Summary:
How is this Dag structure going to be used? This is probably the interesting
question for this diff.
On one side the structure could maintain a view of all the repositories and
manage the DAGs for all repositories in a central place. On the other side the
`Dag` is just an instance of a Changelog and Mononoke manages repositories that
each have a `Dag`. I went with the former pattern as it seems to me to be more
in line with the general architecture of Mononoke.
We can see the Dag being another part of the BlobRepo in the future. We will
want to avoid depending on the BlobRepo for actual functionality to avoid
cyclic dependencies. Currently the BlobRepo is used in construction for
convenience but that will have to change in the future.
Reviewed By: StanislavGlebik
Differential Revision: D21418367
fbshipit-source-id: 7c133eac0f38084615c2b9ba1466de626d2ffcbe
Summary:
The transformation is pretty direct. I didn't add additional functionality
to the IdMap and I did not update the construction algorithm yet. The querying
method on IdMap were updated to async and then there are the SQL interaction
details.
In follow up changes I want to update the construction algorithm and add support
for multiple repositories.
I am not happy with the names of the columns or naming in general in this code.
Open to suggestions. One idea could be matching the client nomenclature as much
as possible.
Reviewed By: StanislavGlebik
Differential Revision: D20929576
fbshipit-source-id: 12104892faa69f37c141e8baf54d5fb24fc5df6b
