Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
This changeset adds test for the improved "branch replacement" logic introduce
in an earlier commits. This tests initially lived in the evolve extensions.
Since we now have the code handling this logic in core, it make sense to have
the tests in core too.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
This changeset adds test for the improved "branch replacement" logic introduce
in an earlier commits. This tests initially lived in the evolve extensions.
Since we now have the code handling this logic in core, it make sense to have
the tests in core too.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
This changeset adds test for the improved "branch replacement" logic introduce
in an earlier commits. This tests initially lived in the evolve extensions.
Since we now have the code handling this logic in core, it make sense to have
the tests in core too.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
This changeset adds test for the improved "branch replacement" logic introduce
in an earlier commits. This tests initially lived in the evolve extensions.
Since we now have the code handling this logic in core, it make sense to have
the tests in core too.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
This changeset adds test for the improved "branch replacement" logic introduce
in an earlier commits. This tests initially lived in the evolve extensions.
Since we now have the code handling this logic in core, it make sense to have
the tests in core too.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
The previous logic had many shortcoming (eg: looking at the head only, not
handling prune, etc...), the new logic use a more robust approach:
For each head, we check if after the push all changesets exclusive to this heads
will be obsolete. If they are, the branch considered be "replaced".
To check if a changeset will be obsolete, we simply checks:
* the changeset phase
* the existence of a marker relevant to the "pushed set" that affects the
changesets..
This fixes two major issues of the previous algorithm:
* branch partially rewritten (eg: head but not root) are no longer detected as
replaced,
* Prune are now properly handled.
(This implementation was introduction in the evolve extension, version 6.0.0.)
This new algorithm has an extended number of tests, a basic one is provided
in this patch. The others will be introduced in their own changeset for clarity.
In addition, we stop trying to process heads unknown locally, we do not have
enough data to take an informed decision so we should stop pretending we do.
This reflect a test that is now update.
Cramming all of this directly into an alias doesn't play nicely on Windows.
Various test-exchange-obsmarkers-case-XX.t were failing with:
abort: cannot select revision when creating marker
It turned out that inside debugcommands.debugobsolete(), the following differed
from Linux (where they were empty, at least in the case I debugged):
'rev': ['.`;'],
'template': "'{node}\\n'"
I've been using `hg serve --web-conf ...` with a simple '/=projects/**' [paths]
configuration for awhile without issue. Let's ditch the need for the manual
configuration in this case, and limit the repos served to the actual subrepos.
This doesn't attempt to handle the case where a new subrepo appears while the
server is running. That could probably be handled with a hook if somebody wants
it. But it's such a rare case, it probably doesn't matter for the temporary
serves.
The main repo is served at '/', just like a repository without subrepos. I'm
not sure why the duplicate 'adding ...' lines appear on Linux. They don't
appear on Windows (see 3f4ff1bdf101), so they are optional.
Subrepositories that are configured with '../path' or absolute paths are not
cloneable from the server. (They aren't cloneable locally either, unless they
also exist at their configured source, perhaps via the share extension.) They
are still served, so that they can be browsed, or cloned individually. If we
care about that cloning someday, we can probably just add the extra entries to
the webconf dictionary. Even if the entries use '../' to escape the root, only
the related subrepositories would end up in the dictionary.
There were a handful of places in the code where HTTPResponse.read()
was called with no explicit error handling or with inconsistent
error handling. In order to eliminate this class of bug, we globally
swap out HTTPResponse.read() with a unified error handler.
I initially attempted to fix all call sites. However, after
going down that rabbit hole, I figured it was best to just change
read() to do what we want. This appears to be a worthwhile
change, as the tests demonstrate many of our uncaught exceptions
go away.
To better represent this class of failure, we introduce a new
error type. The main benefit over IOError is it can hold a hint.
I'm receptive to tweaking its name or inheritance.
