, if B:
> # hg pull ../A; hg update -m; hg commit
> Then bar remains deleted.
>
> If A:
> # hg pull ../B; hg update -m; hg commit
> Then bar is resurrected!
>
> It looks as though, when you merge across a branch, any deletions in
> your own branch are forgotten.
> ...
> Fixing this is a must, as zombie files are a real pain. :-)
Keir later patched our local copy of hg as shown below, which fixes
the problem. I've also enclosed a test which captures the test Keir
outlined...
Files deleted on a branch should not automatically reappear in a merge
Patch notes:
1. The first chunk does not change behaviour, but cleans up the code
to more closely match check of 'force' in the second chunk. I
think it makes the code clearer.
2. The second chunk fixes two bugs --
i. If we choose to keep a remotely-changed locally-deleted file,
then we need to 'get' that file. If we choose to delete it
then no action need be taken (it is already deleted in the
working manifest). Without this fix, choosing to delete would
get a Python traceback.
ii. The test for whether the file was remotely-created is
insufficient. It is only true if f is not in the common
ancestor. Otherwise the file was deleted locally, and should
remain deleted. (this is the most important fix!)
Index: hg/tests/test-merge6
===================================================================
2005-07-05 00:38:34 +04:00
|
|
|
pulling from ../A2
|
|
|
|
|
searching for changes
|
|
|
|
|
adding changesets
|
|
|
|
|
adding manifests
|
2005-07-27 07:23:59 +04:00
|
|
|
adding file changes
|
2005-08-25 06:19:35 +04:00
|
|
|
added 1 changesets with 0 changes to 0 files (+1 heads)
|
2006-03-29 22:27:16 +04:00
|
|
|
(run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
|
2006-05-02 20:44:02 +04:00
|
|
|
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
|
|
|
|
|
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
|
Fix zombie files in merge
# HG changeset patch
# User maf46@burn.cl.cam.ac.uk
# Node ID 57667c9b93a5a743e4629d15a0e6bd76699130c3
# Parent 4309b0a5a6010dd2e5811b77d2bc29a51acf290f
Fix zombie files in merge
Keir Fraser observed the following:
> I made a small test case that illustrates the bug in merging changesets
> with 'hg remove's in them:
>
> 1. Create a repository A containing files foo & bar.
> 2. Create clone called B.
> 3. A removes file bar, and commits this removal.
> 4. B edits file foo, and commits this edit.
>
> Now, if B:
> # hg pull ../A; hg update -m; hg commit
> Then bar remains deleted.
>
> If A:
> # hg pull ../B; hg update -m; hg commit
> Then bar is resurrected!
>
> It looks as though, when you merge across a branch, any deletions in
> your own branch are forgotten.
> ...
> Fixing this is a must, as zombie files are a real pain. :-)
Keir later patched our local copy of hg as shown below, which fixes
the problem. I've also enclosed a test which captures the test Keir
outlined...
Files deleted on a branch should not automatically reappear in a merge
Patch notes:
1. The first chunk does not change behaviour, but cleans up the code
to more closely match check of 'force' in the second chunk. I
think it makes the code clearer.
2. The second chunk fixes two bugs --
i. If we choose to keep a remotely-changed locally-deleted file,
then we need to 'get' that file. If we choose to delete it
then no action need be taken (it is already deleted in the
working manifest). Without this fix, choosing to delete would
get a Python traceback.
ii. The test for whether the file was remotely-created is
insufficient. It is only true if f is not in the common
ancestor. Otherwise the file was deleted locally, and should
remain deleted. (this is the most important fix!)
Index: hg/tests/test-merge6
===================================================================
2005-07-05 00:38:34 +04:00
|
|
|
bar should remain deleted.
|
Fix long-standing excessive file merges
Since switching to the multihead approach, we've been creating
excessive file-level merges where files are marked as merged with
their ancestors.
This explicitly checks at commit time whether the two parent versions
are linearly related, and if so, reduces the file check-in to a
non-merge. Then the file is compared against the remaining parent,
and, if equal, skips check-in of that file (as it's not changed).
Since we're not checking in all files that were different between
versions, we no longer need to mark so many files for merge. This
removes most of the 'm' state marking as well.
Finally, it is possible to do a tree-level merge with no file-level
changes. This will happen if one user changes file A and another
changes file B. Thus, if we have have two parents, we allow commit to
proceed even if there are no file-level changes.
2005-08-22 08:59:55 +04:00
|
|
|
f9b0e817f6a48de3564c6b2957687c5e7297c5a0 644 foo
|
