The delaypush() function had a reference to "repo" that was clearly
supposed to be "pushop.repo". Instead of just fixing that, let's
extract "pushop.repo.ui" to a variable, since that's the only
piece of the repo that's needed in the function.
I have not looked into why I saw a different result in the test to
start with, but that's for another patch anyway.
These are some simple cases. More to come in a future change.
Reviewers: krbullock
Reviewed By: krbullock
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4
This is a first basic visible usage of the changes tracking in the transaction.
We adds a new function computing the pre-existing changesets obsoleted by a
transaction and a transaction call back displaying this information.
Example output:
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
3 new obsolescence markers
obsoleted 1 changesets
The goal is to evolve the transaction summary into something bigger, gathering
existing output there and adding new useful one. This patch is a good first step
on this road. The new output is basic but give a user to the content of
tr.changes['obsmarkers'] and give an idea of the new options we haves. I expect
to revisit the message soon.
The caller recording the transaction summary should also be moved into a more
generic location but further refactoring is needed before it can happen.
We move the feature to a proper configuration and document it. The config goes
in the 'server' section because it feels like something the server owner would
want to decide. We pick and open field because it seems likely that other
checking levels will emerge in the future. (eg: server like the mozilla-try
server will likely wants a "none" value)
The option name contains 'push' since this affects 'push' only. The option value
'check-related' is preferred over one explicitly containing 'allow' or 'deny'
because the client still have a strong decision power here. Here, the server is
just advising the client on the check mode to use.
Client has a mechanism for the server to check that nothing changed server side
since the client prepared a push. That check is wide and any head changed on
the server will lead to an aborted push. We introduce a way for the client to
send a less strict checking. That logic will check that no heads impacted by
the push have been affected. If other unrelated heads (including named branches
heads) have been affected, the push will proceed.
This is very helpful for repositories with high developers traffic on different
heads, a common setup.
That behavior is currently controlled by an experimental option. The config
should live in the "server" section but bike-shedding of the name will happen
in the next changesets. Servers advertise this capability through a new bundle2
capability 'checkeads', using the value 'related'.
The 'test-push-race.t' is updated to check that new capabilities on the
documented cases.
This is the mirror case from the previos one. We check case where the raced
push update a head while the racing push create a new named branch as a
children of that updated head.
We check case where the raced push replace one head while the racing push
replaces another unrelated one.
That second test also make sure we synchronise all repositories to the same
state between tests. That will help us when allowing some sort of concurrent
pushes.
There are very few tests around the detection of push race. This file will be
dedicated to covering these cases more through fully. We start with a simple
case. More complex cases get added in later changesets.
My end goal here is to provide a way for server to accept concurrent push as
long as they are not touching the same heads. However, I want to buff the test
coverage of that code before touching anything.