I've spent several hours over the past few weeks investigating
networking failures involving hg.mozilla.org. As part of this, it
has become clear that the Mercurial client's error handling when
it encounters network failures is far from robust.
To prove this is true, I've devised a battery of tests simulating
various network failures, notably premature connection closes. To
achieve this, I've implemented an extension that monkeypatches the
built-in HTTP server and hooks in at the socket level and allows
various events to occur based on config options. For example, you
can refuse to accept() a client socket or you can close() the socket
after N bytes have been sent or received. The latter effectively
simulates an unexpected connection drop (and these occur all the
time in the real world).
The new test file launches servers exhibiting various "bad" behaviors
and points a client at them. As the many TODO comments in the test
call attention to, Mercurial often displays unhelpful errors when
network-related failures occur. This makes it difficult for users
to understand what's going on and difficult for server administrators
to pinpoint root causes without packet tracing.
Upcoming patches will attempt to fix these error handling
deficiencies.
We parse "descend" symbol as a Boolean using getboolean (prior extraction by
getargsdict already checked that it is a symbol).
In tests, check for error cases and vary Boolean values here and there.
The tag changes information we compute is now written to disk. This gives
hooks full access to that data.
The format picked for that file uses a 2 characters prefix for the action:
-R: tag removed
+A: tag added
-M: tag moved (old value)
+M: tag moved (new value)
This format allows hooks to easily select the line that matters to them without
having to post process the file too much. Here is a couple of examples:
* to select all newly tagged changeset, match "^+",
* to detect tag move, match "^.M",
* to detect tag deletion, match "-R".
Once again we rely on the fact the tag tests run through all possible
situations to test this change.
We now compute the proper actuall differences between tags before and after the
transaction. This catch a couple of false positives in the tests.
The compute the full difference since we are about to make this data available
to hooks in the next changeset.
This changeset introduces detection of tags changes during transaction. When
this happens a 'tag_moved=1' argument is set for hooks, similar to what we do
for bookmarks and phases.
This code is disabled by default as there are still various performance
concerns. Some require a smarter use of our existing tag caches and some other
require rework around the transaction logic to skip execution when unneeded.
These performance improvements have been delayed, I would like to be able to
experiment and stabilize the feature behavior first.
Later changesets will push the concept further and provide a way for hooks to
know what are the actual changes introduced by the transaction. Similar work
is needed for the other families of changes (bookmark, phase, obsolescence,
etc). Upgrade of the transaction logic will likely be performed at the same
time.
The current code can report some false positive when .hgtags file changes but
resulting tags are unchanged. This will be fixed in the next changeset.
For testing, we simply globally enable a hook in the tag test as all the
possible tag update cases should exist there. A couple of them show the false
positive mentioned above.
See in code documentation for more details.
If initial 'fctx' has changes in line range with respect to its parents, we
yield it first. This makes 'followlines(..., descend=True)' consistent with
'descendants()' revset which yields the starting revision.
We reuse one iteration of blockancestors() which does exactly what we want.
In test-annotate.t, adjust 'startrev' in one case to cover the situation where
the starting revision does not touch specified line range.
If this assertion fails, this indicates a flaw in the algorithm. So fail fast
instead of possibly producing wrong results.
Also extend the target line range in test to catch a merge changeset with all
its parents.
Module 'appdirs' tries to import win32com.shell (and catch ImportError as an
indication of failure) to check whether some further functionality should
be implemented one or another way [1]. Of course, demandimport lets it down, so
if we want appdirs to work we have to add it to demandimport's ignore list.
The reason we want appdirs to work is becuase it is used by setuptools [2] to
determine egg cache location. Only fairly recent versions of setuptools depend
on this so people don't see this often.
[1] https://github.com/ActiveState/appdirs/blob/master/appdirs.py#L560
[2] aae0a92811/pkg_resources/__init__.py (L1369)
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test cases.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test case.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test case.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test case.
See inline documentation for details about the test case added in this
changeset.
Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.
