In the initial implementation of blockdescendants (and thus followlines(...,
descend=True) revset), only the first branch encountered in descending
direction was followed.
Update the algorithm so that all children of a revision ('x' in code) are
considered. Accordingly, we need to prevent a child revision to be yielded
multiple times when it gets visited through different path, so we skip 'i'
when this occurs. Finally, since we now consider all parents of a possible
child touching a given line range, we take care of yielding the child if it
has a diff in specified line range with at least one of its parent (same logic
as blockancestors()).
Our current deprecation warning mechanism relies on ui object. They are case
where we cannot have access to the UI object. On a general basis we avoid using
the python mechanism for deprecation warning because up to Python 2.6 it is
exposing warning to unsuspecting user who cannot do anything to deal with them.
So we build a "safe" strategy to hide this warnings behind a flag in an
environment variable. The test runner set this flag so that tests show these
warning. This will help us marker API as deprecated for extensions to update
their code.
Mostly copy CSS rules from style-paper.css into style-gitweb.css. The only
modification is addition of !important on "background-color" rule for
"pre.sourcelines > span.followlines-selected" selector as the background color
is otherwise overriden by "pre.sourcelines.stripes > :nth-child(4n+4)" rule.
Previously, the --template/-T option didn't show up in help because it's marked
as experimental. It's not really experimental for show, and its quite important
for show's funcationality, so let's make sure it always shows up.
This is the beginning of a wip/smartlog view. It is basically a manually
constructed (read: fast) revset function to collect "relevant"
changesets combined with a custom template and a graph displayer.
It obviously needs a lot of work.
I'd like to get *something* usable in 4.2 so `hg show` has some value
to end-users.
Let the bikeshedding begin.
Because we're formatting to RST, short lines wrap and there
needs to be an extra line break between paragraphs to prevent
that.
In addition, the indentation in the old code was a bit off.
Refactor the code to a function (so we don't leak variables outside
the module) and modify it so it renders more correctly.
When this "descend" query parameter is present along with "linerange"
parameter, we get revisions following line range in descending order. The
parameter has no effect without "linerange".
This is useful to follow changes in a block of lines forward in the history
(for instance, when one wants to find out how a function evolved from a point
in history).
We added a 'descend' parameter to followlines(), which defaults to False. If
True, followlines() returns descendants of startrev.
Because context.blockdescendants() does not follow renames, these are not
followed by the revset either, so history will end when a rename occurs (as
can be seen in tests).
Mercurial can't currently send cookies as part of HTTP requests.
Some authentication systems use cookies. So, it seems like adding
support for sending cookies seems like a useful feature.
This patch implements support for reading cookies from a file
and automatically sending them as part of the request. We rely
on the "cookiejar" Python module to do the heavy lifting of
parsing cookies files. We currently only support the Mozilla
(really Netscape-era) cookie format. There is another format
supported by cookielib and we may want to consider using that,
especially since the Netscape cookie parser can't parse ports.
It wasn't immediately obvious to me what the format of the other
parser is, so I didn't know how to test it. I /think/ it might
be literal "Cookie" header values, but I'm not sure. If it is
more robust than the Netscape format, we may want to just
support it.
Like field init shorthand of Rust. This is convenient for building a JSON
object from selected keywords.
This means dict() won't support Python-like dict(iterable) syntax because
it's ambiguous. Perhaps it could be implemented as 'mapdict(xs % (k, v))'.
Before, it could spill an internal representation of compiled template such
as [(<function runsymbol at 0x....>, 'extras'), ...]. Show less cryptic
message if no symbol found.
New findsymbolicname() function will be also used by dict() constructor.
This makes the next patch slightly simpler. We don't need to check the
excessive number of keyword arguments since unknown and duplicated kwargs
are rejected.
