Make 'hg outgoing' respect "paths.default:pushurl" in addition to
"paths.default-push".
'hg outgoing' has always meant "what will happen if I run 'hg push'?" and it's
still documented that way:
Show changesets not found in the specified destination repository or the
default push location. These are the changesets that would be pushed if a
push was requested.
If the user uses the now-deprecated "paths.default-push" path, it continues to
work that way. However, as described at
https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5365, it doesn't behave the same
with "paths.default:pushurl".
Why does it matter? Similar to the bugzilla reporter, I have a read-only mirror
of a non-Mercurial repository:
upstream -> imported mirror -> user clone
^-----------------------/
Users push directly to upstream, and that content is then imported into the
mirror. However, those repositories are not the same; it's possible that the
mirroring has either broken completely, or an import process is running and not
yet complete. In those cases, 'hg outgoing' will list changesets that have
already been pushed.
Mozilla's desired behavior described in bug 5365 can be accomplished through
other means (e.g. 'hg outgoing default'), preserving the consistency and
meaning of 'hg outgoing'.
Upon pull or unbundle, we display a message with the range of new revisions
fetched. This revision range could readily be used after a pull to look out
what's new with 'hg log'. The algorithm takes care of filtering "obsolete"
revisions that might be present in transaction's "changes" but should not be
displayed to the end user.
This fixes (issue2907) a crash when using 'hg incoming --bundle' with an empty
remote repo and a non-empty local repo.
This also fixes an unreported bug that 'hg summary --remote' erroneously
reports incoming changes when the remote repo is empty and the local is not.
Also, add a test to make sure issue2907 stays fixed
Many tests fixed the commit date of their changesets at '1000000 0' or
similar. However testing with "Mon Jan 12 13:46:40 1970 +0000" is not
better than testing with "Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000", which is
the default run-tests.py installs.
Removing the unnecessary flag removes some clutter and will hopefully
make it clearer what the tests are really trying to test. Some tests
did not even change their output when the dates were changed, in which
case the -d flag was truly irrelevant.
Dates used in sequence (such as '0 0', '1 0', etc...) were left alone
since they may make the test easier to understand.