The current code for this logic is very basic (eg: issue4354) and was poorly
tested. We have a better implementation coming in the evolve extension fixing
these issues and with more serious tests coverage. In the process of upstreaming
this improved logic, we start with adding the test case that are already passing
with the current implementation. Once they are all in, we'll upstream the better
implementation and the extra test case.
This changeset introduce the common setup script used by these tests.
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case D-4: unknown changeset in between known on
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case D3: missing prune target (prune not in "pushed set")
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce D-2: missing prune target (prune in "pushed set")
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case D-1:
Pruned changeset based on missing precursor of something not present
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce C.4: multiple successors, one is pruned
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case C-3:
Pruned changeset on precursors of another pruned one
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce C-2: Pruned changeset on precursors
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce C-1: Multiple pruned changeset atop each other
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
In the initial implementation of blockdescendants (and thus followlines(...,
descend=True) revset), only the first branch encountered in descending
direction was followed.
Update the algorithm so that all children of a revision ('x' in code) are
considered. Accordingly, we need to prevent a child revision to be yielded
multiple times when it gets visited through different path, so we skip 'i'
when this occurs. Finally, since we now consider all parents of a possible
child touching a given line range, we take care of yielding the child if it
has a diff in specified line range with at least one of its parent (same logic
as blockancestors()).
Our current deprecation warning mechanism relies on ui object. They are case
where we cannot have access to the UI object. On a general basis we avoid using
the python mechanism for deprecation warning because up to Python 2.6 it is
exposing warning to unsuspecting user who cannot do anything to deal with them.
So we build a "safe" strategy to hide this warnings behind a flag in an
environment variable. The test runner set this flag so that tests show these
warning. This will help us marker API as deprecated for extensions to update
their code.
Mostly copy CSS rules from style-paper.css into style-gitweb.css. The only
modification is addition of !important on "background-color" rule for
"pre.sourcelines > span.followlines-selected" selector as the background color
is otherwise overriden by "pre.sourcelines.stripes > :nth-child(4n+4)" rule.
Previously, the --template/-T option didn't show up in help because it's marked
as experimental. It's not really experimental for show, and its quite important
for show's funcationality, so let's make sure it always shows up.
This is the beginning of a wip/smartlog view. It is basically a manually
constructed (read: fast) revset function to collect "relevant"
changesets combined with a custom template and a graph displayer.
It obviously needs a lot of work.
I'd like to get *something* usable in 4.2 so `hg show` has some value
to end-users.
Let the bikeshedding begin.
Because we're formatting to RST, short lines wrap and there
needs to be an extra line break between paragraphs to prevent
that.
In addition, the indentation in the old code was a bit off.
Refactor the code to a function (so we don't leak variables outside
the module) and modify it so it renders more correctly.
When this "descend" query parameter is present along with "linerange"
parameter, we get revisions following line range in descending order. The
parameter has no effect without "linerange".
This should catch the bug fixed by "worker: ignore meaningless exit status
indication returned by os.waitpid()."
Before, worker.py was untested since test repositories are relatively small.
Default-push has been deprecated in favour of default:pushurl. But "hg clone" still
inserts this in every hgrc file it creates. This patch updates the message by replacing
default-push with default:pushurl and also makes the necessary changes to test files.
Previously Abort raised during 'getbundle' call poorly reported (HTTP-500 for
http, some scary messages for ssh). Abort error have been properly reported for
"push" for a long time, there is not reason to be different for 'getbundle'. We
properly catch such error and report them back the best way available. For
bundle, we issue a valid bundle2 reply (as expected by the client) with an
'error:abort' part. With bundle1 we do as best as we can depending of http or
ssh.
Changeset a0966f529e1b introduced a config option to have the server deny pull
using bundle1. The original protocol has not really been design to allow that
kind of error reporting so some hack was used. It turned the hack only works on
HTTP and that ssh server hangs forever when this is used. After further
digging, there is no way to report the error in a unified way. Using `ooberror`
freeze ssh and raising 'Abort' makes HTTP return a HTTP-500 without further
details. So with sadness we implement a version that dispatch according to the
protocol used.