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B-7: Prune above non-targeted common changeset
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B6: Pruned changeset with precursors not in pushed set
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce B-5:
Push of a children of changeset which successors is pruned
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B4: Pruned changeset on common part of history
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B3: Pruned changeset on non-pushed part of the history
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B-2: Prune on targeted common changeset
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case B-1: Prune on non-targeted common changeset
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A-7: non targeted common changeset
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A6:
new markers between changesets already known on both side
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A-5: partial reordering
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A-4: Push in the middle of the obsolescence chain
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A3: new branchs created, one pushed
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A-2: Two heads, only one of them pushed
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce case A-1: pushing a single head
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
About 3 years ago, in August 2014, the logic to select what markers to select on
push was ported from the evolve extension to Mercurial core. However, for some
unclear reasons, the tests for that logic were not ported alongside.
I realised it a couple of weeks ago while working on another push related issue.
I've made a clean up pass on the tests and they are now ready to integrate the
core test suite. This series of changesets do not change any logic. I just adds
test for logic that has been around for about 10 versions of Mercurial.
They are a patch for each test case. It makes it easier to review and postpone
one with documentation issues without rejecting the wholes series.
This patch introduce the common script that setup the basic environment for the
test cases. Once this script is in. We can accept the other patches in any
order.
Each test case comes it in own test file. It help parallelism and does not
introduce a significant overhead from having a single unified giant test file.
Here are timing to support this claim.
# Multiple test files version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-*.t
53.40s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:10.76 total
52.79s user 6.97s system 85% cpu 1:09.97 total
52.94s user 6.82s system 85% cpu 1:09.69 total
# Single test file version:
# run-tests.py --local -j 1 test-exchange-obsmarkers.t
52.97s user 6.85s system 85% cpu 1:10.10 total
52.64s user 6.79s system 85% cpu 1:09.63 total
53.70s user 7.00s system 85% cpu 1:11.17 total
Previously, when runcommand raises, chg aborts with, and does not wait for
pager. The call stack is like:
hgc_runcommand -> handleresponse -> readchannel -> debugmsg("failed to
read channel") -> exit(255)
That means, chg returns to the shell, then both the pager and the shell will
read from the terminal at the same time, causing problems.
This patch fixes that by using "atexit" to register the pager cleanup
function so chg will always wait for pager even if runcommand raises.
Unlike revset, function arguments are pre-processed in templater. That's why
we need to define argspec per function. An argspec field looks somewhat
redundant in @templatefunc definition as a name field contains human-readable
list of arguments. I'll make function doc be built from argspec later.
Ported separate() function as an example.
Adds a new function to treemanifest that allows walking over the directories in
the tree. Currently it only accepts a matcher to prune the walk, but in the
future it will also accept a list of trees and will only walk over subtrees that
differ from the versions in the list. This will be useful for identifying what
parts of the tree are new to this revision, which is useful when deciding the
minimal set of trees to send to a client given that they have a certain tree
already.
Since this is intended for an extension to use, the only current consumer is a
test. In the future this function may be useful for implementing other
algorithms like diff and changegroup generation.
If we use the normal vfs, store encoding will be applied when we
.join() the path to be copied. This results in attempting to copy
a file that (likely) doesn't exist. Using the rawvfs operates on
the raw file path, which is returned by vfs.readdir().
Users at Mozilla are encountering this, as I've instructed them to
run `hg debugupgraderepo` to upgrade to generaldelta. While Mercurial
shouldn't deposit any files under .hg/store that require encoding, it
is possible for e.g. .DS_Store files to be created by the operating
system.
`hg debugupgraderepo` is currently buggy with regards to path
handling when copying files in .hg/store/. Specifically, it applies
the store filename encoding to paths instead of operating on raw
files.
This commit adds a test demonstrating the buggy behavior.
Previously, revlog.size equals to revlog.rawsize. However, the flag
processor framework could make a difference - "size" could mean the length
of len(revision(raw=False)), while "rawsize" means len(revision(raw=True)).
This patch makes it so.
This corrects "hg status" output when flag processor is involved. The call
stack looks like:
basectx.status -> workingctx._buildstatus -> workingctx._dirstatestatus
-> workingctx._checklookup -> filectx.cmp -> filelog.cmp -> filelog.size
-> revlog.size