Now the error is properly reported, but we still have ungraceful abort after
that. The protocol do not allow anything better to happen using bundle1.
We are about to add a test for ssh pull/cloning being denied because of bundle1
usage. For this, it is cleaner to not operate from the clone using http. So we
update the test beforehand for clarity. This is more churns that what I'm happy
to see on stable, but the rests of the series is worth it in my opinion.
Changeset a0966f529e1b introduced a config option to have the server deny push
using bundle1. The original protocol has not really be design to allow such kind
of error reporting so some hack was used. It turned the hack only works on HTTP
and that ssh wire peer hangs forever when the same hack is used. After further
digging, there is no way to report the error in a unified way. Using 'ooberror'
freeze ssh and raising 'Abort' makes HTTP return a HTTP500 without further
details. So with sadness we implement a version that dispatch according to the
protocol used.
We also add a test for pushing over ssh to make sure we won't regress in the
future. That test show that the hint is missing, this is another bug fixed in
the next changeset.
The remote hint message was ignored when reporting the remote error and
passed to the local generic abort error. I think I might initially have
tried to avoid reimplementing logic controlling the hint display depending of
the verbosity level. However, first, there does not seems to have such verbosity
related logic and second the resulting was wrong as the primary error and the
hint were split apart. We now properly print the hint as remote output.
This patch also makes some expected output lines in tests glob-ed for
persistence of them.
BTW, files below aren't yet changed in 2017, but this patch also
updates copyright of them, because:
- mercurial/help/hg.1.txt
almost all of "man hg" output comes from online help of hg
command, and is already changed in 2017
- mercurial/help/hgignore.5.txt
- mercurial/help/hgrc.5
"copyright 2005-201X Matt Mackall" in them mentions about
copyright of Mercurial itself
This patch also adds new check-code.py pattern to detect invalid usage
of "mercurial@selenic.com".
Change for test-convert-tla.t is tested, but similar change for almost
same test-convert-baz.t isn't yet tested actually, because I couldn't
find out the way to get "GNU Arch baz client".
AFAIK, buildbot skips test-convert-baz.t, too. Does anybody have
appropriate environment for testing?
Add the -B/--bookmark option to select a bookmark whose changesets
and its ancestors will be selected unless a new bookmark/head is
found.
This is inspired by hg strip -B option.
This is the mirror case from the previos one. We check case where the raced
push update a head while the racing push create a new named branch as a
children of that updated head.
We check case where the raced push replace one head while the racing push
replaces another unrelated one.
That second test also make sure we synchronise all repositories to the same
state between tests. That will help us when allowing some sort of concurrent
pushes.
There are very few tests around the detection of push race. This file will be
dedicated to covering these cases more through fully. We start with a simple
case. More complex cases get added in later changesets.
My end goal here is to provide a way for server to accept concurrent push as
long as they are not touching the same heads. However, I want to buff the test
coverage of that code before touching anything.
This is it, `hg strip --rev X` will now also remove obsolescence markers
exclusive to X. Since a previous changeset, the obsmarkers has been backed up
in the strip backup bundle, so it is possible to restore them.
Note: stripping obsmarkers means the precursors of the stripped changeset might no
longer be obsolete after the strip.
Stripping changeset without obsmarkers can be useful when building test case. So
It is possible to disable the stripping of obsmarkers using the
'devel.strip-obsmarkers' config option.
Test change have been carefully validated.
We now display data about the "exclusive markers" in the test dedicated to
relevant and exclusive markers computation and usage. Each output have been
carefully validated
This set will be used to select the obsmarkers to be stripped alongside the
stripped changesets. See the function docstring for details.
More advanced testing is introduced in the next changesets to keep this one
simpler. That extra testing provides more example.
We are about to give 'strip' the ability to remove obsmarkers. Before we start
removing data we must make sure it is preserved somewhere. So the backup bundle
created by 'strip' now contains obsmarkers.
That has (and still does) caused the test to be skipped, but without
this fix it was possible to exit this block of code without clearing
the output channel, which poisoned the channel list for later test
method runs. Fix this by always clearing the channel in a finally.
The test for this is somewhat unfortunate. Sadly, I couldn't get a way
to reproduce this with less than 2n+1 test cases, nor could I get it
to reproduce reliably without the sleep statements. It's also crucial
that the test with the broken #if be smaller (in terms of byte count)
than the sleeping tests, so that it runs first and would poison the
channel list prior to another test needing that entry from the list.
I hit a weird corner case in run-tests where a test that caused an
exception to be raised was breaking everything with an unbound
variable error a few lines down because channel was never getting set
in this for loop. By adding an `else` clause to this for loop, we can
explode right away if we can't find a channel and give the developer a
better chance at figuring out what's going on.
We store bytes in exc.args, which should be translated to a byte string
without encode/decode dance.
IOError subclasses are unchanged for now. We'll need to decide how our
IOErrors should be caught.
c01965ab5195 introduced a deterministic `__repr__` for ignores. However, it
didn't account for when ignore was `util.never`. This broke fsmonitor's ignore
change detection -- with an empty hgignore, it would kick in all the time.
Introduce `nevermatcher` and switch to it. This neatly parallels
`alwaysmatcher`.
We adds a shell function checking that the relevant markers and the bundled
markers matches. Updating all cases in the file at the same time is a bit
overwhelming and harder to double checks. So each cases come in its own patch.
When this test was introduced, it used the short-form of all the flags
on this update invocation. I suspect, based on the "start with clean
dirstates" comment and the fact that the no-exec branch of the #if
guard leaves dirstate clean, that this should have been 'update -qCr'
instead of 'update -qcr', but that a bug in largefiles --check
handling left this problem unnoticed.
I'll leave a breadcrumb further up about the current failure mode in
the hopes that we can fix this some day.
This was previously discussed in [0] but the trail in that thread goes
cold after a few replies. Given that this is still a flaky test, that
appears to only be passing by bad fortune, I think it's worth
correcting the code of the test to make a correct assertion, and to
keep track of the suspected bug with some other mechanism than an
invalid test (if we had support for "expected failure" blocks this
might be a worthwhile use of them?).
0: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2016-October/089501.html
I spent some time confused by this test. I'm pretty sure that this
line intends to be cleaning the dirstate, not checking that it's clean
before updating: the preceding #if block leaves the dirstate clean in
the noexec case, and dirty in the exec case, so we can't expect
consistent behavior across that platform variation. A subsequent patch
will modify this command to use --clean instead of --check.
I'll elaborate in that patch about the hypothetical bug here.
Work around that 'dm' in the data model only can have one operation for the
target file, but still can have multiple and conflicting operations on the
source file where the other operation is a 'rm'. The move would thus fail with
'abort: No such file or directory'.
In this case it is "obvious" that the file should be removed, either before or
after moving it. We thus keep the 'rm' of the source file but drop the 'dm'.
This is not a pretty fix but quite "obviously" safe (famous last words...) as
it only touches a rare code path that used to crash. It is possible that it
would be better to swap the files for 'dm' as suggested on
https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5020#c13 but it is not entirely
obvious that it not just would create conflicts on the other file. That can be
revisited later.
GNU grep, when emitting a matching line that doesn't have a terminating
newline, will add an extra newline. Solaris grep passes the original line
through without the newline. This causes differences in test output when
looking at the last line of the output of get-with-headers.py, which
doesn't usually emit (and certainly doesn't guarantee) a terminating
newline.
Both grep implementations succeed in matching the requested pattern,
though, so rely on specifying the full pattern on grep's commandline
instead of expecting it in the output, and send the output to /dev/null.
I've seen this in a (misconfigured) FreeBSD jail which has ::1 as an
entry for localhost, but IPv6 support is disabled in the jail. It took
me months to figure out what was going on (and I only figured it out
when tinyproxy.py got confused by similar IPv4-level misconfiguration
of the localhost domain in /etc/hosts.)
I don't feel strongly about this patch: on the one hand, it's papering
over a host-level misconfiguration, but on the other it avoids some
weird and hard to diagnose problems that can occur in weirdly
restricted environments.
Only FreeBSD seems to be this picky. Note that this explicit
absolute-path `cd` exposes a defect in the test, in that we end up
still inside the cwd-vanish repository, but that's not a regression in
this change. Since we're in a code freeze, I'm doing the smallest
thing possible to try and fix bugs on FreeBSD, rather than cleaning up
the entire problem. I'll follow up with a more complete fix after the
freeze.
We've made chg utilize the common code path implemented in pager.py (by
e8fb65f5e551 and e97133c7a9dc), but the chg server does not always start
with a tty. Because of this, uisetup() of the pager extension could be
skipped on the chg server.
Kudos given to Sean Farley for dogfooding new chg and spotting this problem.
This patch makes it possible to unshelve while having missing files
in your repo as long as shelved changes don't touch those missing files.
It also makes error message better otherwise.
statprof has a __main__ handler that allows viewing of previously
written data files. As Yuya pointed out during review, 82ee01726a77
broke this. This patch fixes that.
This is useful to follow changes in a block of lines forward in the history
(for instance, when one wants to find out how a function evolved from a point
in history).
We added a 'descend' parameter to followlines(), which defaults to False. If
True, followlines() returns descendants of startrev.
Because context.blockdescendants() does not follow renames, these are not
followed by the revset either, so history will end when a rename occurs (as
can be seen in tests).
Mercurial can't currently send cookies as part of HTTP requests.
Some authentication systems use cookies. So, it seems like adding
support for sending cookies seems like a useful feature.
This patch implements support for reading cookies from a file
and automatically sending them as part of the request. We rely
on the "cookiejar" Python module to do the heavy lifting of
parsing cookies files. We currently only support the Mozilla
(really Netscape-era) cookie format. There is another format
supported by cookielib and we may want to consider using that,
especially since the Netscape cookie parser can't parse ports.
It wasn't immediately obvious to me what the format of the other
parser is, so I didn't know how to test it. I /think/ it might
be literal "Cookie" header values, but I'm not sure. If it is
more robust than the Netscape format, we may want to just
support it.
Like field init shorthand of Rust. This is convenient for building a JSON
object from selected keywords.
This means dict() won't support Python-like dict(iterable) syntax because
it's ambiguous. Perhaps it could be implemented as 'mapdict(xs % (k, v))'.
Before, it could spill an internal representation of compiled template such
as [(<function runsymbol at 0x....>, 'extras'), ...]. Show less cryptic
message if no symbol found.
New findsymbolicname() function will be also used by dict() constructor.
This makes the next patch slightly simpler. We don't need to check the
excessive number of keyword arguments since unknown and duplicated kwargs
are rejected.
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B-7: Prune above non-targeted common changeset
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B6: Pruned changeset with precursors not in pushed set
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce B-5:
Push of a children of changeset which successors is pruned
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B4: Pruned changeset on common part of history
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B3: Pruned changeset on non-pushed part of the history
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B-2: Prune on targeted common changeset
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B-1: Prune on non-targeted common changeset
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A-7: non targeted common changeset
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A6:
new markers between changesets already known on both side
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A-5: partial reordering
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A-4: Push in the middle of the obsolescence chain
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A3: new branchs created, one pushed
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A-2: Two heads, only one of them pushed
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A-1: pushing a single head
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce the common script that setup the basic environment for the
test cases. Once this script is in. We can accept the other patches in any
order.
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Previously, when runcommand raises, chg aborts with, and does not wait for
pager. The call stack is like:
hgc_runcommand -> handleresponse -> readchannel -> debugmsg("failed to
read channel") -> exit(255)
That means, chg returns to the shell, then both the pager and the shell will
read from the terminal at the same time, causing problems.
This patch fixes that by using "atexit" to register the pager cleanup
function so chg will always wait for pager even if runcommand raises.
Unlike revset, function arguments are pre-processed in templater. That's why
we need to define argspec per function. An argspec field looks somewhat
redundant in @templatefunc definition as a name field contains human-readable
list of arguments. I'll make function doc be built from argspec later.
Ported separate() function as an example.
Before this patch, there was a single way to see multiple shelves using
`--patch --list` which show all the shelves. Doing `--patch s1 s2` returns an
error. This patch allows to show multiple shelves using `--patch` and `--stat`.
The final part of integrating the compression manager APIs into
revlog storage is the plumbing for repositories to advertise they
are using non-zlib storage and for revlogs to instantiate a non-zlib
compression engine.
The main intent of the compression manager work was to zstd all
of the things. Adding zstd to revlogs has proved to be more involved
than other places because revlogs are... special. Very small inputs
and the use of delta chains (which are themselves a form of
compression) are a completely different use case from streaming
compression, which bundles and the wire protocol employ. I've
conducted numerous experiments with zstd in revlogs and have yet
to formalize compression settings and a storage architecture that
I'm confident I won't regret later. In other words, I'm not yet
ready to commit to a new mechanism for using zstd - or any other
compression format - in revlogs.
That being said, having some support for zstd (and other compression
formats) in revlogs in core is beneficial. It can allow others to
conduct experiments.
This patch introduces *highly experimental* support for non-zlib
compression formats in revlogs. Introduced is a config option to
control which compression engine to use. Also introduced is a namespace
of "exp-compression-*" requirements to denote support for non-zlib
compression in revlogs. I've prefixed the namespace with "exp-"
(short for "experimental") because I'm not confident of the
requirements "schema" and in no way want to give the illusion of
supporting these requirements in the future. I fully intend to drop
support for these requirements once we figure out what we're doing
with zstd in revlogs.
A good portion of the patch is teaching the requirements system
about registered compression engines and passing the requested
compression engine as an opener option so revlogs can instantiate
the proper compression engine for new operations.
That's a verbose way of saying "we can now use zstd in revlogs!"
On an `hg pull` conversion of the mozilla-unified repo with no extra
redelta settings (like aggressivemergedeltas), we can see the impact
of zstd vs zlib in revlogs:
$ hg perfrevlogchunks -c
! chunk
! wall 2.032052 comb 2.040000 user 1.990000 sys 0.050000 (best of 5)
! wall 1.866360 comb 1.860000 user 1.820000 sys 0.040000 (best of 6)
! chunk batch
! wall 1.877261 comb 1.870000 user 1.860000 sys 0.010000 (best of 6)
! wall 1.705410 comb 1.710000 user 1.690000 sys 0.020000 (best of 6)
$ hg perfrevlogchunks -m
! chunk
! wall 2.721427 comb 2.720000 user 2.640000 sys 0.080000 (best of 4)
! wall 2.035076 comb 2.030000 user 1.950000 sys 0.080000 (best of 5)
! chunk batch
! wall 2.614561 comb 2.620000 user 2.580000 sys 0.040000 (best of 4)
! wall 1.910252 comb 1.910000 user 1.880000 sys 0.030000 (best of 6)
$ hg perfrevlog -c -d 1
! wall 4.812885 comb 4.820000 user 4.800000 sys 0.020000 (best of 3)
! wall 4.699621 comb 4.710000 user 4.700000 sys 0.010000 (best of 3)
$ hg perfrevlog -m -d 1000
! wall 34.252800 comb 34.250000 user 33.730000 sys 0.520000 (best of 3)
! wall 24.094999 comb 24.090000 user 23.320000 sys 0.770000 (best of 3)
Only modest wins for the changelog. But manifest reading is
significantly faster. What's going on?
One reason might be data volume. zstd decompresses faster. So given
more bytes, it will put more distance between it and zlib.
Another reason is size. In the current design, zstd revlogs are
*larger*:
debugcreatestreamclonebundle (size in bytes)
zlib: 1,638,852,492
zstd: 1,680,601,332
I haven't investigated this fully, but I reckon a significant cause of
larger revlogs is that the zstd frame/header has more bytes than
zlib's. For very small inputs or data that doesn't compress well, we'll
tend to store more uncompressed chunks than with zlib (because the
compressed size isn't smaller than original). This will make revlog
reading faster because it is doing less decompression.
Moving on to bundle performance:
$ hg bundle -a -t none-v2 (total CPU time)
zlib: 102.79s
zstd: 97.75s
So, marginal CPU decrease for reading all chunks in all revlogs
(this is somewhat disappointing).
$ hg bundle -a -t <engine>-v2 (total CPU time)
zlib: 191.59s
zstd: 115.36s
This last test effectively measures the difference between zlib->zlib
and zstd->zstd for revlogs to bundle. This is a rough approximation of
what a server does during `hg clone`.
There are some promising results for zstd. But not enough for me to
feel comfortable advertising it to users. We'll get there...
readline() returns '' only when EOF is encountered, in which case, Python's
getpass() raises EOFError. We should do the same to abort the session as
"response expected."
This bug was reported to
https://bitbucket.org/tortoisehg/thg/issues/4659/
When converting a Git repository to Mercurial at Mozilla, I encountered
a scenario where I didn't want `hg convert` to automatically add the
"committer: <committer>" line to commit messages. While I can hack around
this by rewriting the Git commit before it is fed into `hg convert`,
I figured it would be a useful knob to control.
This patch introduces a config option that allows lots of control
over the committer value. I initially implemented this as a single
boolean flag to control whether to save the committer message. But
then there was feedback that it would be useful to save the committer
in extra data. While this patch doesn't implement support for saving
in extra data, it does add a mechanism for extending which actions
to take on the committer field. We should be able to easily add
actions to save in extra data.
Some of the implemented features weren't asked for. But I figured they
could be useful. If nothing else they demonstrate the extensibility
of this mechanism.
The result of diffstatdata should not depend on having noprefix set or not, as
was reported in issue 4755. Forcing noprefix to false on call makes sure the
parser receives the diff in the correct format and returns the proper result.
Another way to fix this would have been to change the regular expressions in
path.diffstatdata(), but that would have introduced many unecessary special
cases.
The rev argument has the same meaning as startrev of follow(), and I think
startrev is more informative.
followlines() is new function, we can make BC now.
revlog.compress() compares the compressed size to the input size
and throws away the compressed data if it is larger than the input.
This is the correct thing to do, as storing compressed data that
is larger than the input takes up more storage space and makes reading
slower.
However, the comparison was implemented inconsistently. For the
streaming compression mode, we threw away the result if it was
greater than or equal to the input size. But for the one-shot
compression, we threw away the compression only if it was greater
than the input size!
This patch changes the comparison for the simple case so it is
consistent with the streaming case.
As a few tests demonstrate, this adds 1 byte to some revlog entries.
This is because of an added 'u' header on the chunk. It seems
somewhat wrong to increase the revlog size here. However, IMO the cost
of 1 byte in storage is insignificant compared to the performance gains
of avoiding decompression. This patch should invite questions around
the heuristic for throwing away compressed data. For example, I'd argue
we should be more liberal about rejecting compressed data, additionally
doing so where the number of bytes saved fails to reach a threshold.
But we can have this discussion another time.
